Abstract

OP01: Degenerative-Cervical 1
A001: Pain Is the Recovery Priority for Patients With Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy
Benjamin Davies1, Oliver Mowforth1, Iwan Sadler2, Bizhan Aarabi3, Brian Kwon4, Shekar Kurpad5, James Harrop6, Jefferson Wilson7, Robert Grossman8, and Michael Fehlings7
1University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
2Myelopathy.org
3University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA
4University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
5Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA
6 Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA
7University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
8 Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, USA
A002: Surgical Outcome of Anterior Versus Posterior Approach in the Treatment of Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: A Propensity-Score-Matched Analysis
Hui Yu Koh1, Kenneth Cheung1, and Kenny Kwan1
1The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
A003: Treatment of Cervical Spinal Canal Stenosis With Myelopathy With Corpectomy and Expandable Cage Implantation: 5 Years Outcomes
Vadim Byvaltsev1, Andrei Kalinin1, Marat Aliev1, Evgenii Belykh1, Ivan Stepanov1, Bakhyt Aglakov1, and Bobur Yussupov1
1Irkutsk State Medical University, Irkutsk, Russian Federation
A004: Do Cervical Spine Patients Recall Their Preoperative Status? A Cohort Study of Recall Bias in Patient-Reported Outcomes
Ilyas Aleem1, Bradford Currier2, Heidi Poppendeck2, Paul Huddleston2, Jason Eck3, John Rhee4, Mohamad Bydon2, Brett Freedman2, and Ahmad Nassr2
1University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
2Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
3Center for Sports Medicine and Orthopaedics, Chattanooga, TN, USA
4Emory Spine Center, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
A005: Minimum Clinically Important Difference and Patient Acceptable Symptom State of Japanese Orthopaedic Association Score in Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy Patients
So Kato1, Yasushi Oshima1, Yoshitaka Matsubayashi1, Yuki Taniguchi1, Sakae Tanaka1, Katsushi Takeshita2
1University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
2Jichi Medical University, Shimotsuke, Japan
A006: Epidemiology and Outcomes of Neck Pain Following Surgery for Cervical Radiculopathy
Mark A. Maclean1, Ayoub Dakson1, Fred Xavier1, Sean D. Christie1, and CSORN Investigators2
1Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
2Canadian Spine Outcomes Research Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
OP02: Trauma-Cervical 1
A007: The Clinical Implications of Adding Computed Tomography Angiography in the Evaluation of Cervical Spine Fractures: A Propensity-Matched Analysis
Daniel Tobert1, Hai Le2, Justin Blucher2, Mitchel Harris2, and Andrew Schoenfeld2
1University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
2Harvard University, Boston, MA, USA
A008: The Window of Opportunity for Surgical Decompression in Patients With Acute Traumatic Cervical Spinal Cord Injury
Marko Jug1, Nataša Kejžar2, Matej Cimerman1, Fajko Bajrovic1
1University Medical Center Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
2University of Medicine, Ljubljana, Slovenia
A009: Blunt Cerebrovascular Injury: Incidence and Long-Term Follow-up
Dennis Hundersmarck1, Willem-Bart Slooff1, Jelle Homans1, Quirine Van der Vliet1, Nizar Moayeri1, Falco Hietbrink1, Gert De Borst1, Cumhur Öner1, Sander Muijs1, and Luke Leenen1
1University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
A010: Unbiased Recursive Partitioning to Stratify Patients With Acute Traumatic Spinal Cord Injuries: External Validity in an Observational Cohort Study
Nathan Evaniew1, Nader Fallah1, Carly Rivers1, Vanessa Noonan1, Tova Plashkes1, Zeina Waheed1, Brian Kwon1, Charles Fisher1, and Marcel Dvorak1
1University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
A011: Early Complications, Morbidity, and Mortality in Octo- and Nonagenarians Undergoing Posterior Intraoperative Spinal Navigation Based C1/2 Fusion for Acute Traumatic Odontoid Type II Fractures
Basem Ishak1, Till Schneider1, Valerie Gimmy1, Andreas Unterberg1, and Karl Kiening1
1Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
A012: Management in Acute Traumatic Cervical Spinal Cord Injury
Andrei Stefan Iencean1 and Stefan Mircea Iencean2
1Clinic Emergency N Oblu Hospital, Iasi, Romania
2Gr T Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Iasi, Romania
OP03: Deformity-Thoracolumbar (Adult) 1
A013: Is Fresh Whole Blood Superior to Blood Components Transfusion in Major Spine Surgeries? A Randomized Controlled Study
Shanmuganathan Rajasekaran1, P. Keerthivasan1, Ajoy Prasad Shetty1, and Rishi Mugesh Kanna1
1Ganga Hospital, Coimbatore, India
A014: Low-Cost Indigenous Implants Versus High-Cost Multinational Company Implants in Treatment of Adolescent Scoliosis Surgery
Rishi M. Kanna1, Ajoy P. Shetty1, and S. Rajasekaran1
1Ganga Hospital, Coimbatore, India
A015: One-Stage Posterior Multiple-Level Asymmetrical Ponte Osteotomies Versus Single-Level Posterior Vertebral Column Resection for Severe and Rigid Adult Idiopathic Scoliosis: A Minimum 2-Year Follow-up Comparative Study
Yangpu Zhang1 and Yong Hai1
1Capital Medical University of China, Beijing, China
A016: The Role of the Fractional Lumbosacral Curve in Persistent Coronal Malalignment Following Adult Thoracolumbar Deformity Surgery
Alekos Theologis1, Thamrong Lertudomphonwanit2, Lawrence Lenke3, Keith Bridwell4, and Munish Gupta4
1University of California–San Francisco, San Francisco, USA
2Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
3Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
4Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO, USA
A017: Successful Creation of Deployable Preoperative Predictive Risk Calculators for Individual Patient Event-Free Survivorship for Major Complications, Hospital Readmissions, and Unplanned Surgery Following Adult Spinal Deformity (ASD) Surgery
Ferran Pellisé1, Miquel Serra-Burriel2, Sleiman Haddad1, Alba Vila-Casademunt3, Francisco Javier Sánchez Pérez-Grueso4, Shay Bess5, Emre R. Acaroglu6, Justin S. Smith7, Frank Kleinstück8, Virginie Lafage9, Ibrahim Obeid10, Frank J. Schwab9, Christopher I. Shaffrey7, Ahmet Alanay11, Christopher P. Ames12, International Spine Study Group ISSG9, European Spine Study Group ESSG3
1Hospital Vall d’Hebron, Barcelona, Spain
2Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain
3Vall d’Hebron Institute of Research, Barcelona, Spain
4Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain
5Presbyterian St. Luke’s/Rocky Mountain Hospital for Children, Denver, CO, United States
6Ankara ARTES Spine Center, Ankara, Turkey
7University of Virginia Medical Center, Charlottesville, VA, USA
8Schulthess Klinik, Zürich, Switzerland
9Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA
10Bordeaux University Hospital, Bordeaux, France
11Acibadem University, Istanbul, Turkey
12University of California San Francisco, CA, USA
A018: Rocket Incision and Approach: A Novel Surgical Approach in Posterior Correction of Neuromuscular Scoliosis
Saurabh Kapoor1, Keiran O’Boyle1, and Masood Shafafy1
1Queen’s Medical Center, Nottingham, UK
OP04: Biomechanics 1
A019: The Effects of Added Compression on Sagittal Plane Lumbosacral Junction Rod Strain and Sacral Screw Bending Moment During In Vitro Loading
Brian P. Kelly1, Anna Newcomb1, Jennifer Lehrman1, Bernardo DeAndrada Pereira1, Jake Godzik1, Jay Turner1, and Randy Hlubek1
1Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, AZ, USA
A020: Dual Pedicle and Cortical Screws Using Robotic Navigation Improves Load to Failure in the Osteopenic Lumbar Spine: An In Vitro Biomechanical Analysis
Michael Steinmetz1, Jessica Riggleman2, Jonathan Harris2, John Butler1, Chelsea Wright1, Mir Hussain2, Bryan Ferrick3, and Brandon Bucklen2
1Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA
2 Musculoskeletal Education and Research Center (MERC), a Division of Globus Medical, Inc, Audubon, PA, USA
3Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
A021: Functional Requirements for the Long-Term Stabilization of Annulus Fibrosus Lesions
Dmitriy Alexeev1, Benedikt Helgason1, Melanie Tschopp1, and Stephen Ferguson1
1ETH Zurich, Institute for Biomechanics, Zurich, Switzerland
A022: A Biomechanical In Vitro Study of a Novel Radio Translucent Expandable CF/PEEK Vertebral Body Replacement
Daniel Adler1 and Michael Akbar1
1Ruprecht-Karls-University Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
A023: Dual Fluoroscopy for Measurement of Spinopelvic Parameters Through the Gait Cycle
Iain S. Elliott1, Keisuke Uemura1, Penny Atkins1, Niccolo Fiorentino1, Nicholas Spina1, Darrel Brodke1, Andrew Anderson1, and William Ryan Spiker1
1University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
A024: Variations Among Human Spine Segments and Their Relationships to In Vitro Kinematics: A Retrospective Analysis of Experimental Data Including 581 Cervical Motion Segments From 147 Donor Spines
Anna Newcomb1, Jennifer Lehrman1, Bernardo DeAndrada Pereira1, Neil Crawford2, and Brian P. Kelly1
1Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, AZ, USA
2Globus Medical, Phoenix, AZ, USA
OP05: Arthroplasty-Cervical
A025: Reconsideration of Patient Selection for Cervical Disc Replacement (CDR) Based on Minimum 10-Year Follow-up Results
Feifei Zhou1 and Yu Sun1
1Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China
Scoring System of Cervical Disc Degeneration Based on Neutral Lateral Radiographs (Walraevens J, Liu B, Sloten JV, Goffin J. Qualitative and quantitative assessment of degeneration of cervical intervertebral discs and facet joints. Eur Spine J. 2009;18:358-369.)
A026: Clinical Significance of Bone Loss Phenomenon of Vertebral Bodies at the Operative Segment After Cervical Arthroplasty
Dong Hwa Heo1 and Choon Keun Park1
1The Leon Wiltse Memorial Hospital, Suwon, Republic of Korea
A027: Correlation Between Heterotopic Ossification After Artificial Cervical Disc Replacement and Intervertebral Disc Degeneration
Xiongsheng Chen1, Yin Zhao1, Shengyuan Zhou1, and Bo Yuan1
1Changzheng Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China
A028: Single-Level Cervical Arthroplasty With ProDisc-C Artificial Disc: 10-Year Follow-up Results in One Center
Yanbin Zhao1, Feifei Zhou1, and Yu Sun1
1Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China
A029: Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes for a Next-Generation Artificial Cervical Disc: Two-Year Follow-up at 5 Investigational Centers Participating in an US FDA-Approved Study
Richard Guyer1, Dom Coric2, Frank Phillips3, Rick Sasso4, Andew Sama5, Frank Cammisa5, Scott Blumenthal1, Todd Albert5, and Jack Zigler1
1Center for Disc Replacement at Texas Back Institute, Plano, TX, USA
2Carolina Neurosurgery & Spine Associates, Charlotte, NC, USA
3Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
4Indiana Spine Group, Carmel, IN, USA
5Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA
A030: Influence of Prosthesis Design on the Relationship Between Preoperative and Postoperative Flexion-Extension Range of Motion After Cervical Disc Arthroplasty
Avinash Patwardhan1, Robert M Havey2, and Saeed Khayatzadeh2
1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation, Maywood, IL, USA
2Edward Hines Jr. VA Hospital, Hines, IL, USA
OP06: Trauma-Cervical 2
A031: Systemic Protein Kinase Inhibition Mitigates Immune Cells Infiltration After Spinal Cord Injury
Mohammad-Masoud Zavvarian1, James Hong1, Jian Wang2, and Michael Fehlings1
1University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
2Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
A032: Early Surgical Decompression Improves Neurological Outcome After Complete Traumatic Cervical Spinal Cord Injury: A Meta-Analysis
Paula Valerie ter Wengel1, P. C. de Witt Hamer2, J. C. Pauptit2, N. A. Van der Gaag3, F. C. Oner4, and W. P. Vandertop2
1Slotervaart Hospital, Amsterdam, Netherlands
2Amsterdam UMC, VUmc, Amsterdam, Netherlands
3LUMC, The Hague, Netherlands
4UMCU, Utrecht, Netherlands
A033: Does the Cervical X-Ray and CT Provide False Security After Trauma? Sensitivity and Specificity of X-Ray, CT, and MRI in Patient With Cervical Trauma
Sebastian Bigdon1, Pascale Amrein1, Sven Hoppe1, Moritz Deml1, Aristomenis Exadaktylos1, Lorin Benneker1, and Christoph Albers1
1Inselspital University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
A034: Temporary Atlantoaxial Segmental Fixation and Reduction for Grauer Type IIB Dens Fractures
Nanjian Xu1 and Weihu Ma1
1Sixth Hospital of Ningbo, Ningbo, China
A035: Description of a New Odontoid Fracture Variant: Proposal for a Modification of the Anderson and D’Alonzo Odontoid Fracture Classification
David Gendelberg1, Haitao Zhou1, Amy Cizik1, Nathan Wigner1, Christina Cheng1, Quynh Nguyen1, and Carlo Bellabarba1
1University of Washington, Harborview Medical Center, Seattle, WA, USA
A036: Radiologic Factors to Predict Injury of Transverse Atlantal Ligament in Unilateral Sagittally Split Fracture of C1 Lateral Mass
Jong-Beom Park1 and Do-Gyun Kim1
1Uijeongbu St. Mary’s Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Uijeongbu, Republic of Korea
OP07: Infections 1
A037: Hemoglobin A1c as a Predictor of Surgical Site Infection Following Single-Level Lumbar/Lumbosacral Posterior Fusion in Patients With Diabetes
Dong Wuk Son1, Geun Sung Song1, Sang Weon Lee1, Soon Ki Sung1, Jun Seok Lee1, and Doo Kyung Son1
1Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Pusan, Republic of Korea
A038: Factors Associated With an Increased Risk of Developing a Postoperative Infection Following Spine Surgery
Mina Aziz1, Greg McIntosh2, Michael Johnson3, Charles Fisher4, Michael Weber1, and Michael Goytan3
1McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
2Canadian Spine Outcomes and Research Network, Mandrake, Ontario, Canada
3University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
4University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
A039: Prevention of Surgical Site Infection in Major Spinal Surgery: Evidence Update With Focus on Wound Care
Goldenberg Yoni1, Martin K Hunn1, Susan Liew1, and Jin W Tee1
1Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
A040: Application of Simultaneous PET-MR Imaging in Pyogenic Spondylodiscitis: Preliminary Study
Ikchan Jeon1, Eun Jung Kong1, and Chul Pyo Hong2
1Yeungnam University Hospital, Daegu, Korea
3Catholic University of Daegu, Daegu, Korea
A041: Multidisciplinary Management of Pyogenic Spondylodiscitis: Epidemiological and Clinical Features, Prognostic Factors, and Long-Term Outcomes
Enrico Pola1, Giovanni Autore1, Valerio Cipolloni1, Luca Piccone1, Massimo Fantoni1, and Francesco Ciro Tamburrelli1
1Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
A042: One-Stage Reconstruction Surgery in Tuberculous Spondylitis With Kyphotic Deformity
Asrafi Rizki Gatam1, Phedy Phedy1, Fachrisal Ipang1, Ajiantoro Aji1, and Luthfi Gatam1
1 Fatmawati General Hospital, Jakarta Selatan, Indonesia
OP08: Biomechanics 2
A043: Sequential Changes in Lumbar Lordosis and Segmental Stability Following Lateral Interbody Cage Placement, Smith-Peterson Osteotomy, and Anterior Longitudinal Ligament Release
Richard K. Hurley Jr1, Amy A. Claeson2, Jason A. Inzana2, Anup Gandhi2, and Zachary Child3
1Brooke Army Medical Center, Fort Sam Houston, TX, USA
2Zimmer Biomet, Westminster, CO, USA
3Tahoe Orthopedic Institute, South Lake Tahoe, CA, USA
1. Bridwell, Lewis SJ, Edwards C, et al. Complications and outcomes of pedicle subtraction osteotomies for fixed sagittal imbalance. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003;28:2093-2101.
2. Bridwell, Lewis SJ, Lenke LG, Baldus C, Blanke K. Pedicle subtraction osteotomy for the treatment of fixed sagittal imbalance. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85-A:454-463.
3. Melikian R, Yoon ST, Kim JY, Park KY, Yoon C, Hutton W. Sagittal plane correction using the lateral transpsoas approach: a biomechanical study on the effect of cage angle and surgical technique on segmental lordosis. J Neurosurg Spine. 2016;41:E1016-E1021.
4. Deukmedjian AR, Dakwar E, Ahmadian A, Smith DA, Uribe JS. Early outcomes of minimally invasive anterior longitudinal ligament release for correction of sagittal imbalance in patients with adult spinal deformity. Scientific World J. 2012;2012:789 698.
A044: Fixation Strength of Cortical Versus Traditional Pedicle Screws in High-Quality Bone: A Biomechanical Cadaver Study
Steve Chang1, Amy A. Claeson2, Anup Gandhi2, and Yoshiyuki Yato3
1Barrow Brain and Spine, Phoenix, AZ, USA
2 Zimmer Biomet, Westminster, CO, USA
3Murayama Medical Center, Musashimurayama, Tokyo, Japan
1. Santoni BG, Hynes RA, McGilvray KC, et al. Cortical bone trajectory for lumbar pedicle screws. Spine J. 2009;9:366-373.
2. Matsukawa K, Yato Y, Kato T, Imabayashi H, Asazuma T, Nemoto K. In vivo analysis of insertional torque during pedicle screwing using cortical bone trajectory technique. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014;39:E240-E245.
3. Baluch DA, Patel AA, Lullo B, et al. Effect of physiological loads on cortical and traditional pedicle screw fixation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014;39:E1297-E1302.
4. Matsukawa K, Yato Y, Nemoto O, Imabayashi H, Asazuma T, Nemoto K. Morphometric measurement of cortical bone trajectory for lumbar pedicle screw insertion using computed tomography. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2013;26:E248-E253.
5. Mobbs RJ. The “medio-latero-superior trajectory technique”: an alternative cortical trajectory for pedicle fixation. Orthop Surg. 2013;5:56-59.
6. Sansur CA, Caffes NM, Ibrahimi DM, et al. Biomechanical fixation properties of cortical versus transpedicular screws in the osteoporotic lumbar spine: an in vitro human cadaveric model. J Neurosurg Spine. 2016;25:467-476.
7. Matsukawa K, Yato Y, Imabayashi H, Hosogane N, Asazuma T, Nemoto K. Biomechanical evaluation of the fixation strength of lumbar pedicle screws using cortical bone trajectory: a finite element study. J Neurosurg Spine. 2015;23:471-478.
8. Ueno M, Sakai R, Tanaka K, et al. Should we use cortical bone screws for cortical bone trajectory? J Neurosurg Spine. 2015;22:416-421.
