College Students’ Perceptions of Communication Technology Use and Parent

Abstract

Technologically-assisted communication plays a key role in facilitating relationships between parents and emerging adult college students who are living away from home. Informed by Media Multiplexity Theory, we investigated the channels that college students use to communicate with parents and the impact that used and non-used channels have on perceived parent–child relationships. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 44 undergraduate students in the United States. Students used diverse channels to connect with parents, although some channels were used exclusively with peers. Themes related to communication repertoire size (CRS) included communication frequency, content of communication, and parent gender emerged; themes related to communication gap size (CGS) included student-perceived technology gaps, privacy concerns, and generational differences. Students in high CRS dyads perceived that communication technologies increased or maintained parent–child relationship quality, whereas students in high CGS dyads reported that communication technologies worsened or did not impact parent–child relationships.

Keywords

parent–child communication communication technology emerging adults media multiplexity theory parent–child relationships

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ahn

Shin

D.-H.

(2013). Is the social use of media for seeking connectedness or for avoiding social isolation? Mechanisms underlying media use and subjective well-being. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(6), 2453–2462. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.12.022

Alfaro

E. C.

(2020). Communication frequency and types of supportive messages: A mixed methods approach to examining Mexican-origin college students’ relationships with their mothers and fathers. Journal of Hispanic Higher Education, 19(1), 52–68. https://doi.org/10.1177/1538192718772663

Aquilino

W. S.

(2006). Family relationships and support systems in emerging adulthood. In Arnett

J. J.

Tanner

J. L.

(Eds.), Emerging adults in America: Coming of age in the 21st century (pp. 193–217). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/11381-008

Arnett

J. J.

(2000). Emerging adulthood: A theory of development from the late teens through the twenties. American Psychologist, 55(5), 469–480. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.5.469

Arnett

J. J.

(2004). Emerging adulthood: The winding road from the late teens through the twenties (1st ed.). Oxford University Press.

Braun

M. T.

(2013). Obstacles to social networking website use among older adults. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(3), 673–680. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.12.004

Bureau of Labor Statistics . (2020, April 28). College enrollment and work activity of recent high school and college graduates summary [Report]. https://www.bls.gov/news.release/hsgec.nr0.htm

Chen

Y.-F.

Katz

J. E.

(2009). Extending family to school life: College students’ use of the mobile phone. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 67(2), 179–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2008.09.002

Chopik

W. J.

(2016). The benefits of social technology use among older adults are mediated by reduced loneliness. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, 19(9), 551–556. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2016.0151

10.

Correa

Straubhaar

J. D.

Chen

Spence

(2015). Brokering new technologies: The role of children in their parents’ usage of the internet. New Media & Society, 17(4), 483–500. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444813506975

11.

De Wolf

Willaert

Pierson

(2014). Managing privacy boundaries together: Exploring individual and group privacy management strategies in Facebook. Computers in Human Behavior, 35(8), 444–454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.03.010

12.

Dennis

J. M.

Phinney

J. S.

Chuateco

L. I.

(2005). The role of motivation, parental support, and peer support in the academic success of ethnic minority first-generation college students. Journal of College Student Development, 46(3), 223–236. https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.2005.0023

13.

Gentzler

A. L.

Oberhauser

A. M.

Westerman

Nadorff

D. K.

(2011). College students’ use of electronic communication with parents: Links to loneliness, attachment, and relationship quality. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, 14(1–2), 71–74. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2009.0409

14.

Haythornthwaite

(2005). Social networks and Internet connectivity effects. Information, Communication & Society, 8(2), 125-147. DOI:10.1080/13691180500146185.

15.

Hennink

M. M.

Kaiser

B. N.

Marconi

V. C.

(2017). Code saturation versus meaning saturation: How many interviews are enough? Qualitative Health Research, 27(4), 591–608. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732316665344

16.

Junco

Heiberger

Loken

(2011). The effect of Twitter on college student engagement and grades. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 27(2), 119–132. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2010.00387.x

17.

Jung

E. H.

Walden

Johnson

A. C.

Sundar

S. S.

(2017). Social networking in the aging context: Why older adults use or avoid Facebook. Telematics and Informatics, 34(7), 1071–1080. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2017.04.015

18.

Kenyon

Koerner

S. S.

(2009). College student psychological well-being during the transition to college: Examining individuation from parents. College Student Journal, 43(4), 1145-1160. DOI:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2006.11.116.

19.

Kerr

D'Angelo

J. D.

Diaz-Caballero

Moreno

M. A.

(2020). College student problematic internet use and digital communication medium used with parents: Cross-sectional study. JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting, 3(1), e17165. https://doi.org/10.2196/17165.

20.

Kraut

Patterson

Lundmark

Kiesler

Mukophadhyay

Scherlis

(1998). Internet paradox: A social technology that reduces social involvement and psychological well-being? American Psychologist, 53(9), 1017–1031. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.53.9.1017

21.

Lefkowitz

E. S.

(2005). “Things Have Gotten Better:” Developmental changes among Emerging adults after the transition to university. Journal of Adolescent Research, 20(1), 40–63. https://doi.org/10.1177/0743558404271236

22.

Lepp

Barkley

J. E.

(2016). College students’ cell phone use and attachment to parents and peers. Computers in Human Behavior, 64(C), 401–408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.07.021

23.

Marwick

A. E.

boyd

(2014). Networked privacy: How teenagers negotiate context in social media. New Media & Society, 16(7), 1051–1067. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444814543995

24.

