Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Study Design

Retrospective case‒control study

Objectives

This study aimed to report the effects of surgical intervention on spinal stability recovery and to assess the long-term outcomes of children and adolescents with lumbar tumors.

Methods

From January 2016 to June 2021, 42 pediatric patients with lumbar tumors were selected and separated into different groups based on the surgical method used (total en bloc resection (TER) group, n = 21; piecemeal resection (PR) group, n = 21; titanium mesh (TM) group n = 23; artificial vertebrae (AV) group n = 19). The clinicopathological characteristics, treatments and related outcomes were described in detail and compared between groups, with P value ≤.05 indicating statistically significant differences.

Results

The average follow-up duration was 24.89 months, and the mean age was 14.89 ± 2.41 years. There were no significant differences in the mean operation time, average blood loss, complication rate, or length of hospital stay between the groups. The ODI, VAS and JOA scores at the final follow-up (FF) were elevated after surgery in all groups. The FF local angular drift (LOD) and lumbar angular drift (LUD) were greater in the TM group than in the AV group (P = .03, P = .001).

Conclusions

After surgery, pediatric patients with lumbar tumors can obtain satisfactory spinal stability, effective relief of pain symptoms and substantial improvements in neurological function. There was no significant difference in the invasiveness, safety or timeliness between the 2 surgical methods, so TER is recommended due to its low postoperative recurrence rate and good local control. Spinal fusion in the AV group resulted in better spinal stability.

Keywords

pediatric lumbar spinal tumour total en bloc resection spinal stability prognosis

Introduction

Spinal tumors account for approximately 4%-20% of all bone tumors,¹ and the incidence of spinal tumors in children and adolescents is relatively low, accounting for 4%-15% of all spinal lesions. According to the data from our spinal tumour centre, pediatric lumbar tumors account for approximately 22% of the total number of pediatric spinal tumors. Lumbar spinal tumors in pediatric patients cause bone destruction and neurological impairment, thus leading to pain, neurological deficits, or spinal deformities.^2-4 The low incidence of spinal tumors, their nonspecific symptoms, and the strong desire for long-term survival makes it very challenging for spine surgeons to diagnose and manage patients with these tumors.

The treatments of spinal tumors in children must be individualized based on the clinical and imagological manifestations. Surgical interventions, including radical resection, segmental fusion and internal fixation, are recommended as the first-line treatment for patients with high tumour malignancy, neurological deficits, and spinal instability. Nonsurgical treatments are also considered for patients with less symptomatic vertebral destruction and focal lesions of disseminated type that are sensitive to chemoradiotherapy.^5,6 Notably, incomplete and immature bone growth increases the difficulty of treating primary spinal tumors in children and adolescents. While trying to control recurrence and preserve neurological function during treatment, every effort must be made to maintain the stability of the spine and avoid affecting children’s growth and development.⁷ After resection of the lesion, internal fixation and fusion may be required to maintain spinal alignment and stability.⁸ Surgical resection is mainly divided into total en bloc and piecemeal resection, and spinal fusion is usually performed using artificial vertebrae or titanium mesh (TM) filled with allogeneic iliac bone. Previous studies of pediatric patients with spinal tumors mainly examined the effects of different surgical approaches on survival and local control of tumors; outcomes related to postoperative spinal stability and quality of life in children were rarely discussed.

Therefore, this study aimed to study the effects of surgical treatments in pediatric patients with lumbar spinal tumors on postoperative spinal stability and quality of life and to compare the outcomes between different surgical strategies.

Methods

Patients

The clinical features and radiological measurements were reviewed after approval by the Ethics Committee of Changzheng Hospital. The approval number was waived due to the retrospective nature of this study. Written informed consent was obtained from the patient's legal guardian, thus authorizing the treatment, imaging, and photographic documentation of the patients. The inclusion criteria were as follows: the patient was younger than 18 years old at the time of diagnosis; the tumour lesion invaded the lumbar vertebrae and was limited to 1 segment (or if 2 or more segments were involved, only 1 vertebral body needed to be treated surgically); Tomita classification: I-III/IV-VI; pathologically confirmed to have a primary spinal tumour without metastasis; and spinal instability, neurological deficits and/or complaints of unbearable pain. The exclusion criteria were as follows: patients with previous spine surgeries, congenital spinal deformity, or other medical history that might affect the postoperative evaluation; total paraplegia/neurological deficits for longer than 48 h; and patients lost to follow-up.