A045: Advanced Degeneration of Articular Facet Joint Cartilage in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: Cause of Pain
Abdulaziz Bin Shebreen1, Daniel Bisson2, Lisbet Haglund2, and Jean Ouellet1
1McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
2McGill Scoliosis & Spinal Research Unit, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
A046: Epidemiological Examination of Trunk Muscle Strength in Healthy Adults
Philipp Flößel1, Stefan Zwingenberger1, Alexander Thomas1, Achim Walther1, Heidrun Beck1, Klaus-Dieter Schaser1, and Alexander C. Disch1
1University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus at Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
A047: Anti-Axial Rotation Strength of Long-Segment Fixation With Cortical Bone Trajectory and Traditional Pedicle Screw: A Biomechanical Study
Zhenlei Liu1, Fengzeng Jian1, Hao Wu1, Xingwen Wang1, Wanru Duan1, Kai Wang1, Jian Guan1, Yu Qian1, and Zan Chen1
1Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
A048: Morphological and Mechanical Evaluation of Newly Formed Bone After Spinal Fusion Treatment Using a Biomimetic Peptide Enhanced Bone Graft
Jacobus Arts1, Scott Johnson2, Jerome Connor2, and Bert van Rietbergen3
1Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, Netherlands
2Cerapedics Inc, Westminster, CO, USA
3 Eindhoven, Netherlands
OP09: Surgical Complications 1
A049: A Comparison of 30-Day Readmission, Reoperation, and Morbidity in Patients That Underwent Anterior Cervical Spinal Surgery, Multi-Level ACDF, and Anterior Cervical Corpectomy and Fusion Approaches Compared Using 10 Years of ACS-NSQIP Data
Nickolas Mancini1, Austen Katz1, Teja Karukonda1, Mark Cote1, and Isaac Moss1
1University of Connecticut, Farmington, CT, USA
A050: Intraoperative Complications of Posterior Internal Fixation of Upper Cervical Spine
Vadim Manukovsky1, Konstantin Tiulikov1, Tahir Tamaev1, Valery Serikov1, and Irina Afanasyeva1
1Dzhanelidze Research Institute of Emergency Care, Saint-Petersburg, Russian Federation
A051: Low Bone Mineral Density Is a Major Risk Factor for Revision Surgery After Posterior Lumbar Fixation
Yu-Mi Ryang1, Maximillain Loeffler2, Anna Rienmüller3, Bernhard Meyer2, and Jan S. Kirschke2
1Helios Klinikum Berlin-Buch, Berlin, Germany
2Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany
3University Hospital Vienna, Vienna, Austria
A052: Risk Factors Associated With Perioperative Complications After Lumbar Spine Surgery in Geriatric Patients
Oscar Bravo1, Rodrigo Donoso1, Manuel Valencia1, Felipe Novoa1, Juan Jose Zamorano1, Ratko Yurac1, Carlos Thibaut1, Bernardo Merello1, Rodrigo Varela1, Alvaro Silva1, and Bartolomé Marré1
1Clinica Alemana of Santiago, Santiago, Chile
OP10: Trauma-Thoracolumbar 1
A053: Influence of Endplate Size and Implant Positioning of Vertebral Body Replacements on Biomechanics and Patients’ Outcome
Michael Kreinest1, Sabine Kelka2, Paul A. Grützner1, Philipp Kobbe3, Miguel Pishnamaz3, and Sven Y. Vetter1
1Klinik für Unfallchirurgie und Orthopädie, Ludwigshafen, Germany
2Klinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral- und Gefäßchirurgie, Hamburg, Germany
3Klinik für Unfall- und Wiederherstellungschirurgie, Aachen, Germany
A054: Robotic Versus Open Fixation for Traumatic Spine Injuries: A Case-Control Study
Alexandra Satanovsky1, Yehiel Gellman1, Hananel Shear Yeshuv1, Leon Kaplan1, and Josh E Schroder1
1Hadassah Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel
A055: Thoracoscopic Correction of Posttraumatic Kyphosis With an Expandable Cage: Radiologic and Patient-Reported Outcomes
Arjen Smits1, Jaap Deunk1, Fred Bakker1, and Frank Bloemers1
1VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands
A056: Utility of Initial Weight-Bearing X-Rays for Predicting the Evolution of AOSpine Type A Thoracolumbar Spine Fractures
Oscar Bravo1, Max Grez2, Jaime Cancino3, Guillermo Izquierdo3, Felipe Novoa1, and Manuel Valencia1
1Clinica Alemana of Santiago, Santiago, Chile
2Hospital Naval de Viña del Mar, Valparaíso, Chile
3Mutual de Seguridad de Santiago, Santiago, Chile
OP11: Degenerative-Cervical 2
A057: Comparison of Inpatient Versus Outpatient Single-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion for Cervical Radiculopathy: Utilization, Safety, and Economics From a National Perspective
Christopher Witiw1, Fabrice Smieliauskas2, John O’Toole1, Richard Fessler1, and Vincent Traynelis1
1Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
2The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
A058: The Influence of Cervical Spondylolisthesis on Clinical Presentation and Surgical Outcome in Patients With DCM: Analysis of a Multicenter Global Cohort of 458 Patients
Aria Nouri1,2, SO Kato3, Jetan Badhiwala4, Michael Robinson1, Mejia Munne Juan1,2, George Yang1,2, William Jeong1,2, Rani Nasser1,2, David Gimbel1,2, Joseph Cheng1,2, and Michael Fehlings4
1University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA
2Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA
3University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
4University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
A059: Does Preoperative T1 Signal Changes on Magnetic Resonance Imaging Affect the Postoperative Functional Recovery in Patients of Cervical Myelopathy?
Ayush Sharma1, Vijay Singh1, Romit Aggrawal1, Sumit Mathapati1, Priyank Deepak1, Shourab Sinha1, Nilesh Mangale1, Jeet Savle1, and Ajay Jaiswal1
1Dr B R Ambedker Central Railway Hospital, Mumbai, India
A060: Patterns and Predictors of Return to Work After the Surgical Management of Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy
Arun Paul1, Rohit Amritanand1, Justin Arockiaraj1, Kenny David1, and Venkatesh Krishnan1
1Christian Medical College, Vellore, India
OP12: Tumor 1
A061: Outcome After Surgery for Symptomatic Spinal Metastases: Results From a Prospective Database of 2621 Surgical Patients
David Choi1 and Global Spine Tumour Study Group2
1NHNN, London, UK
2United Kingdom
A062: Accuracy of Freehand Versus Navigated Thoracolumbar Pedicle Screw Placement in Patients With Metastatic Tumors of the Spine
Rafael De la Garza Ramos1, Yaroslav Gelfand1, Murray Echt1, Michael Longo1, Merrit Kinon1, Jonathan Nakhla2, and Reza Yassari1
1Montefiore Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
2Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
A063: Early Results, Complication Rates, and Revision Rates Following Carbon Fiber–Reinforced Pedicle Screws for Stabilization of the Thoracolumbar Spine
Anna Rienmüller1, Judith Bernett2, Bernhard Meyer2, and Yu-Mi Ryang2
1Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria
2Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany
A064: Asymptomatic Construct Failure After Metastatic Spine Tumor Surgery: A New Entity or a Continuum With Symptomatic Failure?
Naresh Kumar1, Ravish Patel1, Barry Tan1, Aditya Singla1, Lay Wai Khin1, Nivetha Ravikumar1, Helena Milavec1, Aravind Kumar2, Hwee Weng Dennis Hey1, Leok-Lim Lau1, Joseph Thambiah1, and Gabriel Liu1
1National University Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
2Ng Teng Fong General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
OP13: Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery 1
A065: Decreasing Thickness and Remodeling of Ligamentum Flavum After Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion
Akaworn Mahatthanatrakul1, Guang-Xun Lin2, Hyeun-Sung Kim3, and Jin-Sung Kim2
1Naresuan University Hospital, Phitsanulok, Thailand
2Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
3Nanoori Suwon Hospital, Suwon, Republic of Korea
A066: Antepsoas Access, the Best of Lateral Access Without Muscle Damage
Alberto P. Contreras1, Fernando Calderon Carrillo1, Erik Hernandez Vasquez1, and Diana Chavez Lizarraga1
1Centro del Cerebro y Columna Vertebral Hospital Mexico, Mexico City, Mexico
Anterolateral accesses to the lumbar spine have a history dating back to 1960 with transperitoneal access, but it showed more progress with the integration of sedation, lighting, and optics systems giving description to the minimally invasive retroperitoneal access to L2 to L5 with microscope to the implementation of static cages and monitoring for transpsoas access in 1998. Description of antepsoas access and thus avoiding manipulating the lumbosacral plexus inside the muscle has been cataloged as the greatest technical advance for indirect decompression and stabilization of degenerative lumbar spine and degenerative column plus deformity. From January 2017 to June 2018 at Hospital Angeles Mexico of the Angeles Health Services Group, lumbar spine surgery was performed with antepsoas access to scheduled patients. They were selected from medical appointments, performing radiographic studies that included panoramic vertebral column for measurement of sagittal balance, dynamic studies, simple lumbar spine resonance, and bone densitometry from spine and hip. Inclusion criteria: Diagnosis of degenerative disease of symptomatic lumbar spine that did not improve with conservative treatment based on pain killers, weight control, and column hygiene indications including physical therapy in the previous 6 months. Patients also were assessed by Psychology avoiding additional benefits like laboral inability, the preoperative valuation was mandatory in those older than 45 years and grading ASA I-II/IV. The Start scale for lumbar pain and Oswestry scale for functionality were used. Exclusion criteria: L5S1 segment disease, active smoking, BMI (body mass index) greater than 30, and psychiatric and/or psychological disorder. Informed consent was signed for both the procedure and to obtain photographic and video material during the surgery. In total there were 54 patients who were asked to perform the procedure. The following demographic data were revealed: the female gender predominates in 35 patients (64%) and male gender in 19 patients (36%). Active working patients with no distinction of gender. Always performed left side access by the layout of the aorto-psoas corridor and in the image studies always look for fatty tissue between both anatomical structures. The access column level was from L2 to L5 and the levels where L5S1 was treated in the same position either by anterolateral access or by TLIF (transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion) were excluded. Time of the surgery was 25 minutes per level (indirect decompression that includes access, discoidectomy, and intersomatic cage placement). The posterior instrumentation that was performed in the same lateral position of the patient, guided by O-arm, increased the time in 30 minutes, no matter whether it was 1 or 3 levels. In total there were 84 levels in 42 patients (2 levels), 27 levels in 9 patients (3 levels), 8 levels in 2 patients (4 levels), and 1 level in 1 patient. The most affected level was L4L5, followed by L3L4. The position of the patient is lateral decubitus without flexion of the table, offering no traction, protection of bone prominences, and slight flexion of the left hip. The access is made under radiological planning in the year 2017 with 2D fluoroscopy, placing the incision 2 fingers cross-anterior to the vertebral body at the level of the intervertebral disc. In multilevel cases, there was variation of the incision. Blunt dissection of the muscular planes is carried out until reaching the peritoneal fat detecting the abdominal wall, psoas and aorta under direct vision, and the psoas muscle is later displaced allowing access to the intervertebral disc by placing a 30 mm diameter separator without bone fixation or neurophysiological monitoring. Discoidectomy was performed with contralateral fibrous annulus opening, using either the ALIF (anterior lumbar interbody fusion) cage or lateral cage, bone graft, or demineralized bone matrix. Postoperative pain control was with acetaminophen at a dose of 3 g per day with parecoxib 80 mg daily; antibiotic prophylaxis was with vancomycin single dose. Moving in and out of bed was recommended at 4 hours after the surgery, and they left for home with indication of dorsolumbar and lower limb stretching exercises. This kind of access to the spine without muscle damage has allowed rapid functional recovery, achieving correction of deformity cases associated with degeneration, offering improvement with indirect decompression, stabilization of the lumbar spine with shorter hospital stay, and early integration into their activities. This technique has proved to be a reasonable alternative to avoid the use of transoperative monitoring because we avoid navigating through the psoas muscle and thereby avoid complications related to the compression of the lumbosacral plexus, and no complications related to the peritoneal cavity were observed.
A067: Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy for L5S1 Disc Herniation. Does Interlaminar Approach Give Better Results Compared to Transforaminal Approach?
Asrafi Rizki Gatam1, Luthfi Gatam1, and Harmantya Mahadhipta1
1Fatmawati General Hospital, Jakarta Selatan, Indonesia
A068: Minimally Invasive Direct Thoracic Interbody Fusion (MIS-DTIF): Technical Notes of a Single Surgeon Study
Hamid Abbasi1
1Inspired Spine, Tristate Brain & Spine Institute, Minneapolis, MN, USA
A069: Clinical, Radiological, and Patient-Reported Outcomes 13 Years After Pedicle Screw Fixation With Balloon-Assisted Endplate Reduction and Cement Injection for Traumatic Thoracolumbar Burst Fractures
Erin De Gendt1, J. S. Kuperus1, W. Foppen1, F. C. Oner1, and J. J. Verlaan1
1UMC Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
A070: Prospective Randomized Trial Comparing Endoscopic Discectomy and Conventional Open Microdiscectomy for Radicular Pain Treatment Due to Lumbar Disc Herniation
Guilherme Meyer1, Ivan Rocha1, and Alexandre Cristante1
1São Paulo University, São Paulo, Brazil
OP14: Degenerative-Lumbar 1
A071: Unilateral Laminotomy for Bilateral Decompression Versus Posterior Decompression With Instrumented Fusion for Lumbar Degenerative Spondylolisthesis at 5-Year Follow-up
Calvin Kuo1, Maqdooda Merchant1, Alem Yacob1, Kamran Majid1, and Ravi Bains1
1Kaiser Permanente, Oakland, CA, USA
A072: Are There Gender-Based Differences in Outcomes for Elective Lumbar Spine Surgery in Canada?
Henry Ahn1, Abel Davtyan1, Sean Christie2, Raja Rampersaud3, Kenneth Thomas4, Chris Bailey5, Charles Fisher6, Eugene Wai7, Jerome Paquet6, Albert Yee8, Peter Jarzem9, and Philippe Phan7
1St. Michael’s Hospital, University of Toronto Spine Program, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
2Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
3Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
4University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
5University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada
6University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
7University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
8Sunnybrook Hospital, University of Toronto Spine Program, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
9McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
A073: Clinical Outcomes Research in Spine Surgery: What Are Appropriate Follow-up Times?
Oliver Ayling1, Charles Fisher1, Tamir Ailon1, and Nicolas Dea1
1Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
A074: Nanotechnology in Spinal Fusions: Efficient or Not?
Karel Willems1 and Philippe Lauweryns2
1Az Delta Roeselare, Roeselare, Belgium
2Regionaal Ziekenhuis Sint-Trudo, Sint Truiden, Belgium
A075: History of Prior Lumbar Microdiscectomy Poorly Predicts Outcomes Following Open Posterior Lumbar Fusion
Jannat Khan1, Bryce Basques1, Jessica Gosse1, Michael Berkowitz1, Konstantin Tchalukov1, Clayton Maschhoff1, Gagan Grewal1, Matthew Colman1, and Howard An1
1Rush University, Chicago, IL, USA
A076: The Impact of Degenerative Disc Disease on Regional Volumetric Bone Mineral Density (VBMD) Measured by Quantitative Computed Tomography
Ichiro Okano1, Stephan Salzmann1, Courtney Ortiz Miller1, Colleen Rentenberger1, Jennifer Shue1, John Carrino1, Andrew Sama1, Frank Cammisa1, Federico Girardi1, and Alexander Hughes1
1Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA
OP15: Deformity-Thoracolumbar (Adolescent) 1
A077: Novel Intraoperative Technique for Selecting Optimal Lower Instrumented Vertebra in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis
Vishal Borse1, Peter Loughenbury1, and Peter Millner1
1Leeds General Infirmary, Leeds, UK
A078: Asymmetric Biomechanical Characteristics of the Paravertebral Muscle in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis
Aixing Pan1 and Yong Hai1
1Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Beijing, China
A079: Predictors for Postoperative Shoulder Balance in Lenke 1 Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: A Prospective Cohort Study
Alberto Gotfryd1, Maria Fernanda Caffaro1, Robert Meves1, and Osmar Avanzi1
1Santa Casa de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
A080: How Can We Predict the Development of Shoulder Imbalance After the Correction of Idiopathic Scoliosis?
