Within the fifth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5), some diagnoses are now associated with a severity gradient based on the number of diagnostic criteria satisfied. Reasons for questioning the validity of this approach include the implicit assumptions of equal criterion severity and strict additivity of criteria combinations. To assess the implications of heterogeneity of criterion configurations on severity grading, we examined the association between all observed combinations of DSM-5 alcohol use disorder criteria endorsement, at each level of number of criteria endorsed, and multiple validity measures among 22,177 past-year drinkers from Wave 2 of the National Epidemiological Survey on Alcoholism and Related Conditions (NESARC). Substantial variability of implied severity across criteria combinations was observed at each level of endorsement, with nontrivial overlap in implied severity across criterion counts. Findings suggest severity indices are at best imprecise, and potentially misleading. These problems are likely inherent in traditional polythetic approaches to diagnosis and almost certainly applicable to other disorders. Approaches for improving severity grading are proposed.
American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
2.
ApgarV. (1953). A proposal for a new method of evaluation of the newborn. Current Research in Anaesthesia and Analgesia, 32, 260–267.
3.
BalsisS.GleasonM. E.WoodsC. M.OltmannsT. F. (2007). An item response theory analysis of DSM-IV personality disorder criteria across younger and older age groups. Psychology and Aging, 22, 171–185.
4.
BollenK.LennoxR. (1991). Conventional wisdom on measurement: A structural equation perspective. Psychological Bulletin, 110, 305–314.
5.
BurnsL.TeessonM. (2002). Alcohol use disorders comorbid with anxiety, depression and drug use disorders: Findings from the Australian National Survey of Mental Health and Well Being. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 68, 299–307.
6.
CaseyM.AdamsonG.ShevlinM.McKinneyA. (2012). The role of craving in AUDs: Dimensionality and differential functioning in the DSM-5. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 125, 75–80.
7.
CherpitelC. J.BorgesG.YeY.BondJ.CremonteM.MoskalewiczJ.SwiatkiewiczG. (2010). Performance of a craving criterion in DSM alcohol use disorders. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 71, 674–684.
8.
ChungT.MartinC. S. (2005). Classification and short-term course of DSM-IV cannabis, hallucinogen, cocaine, and opioid disorders in clinical adolescents. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 73, 995–1004.
9.
ComptonW. M.DawsonD. A.GoldsteinR. B.GrantB. F. (2013). Crosswalk between DSM-IV dependence and DSM-5 substance use disorders for opioids, cannabis, cocaine and alcohol. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 132, 387–390.
10.
CooperL. D.BalsisS. (2009). When less is more: How fewer diagnostic criteria can indicate greater severity. Psychological Assessment, 21, 285–293.
11.
DawsonD. A.GoldsteinR. B.GrantB. F. (2013). Differences in the profiles of DSM-IV and DSM-5 alcohol use disorders: Implications for clinicians. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 37, E305–E313.
12.
DawsonD. A.GrantB. F. (2010). Should symptom frequency be factored into scalar measures of alcohol use disorder severity?Addiction, 105, 1568–1579.
13.
DawsonD. A.GrantB. F.StinsonF. S.ZhouY. (2005). Effectiveness of the derived Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT-C) in screening for alcohol use disorders and risk drinking in the U.S. general population. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 29, 844–854.
14.
DawsonD. A.SahaT. D.GrantB. F. (2010). A multidimensional assessment of the validity and utility of alcohol use disorder severity as determined by item response theory models. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 107, 31–38.
15.
Galatzer-LevyI. R.BryantR. A. (2013). 636,120 ways to have posttraumatic stress disorder. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8, 651–662.
16.
GilderD. A.GizerI. R.EhlersC. L. (2011). Item response theory analysis of binge drinking and its relationship to lifetime alcohol use disorder symptom severity in an American Indian community sample. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 35, 984–995.
17.
GrantB. F.DawsonD. A.StinsonF. S.ChouP. S.KayW.PickeringR. (2003). The Alcohol Use Disorder and Associated Disabilities Interview Schedule–IV (AUDADIS-IV): Reliability of alcohol consumption, tobacco use, family history of depression and psychiatric diagnostic modules in a general population sample. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 71, 7–16.
