Building upon two complimentary theoretical frameworks related to group relations (i.e., Intergroup Contact Theory and Peer Exposure), we examined how emerging adults’ friendships with men and women were related to their hostile sexism, benevolent sexism, and sexual objectification attitudes. Participants were 212 college students (Mage = 20.20 years, SD = 2.08; 62% female; 58% White) from a large southwestern university. Results provided support for Intergroup Contact Theory and for a Peer Exposure effect, but only for men. Specifically, for men, having female friends was negatively associated with hostile sexism, and having male friends was positively related to hostile sexism; neither friendship type related to benevolent sexism. For women, no significant relations between friends and attitudes were found; this is likely due to the assessed attitudes being about women (their own group). The findings suggest a promising pathway to mitigate gender-based prejudice for men through cross-gender friendships.
AbramsD.VikiG. T.MasserB.BohnerG. (2003). Perceptions of stranger and acquaintance rape: The role of benevolent and hostile sexism in victim blame and rape proclivity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(1), 111–125. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.84.1.111
2.
AikenL. S.WestS. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Sage Publications.
3.
AllisonP. D. (1999). Multiple regression: A primer. Pine Forge Press.
4.
AllportG. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Addison-Wesley.
5.
ArnettJ. (2015). Emerging Adulthood: The winding road from the late teens through the twenties (2nd Edition). The Oxford University Press.
6.
ArnettJ. J. (2000). Emerging adulthood: A theory of development from the late teens through the twenties. American Psychologist, 55(5), 469–480. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.5.469
AubreyJ. S. (2006). Exposure to sexually objectifying media and body self-perceptions among college women: An examination of the selective exposure hypothesis and the role of moderating variables. Sex Roles, 55(3–4), 159–172. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-006-9070-7
BarretoM.EllemersN. (2005). The burden of benevolent sexism: How it contributes to the maintenance of gender inequalities. European Journal of Social Psychology, 35(5), 633–642. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.270
11.
BarretoM.EllemersN.PiebingaL.MoyaM. (2010). How nice of us and how dumb of me: The effect of exposure to benevolent sexism on women’s task and relational self-descriptions. Sex Roles, 62(7–8), 532–544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-009-9699-0
12.
BarryC. M.MadsenS. D.DeGraceA. (2016). Growing up with a little help from their friends in emerging adulthood. In ArnettJ. J.ArnettJ. J. (Eds), The Oxford handbook of emerging adulthood (pp. 215–229). Oxford University Press.
13.
BealF. M. (1970). Double jeopardy: To be Black and female. In CadeT. (Ed), The Black woman: An anthology (pp. 90–100). Signet.
14.
BeckerG. S. (2010). The economics of discrimination. University of Chicago press.
15.
BeckerJ. C.WagnerU. (2009). Doing gender differently—the interplay of strength of gender identification and content of gender identity in predicting women's endorsement of sexist beliefs. European Journal of Social Psychology, 39(4), 487–508. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.551
16.
BeganyJ. J.MilburnM. A. (2002). Psychological predictors of sexual harassment: Authoritarianism, hostile sexism, and rape myths. Psychology of Men and Masculinity, 3(2), 119–126. https://doi.org/10.1037/1524-9220.3.2.119
17.
BendixenM.KennairL. E. O. (2017). When less is more: Psychometric properties of Norwegian short-forms of the ambivalent sexism scales (ASI and AMI) and the Illinois rape myth acceptance (IRMA) scale. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 58(6), 541–550. https://doi.org/10.1111/sjop.12392
18.
BiglerR. S.TomasettoC.McKenneyS. (2019). Sexualization and youth: Concepts, theories, and models. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 43(6), 530–540. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025419870611
19.
BinderJ.ZagefkaH.BrownR.FunkeF.KesslerT.MummendeyA.MaquilA.DemoulinS.LeyensJ.-P., et (2009). Does contact reduce prejudice or does prejudice reduce contact? A longitudinal test of the contact hypothesis among majority and minority groups in three European countries. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(4), 843–856. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013470
20.
BoxerP.GuerraN. G.HuesmannL. R.MoralesJ. (2005). Proximal peer-level effects of a small-group selected prevention on aggression in elementary school children: An investigation of the peer contagion hypothesis. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 33(3), 325–338. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-005-3568-2
21.
BrechwaldW. A.PrinsteinM. J. (2011). Beyond homophily: A decade of advances in understanding peer influence processes. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 12(1), 166–179. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-7795.2010.00721.x
22.