Aleksandr Aleinik1, Andrey Bokov1, and Sergey Mlyavikh1
1Privolzhskiy Research Medical University, Nizhniy Novgorod, Russian Federation
A081: A Novel Mobile App-Based Handheld Scanner Puts Scoliosis Follow-up Assessment Into the Hands of Patients/Relatives: A Feasibility Study
Cheuk Ki Chan1, Michael Kai Tsun To1, Kenny Yat Hong Kwan1, Jason Pui Yin Cheung1, Xin Yu1, King Cheung Berry Cheung2, Yuk Lung Tsang2, Sunny Lut Hey Chu2, Johnson Yiu Nam Lau2, and Kenneth Man Chee Cheung1
1The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
3Avalon SpineCare (HK) Ltd, Hong Kong
A082: A New Modified Luque Trolley Technique for the Treatment of Early-Onset Scoliosis (EOS): A 13 Patient Case Series With a Minimum 5-Year Follow-up
Andrew Cottam1, Bart Van Herwijnen1, and Evan Davies1
1University Hospital Southampton, Southampton, UK
OP16: Tumor 2
A083: Management of Cervical Spine Malignant Disease: A Case Series and Systematic Literature Review
Pedro Coutinho1, Michael Paci2, Andrew Fanous2, and Glen Manzano2
1Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA
2University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA
A084: Comparing Complication Rates for Corpectomy Versus Posterior Approaches in Operations for Metastatic Cervical Spine Disease: A National Database Study
Yaroslav Gelfand1, Rafael De La Garza-Ramos1, Murray Echt1, Jonathan Nakhla2, Michael Longo1, and Reza Yassari1
1Montefiore Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
2Rhode Island Hospital of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
A085: Cervical En Block Spondilectomy: Planning, Results, and Failures (16 Cases)
Alessandro Luzzati1, Gennaro Scotto1, and Luca Cannavò1
1Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Milan, Italy
A086: En Bloc Resection of Tumors of the Lumbar Spine: A Systematic Review of Outcomes and Complications
Morgan Jones1, Okezika Uhiara1, James Holton1, Simon Hughes1, Petr Rehouzek1, Alistair Stirling1, Mel Grainger2, and Marcin Czyz1
1 The Royal Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Trust, Birmingham, UK
2University Hospitals of Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
A087: Transpedicular Vertebrectomy With Circumferential Spinal Cord Decompression and Anterior-Posterior Reconstruction for Patients With Thoracic Spinal Metastatic Tumors
Tarush Rustagi1, Hazem Mashaly1, Michelle Williams1, David Kline1, and Ehud Mendel1
1Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
A088: Patient Satisfaction After Surgery and/or Radiotherapy for Metastatic Spine Disease
Anne Versteeg1, Arjun Sahgal2, Laurence Rhines3, Daniel Sciubba4, James Schuster5, Michael Weber6, Aron Lazary7, Stefano Boriani8, Chetan Bettegowda4, Michael Fehlings9, Michelle Clarke10, Paul Arnold11, Ziya Gokaslan12, and Charles Fisher13
1University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
2 Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre and University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
3The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
4 Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
5Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
6McGill University and Montreal General Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
7National Center for Spinal Disorders and Buda Health Center, Budapest, Hungary
8 IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Milan, Italy
9 University of Toronto and Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
10 Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
11The University of Kansas Hospital, Kansas City, KS, USA
1Brown University, Rhode Island Hospital, and The Miriam Hospital, Providence, RI, USA
13University of British Columbia and Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
OP17: Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery 2
A089: Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy for the Treatment of Multisegmental Lumbar Disc Herniation in Middle-Aged and Young Adults: A Retrospective Cohort Study
Haolin Sun1
1Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China
A090: Modified OLIF: Comparison OLIF and DILF
Hyung Chang Lee1
1Department of Anterior Spine Surgery, Busan, Republic of Korea
A091: The Efficacy of Posterior Cervical Foraminal Decompression Using Unilateral Biportal Endoscopy
Jin Hwa Eum1
1Bumin Hospital, Busan, Korea
A092: Efficiency of Indirect Decompression in Minimally Invasive Oblique Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion (MIS-OLIF) Without Posterior Decompression for the Treatment of Degenerative Lumbar Disease
Jung-Woo Hur1, Kyeong-Sik Ryu1, Jin-Sung Kim1, Ho-Jung Chung1, and Myung-Soo Song1
1Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
A093: Cement Volume and Pattern of Distribution in Fenestrated Screws Used in Cement Augmented Spinal Stabilization: Its Relevance With BMD and Functional Outcome
Saumyajit Basu1, Amitava Biswas1, and Rohan Gala1
1Park Clinic, Kolkata, India
A094: Surgical Treatment for Lumbar Lateral Recess Stenosis With the Percutaneous Endoscopic Technique: Interlaminar Approach Versus Transforaminal Approach
Yawei Li1 and Bing Wang1
1The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China
OP18: Degenerative-Lumbar 2
A095: Lumbar Disc Disease in Children and Adolescents: A Cross-Section Imaging Study
Jun Zhang1, Zhi-Heng Liu2, Fei Zhao3, Hai-Qiang Wang4, and Dino Samartzis5
1The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, China
2Chinese PLA No.451 Hospital, Xi’an, China
3Fourth Military Medical University, Xi’an, China
4Shaanxi University of Chinese Medicine, Xi’an, China
5Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
A096: Effect of Spinal Decompression on Back Pain in Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Canadian Spine Outcomes Research Network (CSORN) Study
Shreya Srinivas1, Charles Fisher2, Greg Mcintosh3, and Nicolas Dea2
1Alder Hey Children’s Hospital, Liverpool, UK
2Vancouver Spine Surgery Institute, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
3Canadian Spine Society, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
A097: Dynamic Pedicle-Based Stabilization Versus Fusion in Lumbar Degenerative Instabilities: A Prospective Randomized Multicenter Double-Blind Trial (Dynorfuse Trial)
Bernhard Meyer1, Claudius Thome1, Peter Vajkoczy1, and Florian Ringel1
1Department of Neurosurgery, München, Germany
A098: Abdominal Obesity and Paraspinal Muscularity Predict Proximal Junctional Kyphosis Requiring Surgical Revision Among Patients Undergoing Thoracolumbosacral Fusion
Zach Pennington1, Ali Ahmed1, Ethan Cottrill1, Jeff Ehresman1, Camilo Molina1, Matthew Goodwin1, C. Rory Goodwin2, and Daniel Sciubba1
1Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
2Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
A099: Functional and Radiological Outcomes of Combined Anterior-Posterior Approach Versus Posterior Alone in Management of Isthmic Spondylolisthesis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Abduljababr Alhammoud1, Gregory Schroeder2, Osama Aldahamsheh1, Kenan Alkhalili3, Mayan Lendner2, Isam Sami Moghamis1, and Alexander Vaccaro2
1Department of Orthopedics, Doha, Qatar
2 Rothman Institute, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
3Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt
A100: PROs Are More Than a Research Tool: A Prospective Assessment of Patient Understanding and Expectation Management
Ross McEntarfer1, Natasha Greene1, Jeremy Shaw1, Chase Grover1, William Ryan Spiker1, Brandon Lawrence1, Nicholas Spina1, and Darrel Brodke1
1University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
OP19: Deformity-Thoracolumbar (Adolescent) 2
A101: The Use of Preoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Patients With Scoliosis at University Hospital Southampton, UK
Andrew Cottam1, Evan Davies1, and Sulagna Roy1
1University Hospital Southampton, Southampton, UK
A102: Abnormalities Associated With Congenital Scoliosis in High-Altitude Geographic Regions
Dongpo Hou1 and Yong Hai1
1Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University of China, Beijing, China
A103: Patient-Related Outcomes in Adolescents and Young Adults With Idiopathic Scoliosis Undergoing Spine Deformity Surgery: A 2-Year Follow-up Cohort Study Based on a Single-Center Spine Outcomes Registry
Miranda van Hooff1, Maarten Spruit1, Raf Mens1, Philip Horsting1, Marinus de Kleuver2, and Luuk de Klerk1
1Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, Netherlands
2Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
1. de Kleuver M, Lewis SJ, Germscheid NM, et al. Optimal surgical care for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: an international consensus. Eur Spine J. 2014;23:2603-2618.
2. Weinstein SL, Dolan LA, Cheng DC, Danielsson A, Morcuende JA. Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Lancet. 2008;371:1527-1537.
3. Bagó J, Climent JM, Pérez-Grueso FJ, Pellisé F. Outcome instruments to assess scoliosis surgery. Eur Spine J. 2013;22(suppl 2):S195-S202.
4. de Kleuver M, Faraj SSA, Holewijn RM, et al. Defining a core outcome set for adolescent and young adult patients with a spinal deformity. Acta Orthop. 2017;88:612-618.
5. Bagó J, Pérez-Grueso FJ, Les E, Hernández P, Pellisé F. Minimal important differences of the SRS-22 Patient Questionnaire following surgical treatment of idiopathic scoliosis. Eur Spine J. 2009;18:1898-1904.
6. van Hooff ML, Mannion AF, Staub LP, Ostelo RW, Fairbank JC. Determination of the Oswestry Disability Index score equivalent to a “satisfactory symptom state” in patients undergoing surgery for degenerative disorders of the lumbar spine—a Spine Tango registry-based study. Spine J. 2016;16:1221-1230.
A104: Does Pregnancy Increase Loss of Correction After Posterior Spinal Fusion?
Pawel Grabala1, Tomasz Guszczyn1, and Ilkka Helenius2
1Medical University in Bialystok, Bialystok, Poland
2University of Turku and Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland
A105: Predictors of Extended Length of Hospital Stay in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Patients Undergoing Posterior Segmental Instrumented Fusion: An Analysis of 407 Surgeries Performed at a Large Academic Center
Assem Sultan1, Ryan Berger1, William Cantrell1, Linsen Samuel1, Deepak Ramanathan1, Jessica Churchill1, Anas Minkara1, Joshua Golubovsky1, Salam Bachour1, Selena Pasadyn1, Jaret Karnuta1, Pierre Tamer1, Thomas Kuivila1, David Gurd1, and Ryan Goodwin1
1Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
A106: Rib Distraction Devices: Do They Really Increase Lung Volume in Patients With Thoracic Spine Anomalies?
Nikita Khusainov1, Sergey Vissarionov1, and Dmitry Kokushin1
1 Department of Spine Pathology and Neurosurgery, Saint-Petersburg, Russian Federation
OP20: Degenerative-Cervical 3
A107: A Novel Anatomic Landmark to Assess Adequate Decompression in Anterior Cervical Spine Surgery: The Posterior Endplate Valley (PEV)
Ilyas Aleem1, Jason Alder2, Joseph Popper2, Brett Freedman2, Ahmad Nassr2, Mohamad Bydon2, and Bradford Currier2
1University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
2Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
A108: Risk Factors of Stand-Alone ACDF Cage Subsidence
Melanie Schindler1, Anna Rienmüller1, Yu-Mi ryang2, Petra Krepler1, Reinhard Windhager1, and Georg Grohs1
1Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria
2Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany
A109: Comparison of the Outcomes of Stand-Alone Cage With Cage-Plate Fixation in 1- and 2-Level ACDF for Treating Cervical Disk Disease
Mohammadreza Etemadifar1, Ali Andalib1, and Hossein Shafiei1
1Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Esfahan, Islamic Republic of Iran
A110: Relationship Between Decompression Range and Decompression Limitation of Cervical Laminoplasty
Yinze Diao1, Yu Sun1, Shaobo Wang1, Fengshan Zhang1, Li Zhang1, and Shengfa Pan1
1Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China
A111: The Effect of Aging on Cervical Sagittal Balance Parameters
Ivan Ye1, Ray Tang1, Zoe Cheung1, Samuel White1, Jun Kim1, and Samuel Cho1
1Mount Sinai Health System, New York, NY, USA
A112: Does Extension Dysfunction Affect Postoperative Loss of Cervical Lordosis in Patients Who Undergo Laminoplasty?
Dong Wuk Son1, Geun Sung Song1, Sang Weon Lee1, Soon Ki Sung1, Jun Seok Lee1, and Doo Kyung Son1
1Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Pusan, Republic of Korea
OP21: Novel Technologies 1
A113: Superior Predictability of Incidental Osteoporotic Vertebral Fractures of Opportunistic QCT Compared to Reference DEXA
Yu-Mi Ryang1, Maximillain Loeffler2, Anna Rienmüller3, Bernhard Meyer2, and Jan S. Kirschke2
1Helios Klinikum Berlin-Buch, Berlin, Germany
2Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany
3University Hospital Vienna, Vienna, Austria
A114: Proteome Profiling in Human Intervertebral Disc: A Comparison Between Herniated and Healthy Disc Samples
Shanmuganathan Rajasekaran1, K. S. Srivijay Anand1, Ajoy Prasad Shetty1, and Rishi Mugesh Kanna1
1Ganga Hospital, Coimbatore, India
A115: Evaluation of the Basal Metabolism of Degenerative Lumbar Intervertebral Discs Based on Pfirmann Grade and Presence of Instability
Chaiyapruk Pundee1, Naomi N. Lee1, Jacob S. Kramer1, Aaron M. Stoker1, Aaron M. Stoker1, Don K. Moore1, Theodore J Choma1, and James L. Cook1
1 University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA
A116: Intraoperative CT-Based Navigation Is More Accurate and Safer Way of Lower Thoracic and Lumbar Pedicle Screw Insertion Than Traditional Fluoroscopy Guidance
Pavel Barsa1, Robert Frohlich1, and Petr Suchomel1
1Regional Hospital of Liberec, Liberec, Czech Republic
A117: Fusion Performance of Attrax® Putty Versus Autograft in Instrumented Posterolateral Spinal Fusion: A Randomized Intrapatient Controlled Noninferiority Trial
A. M. Lehr1, F. C. Oner1, E. A. Hoebink2, D. H. R. Kempen3, J. L. C. van Susante4, R. M. Castelein1, and M. C. Kruyt1
1University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
2 Amphia Hospital, Breda, Netherlands
3OLVG, Amsterdam, Netherlands
4Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem, Netherlands
A118: Quantitative Analysis of Indirect Decompression in Extreme Lateral Interbody Fusion and Posterior Spinal Fusion With a Percutaneous Pedicle Screw System for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
Hiroshi Nomura1, Yamashita Akihisa2, Tetsuya Watanabe2, and Kenzo Shirasawa2
1 Nomura Orthopaedic Clinic, Shimonoseki, Japan
2Shimonoseki City Hospital, Shimonoseki, Japan
A119: Percutaneous Occipitocervical Fusion: Optimal Choice to Obtain Best Cervical Pedicles Screws Accuracy
Wojciech Kloc1, Marek Roclawski2, Rafal Pankowski2, Marek Derenda3, Patryk Kurlandt3, Jakub Wisniewski3, Katarzyna Aleksandrowicz3, and Stanislaw Adamski3
1University of Warmia and Mazury, Olsztyn, Poland
2Medical University, Gdansk, Poland
3Copernicus Medical Centre, Gdansk, Poland
A120: Therapeutic Potential of a Novel Small Molecule in Modifying Lumbar Disc Degeneration
Yi Sun1, Kenny Kwan1, Yuching Hsu1, Ellen Zhang1, Kenneth Cheung1, and Victor Leung1
1University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
A121: No Improvement in Pedicle Screw Accuracy and Increased Radiation With Intraoperative CT-Based Navigation Compared to Free Hand Technique in Idiopathic Scoliosis Surgery
Wiktor Urbanski1, Rafal Zaluski1, and Piotr Morasiewicz1
1University Hospital Wroclaw, Wroclaw, Poland
OP22: Trauma-Thoracolumbar 2
A122: International Validation of the AOSpine PROST (Patient-Reported Outcome Spine Trauma)
Said Sadiqi1, Marcel W. Post2, A. Mechteld Lehr1, F. Cumhur Oner1, and AOSpine Knowledge Forum Trauma3
1University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
2 Rehabilitation Center “De Hoogstraat,” Utrecht, Netherlands
3AOSpine Knowledge Forum Trauma, AO Foundation, Davos, Switzerland
A123: Evaluation of Spinopelvic Balance in Patients With Thoracolumbar Fractures Treated Surgically and Conservatively: A Cross-Sectional Study
Lucas Miotto1, Rodrigo Goes1, Nelson Astur1, Alberto Gotfryd1, Maria Fernanda Caffaro1, and Robert Meves1
1Santa Casa de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
A124: Traumatic Cauda Equina Injury in Canada: What Predicts Neurological and Bowel or Bladder Sphincter Outcomes?
Najmedden Attabib1,2, Colleen O’Connell1, Dilnur Kurban3, Carly Rivers3, Chris Bailey4, Sean Christie1, Karen Ethans5, Heather Flett6, Julio Furlan7, Eve Tsai8, the RHSCIR Network3, and Amanda Carson2
1Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
2Saint John Regional Hospital, Saint John, Canada
3The Rick Hansen Institute, Blusson Spinal Cord Centre, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
4University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada
5University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
6University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
7Toronto Western University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
8Ottawa Combined Adult Spinal Surgery Program, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
A125: Reliability of the AO Classification of Thoracolumbar Fractures Compared to TLICS and Magerl
Alynson Larocca Kulcheski1, Marcel Luiz Benato1, Pedro Grein del Santoro1, Andre Sebben1, and Xavier Soler i Graells1
1Hospital do Trabalhador, Curitiba, Brazil
A126: Analysis of Factors Affecting Postoperative Loss of Reduction in Unstable Thoracolumbar Fractures After Posterior Surgery
Jaewan Soh1
1Soonchunhyang University Cheonan Hospital, Cheonan, Republic of Korea
A127: Treatment of Thoracolumbar Trauma by Short-Segment Percutaneous Transpedicular Screw Instrumentation With Parallel Distraction Using Polyaxial Locking Mechanism (Correction Key): Retrospective Comparative Study
Tsuyoshi Okudaira1, Hideo Baba1, Takayuki Yamaguchi1, Chieko Imai1, Akira Saho1, and Hiroaki Konishi1
1Nagasaki Rosai Hospital, Sasebo, Japan
A128: Vertebral Body Lavage Reduces Hemodynamic Response to Vertebral Body Augmentation With PMMA
Christoph Albers1, Lorin Benneker1, and Sven Hoppe1
1University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland
A129: Posterior Vertebral Column Resection in Management of Severe Posttraumatic Thoracolumbar Kyphosis
Ahmed ElNaggar1, Shamel ElGawhary1, and Tarek ElHewala1
1Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt
A130: Sagittal Alignment and Mismatch After Short Segment Fixation of Thoracolumbar Fracture: 4-Year Follow-up of Thoracolumbar Fracture Treated by Short Segment With Intermediate Screw Fixation
Tarek ElHewala1, Amr El-Adawy1, Shamel ElGawhary1, and Mohamed Abdeen1
1Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt
OP23: Degenerative-Cervical 4
A131: Cervical Degenerative Disc Disease and Subclinical Discitis: Cause or Contaminant?
Amit Bhandutia1, Louis Bivona1, Alysa Nash1, Farooq Usmani1, Jael Camacho1, Meghan Hughes1, Daniel Gelb1, Eugene Koh1, Kelley Banagan1, and Steven Ludwig1
1University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA
A132: The Impact of Older Age on Functional Recovery After Surgical Decompression for Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: Results From an International, Multicenter, Prospective Dataset in 757 Patients
Jamie R. F. Wilson1, Jetan H. Badhiwala1, Fan Jiang1, Jeff Wilson2, Branko Kopjar3, Alex Vaccaro4, and Michael Fehlings1
1Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
2St Michael’s Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
3University of Washington., Seattle, WA, USA
4 Rothman Orthopaedic Institute, Philadelphia, PA, USA
A133: Influence of Uncinate Process Removal on Postoperative Radiologic Outcomes: A Focus on Subsidence and Sagittal Balance in Patients Receiving Single-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion
Sung Hyun Noh1 and Kyung Hyun Kim1
1Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
A134: The Effect of Tandem Lesions in Patients With Cervical Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament
Yoshiharu Kawaguchi1, Masato Nakano1, Taketoshi Yasuda1, Shoji Seki1, Kayo Suzuki1, Yasuhito Yahara1, Hiroto Makino1, Masahiko Kanamori1, and Tomoatsu Kimura1
1University of Toyama, Toyama, Japan
A135: Clinicoradiological Efficacy of Posterior Occipitocervical Fusion With Plate-Screw-Rod Construct and Allograft in Craniovertebral Instability in 52 Patients
Mihir Upadhyaya1
1Bombay Hospital & Research Centre, Mumbai, India
A136: Effects of Renin-Angiotensin System Inhibitors on Spinal Fusion: Retrospective Analysis of a Cohort of ACDF Patients
Alexander Perdomo-Pantoja1, Feras Shamoun1, Christina Holmes2, Wataru Ishida1, Seba Ramhmdani1, Ali Bydon1, Nicholas Theodore1, L. Lo Sheng-Fu1, and Timothy F. Witham1
1 Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
2Florida A&M University-Florida State University College of Engineering, Tallahassee, FL, USA
1. Rajaee SS, Bae HW, Kanim LEA, Delamarter RB. Spinal fusion in the United States: analysis of trends from 1998 to 2008. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012;37:67-76.
2. Gruskay JA, Webb ML, Grauer JN. Methods of evaluating lumbar and cervical fusion. Spine J. 2014;14:531-539. doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2013.07.459
3. Rajaee SS, Kanim LEA, Bae HW. National trends in revision spinal fusion in the USA: patient characteristics and complications. Bone Joint J. 2014;96-B:807-816. doi:10.1302/0301-620X.96B6.31 149
4. Yamamoto S, Kido R, Onishi Y, et al. Use of renin-angiotensin system inhibitors is associated with reduction of fracture risk in hemodialysis patients. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0122691. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0 122 691
5. Bayar A, Turan A, Gülle K, Akpolat M, Turan İ, Turhan E. The effects of the angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor enalapril and the angiotensin II type 1 receptor blocker losartan on fracture healing in rats. Clin Invest Med. 2015;38:E164-E172.
6. Izu Y, Mizoguchi F, Kawamata A, et al. Angiotensin II type 2 receptor blockade increases bone mass. J Biol Chem. 2009;284:4857-4864. doi:10.1074/jbc.M807610200
A137: Identifying Prognostic Profiles of the Symptoms and Quality of Life in Patients With Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy Underwent Surgical Treatment: A Cluster-Analytic Approach
Feifei Zhou1, Yilong Zhang1, and Yu Sun1
1Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China

Cluster analysis of all outcome evaluation items taking different follow-up time points into account.