Patients were followed up at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after surgery; every 6 months for the next 2 years; and once a year thereafter. Patient outcomes were based on the comprehensive outpatient radiological (e.g., postoperative radiography, CT, MRI) and functional assessments. Our study measured 4 main outcomes. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) was defined as the interval between surgery and recurrence or until June 2021 for patients without recurrence. Overall survival was not included because a majority of patients survived during the postoperative follow-up period. Stability was measured as follows. Two lines were drawn on the standing lateral X-ray to measure the local lordosis angle (1 parallel to the upper end-plate of the cephalic vertebra of the diseased segment and the other parallel to the lower end-plate of the caudal vertebra of the diseased segment), and the angle of their intersection was the local lordosis angle. Additionally, 2 lines were drawn on the standing lateral plain film to measure the lumbar lordosis angle (1 parallel to the upper endplate of T12 and 1 parallel to the upper endplate of S1), and their intersection was the lumbar lordosis angle. A convex angle value indicated that a patient was positive for lumbar lordosis and negative for local kyphosis. Neurological and QoL indicators, including JOA and VAS scores, were assessed using questionnaires. Bony fusion between contacts was evaluated by contrast-enhanced CT. Postoperative complications were defined as complications that required additional treatments, including surgery, medical treatment and others, within 30 days after surgery.

Indications for surgery were assessed by the same treatment group surgeons. Approval for this study was obtained from the ethics committee of our institution.

Surgical Procedures

The individualized surgical strategy was decided for each patient according to the Tomita classification, Enneking stage, and Weinstein-Boriani-Biagini surgical staging system. To maintain spinal stability and balance, the selection of the reconstruction method depended on the individualized surgical procedure. A pedicle screw system was placed where the treated segment was determined to be unstable as assessed by the Spinal Instability Neoplastic Score. Pedicle screws were installed at 1 or 2 levels above and below the level of decompression to provide short segmental fixation. This is a case‒control study, and forty-two patients were assigned to 2 groups of 21 cases each. Patients in group A were treated with total en bloc resection (TER), and those in group B were treated with piecemeal resection (PR) (Table 1). Total en bloc resection is an oncology-related surgical procedure that uses a single posterior approach to remove an entire tumoral mass that is completely surrounded by a continuous layer of healthy tissue.^9-11 Furthermore, 2 types of spinal fusion devices were applied in this study: an artificial vertebral body filled with bicortical bone mass (AV) was used in 19 cases (45.23%) (Figure 1), and shaped TM filled with bicortical bone mass was used in 23 cases (54.76%) (Figure 2).

Table 1.

Baseline Characteristics of the Enrolled Pediatric Patients.

	TER Group	PR Group	P
Gender (M/F)	11/10	15/6	.170
Age, y	15.28 ± 2.53	14.90 ± 2.07	.355
Tumor site, L1/L2/L3/L4/L5	2/4/3/8/4	5/5/5/5/1	.356
Tumor size, cm	5.04 ± 1.25	5.45 ± 2.51	.514
Pathology: ,LCH/ABC/Osteoblastoma/Fibroma osteosarcoma/Ewing sarcoma/angioma	3/2/3/4/4/3/2	3/2/3/4/4/3/2	—
Tomita classification, :I-III/IV-VI	11/10	9/12	.537
Adjuvant therapy	11/10	11/10	—
Duration of the disease, mo	4 ± 3.51	5.4 ± 4.59	.340
Follow-up, mo	27.05 ± 3.37	25.57 ± 2.66	.228

When the P value >.05, there was no statistically significant difference between the groups.

Abbreviations: TER: total en bloc resection; PR: piecemeal resection; LCH: Langerhans’ cell histiocytosis; ABC: aneurysm bone cyst.

Figure 1.

An 18-year-old boy (A) X-ray showed the lumbar curvature before surgery; (B) Preoperative CT scans showed the osteolytic fracture; (C) Preoperative transverse section of the lesion (MRI scan) (D, G) Intraoperative picture showed the total en bloc resection and instrumentation; (E) Postoperative X-ray showed instrumentation and the lumbar curvature; (F) At the final follow-up, X-ray showed good bone fusion and the lumbar curvature.

Figure 2.

An 11-year-old boy (A) X-ray showed the lumbar curvature before surgery; (B) Preoperative CT scans showed the osteolytic fracture; (C) Preoperative transverse section of the lesion (MRI scan); (D) Postoperative X-ray showed instrumentation and the lumbar curvature; (E) At the final follow-up, X-ray showed good bone fusion and the lumbar curvature; (F,G) Intraoperative picture showed the piecemeal resection and instrumentation.