BrownC. S.BiefeldS. D.ElpersN. (2020). A bioecological theory of sexual harassment of girls: Research synthesis and proposed model. Review of General Psychology, 24(4), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/1089268020954363
23.
BrownJ. D.L'EngleK. L. (2009). X-rated: Sexual attitudes and behaviors associated with US early adolescents' exposure to sexually explicit media. Communication Research, 36(1), 129–151. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650208326465
24.
BuchananN. T.WestC. M. (2010). Sexual harassment in the lives of women of color. In LandrineH.RussoN. F. (Eds), Handbook of diversity in feminist psychology (pp. 449–476). Springer Publishing Company.
CantorD.FisherB.ChibnallS. H.TownsendR.LeeH.ThomasG.WestatInc. (2015). Report on the AAU campus climate survey on sexual assault and sexual misconduct.
27.
CokerA. L.BushH. M.BrancatoC. J.HuangZ.ClearE. R.FollingstadD. R. (2020). Longer term impact of bystander training to reduce violence acceptance and sexism. Journal of School Violence, 19(4), 525–538. https://doi.org/10.1080/15388220.2020.1760108
28.
CoppM.KleinmanS. (2008). Practicing what we teach: Feminist strategies for teaching about sexism. Feminist Teacher, 18(2), 101–124. https://doi.org/10.1353/ftr.2008.0007
29.
CrenshawK. (2013). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics (pp. 23–51) Feminist legal theories.
30.
CurranP. J.WestS. G.FinchJ. F. (1996). The robustness of test statistics to nonnormality and specification error in confirmatory factor analysis. Psychological Methods, 1, 16–29. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989x.1.1.16
31.
DardenneB.DumontM.BollierT. (2007). Insidious dangers of benevolent sexism: Consequences for women’s performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93(5), 764–779. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.93.5.764
32.
DaviesM.GilstonJ.RogersP. (2012). Examining the relationship between male rape myth acceptance, female rape myth acceptance, victim blame, homophobia, gender roles, and ambivalent sexism. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 27(14), 2807–2823. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260512438281
33.
DhontK.Van HielA.De BolleM.RoetsA. (2012). Longitudinal intergroup contact effects on prejudice using self- and observer-reports. British Journal of Social Psychology, 51(2), 221–238. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.2011.02039.x
34.
DishionT. J.SpracklenK. M.AndrewsD. W.PattersonG. R. (1996). Deviancy training in male adolescents’ friendships. Behavior Therapy, 27(3), 373–390. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0005-7894(96)80023-2
DuranM.MoyaM.MegiasJ. L.VikiG. T. (2010). Social perception of rape victims in dating and married relationships: The role of perpetrator's benevolent sexism. Sex Roles, 62(7-8), 505–519. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-009-9676-7
37.
FabesR. A.HanishL. D.MartinC. L.MossA.ReesingA. (2012). The effects of young children’s affiliations with prosocial peers on subsequent emotionality in peer interactions. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 30(4), 569–585. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-835X.2011.02073
38.
FairchildK.RudmanL. A. (2008). Everyday stranger harassment and women’s objectification. Social Justice Research, 21(3), 338–357. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-008-0073-0
39.
FieldsA. M.SwanS.KloosB. (2010). What it means to be a woman:” Ambivalent sexism in female college students’ experiences and attitudes. Sex Roles, 62(7), 554–567. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-009-9674-9
FitzC. C.ZuckerA. N. (2015). Everyday exposure to benevolent sexism and condom use among college womenRegression diagnostics. (55, pp. 245–262). Sage. https://doi.org/10.1080/03630242.2014.996721Fox,J
42.
FoxJ. (1991). Regression diagnostics. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
43.
FredricksonB. L.RobertsT. (1997). Objectification theory: Toward understanding women’s lived experiences and mental health risks. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21(2), 173–206. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1997.tb00108.x
44.
GaldiS.MaassA.CadinuM. (2014). Objectifying media: Their effect on gender role norms and sexual harassment of women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 38(3), 398–413. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684313515185
45.
GlickP.FiskeS. T. (1997). Hostile and benevolent sexism: Measuring ambivalent sexist attitudes toward women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21(1), 119–135. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1997.tb00104.x
46.
GlickP.FiskeS. T. (1996). The ambivalent sexism inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(3), 491–512. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.70.3.491
GlickP.FiskeS. T.MladinicA.SaizJ. L.AbramsD.MasserB.AdetounB.OsagieJ. E.AkandeA.AlaoA.AnnetjeB.WillemsenT. M.ChipetaK.DardenneB.DijksterhuisA.WigboldusD.EckesT.Six-MaternaI.ExpositoF.LópezW. L. (2000). Beyond prejudice as simple antipathy: Hostile and benevolent sexism across cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(5), 763–775. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.79.5.763
49.