A138: Effects of Regional Cervical Sagittal Alignment on Clinical Outcomes After Decompressive Surgery for Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy
Hui Yu Koh1, Kenneth Cheung1, and Kenny Kwan1
1The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
A139: Predicting Outcomes After Surgical Decompression for Mild Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: Moving Beyond the MJOA to Identify Surgical Candidates
Jetan Badhiwala1, Laureen Hachem1, Zamir Merali1, Christopher Witiw1, Farshad Nassiri1, Muhammad Akbar1, Saleh Almenawer2, Markus Schomacher3, Jefferson Wilson1, and Michael Fehlings1
1University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
2McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
3Charité University Hospital, Berlin, Germany
OP24: Pain and Clinical Evaluation
A140: Cervical Epidural Steroid Injections: Incidence and Determinants of Subsequent Surgery
John Kleimeyer1, Jayme Koltsov2, and Serena Hu2
1Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
2Stanford University, Redwood City, CA, USA
A141: Re-Irradiation With Spine Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy in a Heavily Pretreated Population
Jay Detsky1, Timothy Nguyen1, Sten Myrehaug1, Hany Soliman1, Chia-Lin Tseng1, and Arjun Sahgal1
1 Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
A142: Duration of Preoperative Symptoms Does Not Affect Clinical Outcome After Lumbar Arthrodesis
Jannat Khan1, Bryce Basques1, Young Soo Hong1, Jessica Gosse1, Kevin Alter1, Landan Banks1, Ahish Chitneni1, Matthew Colman1, and Howard An1
1Rush University, Chicago, IL, USA
A143: Evidence of Impaired Pain Modulation in Adolescents With Idiopathic Scoliosis and Chronic Back Pain
Alisson R. Teles1, Don Daniel Ocay1, Abdulaziz Bin Shebreen1, Andrew Tice1, Jean A. Ouellet1, and Catherine E. Ferland1
1Shriners Hospitals for Children, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
A144: Morphological and Biomechanical Approach to Understand Perioperative Back Pain in Patients With Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis
Maxime St-Georges1, Alisson Teles1, Jean Ouellet1, and Catherine Ferland1
1McGill University, Montréal, Quebec, Canada
1. Nault ML, Mac-Thiong JM, Roy-Beaudry M, et al. Three-dimensional spinal morphology can differentiate between progressive and nonprogressive patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis at the initial presentation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014;39:E601-E606.
2. Dalleau G, Damavandi M, Leroyer P, Verkindt C, Rivard CH, Allard P. Horizontal body and trunk center of mass offset and standing balance in scoliotic girls. Eur Spine J. 2010;20:123-128.
3. Sullivan TB, Reighard FG, Osborn EJ, Parvaresh KC, Newton PO. Thoracic idiopathic scoliosis severity is highly correlated with 3D measures of thoracic kyphosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2017;99:e54.
4. Smorgick Y, Mirovsky Y, Baker KC, Gelfer Y, Avisar E, Anekstein Y. Predictors of back pain in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis surgical candidates. J Pediatr Orthop. 2013;33:289-292.
5. Sieberg CB, Simons LE, Edelstein MR, et al. Pain prevalence and trajectories following pediatric spinal fusion surgery. J Pain. 2013;14:1694-1702.
6. Emami F, Yoosefinejad AK, Razeghi M. Correlations between core muscle geometry, pain intensity, functional disability and postural balance in patients with nonspecific mechanical low back pain. Med Eng Phys. 2018;60:39-46.
7. Pasha S, Baldwin K. Are we simplifying balance evaluation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis? Clin Biomech. 2018;51:91-98.
A145: Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pain Interference (PI) Is Superior to the Likert Pain Scale (LPS) for Pain Assessment in Spine Patients
David Bernstein1, Matthew St. John1, and Addisu Mesfin1
1University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA
A146: PROMIS Pain Interference Natural Language: What Does Your PROMIS Pain Score Mean?
Jeremy Shaw1, Ross McEntarfer1, Natasha Greene1, Angela Presson1, Chong Zhang1, Brandon Lawrence1, William Ryan Spiker1, Nicholas Spina1, and Darrel Brodke1
1University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
A147: Trends in Opioid Usage 2 Years Following Thoracolumbar Spine Surgery
Mina Aziz1, Peter Jarzem1, Michael Johnson2, and Michael Weber1
1McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
2University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
1. Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality. 2016 National Survey on Drug Use and Health: Detailed Tables. Rockville, MD: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration; 2017.
2. Vowles KE, McEntee ML, Julnes PS, Frohe T, Ney JP, van der Goes DN. Rates of opioid misuse, abuse, and addiction in chronic pain: a systematic review and data synthesis. Pain. 2015;156:569-576. doi:10.1097/01.j.pain.0 000 460 357.01 998.f1
A148: Effect of Psychosocial Risk Factors on Global Treatment Outcome in Nonspecific Low Back Pain Patients Attending Group Physical Therapy
Julia Szita1, Aron Lazary1, Peter Pal Varga1, Katalin Feher1, and Ivan Lambertus1
1National Center for Spinal Disorders, Budapest, Hungary
OP 25: Deformity-Thoracolumbar (Adult) 2
A149: Comparison of 3 Lumbopelvic Fixation Techniques in Long Fusion to the Sacrum in Osteoporotic Adult Spinal Deformity Patients (>60 Years): Clinical and Radiological Outcomes
Selhan Karadereler1, Emel Kaya Aumann1, Sinan Kahraman1, Isik Karalok1, Cem Sever1, Yunus Emre Akman1, Tunay Sanli1, Meric Enercan1, and Azmi Hamzaoglu1
1Istanbul Spine Center, Istanbul, Turkey
Complication Rates of Lumbopelvic Fixation Techniques.
A150: The Fate of UIV, UIV+1 Compression Fractures After Long Level Spinal Fixation: What Should We Do? Observation Versus Revision surgery
Bang Sang Hahn1, Kyung Hyun Kim1, and Yong Eun Cho1
1Yonsei Medical College, Severance Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
A151: Decision Analysis in Quest of the Ideal Treatment in Adult Spinal Deformity Revisited: Is Surgery Still the Best at 2 Years and Adjusted MCID Values?
Emre Acaroglu1, Selcen Yuksel2, Sinan Bahadir3, Selim Ayhan1, Alba Vila-Casademunt4, Ibrahim Obeid5, Francesco Sanchez Perez-Grueso6; European Spine Study Group4
1Ankara Spine Center, Ankara, Turkey
2Yildirim Beyazit University, Ankara, Turkey
3Amasya University, Amasya, Turkey
4Hospital Universitari Vall d’Hebron, Barcelona, Spain
5 Bordeaux University Hospitals, Bordeaux, France
6 Hospital Universitari La Paz, Madrid, Spain
A152: Iliac Screws Versus S2 Alar-Iliac Screws for Pelvic Fixation, a Meta-Analysis
Yun-Lin Chen1, Wei-Hu Ma1, and Nan-Jian Xu1
1 Department of Spine Surgery, Ningbo, China
A153: Core Set of Outcome Measures for Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery: A Global Consensus-Based Approach
Sayf Faraj1, Miranda van Hooff2, Tsjitske Haanstra1, Anna Wright3, David Polly4, Steven Glassman5, and Marinus de Kleuver1
1Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
2Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, Netherlands
3Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, WA, USA
4University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
5 Norton Leatherman Spine Center, Louisville, KY, USA
1. Porter ME, Teisberg EO. Redefining Health Care: Creating Value-Based Competition On Results. 1st ed. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Review Press; 2006.
2. Porter ME. What is value in health care? N Engl J Med. 2010;363:2477-2481. doi:10.1056/NEJMp1011024
A154: Posterior Surgical Treatment for Moderate to Severe Thoracolumbar Focal Kyphosis: Minimum 3-Year Follow-up
Yan Zeng1, Zhongqiang Chen1, Xiaochen Qu1, Weishi Li1, and Chuiguo Sun1
1Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China
A155: Anterior Surgery with Hyperlordotic Cages Is Novel for Correction of Adult Spinal Deformity
M. Burhan Janjua1 and Vincent Arlet2
1UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
2Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Department of Neurosurgery, Philadelphia, PA, USA
A156: The Effect of Increased Age on Perioperative Outcomes in Adult Idiopathic Scoliosis
Nathan Lee1, James Lin1, Joseph Lombardi1, Alex Ha1, Griffin Baum1, Joseph Osorio1, Simon Morr1, Ronald Lehman1, and Lawrence Lenke1
1Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
A157: Mixing Metals in Adult Deformity Constructs
Sahitya Denduluri1, Jayme Kolstov1, Chason Ziino1, Nicole Segovia1, Craig McMains2, Jonathan Falakassa3, John Ratliff1, Ivan Cheng1, Todd Alamin1, Serena Hu1, and Kirkham Wood1
1Stanford Medical Center, Palo Alto, CA, USA
2Community Health Network, Indianapolis, IN, USA
3Southern California Orthopedic Institute, Van Nuys, CA, USA
OP26: Tumor 3
A158: Association Between Body Fat and Muscle Distribution and Overall Survival in Patients With Bone Metastases Receiving Radiotherapy Treatment: A Prospective Cohort Study
Bart Pielkenrood1, Paul van Urk2, Joanne van der Velden1, Nicolien Kasperts1, Joost Verhoeff1, Gijsbert Bol1, Helena Verkooijen2, and Jorrit-Jan Verlaan2
1University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
2Diakonessenhuis, Utrecht, Netherlands
A159: Developing Therapeutic Guidance for Potentially Unstable Spinal Metastases by Evaluating Health-Related Quality of Life Outcomes for Surgery and/or Radiotherapy
Anne Versteeg1, Arjun Sahgal2, Laurence Rhines3, Daniel Sciubba4, James Schuster5, Michael Weber6, Aron Lazary7, Stefano Boriani8, Chetan Bettegowda4, Michael Fehlings9, Michelle Clarke10, Paul Arnold11, Ziya Gokaslan12, and Charles Fisher13
1University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
2Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre and University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
3 The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
4 Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
5 Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
6 McGill University and Montreal General Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
7 National Center for Spinal Disorders and Buda Health Center, Budapest, Hungary
8 IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Milan, Italy
9 University of Toronto and Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
10Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
11The University of Kansas Hospital, Kansas City, KS, USA
12Brown University and Rhode Island Hospital and The Miriam Hospital, Providence, RI, USA
1 University of British Columbia and Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
A160: Cement Augmentation Procedures in Metastatic Spinal Disease: Is There Increased Dissemination of Tumor Cells Into the Circulatory System?
Moritz C. Deml1, Carlo R. Largiadèr2, Daniel Schärer2, Lorin M. Benneker1, Christoph E. Albers1, Sven Hoppe1, Sebastina F. Bigdon1, and Helena Milavec1
1Bern University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland
2Bern University, Bern, Switzerland
A161: Development and Validation of Clinical Prediction Models of Survival and Clinical Outcomes for Patients With Metastatic Epidural Spinal Disease: A Systematic Review
Anick Nater1, Jetan H. Badhiwala1, James Hong2, So Kato3, Melanie Anderson4, and Michael Fehlings1
1University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
2Toronto Western Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
3University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
4 University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
A162: Recalcification in Lytic Bone Metastases of the Spine After Radiotherapy
Bart Pielkenrood1, Thomas Visser2, Wouter Foppen1, Joanne van der Velden1, Wietse Eppinga1, Nicolien Kasperts1, Gijsbert Bol1, Helena Verkooijen1, and Jorrit-Jan Verlaan1
1University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
2Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
A163: A Phase I Trial on the Use of Photodynamic Therapy in Vertebral Metastases
Carl Fisher1, Zakariya Ali2, Arjun Sahgal2, Elizabeth David2, Edward Chow2, Cari Whyne2, Shane Burch3, Brian Wilson1, amd Albert Yee2
1Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
2Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
4University of California–San Francisco, CA, USA
A164: Delay Resulting From Additional Referrals in Patients Requiring Surgical Treatment for Spinal Metastases
Floris van Tol1, F. C. Oner1, and J. J. Verlaan1
1University Medical Center, Utrecht, Netherlands
A165: Chondrosarcoma of the Spine: A Single Tertiary Spinal Oncology Center Experience
Muaaz Tahir1, Mel Grainger1, Petr Rehouzek1, Simon Hughes1, Alistair Stirling1, Morgan Jones1, and Marcin Czyz1
1The Royal Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Trust, Birmingham, UK
A166: Update on Custom-Made 3D Printed Titanium Implants for Anterior Column Reconstruction Following En Bloc Resection for Spinal Tumors
Marco Girolami1, Giovanni Barbanti-Brodano1, Stefano Bandiera1, Riccardo Ghermandi1, Silvia Terzi1, Gisberto Evangelisti1, Giuseppe Tedesco1, Valerio Pipola1, and Alessandro Gasbarrini1
1IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy
OP27: Degenerative-Cervical 5
A167: Incidence of Fusion Procedure Following Single-Level Lumbar Decompression
Kevin Wiley1, Jiandang Zhang2, Blake Formanek1, Zheng Wang2, Zorica Buser1, and Jeffrey Wang1
1University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
2The General Hospital of PLA, Beijing, China
A168: Subsidence Rates After Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Systematic Review
Mohamed Macki1, Sharath Kumar Anand1, Paul Park2, and Victor Chang1
1Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI, USA
2University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
A169: Impact of Tobacco Smoking on Outcomes After Posterior Decompression Surgery in Patients With Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy
Narihito Nagoshi1, Hitoshi Kono2, Osahiko Tsuji3, Ryoma Aoyama4, Kanehiro Fujiyoshi5, Yuta Shiono6, Masayuki Ishikawa7, Kenshi Daimon8, Naobumi Hosogane9, Kota Watanabe1, Masaya Nakamura1, Morio Matsumoto1, Ken Ishii10, and Junichi Yamane1
1Keio University, Tokyo, Japan
2Keiyu Orthopaedic Hospital, Gunma, Japan
3Saitama Medical Center, Saitama, Japan
4Tokyo Dental College, Ichikawa General Hospital, Chiba, Japan
5Murayama Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan
6Nerima General Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
7International University of Health and Welfare (IUHW), Mita Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
8Ogikubo Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
9National Defense Medical College, Tokyo, Japan
10International University of Health and Welfare School of Medicine, Chiba, Japan
A170: Outcome Analysis of Single Open-Door Posterior Decompression With Instrumented In Situ Fusion for Cervical OPLL Patients of the K-Line (−)
Yawei Li1, Guohua Lv1, and Bing Wang1
1The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China
A171: Postoperative C5 Palsy Is Best Predicted by Use of Intraoperative C5 Laminectomy Among Patients Operated for Degenerative Cervical Myeloradiculopathy
Zach Pennington1, Daniel Lubelski1, Ali Ahmed1, Adam D’Sa1, Erick Westbroek1, Matthew Goodwin1, and Daniel Sciubba1
1Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
A172: Correlation Study Between Buttoning Sign and Severity in Patients With Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy
Torphong Bunmaprasert1 and Komkhem Kaewbaudee1
1Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand
A173: The Down Questionnaire: A Novel Screening Tool for Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy
Ifije Ohiorhenuan1, Kaku Barkoh2, Ray Hah1, and Ian Buchanan1
1University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
2Texas Orthopaedic and Sports Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
A174: Recede-Myelopathy: Regeneration in Cervical Degenerative Myelopathy—A Multicenter, Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo Controlled Trial Assessing the Efficacy of Ibudilast as an Adjuvant Treatment to Decompressive Surgery for Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy
Benjamin Davies1, Michael Fehlings2, Michelle Starkey1, Sukhvinder Kalsi-Ryan1, Mark Kotter1
1University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
2University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
A175: Preventing C5 Palsy After Cervical Decompression by Nerve Root Untethering and Intraforaminal Ligament Release
Andrew Jack1, Brooks Osburn1, Zane Tymchak1, Wyatt Ramey1, Robert Hart1, Rod Oskouian1, Jens Chapman1, and Shane Tubbs1
1Swedish Neuroscience Institute, Seattle, WA, USA
OP28: Basic Science
A176: Bioengineered Smart Human Neural Stem Cells to Degrade Scar and Enhance Regeneration in Chronic Spinal Cord Injury
Christopher Ahuja1, Mohamad Khazaei2, Zijian Lou2, Priscilla Chan3, Sohanthan Udayashankar2, Nayaab Punjani1, William Luong2, Suyue Lyu2, Jian Wang2, and Michael Fehlings1
1University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
2University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
A177: The Effects of Bone Morphogenetic Protein 2 (BMP-2) on Transplanted Bone Marrow Cell Survival and Proliferation in a Mouse Model of Spinal Fusion
Alexander Perdomo-Pantoja1, Wataru Ishida1, Maritza Taylor1, Colson Tomberlin1, L. Lo Sheng-Fu1, Timothy F. Witham1, and Christina Holmes2
1 Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
2Florida A&M University-Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, USA
1. El Baily I, Jiskoot W, Nejadnik MR. Formulation, delivery and stability of bone morphogenetic proteins for effective bone regeneration. Pharm Res. 2017;34:1152-1170.
A178: Self-Assembling KKQL6KK Peptide Biomaterial Optimizes Human Neural Stem Cell Treatment for Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury
Christopher Ahuja1, Mohamad Khazaei2, Yao Yao2, Zijian Lou2, Priscilla Chan1, Nayaab Punjani1, Sohanthan Udayashankar2, William Luong2, Suyue Lyu2, Jian Wang2, and Michael Fehlings1
1University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
2University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
A179: Cobb Measurement With a Conventional Convex Echography Probe: A Prospective, Randomized, and Triple-Blinded Study
Joan Ferràs-Tarragó1, Jorge Mario Morales Valencia1, Silvia Pérez-Vergara1, Pedro Rubio-Belmar1, Jose Luís Bas-Hermida1, Paloma Bas-Hermida1, and Teresa Bas-Hermida1
1 Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Valencia, Spain
A180: Transcriptome High-Throughput Sequencing and Bioinformatics Analysis of the Differentially Expressed Genes for Thoracic Ossification of Ligamentum Flavum Before and After Mechanical Stress
Shanglong Ning1, Jun Miao1, Xinlong Ma1, Zhongqiang Chen2, and Michael Janssen3
1Tianjin Hospital, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China
2Perking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China
3 Center for Spine and Orthopedics, Denver, CO, USA
A181: Preclinical Testing of Anti-Inflammatory Compounds Using a Whole Intervertebral Disc Organ Culture Model
Gernot Lang1, Zhen Li2, Yannik Gehlen1, Fabian Heizmann1, David Kubosch1, Norbert Südkamp1, Mauro Alini2, and Sibylle Grad2
1University Medical Center, Freiburg, Germany
2AO Research Institute Davos, Davos, Switzerland
A182: Combined Annulus Fibrosus Repair and Nucleus Pulposus Replacement in an In Vivo Ovine Study
Christoph Wipplinger1, Stephen R. Sloan2, Sertac Kirnaz1, Rodrigo Navarro-Ramirez1, Franziska A. Schmidt1, Antonella Schiavinato3, Lawrence J. Bonassar2, and Roger Härtl1
1Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
2Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA
3Fidia Farmaceutici S.p.A, Abano Terme, Padua, Italy
A183: A Novel, Biological Therapeutic (Ntg-101) for the Treatment Degenerative Disc Disease
Ajay Matta1, Muhammad Zia Karim1, Hoda Gerami1, Peter Jun2, Martha Funabashi2, Greg Kawchuk2, Alyssa Goldstein3, Warren Foltz3, Marshall Sussman4, Bjorn Eek5, and W Mark Erwin1,4
1Notogen Inc, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
2University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
3University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
4University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
5Private Practice, Long Beach, CA, USA
A184: Nose to Back: Compatibility of Nasal Chondrocytes With Environmental Conditions Mimicking a Degenerated Intervertebral Disc
Max Gay1, Arne Mehrkens1, Michael Rittmann1, Andrea Barbero1, Ivan Martin1, and Stefan Schaeren1
1University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
OP29: Deformity-Thoracolumbar (Adolescent) 3
A185: Back Pain and Outcomes of Pregnancy After Instrumented Spinal Fusion for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis
Pawel Grabala1, Tomasz Guszczyn1, and Ilkka Helenius2
1Medical University in Bialystok, Bialystok, Poland
2University of Turku and Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland
A186: Long-Term Follow-up of Gillet’s Technique in Lumbar Spondylolysis
Daniela Linhares1, Pedro Cacho Rodrigues2, Manuel Ribeiro da Silva1, Vitorino Veludo1, Rui Pinto1, and Nuno Neves1
1Centro Hospitalar São João, Porto, Portugal
2Hospital da Prelada, Porto, Portugal
A187: Outcome Analysis of Operative Hemivertebrae Correction at Children Depending on the Length of Instrumental Fixation
Egor Filatov1, Sergey Ryabykh1, and Dmitriy Savin1
1Ilizarov Center, Kurgan, Russian Federation
A188: The Influence of Cervical Spine Shape in Adolescence Idiopathic Scoliosis
Eduardo Moreira Pinto1, Artur Teixeira1, Jorge Alves2, and António Miranda2
1Entre Douro e Vouga Hospital Center, Santa Maria Feira, Portugal
2Tâmega e Sousa Hospital Center. AOSpine (Platinum Member), member of North American Spine Society (NASS) and Institut de la Colonne Vertébrale (ICV), Bordeaux, France; Member of the Board of SPOT (Portuguese Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology), Penafiel, Portugal
A189: Does the Implant Density Change the Correction Rate of the Main and Accompanying Minor or Major Structural and Nonstructural Curves? A Comparison Between Consecutive and Intermittent Pedicle Screw Constructs
Alpaslan Senkoylu1, Mehmet Cetinkaya1, Ismail Daldal2, Ali Eren3, and Erdem Aktas4
1Medical School of Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey
2Sakarya Training and Research Hospital, Sakarya, Turkey
3Gumushane Kelkit Government Hospital, Gumushane, Turkey
4TOBB University, Ankara, Turkey
A190: Predictors of Postoperative Pain and Satisfaction in Patients With Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis
Anastasios Charalampidis1, Hans Möller1, and Paul Gerdhem1
1Karolinska Institutet and Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
A191: The Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis International Disease Severity Study: Do Operative Curve Magnitude and Complications Vary by Country?