Miles

M. B.

Huberman

A. M.

Saldaña

(2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

25.

Park

H. S.

Klein

K. A.

Smith

Martell

(2009). Separating subjective norms, university descriptive and injunctive norms, and U.S. descriptive and injunctive norms for drinking behavior intentions. Health Communication, 24(8), 746–751. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410230903265912

26.

Perrin

Anderson

(2019). April 10). Share of U.S. adults using social media, including Facebook is mostly unchanged since 2018. https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2019/04/10/share-of-u-s-adults-using-social-media-including-facebook-is-mostly-unchanged-since-2018/

27.

Pew Research Center (2018). Social media use continues to rise in developing countries but plateaus across developed ones. https://www.pewresearch.org/global/2018/06/19/3-social-network-adoption-varies-widely-by-country/

28.

Pew Research Center (2021). Mobile fact sheet. https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/fact-sheet/mobile/

29.

Ramsey

M. A.

Gentzler

A. L.

Morey

J. N.

Oberhauser

A. M.

Westerman

(2013). College students’ use of communication technology with parents: Comparisons between two cohorts in 2009 and 2011. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, 16(10), 747–752. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2012.0534.

30.

Schon

(2014). “Dad doesn’t text”: Examining how parents’ sse of information communication technologies influences satisfaction among emerging adult children. Emerging Adulthood, 2(4), 304-312. DOI:10.1177/2167696814551786.

31.

Seiffge-Krenke

Overbeek

Vermulst

(2010). Parent-child relationship trajectories during adolescence: Longitudinal associations with romantic outcomes in emerging adulthood. Journal of Adolescence, 33(1), 159–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2009.04.001

32.

Small

M. L.

Morgan

Abar

Maggs

J. L.

(2011). Protective effects of parent–college student communication during the first semester of college. Journal of American College Health, 59(6), 547–554. https://doi.org/10.1080/07448481.2010.528099

33.

Smetana

J. G.

(1988). Adolescents' and parents' conceptions of parental authority. Child Development, 59(2), 321–335. https://doi.org/10.2307/1130313

34.

Smetana

J. G.

Metzger

Gettman

D. C.

Campione-Barr

(2006). Disclosure and secrecy in adolescent–parent relationships. Child Development, 77(1), 201–217. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2006.00865.x

35.

Smith

M. E.

Nguyen

D. T.

Lai

Leshed

Baumer

E. P. S.

(2012). Going to college and staying connected: Communication between college freshmen and their parents. CSCW’ 12 computer supported cooperative work, Seattle, WA, USA, 11–15 February, 2012. 10.

36.

Stein

C. H.

Osborn

L. A.

Greenberg

S. C.

(2016). Understanding young adults’ reports of contact with their parents in a digital world: Psychological and familial relationship factors. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 25(6), 1802–1814. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-016-0366-0

37.

S. R.

Fong

Carter

Boehme

Alpert

(2011). Parent support and stress among first-generation and continuing-generation female students during the transition to college. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, 13(3), 383–398. https://doi.org/10.2190/CS.13.3.g

38.

Tanner

J. L.

(2006). Recentering during emerging adulthood: A critical turning point in life span human development. In Arnett

J. J.

Tanner

J. L.

(Eds.), Emerging adults in America: Coming of age in the 21st century (pp. 21–55). APA Books.

39.

Uhls

Y. T.

Ellison

N. B.

Subrahmanyam

(2017). Benefits and costs of social media in adolescence. Pediatrics, 140(Suppl 2), S67–S70. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2016-1758E

40.

U.S. Department of Education (2021). Young adults neither enrolled in school nor working. Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics.

41.

Vaterlaus

J. M.

Barnett

Roche

Young

J. A.

(2016). “Snapchat is more personal”: An exploratory study on Snapchat behaviors and young adult interpersonal relationships. Computers in Human Behavior, 62(C), 594–601. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.04.029

42.

Vogels

E. A.

(2021, June 22). Digital divide persists even as American with lower incomes make gains in tech adoption. https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2021/06/22/digital-divide-persists-even-as-americans-with-lower-incomes-make-gains-in-tech-adoption/

43.

Walther

J. B.

(1996). Computer-mediated communication: Impersonal, interpersonal, and hyperpersonal interaction. Communication Research, 23(1), 3–43. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365096023001001

44.

Weiser

E. B.

(2000). Gender differences in Internet use patterns and Internet application preferences: A two-sample comparison. Cyberpsychology and Behavior, 3(2), 167-178. DOI:10.1089/109493100316012.

45.

Whiteman

S. D.

McHale

S. M.

Crouter

A. C.

(2011). Family relationships from adolescence to early adulthood: Changes in the family system following firstborns' leaving home. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 21(2), 461–474. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-7795.2010.00683.x

46.

Wine

Siegel

Stollberg

(2018). 2015–16 national postsecondary student aid study (NPSAS:16) data file documentation (NCES 2018-482). National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch

47.

Yang

C.-c.

(2018). Social media as more than a peer space: College freshmen encountering parents on Facebook. Journal of Adolescent Research, 33(4), 442–469. https://doi.org/10.1177/0743558416659750

48.

Yang

Barnard-Brak

Siwatu

(2019). How does the availability of information and communication technology (ICT) resources mediate the relationship between socioeconomic status and achievement? Journal of Technology in Behavioral Science, 4(3), 262–266. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41347-018-0079-x

College Students’ Perceptions of Communication Technology Use and Parent–Child Relationships

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References