Postoperative Management

Patients were placed on bed rest after the operation, and the vacuum aspiration was removed within 10 days if appropriate. The internal fixation device was detected by the conventional X-ray film, and the patient was advised to wear an external brace for outdoor activity within 6 months to prevent internal fixation loosening and screw fracture caused by excessive spinal activity. All patients were followed up every month for the first 3 months and every 3 months for the next 12 months through outpatient visits. Reexaminations included evaluation of condition and neurological function, X-ray measurement of the lordosis angle and internal fixation. If necessary, MRI was performed to determine whether the tumour recurred. Patients with malignant tumors usually received chemotherapy. The chemotherapy regimen for Ewing sarcoma includes a biweekly combined treatment of vincristine/doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide or isocyclophosphamide/etoposide.^12,13 The recommended drugs for adjuvant chemotherapy in osteosarcoma are methotrexate, isocyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and cisplatin.^13,14 Radiotherapy, immunotherapy, and targeted therapy were performed according to the pathological nature of the tumour. Other postoperative treatments include improved nutritional intake and specific neurotrophic and functional rehabilitation exercises. Notably, the angular change in the lordosis angle from postoperative to the final follow-up period was defined as the angular drift, which was counted as a positive value.

Statistical Analysis

The quantitative data were recorded as the mean ± standard deviation and range, and the qualitative data were described as counts and percentages. The data from preoperative, postoperative and final follow-up were analysed by paired/independent t tests or chi-square tests. Data were analysed using SPSS version 23.0. (SPSS Inc. Chicago, IL, USA). P values ≤.05 were considered statistically significant.

Results

Injury Indicators

Baseline Information

As shown in Table 1, 42 patients with the same tumour type were allocated to either group A or group B at a 1:1 ratio. The most common tumour site was L4 (n = 13), followed by L2 (n = 9), L3 (n = 8), L1 (n = 7), and L5 (n = 5). Our sample comprised 26 (61.9%) males and 16 (38.1%) females, and the mean age was 14.89 ± 2.41 years (range 10-18). The mean follow-up duration was 24.89 months (range 12-50 months). There was no significant difference in the baseline demographic characteristics of the 42 included patients between the 2 groups (P > .05). According to the Tomita classification, 20 tumors were classified as Tomita I-III, and 22 tumors were classified as Tomita IV-VI. There were no statistically significant differences in age, pathology, tumour site, tumour location or duration of the disease before surgery between the 2 groups (P > .05) (Table 1).

Peripheral Period Indicators

For the TER group, the mean operative time and mean blood loss were 312.24 ± 70.27 min (range 235-445) and 1788.10 ± 1048 mL (range 800-3500), respectively. For the PR group, the mean operative time and mean blood loss were 287.57 ± 136.13 min (range 120-600) and 1431.25 ± 1185.23 mL (range 100-11500), respectively. No significant difference in blood loss was observed between the TER and PR groups (P = .283); however, PR required a shorter operative time (P = .017). The average lengths of hospital stay for the TER and PR groups were 21.62 ± 3.54 days and 19.24 ± 4.12 days, respectively (P = .602). Six months after surgery, the overall performance status of patients was improved by at least 1 grade on the ECOG-PS among 90.5% (n = 19) of patients in group A and 85.7% (n = 18) of patients in group B. The mean time to fusion was 4.67 ± 1.49 months and 4.29 ± 1.23 months in the TER group and PR group, respectively (P = .17) (Table 2).

Table 2.

Comparison of Major Peripheral Period Indicators.

	TER	PR	P
Operation time, min	312.24 ± 70.27	287.57 ± 136.13	.017
Intraoperative blood loss, mL	1788.10 ± 1048	1623.81 ± 541.19	.283
The length of hospital-stay, d	21.62 ± 3.54	19.24 ± 4.12	.602
Recurrence-free survival (RFS)	39.87 (95% CI 33.69-46.35)	28.29(95% CI 21.59-34.99)	.028
Postoperative ECOG, 0-2/3-4	1/20	3/18	.606
Mean fusion time, mo	4.67 ± 1.49	4.29 ± 1.23	.176
Complications, Yes/No	1/20	3/18	.263

When the P value <.05, there was statistically significant difference between the 2 groups.

Abbreviations: TER: total en bloc resection; PR: piecemeal resection.

The Kaplan–Meier curve in Figure 3 shows that the risk of recurrence was significantly higher in the PR group (P = .028), with a mean RFS time of 28.29 months (95% CI 21.59-34.99) and 39.87 months (95% CI 33.69-46.35) in the PR and TER groups, respectively.

Figure 3.

Kaplan‒Meier curves of the effect of surgical method on recurrence-free survival. TER: total en bloc resection; PR: piecemeal resection.