Courtney Toombs1, Baron Lonner2, Akil Fazal3, Oheneba Boachie-Adjei4, Tracey Bastrom5, Ferran Pellise6, Mohamed Ramadan7, Wael Koptan8, Yasser Qiu8, Feng Zhu9, Yong Qiu9, and Harry Shufflebarger10
1Yale New Haven Hospital, New Haven, CT USA
2Mount Sinai Beth Israel Hospital, New York, NY, USA
3Nairobi Spine and Orthopaedic Centre, Nairobi, Kenya
4FOCOS Orthopaedic Hospital, Accra, Ghana
5Rady Children’s Hospital, San Diego, CA, USA
6Hospital Vall d’Hebron, Barcelona, Spain
7Tanta University, Tanta, Egypt
8Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt
9Nanjing University Drum Tower Hospital, Nanjing, China
10Miami Children’s Hospital, Miami, FL, USA
A192: Changing Pelvic Anatomical Morphology During Adolescence: A Longitudinal Study
Hongda Bao1, Zhen Liu1, Xu Sun1, Jun Jiang1, Saihu Mao1, Bangping Qian1, Bin Wang1, Yang Yu1, Zezhang Zhu1, and Yong Qiu1
1Drum Town Hospital, Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing, China
A193: Liposomal Bupivacaine Use in Pediatric Spinal Deformity Surgery; A Controlled Cohort Study
Assem Sultan1, Morad Chughtai1, Reid Chambers1, Joel Kolmodin1, John Seif1, Thomas Kuivila1, Ryan Goodwin1, and Robert Tracy Ballock1
1Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
OP30: Tumor 4
A194: Current Treatment Strategy for Newly Diagnosed Chordoma of the Mobile Spine and Sacrum: Results of an International Survey
Nicolas Dea1, Charles Fisher1, Jeremy Reynolds2, Joseph Schwab3, Laurence D. Rhines4, Ziya Gokaslan5, Chetan Bettegowda6, Arjun Sahgal7, Aron Lazary8, Alessandro Luzzati9, Stefano Boriani10, Alessandro Gasbarini11, Ilya Laufer12, Raphaele Charest-Morin1, Feng Wei13, William Teixeira14, Niccole Germscheid15, Francis Hornicek16, Thomas DeLaney3, and John Shin3
1Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
2Oxford University Hospital, Oxford, UK
3Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
4The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
5The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University and Rhode Island Hospital and The Miriam Hospital, Providence, RI, USA
6Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
7University of Toronto and Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
8National Center for Spinal Disorders and Buda Health Center, Budapest, Hungary
9 Centro Di Chirurgia Oncologia Ortopedica e Ricostruttiva del Rachide (CCOORR), IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Milan, Italy
10GSpine4 Spine Surgery Division, IRCCS Galeazzi Orthopedic Institute, Milan, Italy
11Rizzoli Institute, Bologna, Italy
12Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
13Peking University Third Hospital, HaiDian District, Beijing, China
14Institute of Cancer of the State of São Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil
15AOSpine International, Davos, Switzerland
16University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
A195: Impact of Neurologic Deficits on Surgical Outcomes and HRQoL Following Treatment for Metastatic Epidural Spinal Cord Compression
Ori Barzilai1, Anne Versteeg2, Arjun Sahgal3, Laurence Rhines4, Daniel Sciubba5, James Schuster6, Michael Weber7, Peter Pal Varga8, Stefano Boriani9, Chetan Bettegowda5, Micahel Fehlings5, Michelle Clarke10, Paul Arnold11, Ziya Gokaslan12, Charles Fisher13, Ilya Laufer1; AOSpine Knowledge Forum Tumor
1Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
2Utrecht University Medical Center, Utrecht, the Netherlands
3 Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Center and University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
4The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
5Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
6Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
7McGill University and Montreal General Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
8National Center for Spinal Disorders and Buda Health Center, Budapest, Hungary
9GSpine4 Spine Surgery Division, IRCCS Galeazzi Orthopedic Institute, Milan, Italy
10Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
11The University of Kansas Hospital, Kansas City, KS, USA
12The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University and Rhode Island Hospital and The Miriam Hospital, Providence, RI, USA
13University of British Columbia and Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
A196: Development of Clinical Prognostic Models for Postoperative Survival and Quality of Life in Patients With Metastatic Epidural Spinal Cord Compression Treated Surgically
Anick Nater1, Junior Chuang1, Kuan Liu1, Nasir A. Quraishi2, Dritan Pasku2, Jefferson R. Wilson1, and Michael Fehlings1
1University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
2Queen’s Medical Centre, Nottingham University Hospital NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK
A197: Surgical Treatment of Spinal Metastases: Results of a Large Single-Center Study
Christoph Stihsen1, Bernhard Springer1, Philipp Funovics1, Josef Grohs1, Petra Krepler1, and Reinhard Windhager1
1Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
A198: Molecular Phenotypes, Topical Survival Times and Therapy Options in Spinal Metastatic Breast Cancer
Daniel Adler1 and Michael Akbar1
1Ruprecht-Karls-University Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
A199: A Comparison of Metastasectomy and Decompression With Additional Stereotactic Radiotherapy in Patients With Spinal Metastasis of Renal Cell Carcinoma
Nikita Zaborovskii1, Dmitrii Ptashnikov1, Dmitrii Mikhaylov1, Oleg Smekalenkov1, Sergei Masevnin1, and Anton Denisov1
1R. R. Vreden Russian Research Institute of Traumatology and Orthopedics, Saint-Petersburg, Russian Federation
A200: Zoledronate at Low Doses Maintains Its Antitumor Effect in Prostate Cancer–Induced Bone Metastasis Cells
Elie Akoury1, Pouyan Ahangar1, Antone Nour1, Derek Rosenzweig1, and Michael Weber1
1McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
A201: What Is the Role of Surgery for Spinal Metastasis of Lung Cancer? Propensity Score Matched Analysis With Radiotherapy Alone
Hyung-Youl Park1, Young-Hoon Kim1, Kee-Yong Ha1, Sang-Il Kim1, and Jun-Hyung Cho1
1Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
A202: Survival, Local Control, and Health-Related Quality of Life in Oligometastatic and Polymetastatic Spinal Tumors: A Multicenter, International Study
Ori Barzilai1, Anne Versteeg2, Arjun Sahgal3, Laurence Rhines4, Mark Bilsky1, Daniel Sciubba5, James Schuster6, Michael Weber7, Peter Pal Varga8, Stefano Boriani9, Chetan Bettegowda5, Micahel Fehlings10, Yoshiya Yamada1, Michelle Clarke11, Paul Arnold12, Ziya Gokaslan13, Charles Fisher14, Ilya Laufer1; the AO Spine Knowledge Forum Tumor
1Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
2Utrecht University Medical Center, Utrecht, the Netherlands
3Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Center and University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada
4The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
5Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
6Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
7McGill University and Montreal General Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
8National Center for Spinal Disorders and Buda Health Center, Budapest, Hungary
9IRCCS Galeazzi Orthopedic Institute, Milan, Italy
10University of Toronto and Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
11Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
12The University of Kansas Hospital, Kansas City, KS, United States
13The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University and Rhode Island Hospital and The Miriam Hospital, Providence, RI, USA
14University of British Columbia and Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
OP31: Infections 2
A203: Propionibacterium Acnes: Biofilm Is Present in Nucleus Material From Human Disc Herniations
Christof Birkenmaier1, Manu N. Capoor2, Filip Ruzicka3, Jonathan E. Schmitz4, Garth A. James5, Tana Machackova6, Radim Jancalek3, Martin Smrcka7, Radim Lipina8, Fahad S. Ahmed6, Todd F. Alamin9, Neel Anand10, John C. Baird6, Nitin Bhatia11, Sibel Demir-Deviren12, Robert K. Eastlack13, Steve Fisher5, Steven R. Garfin14, Jaspaul S. Gogia15, Ziya L. Gokaslan16, Kalvin C. Kuo17, Yu-Po Lee11, Konstantinos Mavrommatis18, Elleni Michu6, Hana Noskova6, Assaf Raz2, Jiri Sana6, A. Nick Shamie19, Philip S. Stewart5, Jerry L. Stonemetz20, Jeffrey C. Wang21, Timothy F. Witham20, Michael F. Coscia22, Vincent A. Fischetti2, and Ondrej Slaby6
1Ludwig-Maximilian-University Munich, Munich, Germany
2Rockefeller University, New York, NY, USA
3Masaryk University, St Anne’s Faculty Hospital, Brno, Czech Republic
4Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN, USA
5Montana State University, Bozeman, MT, USA
6Central European Institute of Technology (CEITEC), Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
7University Hospital Brno, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
8University Hospital Ostrava, Ostrava University, Ostrava, Czech Republic
9Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
10Cedars-Sinai Institute for Spinal Disorders, Los Angeles, CA, USA
11University of California Irvine, School of Medicine, Irvine, CA, USA
12UCSF Medical Center, San Francisco, CA, USA
13Scripps Clinic Division of Orthopedic Surgery, San Diego, CA, USA
14University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA
15Kaiser Permanente San Jose Medical Center, San Jose, CA, USA
16The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, RI, USA
17Kaiser Permanente Oakland Medical Center, Oakland, CA, USA
18Celgene Corporation, Information Knowledge and Utilization, San Francisco, CA, USA
19David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
20The Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA
21University Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
2224OrthoIndy Hospital, Indianapolis, IN, USA
A204: Improvement in Frankel Scale in Caries Spine Patients With Frankel Scale “A” Undergone Anterior Decompression and Cage With Autologous Bone Graft After a 5-Year Follow-up
Ammar Dogar1, Haseeb Hussain1, Amer Aziz1, Shahzad Javed1, and Rizwan Akram1
1Ghurki Trust Teaching Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan
A205: Is Gene Xpert Rifampicin Resistance Really That Expert in Detecting MDR? Drug Sensitivity/Resistance Patterns of Gene Xpert Positive Tuberculous Spondylodiscitis
Mihir Upadhyaya1
1Bombay Hospital & Research Centre, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
A206: Reducing Surgical Site Infection in Pediatric Scoliosis Surgery: A Multidisciplinary Improvement Program and Prospective 4-Year Audit
Geoffrey Tipper1, Jonathan Lucas1, Athar Siddiqui2, and Lillian Chiwera2
1Guy’s and St Thomas’ Hospital Trust, London, UK
2Guy’s Hospital, Great Maze Pond, UK
A207: Revision Spine Surgery in Patients Without Clinical Signs of Infection: How Often Are There Occult Infections in Removed Hardware?
Isador Lieberman1 and Xiaobang Hu1
1Texas Back Institute, Texas Health Presbyterian Hospital, Plano, TX, USA
A208: Canadian National Survey on Surgical Site Infection Prophylactic Strategies in Spine Surgery
Reina Yao1, Mark Xu2, Michael Goytan2, and John Street1
1University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
2University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
A209: Evidence of Bacterial Biofilm Initiation at the Screw-Bone Interface and the Method of Avoiding Such
Aakash Agarwal1, Jeffrey Wang2, Neel Anand3, Chris Karas4, Steve Garfin5, Boren Lin1, and Hossein Elgafy1
1University of Toledo, Toledo, OH, USA
2University of Southern California Spine Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
3Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
4OhioHealth, Columbus, OH, USA
5University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA
A210: Predicting and Preventing Post Tubercular Cervical Kyphosis in Pediatric and Adolescent Patients
Aashish Ghodke1, Ram Chaddha2, Agnivesh Tikoo2, Harshal Bamb1, and Sagar Kelkar1
1Robert Jones and Agnes Hunt Orthopaedic Hospital, Oswestry, Shropshire, UK
2Apollo Hospitals, Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
A211: The Impact of Surgical-Site Infection on Functional Recovery, Surgical Outcomes, and Quality of Life After Adult Posterior Thoracolumbar Spinal Surgery
Jennifer Urquhart1, Parham Rasoulinejad1, Lori Nutt1, Alyssa Fleming1, Linda Kuska1, Kevin Gurr1, Fawaz Siddiqi1, and Christopher Bailey1
1Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, The University of Western Ontario, Lawson Health Research Institute, and London Health Sciences Center, London, Ontario, Canada
OP32: Epidemiology
A212: Patterns of Neurological and Functional Recovery After Complete Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury: Evidence from Group Based Trajectory Modelling in the Nascis 3/Sygen/Nactn/Stascis Studies
Blessing Jaja1, Jetan Badhiwala2, Ralph Schar2, Shekar Kurpad3, Robert Grossman4, Bizhan Aarabi5, Maxwell Boakye6, James Harrop7, Fred Geisler8, Jefferson Wilson2, and Michael Fehlings,2 on behalf of the North American Clinical Trials Network Collaborators
1University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
2University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
3 Medical School of Wisconsin, Wauwatosa, WI, USA
4Weill Cornell Medical College, Houston, TX, USA
5University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
6University of Louisville Hospital, Louisville, KY, USA
7Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
8Independent Neurosurgeon, Chicago, IL, USA
A213: Congenital Lumbar Stenosis Prevalence: A New Population-Based Definition
Mauricio Campos1, Ismael Cañete1, Pablo Besa1, María Jesús Lira1, and Macarena Sepúlveda1
1Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile
A214: Radiographic Implications of the Surgical Waiting List for the Treatment of Spinal Deformity
Leonardo Yukio Jorge Asano1, Marina Rosa Filézio1, Vinicius Alves De Andrade1, Andre Evaristo Marcondes Cesar1, and Luciano Miller Reis Rodrigues1
1Faculdade de Medicina do ABC, Santo Andre, Brazil
A215: The Influence of Preoperative Opioid Use on Hospital Length of Stay and Patient Reported Outcomes Following Elective Spine Surgery
Jean-Christophe Murray1, Mayilee Canizares2, Jennifer D. Power2, Anthony V. Perruccio2, and Raja Rampersaud2, on behalf of CSRON Investigators
1University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
2Krembil Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
A216: Epidemiological Trends of Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy in the United States, 2002-2014: A National Population-Based Analysis
Jetan Badhiwala1, Farshad Nassiri1, Christopher Witiw1, Saleh Almenawer2, James Harrop3, Christopher Shaffrey4, Michael Fehlings1, and Jefferson Wilson1
1University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
2McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
3Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
4Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
A217: Ninety-Day Readmission Following Multilevel Anterior Cervical Fusion
Andrew Chung1, Nina Lara1, Nicolas Rubel1, Varun Arvind2, Michael Chang3, and Samuel Cho2
1Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ, USA
2Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
3Sonoran Spine Center, Phoenix, AZ, USA
A218: Using Machine Learning to Search Electronic Medical Records for Surgical Site Infections Following Orthopedic Surgery
Varun Arvind1, Brian Cho1, Aly Valliani1, Andrew Warburton1, Daniel Ranti1, Deepak Kaji1, Ivan Ye1, Ray Tang1, Zoe Cheung2, Jun Kim2, and Samuel Cho2
1Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
2Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY, USA
A219: Trajectories of Recovery in Motor Function After Incomplete Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury
Blessing N. R. Jaja1, Fan Jiang1, Jetan Badhiwala2, Ralph Schar2, Shekar Kurpad7, Robert Grossman5, James Harrop6, Fred Geisler8, Bizhan Aarabi3, Maxwell Boakye4, Michael G. Fehlings2, and Jefferson Wilson2, on behalf of the North American Clinical Trials Network Collaborators
1University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
2University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
3University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
4University of Louisville Hospital, Louisville, KY, USA
5Weill Cornell Medical College, Houston, TX, USA
6Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
7Medical School of Wisconsin, Wauwatosa, WI, USA
8Independent Neurosurgeon, Chicago, IL, USA
A220: Patients’ Expectations for Spine Surgery: What Are They, Are We Meeting Them, and Do They Correlate to One-Year Postoperative Satisfaction
Mayilee Canizares1, Andrew Glennie2, Kenneth Thomas3, Sean Christie2, Eugene Wai4, Charles Fisher5, Anthony V. Perruccio1, and Raja Rampersaud1, on behalf of CSRON Investigators
1Krembil Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
2QEII Health Sciences Centre, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
3Foothills Medical Centre, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
4Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
5Blusson Spinal Cord Centre, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
OP33: Deformity-Thoracolumbar (Adult) 3
A221: Costs and Utility of Postdischarge Acute Inpatient Rehabilitation Following Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery
Alekos Theologis1, Darryl Lau1, Adelyn Tsu1, Vedat Deviren1, and Christopher Ames1
1University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
A222: Preoperative Prediction of Cost and Catastrophic Cost (CC) in Adult Spine Deformity (ASD) Surgery: Feasibility Analysis of Predictive Analytics to Establish 90-Day Bundled Payments
Christopher P. Ames1, Miquel Serra-Burriel2, Justin S. Smith3, Jeffrey L. Gum4, Michael P. Kelly5, Ferran Pellisé6, Ahmet Alanay7, Emre R. Acaroglu8, Francisco Javier Sánchez Pérez-Grueso9, Frank Kleinstück10, Ibrahim Obeid11, Samrat Yeramaneni12, Richard Hostin13, Corinna Zygourakis14, Virginie Lafage15, Frank J. Schwab15, Christopher I. Shaffrey3, Douglas C. Burton16, Shay Bess17, European Spine Study Group ESSG18, International Spine Study Group ISSG15
1University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA< USA
2Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain
3University of Virginia Medical Center, Charlottesville, VA, USA
4Norton Leatherman Spine Center, Louisville, KY, USA
5Washington University at St Louis, St Louis, MO, USA
6Hospital Vall d’Hebron, Barcelona, Spain
7Acibadem University, Istanbul, Turkey
8Ankara ARTES Spine Center, Ankara, Turkey
9Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain
10Schulthess Klinik, Zurich, Switzerland
11Bordeaux University Hospital, Bordeaux, France
12Baylor Scott & White Health Research Institute, Dallas, TX, USA
13Baylor Scott and White, Plano, TX, USA
14Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA
15Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA
16University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA
17Presbyterian St. Luke’s/Rocky Mountain Hospital for Children, Denver, CO, USA
18Vall d’Hebron Institute of Research, Barcelona, Spain
A223: Framework for Developing an AOSpine Comprehensive Classification for Adult Spinal Deformity
J. Naresh Babu1, Miranda L. van Hooff2, Kenny Kwan3, Yabin Wu4, Kenneth Cheung3, Manabu Ito5, Jong-Beom Park6, David Polly7, and Marinus de Kleuver2
1Mallika Spine Centre, Guntur, Andhra Pradesh, India
2Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
3The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
4AOSpine International, Davos, Switzerland
5National Hospital Organization, Hokkaido Medical Center, Hokkaido, Japan
6Uijeongbu St Mary’s Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea College of Medicine, Uijeongbu, Republic of Korea
7University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
1. Pellisé F, Vila-Casademunt A, Ferrer M, et al; European Spine Study Group, ESSG. Impact on health related quality of life of adult spinal deformity (ASD) compared with other chronic conditions. Eur Spine J. 2015;24:3-11. doi:10.1007/s00586-014-3542-1
2. Schwab F, Dubey A, Gamez L, et al. Adult scoliosis: prevalence, SF-36, and nutritional parameters in an elderly volunteer population. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005;30:1082-1085.