18.
GrantB. F.KaplanK. D. (2005). Source and accuracy statement: Wave 2 National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions (NESARC). Rockville, MD: National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism.
19.
GrantB. F.MooreT. C.KaplanK. D. (2003). Source and accuracy statement: Wave 1 National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions (NESARC). Bethesda, MD: National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism.
20.
GrantB. F.StinsonF. S.DawsonD. A.ChouS. P.DufourM. C.ComptonW.. . . KaplanK. (2006). Prevalence and co-occurrence of substance use disorders and independent mood and anxiety disorders. Alcohol Research & Health, 29, 107–120.
21.
GrantB. F.StinsonF. S.DawsonD. A.ChouP. S.RuanW. J. (2005). Co-occurrence of DSM–IV personality disorders in the United States: Results from the National Epidemiologic Study on Alcohol and Related Conditions. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 46, 1–5.
22.
HasinD. S.FentonM. C.BeselerC.ParkJ. Y.WallM. M. (2012). Analyses related to the development of DSM-5 criteria for substance use related disorders: 2. Proposed DSM-5 criteria for alcohol, cannabis, cocaine and heroin disorders in 663 substance abuse patients. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 122, 28–37.
23.
HasinD. S.O’BrienC. P.AuriacombeM.BorgesG.BuckolzK.BudneyA.. . . GrantB. F. (2013). DSM-5 criteria for substance use disorders: Recommendations and rationale. American Journal of Psychiatry, 170, 834–851.
24.
HurlbutS. C.SherK. J. (1992). Assessing alcohol problems in college students. Journal of American College Health, 41, 49–58.
25.
JuddC. M.McClellandG. H.RyanC. S. (2011). Data analysis: A model comparison approach. New York, NY: Routledge.
26.
KahlerC. W.StrongD. R. (2006). A Rasch model analysis of DSM-IV alcohol abuse and dependence items in the National Epidemiological Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 30, 1165–1175.
27.
KesslerR. C.BerglundP.DemlerO.JinR.MerikangasK. R.WaltersE. E. (2005). Lifetime prevalence and age-of-onset distributions of DSM-IV disorders in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication. Archives of General Psychiatry, 62, 593–602.
28.
KeyesK. M.KruegerR. F.GrantB. F.HasinD. S. (2011). Alcohol craving and the dimensionality of alcohol disorders. Psychological Medicine, 41, 629–640.
29.
KruegerR. F.NicholP. E.HicksB. M.MarkonK. E.PatrickC. J.McGueM. (2004). Using latent trait modeling to conceptualize an alcohol problems continuum. Psychological Assessment, 16, 107–119.
30.
LangenbucherJ. W.LabouvieE.MartinC. S.SanjuanP. M.BavlyL.KirisciL.ChungT. (2004). An application of item response theory analysis to alcohol, cannabis, and cocaine criteria in DSM-IV. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 113, 72–80.
31.
LangenbucherJ. W.MartinC. S.HasinD. S.HelzerJ. E. (1996). Alcohol abuse: Adding content to category. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 20, 270A–275A.
32.
LangenbucherJ.MartinC. S.LabouvieE.SanjuanP. M.BavlyL.PollockN. K. (2000). Toward the DSM-5: The withdrawal-gate model versus the DSM-IV in the diagnosis of alcohol abuse and dependence. Journal of Counseling and Clinical Psychology, 68, 799–809.
33.
LindenW. J.HambletonR. K. (1997). Handbook of modern item response theory. New York, NY: Springer.
34.
MartinC. S.ChungT.KirisciL.LangenbucherJ. W. (2006). Item response theory analysis of diagnostic criteria for alcohol and cannabis use disorders in adolescents: Implications for DSM-IV. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 115, 807–814.
35.
MartinC. S.ChungT.LangenbucherJ. W. (2008). How should we revise the diagnostic criteria for substance use disorders in DSM-V?Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 117, 561–575.