Neurological, QoL and Radiological Indicators

Comparison of AV and TM

Overall, after surgery, the performance status of all domains, including VAS, JOA and ODI, was improved in both groups. Moreover, half a year after surgery, the overall performance status of patients improved to a mean VAS score of 4.42 in the AV group and 4.93 in the TM group. Both groups showed significant improvement in JOA and ODI scores at the 6-month follow-up (SMF) compared with preoperative scores. However, there were no significant differences in VAS, JOA and ODI between the 2 groups preoperatively, postoperatively, or at the 6-month follow-up.

Table 3.

Comparison of AV and TM in Neurological, QoL and Radiological Indicators.

	AV			TM
	PRE	POST	SMF	PRE	POST	SMF
VAS	5.16 ± 1.34	3.16 ± 1.17^#	.75 ± .75^#	6.20 ± 1.70	4.06 ± 2.60^#	1.26 ± .88^#
JOA	18.5 ± 6.88	—	26.83 ± 1.34^#	15.47 ± 7.31	—	25.53 ± 3.04^#
ODI	38.50 ± 7.19	—	10.83 ± 2.23^#	41.46 ± 7.83	—	11.60 ± 2.82^#
FACT-G total	63.58 ± 5.73		65.67 ± 5.92^#	65.00 ± 5.15		68.20 ± 4.72^#
Local lordosis angle	14.73 ± 13.41	19.50 ± 11.71	18.98 ± 11.93	33.93 ± 14.48	29.03 ± 8.7^&	21.92 ± 7.99
LOD	—	—	1.85 ± 1.53*	—	—	7.08 ± 3.93
Lumbar lordosis angle	40.32 ± 7.92	42.35 ± 4.54	44.05 ± 5.06	40.31 ± 10.10	40.38 ± 7.02	36.76 ± 5.89
LUD	—	—	2.15 ± 1.36*	—	—	6.48 ± 3.05

Abbreviations: TM: titanium mesh; PRE: preoperative; POST: postoperative; SMF: 6-month follow-up; LUD: lumbar angular drift; LOD: local angular drift; AV: artificial vertebrae; TM: titanium mesh; ODI: Oswestry Disability Index; JOA: Japanese Orthopaedic Association; VAS: visual analogue scale.

#P < .05 compared with pre data; *P < .05 compared with TM data; &P < .05 compared with SMF data.

At the 6-month follow-up, in the AV group, the mean lordosis angle was 44.05 ± 5.63° (range 35.0-54.7), and in the TM group, the mean lumbar lordosis angle was 36.76 ± 5.89° (range 24.4-48.8). There was a significant difference in the lumbar lordosis angle between the 2 groups (P = .002). In the TM group, the local lordosis angle at SMF was less than the local postoperative lordosis angle (P = .009). The final follow-up local angular drift (LOD) was larger in the TM group than in the AV group (P < .001). The final follow-up lumbar angular drift (LUD) was also greater in the TM group than in the TM group (P < .001) (Table 3).

Comparison of TER and PR

As shown in the table, half a year after surgery, improvement in all domains appeared (Table 4). The level of pain was measured by the VAS, with mean scores of 4.71 in the TER group and 4.29 in the TM group. The performance of patients was improved, with mean ODI scores of 28.90 in the AV group and 26.95 in the TM group. The function of patients also improved, with mean JOA scores of 8.67 in the AV group and 8.67 in the TM group. The differences in the JOA and ODI scores between the TER and PR group were not significant before surgery or postoperatively or at the 6-month follow-up.

Table 4.

Comparison of TER and PR in Neurological, QoL and Radiological Indicators.

	TER			PR
	PRE	POST	SMF	PRE	POST	SMF
VAS	5.71 ± 1.73	3.76 ± 2.81^#	1.00 ± .81^#	5.10 ± 1.30	2.81 ± 1.12^#	.89 ± .75^#
JOA	17.62 ± 7.06	—	26.28 ± 2.81^#	17.62 ± 5.78	—	26.28 ± 2.83^#
ODI	40.19 ± 7.10	—	11.29 ± 2.69^#	37.04 ± 7.52	—	10.09 ± 2.19^#
FACT-G total	65.10 ± 4.79		67.85 ± 4.83^#	64.76 ± 5.51		67.82 ± 5.15^#
Local lordosis angle	26.10 ± 17.58	25.54 ± 10.34	20.39 ± 9.79	21.42 ± 11.98	22.55 ± 11.84	19.99 ± 11.63
LOD	—	—	5.75 ± 5.60	—	—	4.46 ± 7.36
Lumbar lordosis angle	37.15 ± 10.74	38.42 ± 6.32	37.23 ± 7.36	39.04 ± 12.82	40.39 ± 8.44	39.59 ± 11.54
LUD	—	—	4.20 ± 3.47	—	—	4.83 ± 10.26

Abbreviations: PRE:preoperative; POST: postoperative; SMF:6-month follow-up; LUD: lumbar angular drift; LOD: local angular drift; TER: total en bloc spondylectomy; PR: piecemeal spondylectomy; ODI: Oswestry Disability Index; JOA: Japanese Orthopaedic Association; VAS: visual analogue scale.