GrahamS.MunniksmaA.JuvonenJ. (2014). Psychosocial benefits of cross-ethnic friendships in urban middle school. Child Development, 85(2), 469–483. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12159
50.
GreenV. A.BiglerR.CatherwoodD. (2004). The variability and flexibility of gender-typed toy play: A close look at children's behavioral responses to counterstereotypic models. Sex Roles, 51(7), 371–386. https://doi.org/10.0360-0025/04/1000-0371/0
51.
HalimM. L. D.MartinC. L.AndrewsN. C. Z.ZosulsK. M.RubleD. N. (2021). Enjoying each other’s company: Gaining other-gender friendships promotes positive gender attitudes among ethnically diverse children. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 47(12), 1635–1653. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167220984407
52.
HammondM. D.OverallN. C.CrossE. J. (2016). Internalizing sexism in close relationships: The perceived sexism of partners maintains women’s endorsement of benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 110(2), 214–238. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000043
53.
HanishL. D.MartinC. L.FabesR. A.BarceloH. (2008). The breadth of peer relationships among preschoolers: An application of the Q-connectivity method to externalizing behavior. Child Development, 79(4), 1119–1136. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2008.01179.x
54.
HanishL. D.MartinC. L.FabesR. A.LeonardS.HerzogM. (2005). Exposure to externalizing peers in early childhood: Homophily and peer contagion processes. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 33(3), 267–281. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-005-3564-6
55.
HarperB.TiggemannM. (2008). The effect of thin ideal media images on women’s self-objectification, mood, and body image. Sex Roles, 58(9–10), 649–657. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-007-9379-x
56.
HässlerT.GlazierJ. J.OlsonK. R. (2022). Consistency of gender identity and preferences across time: An exploration among cisgender and transgender children. Developmental psychology. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0001419
57.
HeilbronN.PrinsteinM. J. (2008). Peer influence and adolescent non-suicidal self-injury: A theoretical review of mechanisms and moderators. Applied and Preventative Psychology, 12(4), 169–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appsy.2008.05.004
58.
JonesK.StewartK.KingE.MorganW. B.GilraneV.HyltonK. (2014). Negative consequence of benevolent sexism on efficacy and performance. Gender in Management, 29(3), 171–189. https://doi.org/10.1108GM-07-2013-0086
59.
JordanC. E.CombsJ. L.SmithG. T. (2014). An exploration of sexual victimization and academic performance among college women. Trauma, Violence & Abuse, 15(3), 191–200. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838014520637
60.
KaufmanM. R.TsangS. W.SabriB.BudhathokiC.CampbellJ. (2019). Health and academic consequences of sexual victimisation experiences among students in a university setting. Psychology & Sexuality, 10(1), 56-68. https://doi.org/10.1080/19419899.2018.1552184
61.
KlonoffE. A.LandrineH. (1995). The schedule of sexist events: A measure of lifetime and recent sexist discrimination in women’s lives. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 19(4), 439–472. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1995.tb00086.x
62.
KuchynkaS. L.SalomonK.BossonJ. K.El-HoutM.KiebelE.CoopermanC.ToomeyR. (2018). Hostile and benevolent sexism and college women’s STEM outcomes. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 42(1), 72–87. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684317741889
63.
LeaperC. (2011). Research in developmental psychology on gender and relationships: Reflections on the past and looking into the future. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 29(2), 347–356. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-835X.2011.02035.x
LevinS.van LaarC.SidaniusJ. (2003). The effects of ingroup and outgroup friendship on ethnic attitudes in college: A longitudinal study. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 6(1), 76–92. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430203006001013
MartinC. L.CookR. E.AndrewsN. C. Z. (2017). Reviving androgyny: A modern day perspective on flexibility of gender identity and behavior. Sex Roles, 76(9–10), 592–603. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-016-0602-5
69.
MartinC. L.FabesR. A. (2001). The stability and consequences of young children’s same-sex peer interactions. Developmental Psychology, 37(3), 431–446. https://doi.org/10.1037//0012-1649.37.3.431
70.
MartinC. L.KornienkoO.SchaeferD. R.HanishL. D.FabesR. A.GobleP. (2013). The role of sex of peers and gender-typed activities in young children’s peer affiliative networks: A longitudinal analysis of selection and influence. Child Development, 84(3), 921–937. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12032
71.