36.
MartinC. S.LangenbucherJ. W.ChungT.SherK. J. (in press). Truth or consequences in the diagnosis of substance use disorders. Addiction.
37.
MartinC. S.SteinleyD. L.VergesA.SherK. J. (2011). Letter to the editor: The proposed 2/11 symptom algorithm for DSM-5 substance-use disorders is too lenient. Psychological Medicine, 41, 2008–2010.
38.
McCutcheonV. V.AgrawalA.HeathA. C.EdenbergH. J.HesselbrockV. M.SchuckitM. A.. . . BucholzK. K. (2011). Functioning of alcohol use disorder criteria among men and women with arrests for driving under the influence of alcohol. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 35, 1985–1993.
39.
MewtonL.SladeT.McBrideO.GroveR.TeessonM. (2011). An evaluation of the proposed DSM-5 alcohol use disorder criteria using Australian national data. Addiction, 106, 941–950.
40.
MewtonL.TeessonM.SladeT.CottlerL. (2011). Psychometric performance of DSM-IV alcohol use disorders in young adulthood: Evidence from an Australian general population sample. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 72, 811–822.
41.
MuthénL. K.MuthénB. O. (2010). Mplus: Statistical analysis with latent variables: User’s guide. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
42.
National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism. (1995). The physicians’ guide to helping patients with alcohol problems (NIH Pub. No. 95-3769). Rockville, MD: Department of Health and Human Services.
43.
O’NeillS.SherK. J. (2000). Physiological alcohol dependence symptoms in early adulthood: A longitudinal perspective. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 8, 493–508.
44.
PollockN. K.MartinC. S. (1999). Diagnostic orphans: Adolescents with alcohol symptoms but no DSM–IV diagnosis. American Journal of Psychiatry, 156, 897–901.
45.
RegierD. A.FarmerM. E.RaeD. S.LockeB. Z.KeithS. J.JuddL. L.GoodwinF. K. (1990). Comorbidity of mental disorders with alcohol and other drug use: Results from the Epidemiologic Catchment Area (ECA) study. Journal of the American Medical Association, 264, 2511–2518.
46.
ReiseS. P.WallerN. G. (2009). Item response theory and clinical measurement. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 5, 27–48.
47.
SahaT. D.ChouS. P.GrantB. F. (2006). Toward an alcohol use disorder continuum using item response theory: Results from the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions. Psychological Medicine, 36, 931–941.
48.
SahaT. D.StinsonF. S.GrantB. F. (2007). The role of alcohol consumption in future classifications of alcohol use disorders. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 89, 82–92.
49.
TeasdaleG.JennettB. (1974). Assessment of coma and impaired consciousness: A practical scale. Lancet, 304, 81–84.
50.
UebelackerL. A.StrongD.WeinstockL. M.MillerI. W. (2009). Use of item response theory to understand differential functioning of DSM-IV major depression symptoms by race, ethnicity and gender. Psychological Medicine, 39, 591–601.
51.
WakefieldJ. C.SchmitzM. F. (2014). How many people have alcohol use disorders? Using the harmful dysfunction analysis to reconcile prevalence estimates in two community surveys. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 5, 10.
52.
WareJ. E.KosinskiM.Turner-BowkerD. M.GandekB. (2002). How to score version 2 of the SF-12 Health Survey (with supplement documenting version 1). Lincoln, RI: QualityMetric Incorporated.
53.
WidigerT. A.TrullT. J. (2007). Plate tectonics in the classification of personality disorder: Shifting to a dimensional model. American Psychologist, 62, 71–83.
54.
World Health Organization. (1992). The ICD-10 classification of mental and behavioural disorders: Clinical descriptions and diagnostic guidelines (Vol. 1). Geneva, Switzerland: Author.
55.
World Health Organization. (1997). Composite International Diagnostic Interview—version 2.0. Geneva, Switzerland: Author.
56.
World Health Organization. (2011). Global status report on alcohol and health. Geneva, Switzerland: Author.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