3. Ames CP, Scheer JK, Lafage V, et al. Adult spinal deformity: epidemiology, health impact, evaluation, and management. Spine Deform. 2016;4:310-322. doi:10.1016/j.jspd.2015.12.009
4. Audigé L, Bhandari M, Hanson B, Kellam J. A concept for the validation of fracture classifications. J Orthop Trauma. 2005;19:401-406.
A224: The Intraoperative Neurological Monitoring for Corrective Surgery of Thoracolumbar Kyphosis: Results and Trouble Treatment
Yan Zeng1, Zhongqiang Chen1, and Yue Ma1
1Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China
OP34: Trauma-Cervical 3
A225: The Effect of Frailty on Patient Outcome After Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury
Daniel Banaszek1, Tom Inglis1, Travis Marion2, Eryck Moskven1, Carly Rivers3, Alana Flexman4, Tamir Ailon1, Nicolas Dea1, Raphaele Charest-Morin1, Marcel Dvorak1, Charles Fisher1, Brian Kwon1, Scott Paquette1, and John Street1
1Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
2Thunder Bay Health Sciences Center, Thunder Bay, Ontario,Canada
3Rick Hansen Institute, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
4Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
A226: The Effects of Glycemia in Survival and Neurological Recovery After Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury
Julio Furlan1, and Michael Bracken2
1Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network and University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
2Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA
Results of the Regression Analyses Adjusted for Neurological Scores at Admission, Age, Sex, Trial Drug protocol, Level of SCI, Glasgow Coma Score, and Serum Creatinine Concentration.

Survival analysis using Kaplan-Meier curve with log-rank test (P < .0001).
A227: Management of C2 Odontoid Peg Fragility Fractures: A UK-Wide Survey
Anna L. Watts1, and James Tomlinson1
1Sheffield Teaching Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK
A228: A Simple Surgical Technique for Easier Anterior Odontoid Screw Fixation
Sherif Elghamry1, Youssry Elhawary1, and Mohamed Khattab1
1Orthopedic and Spine, Cairo, Egypt
OP35: Degenerative-Lumbar 3
A229: Surgery for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis in Octogenarians: Is It Worth It?
Sultan Aldebeyan1, Ahmed Aoude1, Felipe E. Nares1, Gregory McIntosh1, Alex Soroceanu1, and Kenneth Thomas1
1University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
A230: Factors Associated With 12-Month Return to Work Following Surgery for Grade 1 Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis: An Analysis of the Quality Outcomes Database
Leslie C. Robinson1, Erica F. Bisson2, Mohamad Bydon3, Andrew K. Chan1, Panagiotis Kerezoudis3, Steven D. Glassman4, Kevin T. Foley5, Eric A. Potts6, Christopher I. Shaffrey7, Mark E. Shaffrey7, Domagoj Coric8, John J. Knightly9, Paul Park10, Michael Y. Wang11, Kai-Ming Fu12, Jonathan R. Slotkin13, Anthony L. Asher8, Michael S. Virk12, Mohammed A. Alvi3, Jian Guan2, Regis W. Haid14, and Praveen V. Mummaneni1
1University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
2University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
3Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
4Norton Leatherman Spine Center, Louisville, KY, USA
5University of Tennessee, Semmes-Murphey Neurologic and Spine Institute, Memphis, TN, USA
6Indiana University, Goodman Campbell Brain and Spine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
7University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA
8Carolinas Healthcare System and Carolina Neurosurgery & Spine Associates, Charlotte, NC, USA
9Atlantic Neurosurgical Specialists, Morristown, NJ, USA
10University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
11University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA
12Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
13Geisinger Health, Danville, PA, USA
14Atlanta Brain and Spine Care, Atlanta, GA, USA
A231: Are Modic Changes Related to Long-Term Pain and Disability? A Prospective Cohort Study With 13-Year Follow-up
Peter Udby1, Søren Ohrt-Nissen1, Michael Ruud Lassen1, Stig Brorson1, Mikkel Andersen2, and Leah Carreon2
1Zealand University Hospital, Køge, Denmark
2 Middelfart Hospital, Middelfart,Denmark
A232: Effects of Concomitant Decompression Adjacent to a Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion Segment on Clinical and Radiologic Outcomes: Comparative Analysis 5 Years After Surgery
Tomiya Matsumoto1, Shinya Okuda1, Yukitaka Nagamoto1, Yoshifumi Takahashi1, and Motoki Iwasaki1
1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery , Sakai, Japan
OP36: Imaging 1
A233: Do Radiologic Impressions of Cervical Stenosis on Computed Tomography Correlate With Measured Torg-Pavlov Ratios?
John Mangan1, James McKenzie1, David Casper1, Christopher Kepler Kepler1, and John Koerner2
1Thomas Jefferson University/Rothman Institute, Philadelphia, PA, USA
2New Jersey Spinal Medicine and Surgery, Maywood, NJ, USA
A234: Multiparametric Quantitative MRI to Measure Tissue Injury in the Spinal Cord: Development of a Diagnostic Model for Myelopathy via Supervised Machine Learning
Muhammad Ali Akbar1, Jetan Badhiwala1, Allan Martin1, Benjamin, De Leener2, Julien Cohen-Adad2, David Mikulis1, Adrian Carwley1, Sukhvinder Kalsi-Ryan1, and Jefferson Wilson1
1University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
2Polytechnique Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
A235: Do Culture Positive Cervical Discs Correlate With Radiographic Changes?
Charles Gordon1, Robert Morales1, Alysa Nash1, Jael Camacho1, Farooq Usmani1, Jonathan Hurst1, Sivacharan Gaddam1, Eugene Koh1, Kelley Banagan1, Daniel Gelb1, and Steven Ludwig1
1University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA
A236: The Role of MRI Nerve Root Sedimentation Sign in the Evaluation of Degenerative and Combined Lumbar Stenosis Surgical Treatment Results
Sergey Lyulin1 and Konstantin Dyachkov1
1Ilizarov Center of Ortopedie, Kurgan, Russian Federation
OP37: Deformity—Cervical
A237: The Characteristics and Management of Pain in Patients With Klippel-Feil Syndrome: Analysis of a Global Patient-Reported Registry
Kishan Patel1, Hardy Evans2, Enrico Tessitore3, Samuel Sommaruga3, Tariq Qureshi1, Luis Kolb1, Michael Fehlings4, Joseph Cheng2, and Aria Nouri2
1Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
2University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA
3University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
4University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
A238: Treatment of Mild Cervical Myelopathy: Factors Associated With Decision for Surgical Intervention?
Michael Bond1, Charles Fisher1, Jacobs Bradley2, Jefferson Wilson3, Christopher Bailey4, Sean Christie5, Raphael Charest-Morin1, Paquet Jerome6, Michael Johnson7, Andrew Nataraj8, David Cadotte2, Hamilton Hall9, Kenneth Thomas10, Raja Rampersaud9, and Nicolas Dea1
1Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
2Foothills Medical Centre, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
3St Michael’s Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
4Western University, Schulich School of Medicine, London, Ontario, Canada
5Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
6Université Laval, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
7University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
8University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
9University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
10University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
A239: Synthetic Osteoconductive Bone Substitute to Augment Occipitocerivcal Instrumentation in Children
Younus Hanif1, Dominic Thompson2, Steve Tucker2, and Mohammed Shahvaiz Younus2
1Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics , Stoke, UK
2Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, UK
A240: Demographics, Comorbidities, and Common Procedures in Children With Klippel-Feil Syndrome: Analysis of the Pediatric National Surgical Quality Improvement Program
Hardy Evans1, Kishan Patel2, Abhijith Matur1, Rafael De La Garza Ramos3, Jonathan Nakhla3, Reza Yassari3, Rani Nasser1, Charles Stevenson4, Francesco Mangano4, Aria Nouri1, and Joseph Cheng1
1University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA
2Yale College of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
3Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
4Cincinnati Children’s Hospital, Cincinnati, OH, USA
A241: Feasibility and Accuracy of Atlantoaxial Fluoroscopy-Guided Pedicle Screw Fixation in Patients Younger Than 12 Years: A Radiographic and Clinical Assessment
Yuehui Zhang1, Jia Song1, Jing Zhang1, and Jiang Shao1
1Xin Hua Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
A242: Retrospective Review of Craniovertebral Junction (CVJ) Anomalies: A Clinical Profile and Outcome Analysis of Surgically Treated Patients
Prakash Paudel1, Nilam Khadka2, Prakash Bista2, Gopal Raman Sharma1, and Deepak Shrestha3
1Nepal Mediciti, Kathmandu, Nepal
2National Academy of Medical Sciences, Kathmandu, Nepal
3Dhulikhel Hospital, Kathmandu, Nepal
A243: Outcomes of 3-Column Osteotomy in Cervicothoracic Spine(C7/T1) for Congenital Cervicothoracic Scoliokyphosis in Children: A Report Of 30 Cases in a Single Center
Shengru Wang1 and Jianguo Zhang1
1Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing, China
A244: Anterior Correction and Reconstruction for Severe Dystrophic Cervical Kyphotic Deformity
Yifei Gu1, and Wen Yuan1
1Shanghai Changzheng Hospital, Shanghai, China
A245: Releasing Anterior Soft Tissue and Reduction of the Irreducible Atlantoaxial Dislocation Associated With Basilar Invagination Through Single-Stage Posterior Approach
Zan Chen1 and Wanru Duan1
1Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
OP38: Novel Technologies 2
A246: Preliminary Results of the Impact of Telemonitoring on Postoperative Spine Surgery
Asdrubal Falavigna1, Frederico Arriaga Criscuoli de Farias1, Manuela Figueiró1, and Natália Fontana Nicoletti1
1University of Caxias do Sul, Caxias do Sul, Brazil
A247: Carbon Fiber Components in Spine Tumor Surgery: A Single Center Case Series
David Choi1
1National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, UK
A248: Utility of “Tip Protocol” in Complex Spine Surgery: An Effective, Simplified, and Reproducible Rescue Algorithm of Management When Intraoperative Neurophysiological Potentials Fall Down
Juan Pablo Cabrera Cousiño1, Francisco Luna A.1, Esteban Torche V.1, Sebastián Vigueras A.1, Maximo Torche V.1, Mario Condal M.1, Rudy García V.1, Luis Lastra R.1, Walter Rivas W.1, Roberto Vigueras A.1, and Guillermo Valdés I.1
1Hospital Clínico Regional de Concepción, Concepción, Chile
A249: Radiostereometric Analysis as a Diagnostic for Assessing Vertebral Fusion: A Phantom Study
Trevor Gascoyne1, Sara Parashin1, Michael Johnson2, and Mohammad Zarrabian2
1Orthopaedic Innovation Centre, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
2Division of Orthopedic Surgery, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
A250: Anterior Cervical Ossified Posterior Longitudinal Ligament En Bloc Resection: The Efficacy and Advantages of a Novel Surgical Technique for the Treatment of Cervical Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament With Myelopathy
Xiongsheng Chen1, Shengyuan Zhou1, Yin Zhao1, and Bo Yuan1
1Changzheng Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China
A251: Machine Learning Can Identify Postoperative Complications Following Cervical Spine Surgery Using Medical Notes
Varun Arvind1, Brian Cho1, Daniel Ranti1, Aly Valliani1, Andrew Warburton1, Deepak Kaji1, Ivan Ye1, Ray Tang1, Zoe Cheung2, Jun Kim2, and Samuel Cho2
1Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
2Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY, USA
A252: Use of Artificial Intelligence to Improve Surgical Referrals in Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Conditions
Nathan Xie1, Peter Wilson2, and Rajesh Reddy2
1University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
2Prince of Wales Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
A253: Clinical Results of a Single Magnetically Controlled Growing Rod (MCGR) With a Contralateral Gliding System and Apical Control for Early-Onset Scoliosis: 3-Year Follow-up
Sebastiaan P. J. Wijdicks1, Simon T. Skov2, René M. Castelein1, Haisheng Li2, Moyo C Kruyt1, and Cody Bünger2
1University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
2Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
A254: Double Team for Double Crush! Clinicoradiological Efficacy of “Single Staged Double Team” Surgical Decompression for Tandem Spinal Stenosis in Elderly Population (>65 years)
Zahirabbas Merchant1, Vishal Kundnani1, Rahul Prakash1, Ankit Patel1, Mihir Upadhyaya1, Neil Kire1, and Sanyam Jain1
1Bombay Hospital & Medical Research Center, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
OP39: Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery 3
A255: Retrospective Review of Immediate Restoration of Lordosis in Single-Level Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (MI-TLIF): A Comparison of Static and Expandable Interbody Cages
Sertac Kirnaz1, Philip Saville2, Avani Vaishnav2, Steven McAnany2, Rodrigo Navarro-Ramirez1, Christoph Wipplinger1, Franziska Schmidt1, Catherine Himo Gang2, Sheeraz Qureshi2, and Roger Härtl1
1Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
2Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA
A256: Risk Factors for Subsidence After Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Degenerative Lumbar Disorders
Vit Kotheeranurak1, Jun-Sung Kim2, Guang-Xun Lin2, and Akaworn Mahatthanatrakul3
1Queen Savang Vadhana Memorial Hospital, Sriracha, Chonburi, Thailand
2The Catholic University of Korea Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
3Naresuan University Hospital, Phisanulok, Thailand
A257: A Prospective Randomized Study Comparing Minimally Invasive TLIF With Navigation Versus Open TLIF for Isthmic Spondylolisthesis
Xiaofeng Lian1, Jianing Ding1, and Jianguang Xu1
1Shanghai Sixth People’s Hospital, Shanghai, China
A258: Comparative Study Between Endoscopic Interlaminar Laminectomy and Tubular Laminectomy in the Treatment of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
Angela Carrascosa Granada1, Ralf Wagner2, Willian Velazquez3, Andres Vargas1, and Anwar Saab Mazzei1
1Department of Neurosurgery, Madrid, Spain
2 Ligamenta Spine Center, Germany
3 Department of Neurosurgery, Salta, Argentina
1. Kamson S, Trescot AM, Sampson PD, Zhang Y. Full-endoscopic assisted lumbar decompressive surgery performed in an outpatient, ambulatory facility: report of 5 years of complications and risk factors. Pain Physician. 2017;20:E221-E231.
2. Polikandriotis JA, Hudak EM, Perry MW. Minimally invasive surgery through endoscopic laminotomy and foraminotomy for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis. J Orthop. 2013;10:13-16.
3. Skovrlj B, Gilligan J, Cutler HS, Qureshi SA. Minimally invasive procedures on the lumbar spine. World J Clin Cases. 2015;3:1-9.
4. Wada K, Sairyo K, Sakai T, Yasui N. Minimally invasive endoscopic bilateral decompression with a unilateral approach (endo-BiDUA) for elderly patients with lumbar spinal canal stenosis. Minim Invasive Neurosurg. 2010;53:65-68.
5. Komp M, Hahn P, Oezdemir S, et al. Bilateral spinal decompression of lumbar central stenosis with the full-endoscopic interlaminar versus microsurgical laminotomy technique: a prospective, randomized, controlled study. Pain Physician. 2015;18:61-70.
6. Yang B, Chen R, Xie P, Liu B, Dong J, Rong L. Microendoscopic decompression via unilateral approach for lumbar spinal stenosis [in Chinese]. Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2011;25:1158-1163.
7. Pao JL, Chen WC, Chen PQ. Clinical outcomes of microendoscopic decompressive laminotomy for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. Eur Spine J. 2009;18:672-678.
8. Celik SE, Celik S, Göksu K, Kara A, Ince I. Microdecompressive laminotomy with a 5-year follow-up period for severe lumbar spinal stenosis. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2010;23:229-235.
9. Costa F, Sassi M, Cardia A, et al. Degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: analysis of results in a series of 374 patients treated with unilateral laminotomy for bilateral microdecompression. J Neurosurg Spine. 2007;7:579-586.
10. Cavuşoğlu H, Kaya RA, Türkmenoglu ON, Tuncer C, Colak I, Aydin Y. Midterm outcome after unilateral approach for bilateral decompression of lumbar spinal stenosis: 5-year prospective study. Eur Spine J. 2007;16:2133-2142.
11. Alimi M, Hofstetter CP, Torres-Campa JM, et al. Unilateral tubular approach for bilateral laminotomy: effect on ipsilateral and contralateral buttock and leg pain. Eur Spine J. 2017;26:389-396.
12. Alimi M, Njoku I Jr, Cong GT, et al. Minimally invasive foraminotomy through tubular retractors via a contralateral approach in patients with unilateral radiculopathy. Neurosurgery. 2014;10(suppl 3):436-447.
A259: Ao Consensus On Nomenclature for Working Channel Endoscopic Spinal Procedures
Christoph Hofstetter1, Vit Kotheeranurak2, Saqib Hasan1, Roger Härt3, and Jin-Sung Kim2
1The University of Washington Seattle, Seattle, WA, USA
2The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
3Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
A260: A Mobile Outside-In Technique of Transforaminal Lumbar Endoscopy for Lumbar Disc Herniations
Hyeun-Sung Kim1, Ravindra Singh1, Sung Ho Choi2, Nitin Maruti Adsul3, Seong-Hoon Oh4, Il Tae Jang1, Sung Woon Oh1, and Jung Hoon Noh1
1Nanoori Gangnam Hopsital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
2Nanoori Suwon Hopsital, Suwon, Republic of Korea
3Sir Ganga Ram Hospital, New Delhi, India
4Nanoori Incheon Hopsital, Incheon, Republic of Korea
A261: Endoscopic Electrothermic Procedure of the Sacroiliac Joint (ESIJ): 24-Month Follow-up Studies
Richard Ibrahim1
1Schmerztherapiezentrum Riem, Munich, Germany
A262: Minimally Invasive Percutaneous Endoscopic Surgery Combined With Posterior Fixation in the Elderly With Spinal Tuberculosis
Nanjian Xu1 and Weihu Ma1
1Sixth Hospital of Ningbo, Ningbo, China
A263: Endoscopic Treatment for Thoracic Cord Compression Due to Ossification of Ligamentum Flavum
Yong-Sang Kim1
1Barun Hospital, Jinju-Si, Republic of Korea
OP40: Imaging 2
A264: The Relationship Between L5/S1 Disc Degeneration and Facet Joints: A Kinetic MRI Study
Ian Buchanan1, Haiyin Lee2, Ishan Shah1, Changqing Li2, Zorica Buser1, and Jeffrey Wang1
1University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
2Xinqiao Hospital, The Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, China
A265: Can Cervical Spine Lateral Radiograph Replace Whole-Spine Lateral Radiograph as an Evaluating Tool for Cervical Sagittal Alignment?