#P < .05 compared with pre data; *P < .05 compared with TM data; &P < .05 compared with SMF data.

At the 6-month follow-up, in the TER group, the mean lordosis angle was 37.23 ± 7.36° (range 24.4-46.8), and in the PR group, the mean lumbar lordosis angle was 39.58 ± 11.54° (range 13.8-54.7). There was no significant difference in the lumbar lordosis angle between the 2 groups (P = .445). There was no statistically significant difference in the LOD or LUD drift between the TER and PR groups at the final follow-up (P = .795; P = .543).

Complications

In the TER group, there was 1 case of delayed wound healing due to malnutrition. In the PR group, postoperative complications were observed in 15.38% (n = 3) of patients, including surgical site infection (n = 1), dura tear and intraoperative cerebrospinal fluid leak (n = 1), and postoperative broken rod (n = 1).

Discussion

Primary osseous spinal tumors are relatively rare in the pediatric and adolescent population, accounting for approximately 1% of all spinal and spinal cord tumors.^15,16 The low incidence of spinal tumors in children, poor description of their symptoms by themselves, and parental neglect lead to tremendous difficulty and challenge for managing such patients. More than 50% of pediatric malignancy patients exhibit neurological symptoms, and thus, neurological symptoms are highly indicative of the diagnosis of pediatric malignancy.¹⁵ In addition, approximately 25% of pediatric spinal tumors often cause spinal deformities, including kyphosis, scoliosis, and pronation. The deformities may be caused by direct tumour-induced bone destruction and compression fractures or muscle tension or can be the result of compensatory responses to painful symptoms due to nerve compression.^17,18 Some malignancies, especially Ewing's sarcoma and lymphoma, present with nonspecific systemic symptoms (e.g., fever, night sweats) and induce a misdiagnosis of infection rather than a diagnosis of malignancy.^3,19 A clear preoperative diagnosis is particularly important to guide the individualized treatment of spinal tumors in children. In addition to clinical symptoms and signs as well as imaging examination, biopsy is often required to confirm the pathology before treatment, and commonly used pathological diagnostic methods include incisional biopsy, puncture biopsy, CT-guided puncture biopsy, and intraoperative frozen pathological examination.

The current treatment strategy for pediatric spine tumors basically refers to adult spine tumors, and common treatment modalities include surgical treatments, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and targeted therapy. Especially for the surgical treatment of spinal tumors in children, the indications and surgical procedures are basically the same as those for adults.^20-22 However, unlike adults, children and adolescents have incomplete and immature growth, and there is still a lack of relevant studies on the stability of the spine and the degree of recovery of neurological function in children after surgery. The indications for surgery, surgical methods, and the selection of implant materials are controversial. Based on previous experience, patients with persistent pain, neurological symptoms, or spinal deformity usually opt for surgical treatment to remove the lesion, decompress the nerve, improve spinal deformity, and preserve spinal stability. It provides the best chance of cure and reduces the risk of recurrence.^12,23,24 Surgical methods can be broadly divided into piecemeal resection and en bloc resection, and commonly used spinal fusion materials include artificial vertebral bodies and shaped TMs.

We aimed to investigate changes in spinal stability and quality of life after lumbar spine surgery in pediatric patients. The results show that after surgery, pediatric patients achieved substantial improvements in pain levels, neurological function and ODI scores with no significant differences either between the 2 surgical approaches compared to each other or between the 2 spinal fusion materials. Additionally, we found that there was no significant difference in blood loss, length of hospital stay or fusion time between different surgical methods or between different spinal fusion materials.

In addition, the lumbar lordosis angle of the children did not change significantly when compared between the preoperative, postoperative, and final follow-up periods, and the difference was not statistically significant, indicating that there was no significant change in the physiological curvature of the lumbar spine after spinal fusion using pedicle screws combined with artificial vertebral body or TM implanted with allogeneic double-sided iliac bone block in pediatric lumbar tumour resection; thus, it can be inferred that the spinal stability will not be significantly damaged after pediatric lumbar tumour surgery. The TB group had a lower local lordosis angle at the final follow-up than at pre-operation and at 1 week postoperatively. Additionally, we can see that the lumbar angle drift and local angle drift at the final follow-up in the AB group were significantly lower than those in the TB group, and it can be inferred that children with lumbar fusion using artificial vertebrae will obtain better spinal stability.

