This experiment explored behavioral consequences of interpersonal objectification. In an actual interaction with an objectifying man, women (N = 91) perceived the interaction as less pleasant, reducing the amount of time they spent interacting with the male objectifier compared to a neutral interaction. Moreover, the effect of the objectifying behavior on women’s unpleasant perceptions of the interaction was mediated by the feeling of being treated as a sex object. This work demonstrates the consequences of an objectifying interaction at an interpersonal level.
CalogeroR. M. (2013). Objects don’t object: Evidence that self-objectification disrupts women’s social activism. Psychological Science, 24, 312–318. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797612452574
2.
FairchildK.RudmanL. A. (2008). Everyday stranger harassment and women’s objectification. Social Justice Research, 21, 338–357. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-008-0073-0
3.
FaulF.ErdfelderE.LangA. G.BuchnerA. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146
4.
FredricksonB. L.RobertsT. A. (1997). Objectification theory: Toward understanding women’s lived experiences and mental health risks. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 173–206. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1997.tb00108.x
5.
GarciaR. L.EarnshawV. A.QuinnD. M. (2016). Objectification in action: Self-and other-objectification in mixed-sex interpersonal interactions. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 40(2), 213–228. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684315614966
6.
GervaisS. J.AllenJ.RiemerA. R.GullicksonM. (2018). The balanced objectification hypothesis: The effects of objectification valence and body sentiment on source sentiment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 45, 571–586. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167218789625
7.
GervaisS. J.SáezG.RiemerA. R.KleinO. (2020). The social interaction model of objectification: A process model of goal-based objectifying exchanges between men and women. British Journal of Social Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12339
8.
GervaisS. J.VescioT.AllenJ. (2011). When what you see is what you get: The consequences of the objectifying gaze for women and men. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 35, 5–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684310386121
9.
HayesA. F. (2018). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach (2nd ed.). The Guilford Press.
10.
HurstR. J.BeesleyD. (2013). Perceived sexism, self-silencing, and psychological distress in college women. Sex Roles, 68, 311–320. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-012-0253-0
11.
JackD. C.DillD. (1992). The silencing the self scale: Schemas of intimacy associated with depression in women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 16, 97–106.
12.
KozeeH. B.TylkaT. L.Augustus-HorvathC. L.DenchikA. (2007). Development and psychometric evaluation of the interpersonal sexual objectification scale. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 31(2), 176–189. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032075
13.
LissM.ErchullM. J.RamseyL. R. (2011). Empowering or oppressing? Development and exploration of the enjoyment of sexualization scale. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37, 55–68. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167210386119
14.
NorrisJ.NuriusP. S.DimeffL. A. (1996). Through her eyes: Factors affecting women’s perception of and resistance to acquaintance sexual aggression threat. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 20, 123–145. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1996.tb00668.x
15.
RiemerA. R.AllenJ.GullicksonM.GervaisS. J. (2020). “You can catch more flies with honey than vinegar”: Objectification valence interacts with women’s enjoyment of sexualization to influence social perceptions. Sex Roles, (2020). https://doi.org/0.1007/s11199-020-01143-z
16.
RobertsT. A.CalogeroR. M.GervaisS. J. (2018). Objectification theory: Continuing contributions to feminist psychology. In TravisC. B.WhiteJ. W.RutherfordA.WilliamsW. S.CookS. L.WycheK. F. (Eds.), APA handbook in psychology series. APA handbook of the psychology of women: History, theory, and battlegrounds (pp. 249–271). American Psychological Association.
17.
SaguyT.QuinnD. M.DovidioJ. F.PrattoF. (2010). Interacting like a body: Objectification can lead women to narrow their presence in social interactions. Psychological Science, 21, 178–182. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797609357751
18.
ShepherdL. (2019). Responding to sexual objectification: The role of emotions in influencing willingness to undertake different types of action. Sex Roles, 80, 25–40https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-018-0912-x
19.
SwimJ. K.HyersL. L. (1999). Excuse me—What did you just say?!: Women’s public and private responses to sexist remarks. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35, 68–88. https://doi.org/10.1006/jesp.1998.1370
20.
TengF.ChenZ.PoonK. T.ZhangD. (2015). Sexual objectification pushes women away: The role of decreased likability. European Journal of Social Psychology, 45(1), 77–87. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2070
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
