Forming novel friendships is an important aspect of emerging adulthood, yet little is known about how emerging adults identify potential friends in contexts where behavioral information is limited. We propose that emerging adults use value congruence to guide friendship formation when observable behavioral cues are constrained. Using an experimental approach across two studies, we investigated whether friendship interest in an unfamiliar individual was dependent on value congruence. In Study 1 (N = 322 university students; Mage = 20.70, SD = 1.62; 50% female), we evaluated value-expressive self-descriptions of peers, while in Study 2 (N = 451 university students; Mage = 19.88, SD = 1.64; 52% female), we examined friendship interest in the context of meeting someone online for the first time. Across both studies, we found associations between value congruence and friendship interest for conservation, openness, and self-transcendence values, but not for self-enhancement values. Additionally, we found that vignettes expressing openness and self-transcendence values generated higher friendship interest overall compared to those expressing self-enhancement values. Study 2 also revealed evidence for value incongruence effects, with participants reporting lower friendship interest when exposed to opposing values. These findings suggest that value (in)congruence plays a meaningful role in friendship formation among emerging adults, particularly when observable behavioral information is limited, with effects being most pronounced for values emphasizing the contrast between novelty-seeking and self-restraint.
AmitA.Oppenheim‐WellerS.KarmelY. (2025). The role of perceived self‐transcendence values in forming functional relationships with professionals. British Journal of Social Psychology, 64(3), Article e12897. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12897
2.
ArnettJ. J. (2000). Emerging adulthood. A theory of development from the late teens through the twenties. American Psychologist, 55(5), 469–480.
3.
ArnettJ. J. (2015). The Oxford handbook of emerging adulthood. Oxford University Press.
4.
BahnsA. J. (2025). Examining the frequency and characteristics of politically diverse friendships. Social Psychological and Personality Science. (online first). https://doi.org/10.1177/19485506251349880
5.
BallantyneR.HughesK.LeeJ.PackerJ.SneddonJ. (2018). Visitors’ values and environmental learning outcomes at wildlife attractions: Implications for interpretive practice. Tourism Management, 64, 190–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2017.07.015
6.
BelentschikowV.PfeffelK.MüllerN. H. (2022). Making friends on Facebook: Common group membership as a central decision rule. Computers in Human Behavior, 126, Article 107040. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.107040
BoerD.FischerR.StrackM.BondM. H.LoE.LamJ. (2011). How shared preferences in music create bonds between people: Values as the missing link. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37(9), 1159–1171. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167211407521
9.
BranjeS.Laninga-WijnenL.YuR.MeeusW. (2014). Associations among school and friendship identity in adolescence and romantic relationships and work in emerging adulthood. Emerging Adulthood, 2(1), 6–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167696813515851
10.
ByrneD. (1997). An overview (and underview) of research and theory within the attraction paradigm. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 14(3), 417–431. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407597143008
11.
CapraraG. V.AlessandriG.EisenbergN. (2012). Prosociality: The contribution of traits, values, and self-efficacy beliefs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(6), 1289–1303. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025626
12.
CemalcilarZ.BaruhL.KezerM.KamilogluR. G.NigdeliB. (2018). Role of personality traits in first impressions: An investigation of actual and perceived personality similarity effects on interpersonal attraction across communication modalities. Journal of Research in Personality, 76, 139–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2018.07.009
13.
ChodenK.BagchiK. K.UdoG. J.KirsP. J. (2019). The influence of individual values on internet use: A multinational study. International Journal of Information Management, 46, 198–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2018.12.010
14.
CoombsR. H. (1966). Value consensus and partner satisfaction among dating couples. Journal of Marriage and Family, 28(2), 166–173. https://doi.org/10.2307/349275
15.
DuckS. W.CraigG. (1975). Effects of type of information upon interpersonal attraction. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 3(2), 157–164. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.1975.3.2.157
16.
DuckS. W.CraigG. (1978). Personality similarity and the development of friendship: A longitudinal study. British Journal of Social & Clinical Psychology, 17(3), 237–242. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8260.1978.tb00272.x
17.
EastwickP. W.FinkelE. J.SimpsonJ. A. (2019). Best practices for testing the predictive validity of ideal partner preference-matching. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 45(2), 167–181. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167218780689
18.
FehrB.HarasymchukC. (2019). Friendships: Close relationships throughout the life course. In D. Schoebi & B. Campos (Eds.), New directions in the psychology of close relationships (pp. 62–79). Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351136266-5
19.
GandulliaL.LezziE.ParciasepeP.SiriL. (2021). Altruism and structure of values: An experimental investigation. Journal of Interdisciplinary Economics, 33(1), 103–129. https://doi.org/10.1177/0260107919897219
HanelP. H. P.MaioG. R.SoaresA. K. S.VioneK. C.de Holanda CoelhoG. L.GouveiaV. V.PatilA. C.KambleS. V.MansteadA. S. R. (2018). Cross-cultural differences and similarities in human value instantiation. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 849. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00849
22.
HawthorneG. (2006). Measuring social isolation in older adults: Development and initial validation of the friendship scale. Social Indicators Research, 77(3), 521–548. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-005-7746-y
23.
HitlinS. (2003). Values as the core of personal identity: Drawing links between two theories of self. Social Psychology Quarterly, 66(2), 118–137. https://doi.org/10.2307/1519843
24.
HoodM.CreedP. A.MillsB. J. (2018). Loneliness and online friendships in emerging adults. Personality and Individual Differences, 133, 96–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.03.045
25.
HuangS. A.LedgerwoodA.EastwickP. W. (2020). How do ideal friend preferences and interaction context affect friendship formation? Evidence for a Domain- general relationship initiation process. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 11(2), 226–235. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550619845925
26.