Many studies have demonstrated that TER can provide excellent pain relief, provide the best chance of cure and reduce the risk of recurrence^25-29; however, lumbar tumour surgery causes almost partial or even complete destruction of the anterior, middle, and posterior column structure of the vertebral body, and some people worry that it may cause iatrogenic spinal instability, which did not occur in our study. Thus, TER is recommended not only for malignant tumors but also for benign pediatric lumbar spine tumors with a high recurrence rate of potential malignancy, and spinal fusion is performed intraoperatively using artificial vertebral bodies implanted with bicortical iliac blocks. No implant fusion failure occurred in our study, and only 1 case of longitudinal rod breakage occurred. This appears to be due to several reasons: appropriately strong pedicle screws; adequate bone grafting (allograft and posterior bone grafting); and strict surgical indications (<= 2 vertebrae bodies compromised by tumour). Postoperative complications are usually associated with low compliance, malnutrition, and premature ambulation rather than the surgical procedure.

The main types of traditional spinal reconstruction are strut bone grafts and prefabricated prosthetic replacement devices. Supporting bone grafts include autologous supporting bone grafts and allogeneic supporting bone grafts.^30,31 Prefabricated prosthetic replacement devices include porous TM, self-expanding TM, and polyetheretherketone fusion.^11,32,33 All of the graft materials mentioned above have been used for intervertebral fusion, and the graft may fail due to postoperative slippage, fracture, resorption, or subsidence.^4,34,35 Bony fusion was observed in all cases in our study, and no loosening, displacement, or dislocation of the implant was observed. The stiffness and strength-bearing quality of the artificial vertebra in combination with the pedicle screw plays a crucial supporting role. The artificial cone ensures that a sufficient contact area is achieved between the bone socket surface and the bone graft area to meet the requirements of osseointegration. The instrumentation reduces the trauma and complications caused by autogenous iliac bone and solves the problem of long-term resorption of the bone graft. More importantly, the artificial vertebra can be adjusted in length and ground slope according to the intraoperative situation, thus meeting individual treatment needs. In addition, three-dimensionally printed prostheses with the advantages of precisely matching anatomical shapes, adequate strength, and elastic modulus that is closer to that of cancellous bone are gradually being tried and applied in clinical practice. However, clinical trial data to support widespread application are still lacking.^36-38

This retrospective study has several limitations, including a small sample size and relatively short follow-up period; the effect of fusion on the proximal and distal connecting segments and the effect of degenerative changes are also worth investigating. Prospective studies of a larger number of patients and longer follow-up periods (at least until skeletal maturity) may further elucidate the effect on spinal stability after pediatric lumbar tumour surgery. In addition, the type of tumour pathology and the extent of soft tissue invasion by the tumour may also have an impact on spinal stability after lumbar tumour surgery in children and requires further investigation.

Conclusion

This study showed that after posterior lumbar tumour resection and reconstruction of internal fixation, pediatric patients with lumbar tumors could obtain satisfactory spinal stability, effectively relieve pain symptoms and substantially improve neurological function. There was no significant difference in the invasiveness, safety or timeliness between the 2 surgical methods, so TER with a low postoperative recurrence rate and good local control is recommended. Spinal fusion using an artificial vertebral body implanted with bicortical bone mass results in better spinal stability.

Footnotes

Authors' Contributions

Haifeng Wei and Shaohui He designed the study and gave us several meaningful suggestions. Wenjun Chen reviewed and collected the medical records. Shuang Cao analyzed and interpreted the patient data. Yue Zhang was a contributor in writing the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Declaration of Conflicting Interests

The author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: No conflict of interest exits in the submission of this manuscript, and manuscript is approved by all authors for publication. I would like to declare on behalf of my co-authors that the work described was original research that has not been published previously, and not under consideration for publication elsewhere, in whole or in part.

Funding

The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This work was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (82072971).

