Family communication patterns,mediated communication,and well-being: A communication interdependence perspective on parent

Abstract

This study investigated how technology use, as understood through the communication interdependence perspective (CIP) and family communication patterns (FCPs), influence well-being in parent–adult child relationships. We proposed a model in which beliefs and attitudes about family communication shape adult children’s interdependent use of multiple modes of communication with a parent, which in turn impact their loneliness, psychological well-being, relational satisfaction, and closeness with a parent. Results revealed conversation orientation largely promoted communication interdependence (i.e., increased integration of face-to-face and mediated communication and ease of transitioning between channels), whereas conformity orientation largely dampened communication interdependence (i.e., increased segmentation to mediated channels and difficulty transitioning between channels). In turn, more communication interdependence (i.e., less segmentation to mediated channels and more ease transitioning between channels) corresponded with more relational well-being while segmentation to face-to-face reduced loneliness. Several indirect effects suggest that the ways adult children use technology with a parent help explain how cognitive schemas fostered by FCPs affect well-being. Theoretical implications are discussed as they pertain to the CIP and family communication.

Keywords

family communication patterns communication interdependence perspective well-being technologically-mediated communication parent–child relationships

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Afifi

T. D.

Olson

(2005). The chilling effect in families and the pressure to conceal secrets. Communication Monographs, 72(2), 192–216. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637750500111906

Baxter

L. A.

Pederson

J. R.

(2013). Perceived and ideal family communication patterns and family satisfaction for parents and their college-aged children. Journal of Family Communication, 13(2), 132–149. https://doi.org/10.1080/15267431.2013.768250

Buchanan

C. M.

Maccoby

E. E.

Dornbusch

S. M.

(1991). Caught between parents: Adolescents’ experience in divorced homes. Child Development, 62(5), 1008–1029. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.1991.tb01586.x

Caplan

S. E.

(2018). The Changing Face of Problematic Internet Use: An Interpersonal Approach. Peter Lang Inc.

Caughlin

J. P.

Koerner

A. F.

Schrodt

Fitzpatrick

M. A.

(2011). Interpersonal communication in family relationships. In Knapp

M. L.

Daly

J. A.

(Eds), Handbook of Interpersonal Communication (4th ed., pp. 317–354). Sage.

Caughlin

J. P.

Sharabi

L. L.

(2013). A communicative interdependence perspective of close relationships: The connections between mediated and unmediated interactions matter. Journal of Communication, 63(5), 873–893. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12046

Diener

Wirtz

Biswas-Diener

Tov

Kim-Prieto

Choi

Oishi

(2009). New measures of well-being. In Diener

(Ed), Assessing Well-Being: The Collected Works of Ed Diener (pp. 247–266). Springer.

Dorrance Hall

McNallie

(2016). The mediating role of sibling maintenance behavior expectations and perceptions in the relationship between family communication patterns and relationship satisfaction. Journal of Family Communication, 16(4), 386–402. https://doi.org/10.1080/15267431.2016.1215316

Fowers

Wan

(2020). A third of Americans now show symptoms of clinical anxiety or depression, Census Bureau finds amid coronavirus pandemic. The Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/health/2020/05/26/americans-with-depression-anxiety-pandemic/

10.

Hall

Pennington

Holmstrom

(2021). Connecting through technology during COVID-19. Human Communication & Technology, 3(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.17161/hct.v3i1.15026.

11.

Hayes

A. F.

(2017). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach (2nd ed.). Guilford Press.

12.

Haythornthwaite

(2005). Social networks and Internet connectivity effects. Information, Communication & Society, 8(2), 125–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691180500146185

13.

Huston

T. L.

McHale

S. M.

Crouter

A. C.

(1986). When the honeymoon’s over: Changes in the marriage relationship over the first year. In Gilmour

Duck

(Eds.), The Emerging Field of Personal Relationships (pp. 109–132). Erlbaum.

14.

Kelley

H. H.

Berscheid

Christensen

Harvey

J. H.

Huston

T. L.

Levinger

Peterson

D. R.

(1983). Close relationships. W. H. Freeman.

15.

Koerner

A. F.

Fitzpatrick

M. A.

(2002). Toward a theory of family communication. Communication Theory, 12(1), 70–91. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2002.tb00260.x

16.

Koerner

Ascan F.

Schrodt

Paul

(2014). An introduction to the special issue on family communication patterns theory. Journal of Family Communication, 14(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/15267431.2013.857328.

17.

Ledbetter

A. M.

(2009). Family communication patterns and relational maintenance behavior: Direct and mediated associations with friendship closeness. Human Communication Research, 35(1), 130–147. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2008.01341.x

18.

Ledbetter

A. M.

(2010). Family communication patterns and communication competence as predictors of online communication attitude: Evaluating a dual pathway model. Journal of Family Communication, 10(2), 99–115. https://doi.org/10.1080/15267431003595462

19.

