Energy Consumption Response to Climate Change: Policy Options for India

Abstract

In this article, the contributions of energy use to the climate variation debates are explored. Analyses based on secondary data depict that global fossil fuel use has increased and dominated world energy consumption and supply which is quite similar to the Indian case. This increase in the global energy use has resulted in higher emissions. To account for the changes in carbon dioxide (CO₂) emission, this article follows an index decomposition analysis using data from PROWESS database of the Center for Monitoring Indian Economy (CMIE). Two factors are considered to account for the changes in emission intensity of Indian economy: (i) shift in output among three sectors of the India economy (Agriculture, Service and Manufacturing) and (ii) structural change due to change in aggregate output with respect to emissions change. Based on the estimates, we conclude that structural changes in the Indian economy from 1991 to 2007 played important major driving factor in reducing emissions compared to output shifts across sectors. Based on the findings and international experiences, few policy options for Indian economy, such as, energy pricing reforms, promoting investment in renewable energy technologies and creating public environmental awareness, are further suggested.

Keywords

Emission energy consumption climate change post-globalization policy instruments

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Akbostanc

Tunç

G. I.

Türüt-Asık

(2011). CO2 emissions of Turkish manufacturing industry: A decomposition analysis. Applied Energy, 88(6), 2273–2278.

Baer

Tom

Kartha

Kemp-Benedict

(2008). Greenhouse development rights: Towards an equitable framework for global climate policy. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 21(4), 649–666.

Cao

(2003). Climate change and energy development: Implications for developing countries. Resources Policy, 29, 61–67.

Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center (CDIAC). (2009). Oak Ridge National Laboratory. Retrieved from http://www.esd.ornl.gov/iab/iab2-15.htm

Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center (CDIAC). (2010). Oak Ridge National Laboratory and British Petroleum. Retrieved from http://www.columbia.edu/~mhs119/UpdatedFigures/

Dong

Long

Chen

Yang

(2013). Factors affecting regional per-capita carbon emissions in China based on an LMDI factor decomposition. PLoS ONE, 8(12), 1–10.

Energy Conservation Act (2001). Ministry of Power, Government of India. Retrieved from http://powermin.nic.in/acts_notification/energy_conservation_act/

Farhani

Shahbaz

Ozturk

(2014). Coal consumption, industrial production and CO2 emissions in China and India. Working Paper 2014–225. IPAG Business School. Retrieved from http://www.ipag.fr/fr/accueil/la-recherche/publications-WP.html

Girardet

Mendonca

(2009). A renewable world: Energy, ecology, equality. World Future Council, UK: Green Books ltd.

10.

International Energy Agency (IEA). (2007). Data cited by Planning Commission, India.

11.

International Energy Agency (IEA). (2010a). CO₂ emissions from fuel combustions, highlights. Paris, France: OECD/IEA.

12.

International Energy Agency (IEA). (2010b). CO₂ emissions from fuel combustions, annual historical series (1971–2008). Retrieved from www.iea.org/statistics/

13.

IPCC. (2007). Climate change 2007: Mitigation of climate change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the IPCC. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

14.

IPCC. (2010). Climate change assessments: Review of the processes and procedures of the IPCC. Inter Academy Council. Retrieved from http://reviewipcc.interacademycouncil.net/report/Climate%20Change%20Assessments,%20Review%20of%20the%20Processes%20&%20Procedures%20of%20the%20IPCC.pdf

15.

IPCC. (2013). Climate change: The physical science basis. Working Group I Contribution to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Retrieved from https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar5/wg1/

16.

Knight

K. W.

Schor

J. B.

(2014). Economic growth and climate change: A cross-national analysis of territorial and consumption-based carbon emissions in high-income countries. Sustainability, 6(6), 3722–3731.

17.

Qing-Xiang

. (2013). Decomposition of China’s carbon emissions intensity from 1995 to 2010: An extended kaya identity. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2013 (pp. 1–7), Article ID 973074 (Hindawi Publishing Corporation).

18.

Liu

Ang

B. W.

(2007). Factors shaping aggregate energy intensity for industry: Energy intensity versus product mix. Energy Economics, 29(4), 609–635.

19.

Prowess (2011). Center for Monitoring Indian Economy. Retrieved from https://prowess.cmie.com/

20.

Quadrelli

Peterson

(2007). The energy-climate challenge: Recent trends in CO₂ emissions from fuel combustion. Energy Policy, 35(11), 5938–5952.

21.

Reddish

Rand

(1996). The environmental effects of present energy policies. In Blunden

Reddish

(Eds), Energy resources and environment (pp. 43–91). Hodder and Stoughton & the Open University.

22.

Spence

(2009). Climate change, mitigation, and developing country growth. Commission on Growth and Development Working Paper No. 64. Washington, DC: The World Bank. Retrieved from www.growthcommission.org/storage/cgdev/documents/gcwp064812web.pdf

23.

World Bank (1992). World development report 1992: Development and the environment. Oxford University Press.

24.

World Bank (2000). Fuel for thought: An environmental strategy for the energy sector. Washington DC, USA: The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/World Bank.