JinE.EastinM. S. (2022). Birds of a feather flock together: Matched personality effects of product recommendation chatbots and users. Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing, 17(3), 416–433. https://doi.org/10.1108/JRIM-03-2022-0089
KoepkeS.DenissenJ. J. A. (2012). Dynamics of identity development and separation–individuation in parent–child relationships during adolescence and emerging adulthood – A conceptual integration. Developmental Review, 32(1), 67–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2012.01.001
29.
LakeJ.SneddonJ.BardiA.LeeJ. (2024). How far into the future can values predict behavior? It depends on value importance. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 16(5), 19485506241233646. https://doi.org/10.1177/19485506241233646
30.
Laninga-WijnenL.VeenstraR. (2021). Peer similarity in adolescent social networks: Types of selection and influence, and factors contributing to openness to peer influence. In Reference module in biomedical sciences. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-818872-9.00047-9
31.
LaursenB. (2017). Making and keeping friends: The importance of being similar. Child Development Perspectives, 11(4), 282–289. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12246
32.
LeeC. Y. S.GoldsteinS. E. (2016). Loneliness, stress, and social support in young adulthood: Does the source of support matter?Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 45(3), 568–580. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-015-0395-9
33.
LeeJ. A.BardiA.GerransP.SneddonJ.van HerkH.EversU.SchwartzS. (2022). Are value–behavior relations stronger than previously thought? It depends on value importance. European Journal of Personality, 36(2), 133–148. https://doi.org/10.1177/08902070211002965
34.
LeeJ. A.SneddonJ. N.DalyT. M.SchwartzS. H.SoutarG. N.LouviereJ. J. (2019). Testing and extending schwartz refined value theory using a best–worst scaling approach. Assessment, 26(2), 166–180. https://doi.org/10.1177/10731911166837
35.
LeikasS.IlmarinenV.-J.VerkasaloM.VartiainenH.-L.LönnqvistJ.-E. (2018). Relationship satisfaction and similarity of personality traits, personal values, and attitudes. Personality and Individual Differences, 123, 191–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.11.024
36.
LouviereJ. J.FlynnT. N.MarleyA. A. J. (2015). Best-worst scaling: Theory, methods and applications. Cambridge University Press.
37.
ManagoA. M.VaughnL. (2015). Social media, friendship, and happiness in the millennial generation. In DemirM. (Ed.), Friendship and happiness (pp. 187–206). Springer.
38.
McPhersonM.Smith-LovinL.CookJ. M. (2001). Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27(1), 415–444. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.27.1.415
39.
Padilla-WalkerL. M.Memmott-ElisonM. K.NelsonL. J. (2017). Positive relationships as an indicator of flourishing during emerging adulthood. In Flourishing in emerging adulthood: Positive development during the third decade of life (pp. 212–236). Oxford University Press.
40.
RighettiF.LuchiesL. B.van GilsS.SlotterE. B.WitcherB.KumashiroM. (2015). The prosocial versus proself power holder: How power influences sacrifice in romantic relationships. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41(6), 779–790. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167215579054
41.
SagivL.RoccasS. (2021). How do values affect behavior? Let me count the ways. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 25(4), 295–316. https://doi.org/10.1177/10888683211015975
42.
SagivL.SchwartzS. H. (1995). Value priorities and readiness for out-group social contact. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(3), 437–448. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.69.3.437
43.
SchaeferD. R.Van WoerdenI.HruschkaD.BrueningM. (2021). Finding and keeping friends in college and their influence on alcohol use: A network analysis. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 82(1), 121–131. https://doi.org/10.15288/jsad.2021.82.121
44.
SchwabaT.LuhmannM.DenissenJ. J. A.ChungJ. M.BleidornW. (2018). Openness to experience and culture-openness transactions across the lifespan. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 115(1), 118–136. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000150
45.
SchwartzS. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 25, 1–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60281-6
SchwartzS. H. (2017). The refined theory of basic values. In Values and behavior: Taking a cross cultural perspective (pp. 51–72). Springer International Publishing.
48.
SchwartzS. H.CieciuchJ. (2022). Measuring the refined theory of individual values in 49 cultural groups: Psychometrics of the revised portrait value questionnaire. Assessment, 29(5), 1005–1019. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191121998760
49.
SelfhoutM.BurkW.BranjeS.DenissenJ.Van AkenM.MeeusW. (2010). Emerging late adolescent friendship networks and Big Five personality traits: A social network approach. Journal of Personality, 78(2), 509–538. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2010.00625.x
SolomonS.KnafoA. (2007). Value similarity in adolescent friendships. In Focus on adolescent behavior research (pp. 133–155). Nova Science Publishers.
52.
UrbergK. A.DegirmenciogluS. M.TolsonJ. M. (1998). Adolescent friendship selection and termination: The role of similarity. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 15(5), 703–710. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407598155008
53.
VecchioneM.AlessandriG.BarbaranelliC.CapraraG. (2011). Higher‐order factors of the big five and basic values: Empirical and theoretical relations. British Journal of Psychology, 102(3), 478–498. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8295.2010.02006.x
54.
WoodD.CrapnellT.LauL.BennettA.LotsteinD.FerrisM.KuoA. (2018). Emerging adulthood as a critical stage in the life course. In HalfonN.ForrestC. B.LernerR. M.FaustmanE. M. (Eds.), Handbook of life course health development (pp. 123–143). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47143-3_7
55.
WrzusC.HänelM.WagnerJ.NeyerF. J. (2013). Social network changes and life events across the life span: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 139(1), 53–80. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028601
56.
YangC.-C.BrownB. (2016). Online self-presentation on Facebook and self development during the college transition. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 45(2), 402–416. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-015-0385-y
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
