This study examines the causal relationship between foreign direct investment and economic growth in sub-Saharan Africa from the period 1995–2011. The study uses annual data for a panel of 30 sub-Saharan Africa Countries. We test for Granger causality in heterogeneous panels by testing first for Homogeneous Non-Causality and Homogeneous Causality hypotheses. The non-homogeneous test, which tests the hypothesis that gross domestic product (GDP) does not Granger-cause foreign direct investment and foreign direct investment does not Granger-cause GDP, is rejected, and it is also shown that there is bidirectional causality between economic growth and insurance in sub-Saharan Africa. The homogeneous causality tests, which test the hypothesis that GDP Granger-causes foreign direct investment and foreign direct investment Granger-causes GDP, are accepted. It is also shown that causality is homogeneous across all members of the panel.
AkinloTAkinsokejiRAOziegbeTR (2013) Determinant of foreign direct investment in ten African countries: A panel data analysis. Asian Journal of Business and Management1(5): 232–237.
2.
Bende-NabendeA (2002) Foreign direct investment determinants in Sub-Saharan Africa: A co-integration analysis. Economics Bulletin6(4): 1–19.
3.
Bende-NabendeAFordJL (1998) FDI, policy adjustments and endogenous growth: Multiplier effects from a small dynamic model for Taiwan, 1959–1995. World Development26(7): 1315–1330.
4.
Bende-NabendeAFordJSantosoBSenS (2003) The Interaction between FDI, output and the spillover variables: Cointegration and VAR analyses for APEC, 1965.99. Applied Economics Letters10(3): 165–172.
5.
BogahawatteCBalamuraliN (2004) Foreign direct investment and economic growth in Sri Lanka. Sri Lankan Journal of Agricultural Economics6(1): 37–50.
6.
BreitungJ (2000) The local power of some unit root tests for panel data. In BaltagiB (ed.) Advances in Econometrics, Vol. 15: Nonstationary Panels, Panel Cointegration, and Dynamic Panels. Amsterdam: JAI Press, pp. 161–178.
7.
ChoeJI (2003) Do foreign direct investment and gross domestic investment promote economic growth?Review of Development Economics7: 44–57.
8.
ChoiI (2001) Unit root tests for panel data. Journal of International Money and Finance20: 249–272.
9.
ChowPCY (1987) Causality between export and industrial development. Journal of Developmental Economics26: 55–63.
10.
ChowdhuryAMavrotasG (2005) FDI and growth: A causal relationship. World Institutes of Development Economic Research. Research, paper no. 2005/25
11.
De MelloLR (1997) Foreign direct investment in developing countries and growth: A selective survey. Journal of Development Studies34: 1–34.
12.
De MelloLR (1999) Foreign direct investment-led growth: Evidence from time series and panel data. Oxford Economic Papers51: 133–151.
13.
de MelloL (2008) Local government finances: The Link between intergovernmental transfers and net worth. In: IngramGKHongYH (eds), Fiscal Decentralization and Land Policies. Lincoln Institute: Cambridge, MA.
14.
DregerCHans-EggertR (2005) Health care expenditures in OECD countries: A panel unit root and cointegration analysis. International Journal of Applied Econometrics and Quantitative Studies2(2): 5–20.
15.
DupasquierCOsakweNP (2005) Foreign direct investment in Africa: Performance, challenges and responsibilities. Journal of Asian Economics17(2): 241–260.
16.
EngleRFGrangerCWJ (1987) Co-integration and error correction: Representation, estimation, and testing. Econometrica55: 251–276.
17.
EssoLJ (2010) Long-run relationship and causality between foreign direct investment and growth: Evidence from ten African countries. International Journal of Economics and Finance2(2): 168–177.
18.
GrangerC (1969) Investigating Causal Relations by Econometric Models and Cross Spectral Methods. Econometrica37(3): 434–48.
19.
HadriK (2000) Testing for stationarity in heterogeneous panel data. Econometric Journal3: 148–161.
20.
HurlinC (2004) Testing Granger causality in heterogeneous panel data models with fixed coefficients. DR LEO 2004–05, Econometric Theory, en révision.
21.
HurlinC (2007) Testing for Granger non-causality in heterogeneous panels. Working Paper LEO, Université d.Orléans, 2007–10.
22.
HurlinC (2008) Testing for Granger non-causality in heterogeneous panels. Working Papers, halshs-00224434_v1, HAL
23.
HurlinCVenetB (2001) Granger causality tests in panel data models with fixed coefficients. Working Paper EURISCO no. 2001-09, Université Paris Dauphine.
LevinALinCFChuCSJ (2002) Unit root tests in panel data: Asymptotic and finite-sample properties. Journal of Econometrics108: 1–24.
30.
LiXLiuX (2005) Foreign direct investment and economic growth: An increasingly endogenous relationship. World Development33(3): 393–407.
31.
MaddalaGSWuS (1999) A comparative study of unit root tests with panel data and a new simple test. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics61: 621–652.
32.
NdoricimpaA (2009) Foreign direct investments, exports and economic growth in COMESA countries: A heterogeneous panel causality approach. Unpublished thesis.
33.
Nyatepe-CooA (1998) Foreign direct investment and economic growth in selected LDCs, 1963–1992. In: Levy-LivermoreA (ed.) Handbook on the Globalization of the World Economy. Edward Elgar Publishing Inc.: Massachusetts, 87–100.
34.
PedroniP (2004) Panel cointegration; Asymptotic and finite sample properties of pooled time series tests with an application to the PPP hypothesis. Econometric Theory20: 597–625.
35.
PesaranMHShinYSmithRJ (2001) Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships. Journal of Applied Econometrics16: 289–326.
36.
RodrikD (1998) Trade policy and economic performance in Sub-Saharan Africa. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper 6562.
37.
TodaHYYamamotoT (1995) Statistical inference in vector autoregressions with possibly integrated processes. Journal of Econometrics66: 225–250.
38.
UNCTAD (1997) World Investment Report: Trends and Determinants. Geneva: United Nations.
39.
UNCTAD (1999) Foreign Direct Investment in Africa: Performance and PotentialNew York: UNCTAD.
40.
Unido (2007) Has foreign direct investment led to higher productivity in sub-Saharan Africa? Research and Statistics branch working paper 08/2008.
41.
ZhangZY (1999) A Comparative Study of FDI in China and Vietnam. American Asian Review17(2): 117–156.
42.
ZhangZ (2002) Productivity and economic growth: an empirical assessment of the contribution of FDI to the Chinese Economy. Journal of Economic Development27(2): 81–94.