Dong-Ho Lee1, Dong Gyun Kim2, Chang ju Hwang1, Jaewoo Park1, and Sehan Park1
1Seoul Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea
2Bumin Hospital Haeundae, Busan, Republic of Korea
A266: Spinal CT to MR Image Synthesis Using Generative Adversarial Networks
In Ho Han1, Jung Hwan Lee1, Seongsu Joo2, Chung-Bin Jin3, and Hakil Kim3
1Pusan National University Hospital, Busan, Republic ofKorea
2Team Elysium Inc, Seoul, Republic of Korea
3Inha University, Incheon, Republic of Korea
A267: AOSpine Global Survey: Trends in Utilization of MRI for Spinal Trauma and Spinal Cord Injury Across AO Regions
Saman Shabani1, Ha Son Nguyen2, Mayank Kaushal1, Hesham Soliman1, Bizhan Aarabhi3, Mark Kotter4, Michael Fehlings5, Brian Kwon6, James Harrop7, and Shekar Kurpad1
1Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA
2California Institute of Neuroscience, Thousand Oaks, CA, USA
3University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
4University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
5University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
6University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
7Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
A268: Tridimensional Reconstruction Using Stereoradiography for Evaluating In-Brace Patients With Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (AIS): A Reproducibility Study
Haidara Almansour1, Wojciech Pepke1, and Michael Akbar1
1Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
A269: Machine Learning Automates Cobb Angle Measurements in Scoliosis
Brian Cho1, Deepak Kaji1, Aly Valliani1, Jun Kim1, Ivan Ye1, Ray Tang1, Amy Ahn1, Oscar Carrillo1, Varun Arvind1, Thomas Kroshus1, Andrew Warburton1, Daniel Ranti1, Zoe Cheung1, and Samuel Cho1
1Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York NY, USA
A270: Radiographic Evaluation of Minimally Invasive Instrumentation and Fusion for Treating Unstable Spinal Column Injuries
Daniel Cavanaugh1, Tristan Weir1, Farooq Usmani1, Jael Camacho1, Kim Joanna1, Mark Shasti1, Vishal Khatri1, Louis Bivona1, Eugene Koh1, Kelley Banagan1, Daniel Gelb1, and Steven Ludwig1
1University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA
A271: The Utility of Postoperative Radiographs Following Surgical Treatment of Traumatic Cervical Spine Injuries
Vishal Khatri1, Alysa Nash1, Noah Lessing2, Farooq Usmani1, Jael Camacho1, Eugene Koh1, Kelley Banagan1, Daniel Gelb1, and Steven Ludwig1
1University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA
2School of Medicine, University of Maryland, Balltimore, MD, USA
A272: Decreased Value of Highly Accurate Fractional Anisotropy by Using 3-Tesla Zoom Diffusion Tensor Imaging After Decompressive Surgery in Patients With Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: “Aligned Fibers Effect”
Motoyuki Iwasaki1 and Motoyuki Iwasaki1
1Otaru General Hospital, Otaru, Japan
OP41: Trauma
A273: Clinical and Radiological Outcomes of Conservative Treatment for Unilateral Sagitally Split Fractures of C1 Lateral Mass
Jong-Beom Park1 and Do-Gyun Kim1
1Uijeongbu St Mary’s Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Uijeongbu, Republic of Korea
A274: Analysis of Acute Secondary Adverse Events Following Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury And Its Relationship to Long-Term Neurological Recovery and Functional Outcomes
Fan Jiang1, Blessing Jaja1, Shekar Kurpad2, Jetan Badhiwala1, Bizhan Aarabi3, Robert Grossman4, James Harrop5, Jim Guest6, Ralph Schär7, Chris Shaffrey8, Max Boakye9, Elizabeth Toups4, Jefferson Wilson7, and Michael Fehlings1
1Toronto Western Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
2Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA
3University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD, USA
4Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, USA
5Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA
6University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA
7St Michael’s Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
8University of Virginia, Chalottesville, VA, USA
9University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA
A275: Reliability Analysis of the Aospine Crost (Clinician Reported Outcome Spine Trauma)
Said Sadiqi1, J. J. Verlaan1, Marcel W. Post2, A. Mechteld Lehr1, F. Cumhur Oner1; and AOSpine Knowledge Forum Trauma3
1University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
2Rehabilitation Center ‘De Hoogstraat’, Utrecht, Netherlands
3AO Foundation, Davos, Switzerland
A276: Pneumonia, Wound Infection, a nd Sepsis After Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury (SCI): The Relation to Long-Term Neurological and Functional Outcomes
Fan Jiang1, Blessing Jaja1, Jetan Badhiwala1, Ralph Schär2, Shekar Kurpad3, Robert Grossman4, James Harrop5, Jim Guest6, Elizabeth Toups4, Chris Shaffrey7, Bizhan Aarabi8, Max Boakye9, Michael Fehlings1, and Jefferson Wilson2
1Toronto Western Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
2St Michael’s Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
3Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA
4Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, USA
5Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA
6University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA
7University of Virginia, Chalottesville, VA< USA
8University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD, USA
9University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA
A277: Current Clinical Trials on Therapies for Individuals With Acute Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury: An Analysis on Their Generalizability
Julio Furlan1 and B. Catharine Craven1
1University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
A278: How to Approach L5? Treatment of Lumbal Plexus Injury After Pelvic Vertical Shear Fractures via Pararectus Approach: A Case Series
Sonja Haeckel1, Sven Hoppe1, Johannes Bastian1, Lorin Benneker1, and Keel Marius2
1Inselspital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
2Trauma Centre Hirslanden, Zurich, Switzerland
1. Blum L, Hake ME, Charles R, et al. Vertical shear pelvic injury: evaluation, management, and fixation strategies. Int Orthop. 2018;42:2663-2674. doi:10.1007/s00264-018-3883-1
2. Keel MJ, Ecker TM, Cullmann JL, et al. The pararectus approach for anterior intrapelvic management of acetabular fractures: an anatomical study and clinical evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2012;94:405-411.
A279: A 10-Year Analysis of Combined Sternal and Vertebral Injuries in a Level-1 Trauma Center
Dorine S. Klei1, F. Cumhur Öner1, Luke P. H. Leenen1, and Karlijn J. P. van Wessem1
1University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
A280: Assessing Stability of Cervical Spine Fractures Using Adjunctive Dynamic C-Spine X-Ray
Ruben Patrick Thumbadoo1, Jan Herzog1, Kenny Kwan2, Niv Bhamber1, Jason Bernard1, Timothy Bishop1, Kenneth Cheung2, and Darren Lui1
1St George’s Hospital, London, UK
2Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong SAR, China
A281: The First Results of the Functional Approach of Surgical Treatment of the Upper Cervical Spine Trauma
Takhir Tamaev1, Vadim Manukovskiy1, Konstantin Tulikov1, and Valeriy Serikov1
1Department of Neurosurgery Emergency Care Institute of Medicine, San, Russian Federation
OP 42: Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery 4
A282: Vascular Complications Associated With the Minimally Invasive Anterior to the Psoas (ATP) Approach for Lumbar Fusion
Chadi Tannoury1, Avilash Das2, Rahul Bhale2, Molly Vora2, Kathy Chen2, Giuseppe Orlando1, and Tony Tannoury1
1Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
2Boston University, Boston, MA, USA
1. Bateman DK, Millhouse PW, Shahi N, et al. Anterior lumbar spine surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of associated complications. Spine J. 2015;15:1118-1132.
2. Rajaraman V, Vingan R, Roth P, Heary RF, Conklin L, Jacobs GB. Visceral and vascular complications resulting from anterior lumbar interbody fusion. J Neurosurg. 1999;91(1 suppl):60-64.
3. Hijji FY, Narain AS, Bohl DD, et al. Lateral lumbar interbody fusion: a systematic review of complication rates. Spine J. 2017;17:1412-1419.
4. Phillips FM, Isaacs RE, Rodgers WB, et al. Adult degenerative scoliosis treated with XLIF: clinical and radiographical results of a prospective multicenter study with 24-month follow-up. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013;38:1853-1861.
5. Anand N, Baron EM, Khandehroo B, Kahwaty S. Long-term 2- to 5-year clinical and functional outcomes of minimally invasive surgery for adult scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013;38:1566-1575.
6. Woods K, Fonseca A, Miller LE. Two-year outcomes from a single surgeon’s learning curve experience of oblique lateral interbody fusion without intraoperative neuromonitoring. Cureus. 2017;9:e1980.
7. Woods KR, Billys JB, Hynes RA. Technical description of oblique lateral interbody fusion at L1-L5 (OLIF25) and at L5-S1 (OLIF51) and evaluation of complication and fusion rates. Spine J. 2017;17:545-553.
A283: Minimally Invasive Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Clinical Adjacent Segment Pathology: A Comparative Study with Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion
Hyung-Youl Park1, Young-Hoon Kim1, Kee-Yong Ha2, Sang-Il Kim2, and Jun-Hyung Cho2
1St. Mary’s Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
2Seoul, Republic of Korea
A284: Effect of Supplemental Fixation on Fusion Rates at One Year Following Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion
Timothy O’Connor1, Asham Khan1, Joshua Meyers1, Jeffrey Mullin1, and John Pollina1
1University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, United States
A285: Comparative Analysis Between Three Different Lumbar Decompression Techniques (Microscopic, Tubular, and Endoscopic) in Lumbar Canal and Lateral Recess Stenosis: Preliminary Report
Chul-Woo Lee1, Kang-Jun Yoon1, and Sang-Soo Ha1
1St Peter’s Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
A286: The Effectiveness of Percutaneous Endoscopic Stenosis Lumbar Decompression (PESLD) for Facet Joint Preservation in Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
Hyeun-Sung Kim1, Ravindra Singh1, Sung Woon Oh1, Jung Hoon Noh1, Seong-Hoon Oh2, Il Tae Jang1, and Nitin Maruti Adsul3
1Nanoori Hospital Gangnam, Seoul, Republic of Korea
2Nanoori Hospital Incheon, Incheon, Republic of Korea
3Sir Ganga Ram Hospital, New Delhi, India
A287: Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Minimum Six Years Follow-Up on a Consecutive Series of Patients Done in a Single-Center Setting
Josip Buric1, Renato Conti1, Massimiliano Pulidori1, and Ilaria Barni1
1Spine Surfgeryt, Forte dei Marmi, Italy
A288: Endoscopic Surgery and Dynamic Rehabilitation in Foraminal and Extra-Foraminal Disc Herniation: 888 Cases
Marjory Rué1 and Jean Destandau1
1Endoscopic Spine Center, Bordeaux, France
A289: Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Adjacent Segment Degeneration
Siamak Yasmeh1, James Bernatz2, Eli Garrard2, Miranda Bice2, and Seth Williams2
1Los Angeles, CA, USA
2University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA
A290: Hardware-Related Complications and Reoperation Rates Following Long Spinal Fusion to the Sacrum With Iliac Fixation in Patients Treated With Minimally Invasive Anterolateral Anterior to the Psoas (ATP) Approach and Posterior Percutaneous Screws
Tony Tannoury1, Giuseppe Orlando1, Avilash Das2, Rahul Bhale2, Kathy Chen2, Molly Vora2, and Chadi Tannoury1
1Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
2Boston University, Boston, MA, USA
OP43: Surgical Complications 2
A291: The Safety Profile of Intentional or Iatrogenic Sacrifice of the Artery of Adamkiewicz and Spinal Segmental Arteries in Its Vicinity: A Systematic Review
Terence Tan1, Joost Rutges2, Travis Marion3, Charles Fisher4, and Jin Tee1
1Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
2Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, Netherlands
3Big Thunder Orthopaedic Associates, Thunder Bay, Ontario, Canada
4University of British Columbia and Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
A292: Effect of Chewing Gum in Mild-Moderate Dysphagia After Anterior Cervical Fusion: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Guoyan Liang1 and Yunbing Chang1
1Guangdong General Hospital, Guangzhou, China
A293: The Relationship Between Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring Alert During Different Surgical Steps and Neurological Recovery: A Long-Term Follow-up Study
Yangliang Huang1, Yong Hu1, Martin Chan1, Yat-Wa Wong1, Kenneth M. C. Cheung1, and Kenny Kwan1
1The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China
A294: Wear and Corrosion in Cobalt Chrome and Titanium Implants in Scoliosis Correction: An In Vitro Analysis With Validation in Explanted Instrumentation
Oded Hershkovich1, Edward Bayley1, and Wai Weng Yoon1
1Queen’s Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK
1. Hedequist DJ. Instrumentation and fusion for congenital spine deformities. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009;34:1783-1790. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181ab62b3
2. Yeung KW, Wong KH. Biodegradable metallic materials for orthopaedic implantations: a review. Technol Health Care. 2012;20:345-362. doi:10.3233/THC-2012-0685
3. Fraker AC. Corrosion of metallic implants and prosthetic devices. In: Metals Handbook. Vol. 13, 9th ed. Metals Park, OH: ASM International; 1987:1324-1335.
4. Collier JP, Surprenant VA, Jesen RE, Mayor MB. Corrosion at the interface of cobalt-alloy heads on titanium-alloy stems. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1991;(271):305-312.
5. Crowninsheild RD, Maloney WJ, Wentz DH, Humphrey SM, Blanchard CR. Biomechanics of large femoral heads: what they do and don’t do. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;(429):102-107.
6. Smith TM, Berend KR, Lombardi AV Jr, Emerson RH Jr, Mallory TH. Metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty with large heads may prevent early dislocation. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005;441:137-142.
7. Langton DJ, Jameson SS, Joyce TJ, Webb J, Nargol AV. The effect of component size and orientation on the concentrations of metal ions after resurfacing arthroplasty of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008;90:1143-1151. doi:10.1302/0301-620X.90B9.20 785
8. Haddad FS, Thakrar RR, Hart AJ, et al. Metal-on-metal bearings: the evidence so far. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2011;93:572-579.
9. Panagiotidou A, Meswania J, Hua J, Muirhead-Allwood S, Hart A, Blunn G. Enhanced wear and corrosion in modular tapers in total hip replacement is associated with the contact area and surface topography. J Orthop Res. 2013;31:2032-2039. doi:10.1002/jor.22 461
10. Jacobs JJ, Gilbert JL, Urban RM. Corrosion of metal orthopaedic implants. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1998;80:268-282.
11. Kasai Y, Iida R, Uchida A. Metal concentrations in the serum and hair of patients with titanium alloy spinal implants. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003;28:1320-1326.
12. Kim YJ, Kassab F, Berven SH, et al. Serum levels of nickel and chromium after instrumented posterior spinal arthrodesis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005;30:923-926.
13. Cundy TP, Antoniou G, Sutherland LM, Freeman BJ, Cundy PJ. Serum titanium, niobium, and aluminum levels after instrumented spinal arthrodesis in children. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013;38:564-570. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182741961
14. Scharf B, Clement CC, Zolla V, et al. Molecular analysis of chromium and cobalt-related toxicity. Sci Rep. 2014;4:5729. doi:10.1038/srep05729
15. Serhan H, Slivka M, Albert T, Kwak SD. Is galvanic corrosion between titanium alloy and stainless steel spinal implants a clinical concern? Spine J. 2004;4:379-387.
16. Kawalec JS, Brown SA, Payer JH, Merritt K. Mixed-metal fretting corrosion of Ti6A14V and wrought cobalt alloy. J Biomed Mater Res. 1995;29:867-873.
17. Urban RM, Jacobs JJ, Tomlinson MJ, Gavrilovic J, Black J, Peoc’h M. Dissemination of wear particles to the liver, spleen and abdominal lymph nodes of patients with hip or knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;82:457-476.
18. Cook S, Asher M, Lai SM, Shobe J. Reoperation after primary instrumentation and fusion from idiopathic scoliosis. Toward defining late operative site pain of unknown cause. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000;25:436-438.
A295: Differences in Presentation and Revision Rates of Unilateral and Bilateral Rod Fractures in Long, Thoracolumbar Fusions for Adult Spinal Deformity
Thamrong Lertudomphonwanit1, Keith Bridwell2, Michael Kelly2, Prachya Punyarat3, Alekos Theologis4, Brenda Sides2, and Munish Gupta2
1Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
2Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO, USA
3Thammasat University, Pathumthani, Thailand
4University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
A296: Machine Learning Can Identify Postoperative Complications Following Posterior Spinal Fusion Using Medical Notes
Varun Arvind1, Brian Cho1, Deepak Kaji1, Ivan Ye1, Ray Tang1, Andrew Warburton1, Aly Valliani1, Daniel Ranti1, Zoe Cheung1, Jun Kim1, and Samuel Cho1
1Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United States
A297: The Complication Trends of Spinal Deformity Surgery in Japan: Research by the Japanese Scoliosis Society Morbidity & Mortality Committee
Ryo Sugawara1, Katsushi Takeshita1, and Hirokazu Inoue1
1Jichi Medical University, Tochigi, Japan
A298: Complications of Spine Surgery in “Super Obese” Patients
Gennadiy Katsevman1, Scott Daffner1, John France1, Sanford Emery1, Shari Cui1, and Cara Sedney1
1West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA
A299: The Efficacy and Safety of Early VTE Chemoprophylaxis Within 24 Hours of Surgical Intervention After Spinal Cord Injury
Don Young Park1, Seth Austin Ahlquist1, Howard Young Park1, and Nick Arya Shamie1
1UCLA Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
OP44: Novel Technologies 3
A300: 2-Year Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion Versus Conservative Management for Sacroiliac Joint Pain
Djaya Kools1, Julius Dengler2, Bengt Sturesson3, Robert Pflugmacher4, Domenico Prestamburgo5, and Alessandro Gasbarrini6
1OLV Hospital Aalst, Aalst, Belgium
2Charité Hospital, Berlin, Germany
3Ängelholm Hospital, Ängelholm, Sweden
4University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
5ASST Ovest Milanese, Ospedale di Legnano, Legnano, Italy
6Instituto Ortopedico Rizzoli di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
A301: Results From a Retrospective Study of a Posterior Dynamic Deformity Correction Device for the Treatment of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis
Yizhar Floman1, Ron El-Hawary2, Baron Lonner3, and Randal Betz1
1Department of Orthopaedics , Tel Aviv, Israel
2Department of Surgery, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
3Department of Orthopaedics, New York, NY, USA
A302: Live Machine Learning Centered Architecture System to Optimize Lumbar Stenosis Surgical Outcome
Ghaith Habboub1, Josh Johnston1, Rod Nault1, David Watson1, Sebastian Salas-Vega1, Mathew Grabowski1, Michael Steinmetz1, and Thomas Mroz1
1Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
1. Weinstein JN, Tosteson TD, Lurie JD, et al; SPORT Investigators. Surgical versus nonsurgical therapy for lumbar spinal stenosis. N Engl J Med. 2008;358:794-810.