Ethical Statement

ORCID iDs

Yue Zhang

Haifeng Wei

References

Simmons

Zheng

. Vertebral tumors: Surgical versus nonsurgical treatment. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;443:233-247. doi:10.1097/01.blo.0000198723.77762.0c

Garg

Dormans

. Tumors and tumor-like conditions of the spine in children. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2005;13(6):372-381. doi:10.5435/00124635-200510000-00002

Takano

Yonezawa

Shimamura

, et al. Spontaneous improvement of cervical kyphosis in eosinophilic granuloma: A case report. J Pediatr Orthop B. 2017;26(1):95-98. doi:10.1097/bpb.0000000000000296

Missenard

Bouthors

Fadel

Court

. Surgical strategies for primary malignant tumors of the thoracic and lumbar spine. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2020;106(1s):S53-S62. doi:10.1016/j.otsr.2019.05.028

Haupt

Minkov

Astigarraga

, et al. Langerhans cell histiocytosis (LCH): Guidelines for diagnosis, clinical work-up, and treatment for patients till the age of 18 years. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2013;60(2):175-184. doi:10.1002/pbc.24367

Rao

Figueiredo

MLS

Yegya-Raman

, et al. Clinical practice and outcomes of palliative radiation therapy in pediatric oncology patients: An international comparison of experiences from two distinct countries and health care systems. Radiother Oncol. 2019;140:1-5. doi:10.1016/j.radonc.2019.05.017

Ibebuike

Roussot

Watt

Skead

Dunn

. Diagnostic challenges and surgical management of co-existent osteoblastoma and aneurysmal bone cyst of the lumbar spine in a child: Case report. Afr Health Sci. 2019;19(2):2294-2301. doi:10.4314/ahs.v19i2.56

Nisson

Link

Carnevale

Virk

Greenfield

. Primary aneurysmal bone cyst of the thoracic spine: A pediatric case report. World Neurosurg. 2020;134:408-414. doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2019.10.151

Tomita

Kawahara

Baba

Tsuchiya

Fujita

Toribatake

. Total en bloc spondylectomy. A new surgical technique for primary malignant vertebral tumors. Spine. 1997;22(3):324-333. doi:10.1097/00007632-199702010-00018

10.

Fisher

Saravanja

Dvorak

, et al. Surgical management of primary bone tumors of the spine: Validation of an approach to enhance cure and reduce local recurrence. Spine. 2011;36(10):830-836. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181e502e5

11.

Boriani

. En bloc resection in the spine: A procedure of surgical oncology. J Spine Surg. 2018;4(3):668-676. doi:10.21037/jss.2018.09.02

12.

Womer

West

Krailo

, et al. Randomized controlled trial of interval-compressed chemotherapy for the treatment of localized Ewing sarcoma: A report from the Children's Oncology Group. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30(33):4148-4154. doi:10.1200/jco.2011.41.5703

13.

Meyers

. Systemic therapy for osteosarcoma and Ewing sarcoma. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book 2015;e644-e647. doi:10.14694/EdBook_AM.2015.35.e644

14.

Egea-Gámez

Ponz-Lueza

Cendrero-Torrado

Martínez-González

Certucha-Barragán

González-Díaz

. Spinal osteosarcoma in the pediatric age group: Case series and literature review. Rev Esp Cir Ortop Traumatol (English ed). 2019;63(2):122-131. Osteosarcoma lumbar en edad pediátrica: reporte de casos y revisión de la literatura. doi:10.1016/j.recot.2018.09.001

15.

Ravindra

Eli

Schmidt

Brockmeyer

. Primary osseous tumors of the pediatric spinal column: Review of pathology and surgical decision making. Neurosurg Focus. 2016;41(2):E3. doi:10.3171/2016.5.Focus16155

16.

Wilne

Walker

. Spine and spinal cord tumors in children: A diagnostic and therapeutic challenge to healthcare systems. Arch Dis Child Educ Pract Ed. 2010;95(2):47-54. doi:10.1136/adc.2008.143214

17.

Kelley

Ashford

Rao

Dickson

. Primary bone tumors of the spine: A 42-year survey from the leeds regional bone tumour registry. Eur Spine J. 2007;16(3):405-409. doi:10.1007/s00586-006-0188-7

18.

Casabianca

Journé

Mirouse

, et al. Solid aneurysmal bone cyst on the cervical spine of a young child. Eur Spine J. 2015;24(6):1330-1336. doi:10.1007/s00586-015-3809-1

19.

Kan

Schmidt

. Osteoid osteoma and osteoblastoma of the spine. Neurosurg Clin N Am. 2008;19(1):65-70. doi:10.1016/j.nec.2007.09.003

20.

Lettieri

Appel

Labban

Lussier

Blattman

Hingorani

. Progress and opportunities for immune therapeutics in osteosarcoma. Immunotherapy. 2016;8(10):1233-1244. doi:10.2217/imt-2016-0048

21.

Tsitouras

Wang

Dirks

, et al. Management and outcome of chordomas in the pediatric population: The Hospital for Sick Children experience and review of the literature. J Clin Neurosci. 2016;34:169-176. doi:10.1016/j.jocn.2016.06.003

22.