MuehlenhardC. L.PetersonZ. D.HumphreysT. P.JozkowskiK. N. (2017). Evaluating the one-in-five statistic: Women’s risk of sexual assault while in college. The Journal of Sex Research, 54(4–5), 549–576. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2017.1295014
72.
OswaldD. L.BaalbakiM.KirkmanM. (2018). Experiences with benevolent sexism: Scale development and associations with women’s well-being. Sex Roles, 80(5–6), 362–380. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-018-0933-5
73.
OverallN. C.HammondM. D. (2018). How intimate relationships contribute to gender inequality: Sexist attitudes encourage women to trade off career success for relationship security. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 5(1), 40–48. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F2372732217745096
74.
OverallN. C.SibleyC. G.TanR. (2011). The costs and benefits of sexism: Resistance to influence during relationship conflict. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(2), 271–290. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022727
75.
PahlkeE.BiglerR.MartinC. L. (2014). Can fostering sexism schemas among children to improve critical analysis, internalization, and enactment of inclusive, egalitarian peer relationships?Journal of Social Issues, 70(1), 115–133. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12050
76.
ParksJ. B.RobertonM. A. (2004). Attitudes toward women mediate the gender effect on attitudes toward sexist language. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 28(3), 233–239. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2004.00140.x
77.
PaxtonS. J.SchutzH. K.WertheimE. H.MuirS. L. (1999). Friendship clique and peer influences on body image concerns, dietary restraint, extreme weight-loss behaviors, and binge eating in adolescent girls. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 108(2), 255–266. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0021-843X.108.2.255
78.
PeterJ.ValkenburgP. M. (2007). Adolescents’ exposure to a sexualized media environment and their notions of women as sex objects. Sex Roles, 56(5), 381–395. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-006-9176-y
79.
PettigrewT. F.TroppL. R. (2006). A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(5), 751–783. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.90.5.751
80.
PharrS. (1997). Homophobia: A weapon of sexism. Chardon.
RolleroC.GlickP.TartagliaS. (2014). Psychometric properties of short versions of the ambivalent sexism inventory and ambivalence toward men inventory. TPM - Testing, Psychometrics, Methodology in Applied Psychology, 21(2), 149–159. https://doi.org/10.4473/TPM21.2.3
83.
RussellB. L.TriggK. Y. (2004). Tolerance of sexual harassment: An examination of gender differences, ambivalent sexism, social dominance, and gender roles. Sex Roles, 50(7/8), 565–573. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SERS.0000023075.32252.fd
84.
SteelFisherG. K.FindlingM. G.BleichS. N.CaseyL. S.BlendonR. J.BensonJ. M.SaydeJ. M.MillerC. (2019). Gender discrimination in the United States: Experiences of women. Health Services Research, 54(S2), 1442–1453. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.13217
SwimJ. K.HyersL. L.CohenL. L.FergusonM. J. (2001). Everyday sexism: Evidence for its incidence, nature, and psychological impact from three daily diary studies. Journal of Social Issues, 57(1), 31–53. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00200
87.
SzymanskiD. M.MoffittL. B.CarrE. R. (2011). Sexual objectification of women. Advances to Theory and Research.
88.
VikiG. T.AbramsD.HutchisonP. (2003). The “true” romantic: Benevolent sexism and paternalistic chivalry. Sex Roles, 49(9/10), 533–537. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025888824749
89.
WardL. M. (2002). Does television exposure affect emerging adults' attitudes and assumptions about sexual relationships? Correlational and experimental confirmation. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 31(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014068031532
90.
WatsonL. B.MarszalekJ. M.DispenzaF.DavidsC. M. (2015). Understanding the relationships among White and African American women’s sexual objectification experiences, physical safety anxiety, and psychological distress. Sex Roles, 72(3–4), 91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-014-0444-y
91.
WintreM. G.NorthC.SugarL. A. (2001). Psychologists’ response to criticisms about research based on undergraduate participants: A developmental perspective. Canadian Psychology, 42(3), 216–225. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/h0086893
92.
XiaoS. X.CookR. E.MartinC. L.NielsonG. M. (2019). Preschool gender enforcers: Their characteristics and the effects on peers of affiliation with gender enforcers. Sex Roles, 81(11–12), 671–685. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-019-01026-y
93.
XiaoS. X.MartinC. L.SpinradT. L.EisenbergN.DeLayD.HanishL. D.FabesR. A.OswaltK. (2022). Being helpful to other-gender peers: School-age children’s gender-based intergroup prosocial behavior. British Journal of Developmental Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjdp.12426