2. Malmivaara A, Slätis P, Heliövaara M, et al; Finnish Lumbar Spinal Research Group. Surgical or nonoperative treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis? A randomized controlled trial. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007;32:1-8.
3. Amundsen T, Weber H, Nordal HJ, Magnaes B, Abdelnoor M, Lilleås F. Lumbar spinal stenosis: conservative or surgical management? A prospective 10-year study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000;25:1424-1436.
4. Zaina F, Tomkins-Lane C, Carragee E, Negrini S. Surgical versus non-surgical treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;(1):CD010264.
5. Chen T, Guestrin C. XGBoost: reliable large-scale tree boosting system. Paper presented at: The 22nd SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining; August 13-17, 2016; San Francisco, CA.
A303: Machine Learning (Ml) and Time Series Motion Classification: Is it Possible to Write Real-World, Single Sensor Algorithms to Detect the Activities of Daily Living Used Patient-Reported Outcome (PRO) Questionnaires?
Nicholas Benson1, Andrew Fields1, Arjun Siby Kurian1, Newton Metcalf1, Domagoj Coric2, Shane Burch3, and Steven Glassman4
1 Medtronic
2Carolina Neurosurgery & Spine Associates, Charlotte, NC, USA
3University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, USA
4Norton Leatherman Spine Center, Louisville, KY, USA
A304: Development of a Human Bone Metastases 3D Microenvironment Model
Antone Nour1, Elie Akoury1, Pouyan Ahangar1, Michael Weber1, and Derek Rosenzweig1
1McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
A305: Automated Performance Feedback System Using Artificial Intelligence in a Virtual Reality Hemilaminectomy Simulation
Nykan Mirchi1, Vincent Bissonnette1,2, Ghusn Alsideiri1,3, M. Recai Yilmaz1, Alexander Winkler-Schwartz1, Samaneh Siyar1,4, Hamed Azarnoush1,4, Nicole Ledwos1, Robin Sawaya1, Fahad E. AlOtaibi5, Abdulgadir Bugdadi1, Khalid Bajunaid6, Greg Berry2, Jean Ouellet2, Bekir Karlik1, and Rolando F. Del Maestro1
1Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
1,2Montreal General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
3Sultan Qaboos University Hospital, Muscat, Oman
4Amirkabir University of Technology (Tehran Polytechnic), Tehran, Iran
5King Fahad Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
6University of Jeddah, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
A306: A Dynamic Growth Friendly Technique Based on a Spring Distraction System (SDS) for Early Onset Scoliosis
Sebastiaan P. J. Wijdicks1, Justin V. C. Lemans1, René M. Castelein1, and Moyo C. Kruyt1
1University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
A307: Vertebral Body Stenting: Early Results With a New Technique for The Treatment of Vertebral Compression Fractures
Abdulrazzaq Alobaid1, Abdulaziz Al-Mutair2, Islam Elsayed2, and Tamer Ramadan1
1WARA Hospital, Kuwait
2Alrazi Hospital, Kuwait City, Kuwait
A308: Scan & Plan Strategy With BodyTom Portable CT Scanner and Renaissance Surgical Robot
Dmitry Dzukaev1, Anton Borzenkov1, Aleksander Pejker1, Vladimir Gulyy1, and Andrey Aksenov1
1Moscow Spine Center, Moscow, Russian Federation
OP45: Degenerative-Cervical 6
A309: Guiding the Expectations of Mortality in Octogenarians and Nonagenarians in Cervical Spinal Surgery Using the Charlson Comorbidity Index
Adeel Ikram1, Rajendranadh Bommireddy1, and Zdenek Klezl1
1University Hospital of Derby and Burton, Derby, UK
A310: Diagnostic Delays in Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy (DCM) Are Associated With Greater Disability and Represent a Health Inequality
Daniel Pope1, Benjamin Davies1, Oliver Mowforth1, and Mark Kotter1
1University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
A311: Using Machine Learning to Predict Surgical Outcomes in Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy
Omar Khan1, Jetan Badhiwala2, and Michael Fehlings2
1University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
A312: Herniated Discs at the Cervicothoracic Junction
Kyung-Hyun Kim1, Bang-Sang Hahn1, and Sung-Uk KUH1
1Yonsei University, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
A313: Analysis of the Results of Simultaneous Surgical Interventions in the Treatment of Patients With Tandem Stenosis of the Cervical and Lumbar Spine
Vadim Byvaltsev1, Andrei Kalinin1, Marat Aliev1, Ivan Stepanov1, Bakhyt Aglakov1, Bobur Yussupov1, and Valerii Shepelev1
1Irkutsk State Medical University, Irkutsk - Russian Federation
A314: Anterior Versus Posterior Cervical Decompression and Fusion in Patients With Multi-Level Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy
Jetan Badhiwala1, Yosef Ellenbogen2, Jamie Wilson1, Farshad Nassiri1, Christopher Witiw1, Saleh Almenawer2, Jefferson Wilson1, and Michael Fehlings1
1University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
2McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
OP46: Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery 5
A315: Radiographic Outcomes of Custom-Made Asymmetric Titanium Lordotic Cages in Minimally Invasive Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Adult Degenerative Scoliosis
A Denisov1, Dmitriy Mikhaylov1, Dmitriy Ptashnikov1, Nikita Zaborovsky1, Oleg Smekalenkov1, and Sergey Masevnin1
1RSRI n.a. Vreden R.R., Saint Petersburg, Russian Federation
A316: Minimally Invasive Antero-Lateral Extracavitary Corpectomy Approach For Thoracolumbar Spinal Diseases in a Colombian Hospital: Cases Series
Alberto Daza1, David Solano1, Jorge Torres1, William Riveros1, and Marco Garcia1
1Hospital Universitario Mayor, Bogota DC, Colombia
1. Uribe J, Dakwar E, Le T, Christian G, Serrano S, Smith W. Minimally invasive surgery treatment for thoracic spine tumor removal: a mini-open, lateral approach. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010;35(26 suppl):S347-S354.
2. Uribe JS, Dakwar E, Cardona RF, Vale FL. Minimally invasive lateral retropleural thoracolumbar approach: cadaveric feasibility study and report of 4 clinical cases. Neurosurgery. 2011;68(1 suppl operative):32-39.
3. Park MS, Deukmedjian AR, Uribe JS. Minimally invasive anterolateral corpectomy for spinal tumors. Neurosurg Clin N Am. 2014;25:317-325.
4. Payer M, Sottas C. Mini-open anterior approach for corpectomy in the thoracolumbar spine. Surg Neurol. 2008;69:25-32.
5. Ballard J, Carlson G, Chen J, White J. Anterior thoracolumbar spine exposure: critical review and analysis. Ann Vasc Surg. 2014;28:465-469.
6. Bateman D, Millhouse P, Shahi N, et al. Anterior lumbar spine surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of associated complications. Spine J. 2015;15:1118-1132.
7. D’Aliberti G, Talamonti G, Villa F, et al. Anterior approach to thoracic and lumbar spine lesions: results in 145 consecutive cases. J Neurosurg Spine. 2008;9:466-482.
8. Holland C, Bass D, Gary M, Howard B, Refai D. Thoracic lateral extracavitary corpectomy for anterior column reconstruction with expandable and static titanium cages: clinical outcomes and surgical considerations in a consecutive case series. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2015;129:37-43.
9. Quraishi NA, Konig M, Booker SJ, et al. Access related complications in anterior lumbar surgery performed by spinal surgeons. Eur Spine J. 2013;22(suppl 1):S16-S20.
10. Lubelski D, Abdullah KG, Steinmetz MP, et al. Lateral extracavitary, costotransversectomy, and transthoraric thoracotomy approaches to the thoracic spine review of techniques and complications. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2013;26:222-232.
11. Foreman PM, Naftel RP, Moore TA 2nd, Hadley MN. The lateral extracavitary approach to the thoracolumbar spine: a case series and systematic review. J Neurosurg Spine. 2015;24:570-579.
12. Khoo LT, Smith ZA, Asgarzadie F, et al. Minimally invasive extracavitary approach for thoracic disectomy and interbody fusion: 1-year clinical and radiographic outcomes in 13 patients compared with a cohort of traditional anterior transthoracic approaches. J Neurosurg Spine. 2011;14:250-260.
A317: Extra-Transversalis Approach of Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion
Hitoshi Hayase1, Takahisa Kaneko1, Tomohiro Murakami1, Hiroshi Nakagawa2, Manabu Sumiyoshi2, and Koji Saito2
1Kojinkai Social Medical Corporation, Hokkaido Ohno Memorial Hospital, Sapporo, Japan
2Kojinkai Social Medical Corporation, Kushiro Kojinkai Memorial Hospital, Kushiro, Japan
A318: Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Adjacent Segment Disease
Javier Quillo-Olvera1, and Jin-Sung Kim2
1Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery Center, Queretaro, Mexico
2Seoul St Mary’s Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
A319: Full-Endoscopic Approach for Removal of the Spontaneous Spinal Epidural Hematoma
Chien-Min Chen1
1Changhua Christian Hospital, Changhua, Taiwan, Province of China
A320: Comparison of Clinical Outome and Spinopelvic Parameters Modifications Between Minimally Invasive and Conventional Open Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Treatment of High-Grade L5-S1 Isthmic Spondylolisthesis
Massimo Miscusi1, Alessandro Ramieri2, Stefano Forcato3, Sokol Trungu3, Alessandro Pesce1, Pietro Familiari1, Giuseppe Costanzo2, and Antonino Raco1
1Sant’Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
2Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
3Cardinal Panico Hospital, Tricase, Italy
OP47: Deformity-Thoracolumbar (Adult) 4
A321: The Effect of Surgical Alignment on Dynamic Balance and Neuromuscular Activity in Adult Degenerative Scoliosis Patients Compared With Controls
Ram Haddas1 and Isador Lieberman1
1Texas Back Institute, Plano, TX, USA
A322: Impact of Lumbar Lordosis Correction on Cervical Sagittal Alignment in Adult Spinal Deformity: Is Postoperative Cervical Kyphosis Permanent?
Jung-Hee Lee1, Key-Young Lee1, Won-Ju Shin1, Sang-Kyu Im1, and Dong-Gune Chang2
1Kyung Hee University Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea
2Inje University, Sanggye Paik Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
A323: The L3l5 Segment in the Coronal (Anteroposterior) Plane Gives Information on Sagittal Balance: New Parameters, Based on Pathogenesis, of Adult Scoliosis Patients
Maximo-Alberto Diez-Ulloa1, Lucia Domingo-Rodriguez2, Alba Pereiros-Parada2, Maria 0tero-Fernandez1, Carlos Pernal-Duran1, Eva Diez-Sanchidrian2, and Blanca Otero-Torron2
1Hospitalary Universitary Complex of Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
2University of Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
A324: Functional Outcome 5 Years After Circumferential Fusion for Low-Grade Isthmic Spondylolisthesis (LGIS)
Philip Horsting1, Malou te Molder1, Marinus de Kleuver2, and Miranda van Hooff1
1Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, Netherlands
3Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
A325: Variation of MCID by Age, Gender, Baseline Scores, and Change of Direction
Sinan Bahadir1, Selcen Yüksel2, Selim Ayhan3, Alba Vila-Casademunt4, Ibrahim Obeid5, Francesco Sanchez Perez-Grueso6, Emre Acaroglu7; European Spine Study Group4
1Amasya University, Amasya, Turkey
2Yildirim Beyazit University, Ankara, Turkey
3ARTES Spine Center, Ankara, Turkey
4Hospital Universitari Vall d’Hebron, Barcelona, Spain
5Bordeaux University Hospital, Bordeaux, France
6Hospital Universitari La Paz, Madrid, Spain
7Ankara Spine Center, Ankara, Turkey
A326: Effect of Tobacco Smoking on Implant Failure Rate and Risk of Intraoperative Bleeding: Analysis Of 270 Patients From the Prospective, Multicenter Scoli-Risk-1 Study of Complex Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery
Jamie R. F. Wilson1, Fan Jiang1, Benny T. Dahl2, Justin Smith3, Kenneth M. C. Cheung4, Leah Y. Careeon5, Christopher I. Shaffrey6, Stephen Lewis1, Lawrence G. Lenke7, and Michael Fehlings1
1Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
2Texas Children’s Hospital, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
3University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA
4University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
5Norton Leatherman Spine Centre, Louisville, KY, USA
6Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
7The Spine Hospital, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
OP48: Novel Technologies 4
A327: Protective Effect of Stimulating EMG on Sacrum 2 Nerve Root in Selective Posterior Rhizotomy for Spastic Cerebral Palsy
Zhiming Cui1 and Guofeng Bao1
1The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Nantong, China
A328: Validity and Reliability Assessment of a Novel Laser-Guided Digital Goniometer
Saimurooban Muralidaran1, Peter Beshara2, Louise Nettleton2, Ashley Wilson-Smith1, Matthew Pelletier2, Tian Wang2, and William Robert Walsh2
1The University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
2Prince of Wales Hospital, Randwick, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
1. Cobian DG, Daehn NS, Anderson PA, Heiderscheit BC. Active cervical and lumbar range of motion during performance of activities of daily living in healthy young adults. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013;38:1754-1763.
2. Pile KD, Laurent MR, Salmond CE, Best MJ, Pyle EA, Moloney RO. Clinical assessment of ankylosing spondylitis: a study of observer variation in spinal measurements. Br J Rheumatol. 1991;30:29-34.
3. Nitschke JE, Nattrass CL, Disler PB, Chou MJ, Ooi KT. Reliability of the American Medical Association guides’ model for measuring spinal range of motion. Its implication for whole-person impairment rating. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1999;24:262-268.
A329: A Hybrid Technique for Severe Rigid Congenital Scoliosis: Posterior Osteotomy With Short Segmental Fusion and Dual Growing Rod Technique
Jianguo Zhang1 and Shengru Wang1
1Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing, China
A330: Therapeutic Feasibility of Full Endoscopic Deocmpression in One- to Three-Level Lumbar Canal Stenosis via a Single Skin Port Using a New Spinal Endoscopic System
KangTaek Lim1, Soo Beom Kim1, Hyung Suk Kim1, Jin Soo Park1, and Chun-Kun Park1
1 Good Doctor Teun Teun Hospital, Anyang, Korea
A331: Tele-Rehabilitation Program After Surgery for Uncomplicated Lumbar Discectomy: Randomized Control Trial Methodology
Uladzislau Ulasavets1, Ewelina Grzywna1, Jaroslaw Polak1, Pawel Adamkiewicz2, Katarzyna Jasinska1, Irena Roterman-Konieczna1, and Marek Moskala1
1Jagiellonian University Medical College, Kraków, Poland
2Polskie Centrum Rehabilitacji Funkcjonalnej Votum, Kraków, Poland
A332: A Novel Virtual Reality Simulator for Spinal Surgery Assessment
Nicole Ledwos1, Nykan Mirchi1, Vincent Bissonnette1, Anika Sawni1, Alexander Winkler-Schwartz1, M. Recai Yilmaz1, and Rolando Del Maestro1
1Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Quebce, Canada
OP49: Best Paper Session
A333: The Safety and Efficacy of Riluzole as a Neuroprotective Therapy in Patients Undergoing Surgery for Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: Results of the CSM-Protect Trial
Michael Fehlings1, Jetan Badhiwala1, Henry Ahn2, Francis Farhadi3, Christopher Shaffrey4, Ahmad Nassr5, Praveen Mummaneni6, Paul Arnold7, W. Bradley Jacobs8, K. Daniel Riew9, Michael Kelly10, Darrel Brodke11, Alexander Vaccaro12, Alan Hilibrand12, James Wilson13, James Harrop12, S. Tim Yoon14, Kee Kim15, Daryl Fourney16, Carlo Santaguida17, and Branko Kopjar18
1University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
2St Michael’s Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
3Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
4University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA
5Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
6University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
7Kansas University Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA
8University of Calgary Spine Program, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
9Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
10Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO, USA
11University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
12Thomas Jefferson University/Rothman Institute, Philadelphia, PA, USA
13Louisiana State University, New Orleans, LA, USA
14Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
15UC Davis Spine Center, Sacramento, CA, USA
16University of Saskatchewan Royal University Hospital, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada
17McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
18University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
A334: Burnout and Quality of Life Among Spine Surgeons: Results of a Worldwide Survey
Alisson R. Teles1, Fahad Abduljabbar2, Jean A. Ouellet1, Catherine E. Ferland1, Chung C. Wong3, Giuseppe Barbagallo4, Darrel Brodke5, Abdulaziz Al-Mutair6, and Asdrubal Falavigna7
1McGill Scoliosis and Spine Group, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
2King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
3Sarawak General Hospital, Jalan Tun Ahmad Zaidi Adruce, Kuching, Malaysia
4Policlinico “G. Rodolico” University Hospital, Catania, Italy
5University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
6Alrazi Hospital, Ministry of Health/Kuwait Institute for Medical Specialization, Adailiya, Kuwait
7Universidade de Caxias do Sul, Caxias do Sul, Brazil
A335: The Trans-Sap Approach: A Novel Technique for Endoscopic Decompression
Saqib Hasan1, Brie White-Dzuro1, Ralf Wagner2, and Christoph Hofstetter1
1The University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
2Ligamenta Wirbelsäulenzentrum, Frankfurt, Germany

Graphs depicting clinical outcomes following endoscopic decompression via the trans-SAP (superior articular process) approach. (A) Reduction of the visual analog score for ipsilateral leg pain are recorded; (B) patients experience alleviation of their disability as measured by the Oswestry Disability Index.
A336: Predictors of Functional Recovery in Traumatic Central Cord Syndrome
Hetshree Joshi1, Jetan Badhiwala1, Jefferson Wilson2, Robert Grossman3, Bizhan Aarabi4, Michael Bracken5, and Michael Fehlings1
1Toronto Western Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
2St Michael’s Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
3Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, USA
4University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD, USA
5 Yale Center for Perinatal, Pediatric and Environmental Epidemiology, New Haven, CT, USA
We would like to acknowledge the Fehlings Lab, University of Toronto, University Health Network, and the Neurosurgery Research and Education Foundation.
1. Brooks NP. Central cord syndrome. Neurosurg Clin N Am. 2017;28:41-47.
2. Jin W, Sun X, Shen K, et al. Recurrent neurological deterioration after conservative treatment for acute traumatic central cord syndrome without bony injury: seventeen operative case reports. J Neurotrauma. 2017;34:3051-3057.
3. Lenehan B, Fisher CG, Vaccaro A, Fehlings M, Aarabi B, Dvorak MF. The urgency of surgical decompression in acute central cord injuries with spondylosis and without instability. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010;35(21 suppl):S180-S186.
4. Molliqaj G, Payer M, Schaller K, Tessitore E. Acute traumatic central cord syndrome: a comprehensive review. Neurochirurgie. 2014;60:5-11.
5. Anderson KK, Tetreault L, Shamji MF, et al. Optimal timing of surgical decompression for acute traumatic central cord syndrome: a systematic review of the literature. Neurosurgery. 2015;77(suppl 4):S15-S32.
A337: Characteristics of Upper Limb Impairment Related to Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: Development of a Sensitive Hand Assessment (GRASSP Version Myelopathy)
Sukhvinder Kalsi-Ryan1, Eric Massicotte2, Allan Martin2, and Michael Fehlings2
1University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
2Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
A338: The Fate of High Pelvic Tilt With Good Alignment (False Type 2) in Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery Fused to the Sacrum
Thamrong Lertudomphonwanit1, Alekos Theologis2, Munish Gupta3, Lawrence Lenke4, Keith Bridwell3, and Michael Kelly3
1Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
2University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
3Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO, USA
4Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