Stachelek

Terezakis

Ermoian

. Palliative radiation oncology in pediatric patients. Ann Palliat Med. 2019;8(3):285-292. doi:10.21037/apm.2019.05.01

23.

Gradoni

Giordano

Oretti

Fantoni

Ferri

. The role of surgery in children with head and neck rhabdomyosarcoma and Ewing's sarcoma. Surg Oncol. 2010;19(4):e103-e109. doi:10.1016/j.suronc.2010.01.006

24.

Sundaresan

Rosen

Boriani

. Primary malignant tumors of the spine. Orthop Clin N Am. 2009;40(1):21-36. doi:10.1016/j.ocl.2008.10.004

25.

Ren

Sun

. Destructive osteoblastoma with secondary aneurysmal bone cyst of cervical vertebra in an 11-year-old boy: Case report. Int J Clinical Exp Med. 2014;7(1):290-295.

26.

Jia

Chen

Cao

, et al. Clinical features and prognostic factors of pediatric spine giant cell tumors: Report of 31 clinical cases in a single center. Spine J. 2019;19(7):1232-1241. doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2019.02.011

27.

Yin

Liu

Hao

. Single posterior surgical management for lumbosacral tuberculosis: Titanium mesh versus iliac bone graft: A retrospective case-control study. Medicine. 2017;96(51):e9449. doi:10.1097/md.0000000000009449

28.

Al-Ibraheemi

Inwards

Zreik

, et al. Histologic spectrum of giant cell tumor (GCT) of bone in patients 18 Years of Age and below: A study of 63 patients. Am J Surg Pathol. 2016;40(12):1702-1712. doi:10.1097/pas.0000000000000715

29.

Kadhim

Binitie

O'Toole

Grigoriou

De Mattos

Dormans

. Surgical resection of osteoid osteoma and osteoblastoma of the spine. J Pediatr Orthop B. 2017;26(4):362-369. doi:10.1097/bpb.0000000000000406

30.

Mankin

Hornicek

Raskin

. Infection in massive bone allografts. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2005;(432):210-216. doi:10.1097/01.blo.0000150371.77314.52

31.

Chiarello

Cadossi

Tedesco

, et al. Autograft, allograft and bone substitutes in reconstructive orthopedic surgery. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2013;25(Suppl 1):S101-S103. doi:10.1007/s40520-013-0088-8

32.

Sciubba

De la Garza Ramos

Goodwin

, et al. Total en bloc spondylectomy for locally aggressive and primary malignant tumors of the lumbar spine. Eur Spine J. 2016;25(12):4080-4087. doi:10.1007/s00586-016-4641-y

33.

Boriani

Bandiera

Donthineni

, et al. Morbidity of en bloc resections in the spine. Eur Spine J. 2010;19(2):231-241. doi:10.1007/s00586-009-1137-z

34.

Feng

Yang

Liu

, et al. Osteosarcoma of the spine: Surgical treatment and outcomes. World J Surg Oncol. 2013;11(1):89. doi:10.1186/1477-7819-11-89

35.

Marks

Bastrom

Petcharaporn

, et al. The effect of time and fusion length on motion of the unfused lumbar segments in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine Deform. 2015;3(6):549-553. doi:10.1016/j.jspd.2015.03.007

36.

Malik

Darwood

Shaunak

, et al. Three-dimensional printing in surgery: A review of current surgical applications. J Surg Res. 2015;199(2):512-522. doi:10.1016/j.jss.2015.06.051

37.

Xiao

Huang

Yang

, et al. En bloc resection of primary malignant bone tumor in the cervical spine based on 3-dimensional printing technology. Orthop Surg. 2016;8(2):171-178. doi:10.1111/os.12234

38.

Martelli

Serrano

van den Brink

, et al. Advantages and disadvantages of 3-dimensional printing in surgery: A systematic review. Surgery. 2016;159(6):1485-1500. doi:10.1016/j.surg.2015.12.017

Surgical Treatments and Long-Term Outcomes for Pediatric Patients With Lumbar Spinal Tumors

Abstract

Study Design

Objectives

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Keywords

Introduction

Methods

Patients

Surgical Procedures

Postoperative Management

Statistical Analysis

Results

Injury Indicators

Baseline Information

Peripheral Period Indicators

Neurological, QoL and Radiological Indicators

Comparison of AV and TM

Comparison of TER and PR

Complications

Discussion

Conclusion

Footnotes

Authors' Contributions

Declaration of Conflicting Interests

Funding

Ethical Statement

ORCID iDs

References