Ledbetter

A. M.

Beck

S. J.

(2014). A theoretical comparison of relational maintenance and closeness as mediators of family communication patterns in parent-child relationships. Journal of Family Communication, 14(3), 230–252. https://doi.org/10.1080/15267431.2014.908196

20.

Ledbetter

A. M.

Schrodt

(2008). Family communication patterns and cognitive processing: Conversation and conformity orientations as predictors of informational reception apprehension. Communication Studies, 59(4), 388–401. https://doi.org/10.1080/10510970802467429

21.

Miczo

Presnell

Lombardo

(2021). Sibling topic avoidance in emerging adulthood: Associations with sibling communication patterns, interference/facilitation, and topic avoidance motivations. Journal of Family Communication, 21(4), 239–254. https://doi.org/10.1080/15267431.2021.1938069

22.

Nguyen

M. H.

Gruber

Marler

Hunsaker

Fuchs

Hargittai

(2022). Staying connected while physically apart: Digital communication when face-to-face interactions are limited. New Media & Society, 24(9), 2046–2067. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820985442

23.

Padilla-Walker

L. M.

Coyne

S. M.

Fraser

A. M.

(2012). Getting a high speed family connection: Associations between family media use and family connection. Family Relations, 61(3), 426–440. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3729.2012.00710.x

24.

Przybylski

A. K.

Weinstein

(2017). A large-scale test of the goldilocks hypothesis: Quantifying the relations between digital-screen use and the mental well-being of adolescents. Psychological Science, 28(2), 204–215. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797616678438

25.

Punyanunt-Carter

N. M.

(2008). Father-daughter relationships: Examining family communication patterns and interpersonal communication satisfaction. Communication Research Reports, 25(1), 23–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/08824090701831750

26.

Rains

S. A.

Young

(2009). A meta-analysis of research on formal computer-mediated support groups: Examining group characteristics and health outcomes. Human Communication Research, 35(3), 309–336. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2009.01353.x

27.

Ramirez

Jr Zhang

(2007). When online meets offline: The effect of modality switching on relational communication. Communication Monographs, 74(3), 287–310. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637750701543493

28.

Ritchie

L. D.

Fitzpatrick

M. A.

(1990). Revised family communication patterns scale. Communication Research, 17(4), 523–544. https://doi.org/10.1037/t52561-000

29.

Rudi

J. H.

Walkner

Dworkin

(2015). Adolescent–parent communication in a digital world: Differences by family communication patterns. Youth & Society, 47(6), 811–828. https://doi.org/10.1177/0044118X14560334

30.

Russell

D. W.

(1996). UCLA loneliness scale (version 3): Reliability, validity, and factor structure. Journal of Personality Assessment, 66(1), 20–40. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa6601_2

31.

Schrodt

Ledbetter

A. M.

Ohrt

J. K.

(2007). Parental confirmation and affection as mediators of family communication patterns and children’s mental well-being. Journal of Family Communication, 7(1), 23–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/15267430709336667

32.

Schrodt

Phillips

K. E.

(2016). Self-disclosure and relational uncertainty as mediators of family communication patterns and relational outcomes in sibling relationships. Communication Monographs, 83(4), 486–504. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2016.1146406

33.

Schrodt

Witt

P. L.

Messersmith

A. S.

(2008). A meta-analytical review of family communication patterns and their associations with information processing, behavioral, and psychosocial outcomes. Communication Monographs, 75(3), 248–269. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637750802256318

34.

Sharabi

L. L.

Dorrance Hall

(2021). Conceptualizing and measuring communication interdependence: The technology and face-to-face integration scale. Communication Methods and Measures, 15(3), 222–242. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2021.1894325

35.

Sharabi

L. L.

Dorrance Hall

(2022). Communication interdependence and cohabitation: The role of interpersonal technologies in satisfaction and disillusionment among couples in transition. Human Communication Research, 48(2), 292–319. https://doi.org/10.1093/hcr/hqab021

36.

Thoits

P. A.

(2011). Mechanisms linking social ties and support to physical and mental health. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 52(2), 145–161. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022146510395592

37.

Vangelisti

A. L.

(2006). Foreword: Family communication theories: Variations and challenges. In Braithwaite

D. O.

Baxter

L. A.

(Eds.), Engaging Theories in Family Communication: Multiple Perspectives, pp. (ix–xviii). Sage.

38.

Wang

Roaché

D. J.

Pusateri

K. B.

(2019). Interconnection of multiple communication modes in long-distance dating relationships. Western Journal of Communication, 83(5), 600–623. https://doi.org/10.1080/10570314.2018.1552986

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.15 MB

Family communication patterns,mediated communication,and well-being: A communication interdependence perspective on parent–adult child relationships

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material