This study explores the digital labor and working practices of endurance athletes in ultra, trail, and triathlon sports. Drawing on 25 semi-structured interviews with athletes and their agents, I examine how these individuals navigate shifting boundaries of professionalism and identity shaped by an evolving media landscape, cultural pressures to self-brand, and a sport that glorifies pain. I introduce the concept of the athlete-creative to capture how contemporary athletes combine creative and athletic labor, engaging in storytelling and meaning-making that emphasizes depth, authenticity, and artistry. These practices enable athletes to construct visible and viable careers but also normalize boundless work and constant sharing, with physical, emotional, and temporal consequences. I situate these labors as forms of boundary work through which athlete-creatives distinguish themselves from both influencers and amateurs, producing a professional identity that is disciplined, human, and exceptional.
AbidinC. (2015). Communicative intimacies: Influencers and perceived interconnectedness. Ada: A Journal of Gender, New Media, and Technology, 8, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.7264/N3MW2FFG
2.
AbidinC. (2016). Visibility labour: Engaging with influencers, fashion brands, and #OOTD advertorial campaigns on Instagram. Media International Australia, 161(1), 86–100. https://doi.org/10.1177/1329878x16665177
3.
AtkinsonM. (2012). Grounded theory. In AtkinsonM. (Ed.), Key concepts in sport and exercise research methods (pp. 93–98): Sage Publications Ltd.
4.
Banet-WeiserS. (2012). Authentic. NYU Press.
5.
BaumanZ. (2000). Liquid modernity. Polity Press.
6.
BaymN. K. (2018). Playing to the crowd: Musicians, audiences, and the intimate work of connection. NYU Press.
7.
BegelD.BurtonR. (2000). Sports Psychiatry: Theory and Practice. W.W. Norton.
8.
Belair-GagnonV.HoltonA. E. (2020). Boundary work, interloper media, and analytics in newsrooms: An analysis of the roles of web analytics companies in news production. In CarlsonE. (Ed.), Measurable journalism (pp. 87–103): Routledge.
9.
BishopS. (2025). Influencer creep: How artists strategically navigate the platformisation of art worlds. New Media & Society, 27(4), 2109–2126. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448231206090
10.
CoakleyJ. (2015). Assesing the sociology of sport: On cultural sensibilities and the great sport myth. International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 50(4–5), 402–406. https://doi.org/10.1177/1012690214538864
11.
ColangeloJ.SmithA.BuadzeA.LiebrenzM. (2023). Ultra culture-ultra reality: A content analysis of YouTube depictions of ultra endurance sport and comparisons to scientific literature. Frontiers in Sports and Active Living, 5, Article 1192401. https://doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2023.1192401
CrawleyM. (2022). Enduring influence: The work of social media for elite endurance athletes. In SalazarN.ScheerderJ. (Eds.), Contemporary meanings of endurance: An interdisciplinary approach (pp. 139–146). Routledge.
14.
DuffyB. E. (2017). (Not) getting paid to do what you love: Gender, social media, and aspirational work. Yale University Press.
15.
EhrlichS. C.SabinJ.TernesN. C. (2023). With name, image, and likeness, college sports enters the gig economy. Journal of Sport Management, 37(5), 319–332. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsm.2022-0152
16.
EldridgeS. (2014). Boundary maintenance and interloper media reaction: Differentiating between journalism’s discursive enforcement processes. Journalism Studies, 15(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670x.2013.791077
GierynT. F. (1983). Boundary-work and the demarcation of science from non-science: Strains and interests in professional ideologies of scientists. American Sociological Review, 48(6), 781–795. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095325
19.
GilchirstP.WheatonB. (2013). New media technologies in lifestyle sport. In HutchinsB.RoweD. (Eds.), Digital media sport: Technology, power and culture in the network society (pp. 169–185). Routledge.
20.
GlaserB. G.StraussA. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Aldine Pub. Co.
21.
GoffmanE. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. Doubleday.
22.
HarawayD. (1988). Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist Studies, 14(3), 575–599. https://doi.org/10.2307/3178066
HearnA. (2008). Meat, mask, burden: Probing the contours of the branded self. Journal of Consumer Culture, 8(2), 197–217. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469540508090086
25.
HundE. (2023). The influencer industry. Princeton University Press.
26.
HutchinsB.RoweD. (2012). Sport beyond television: The internet, digital media and the rise of networked media sport (1st ed.). Routledge.
27.
MarkulaP. (2003). The technologies of the self: Sport, feminism, and foucault. Sociology of Sport Journal, 20(2), 87–107. https://doi.org/10.1123/ssj.20.2.87
28.
MarwickA. E. (2013). Status update. Yale University Press.
29.
McRobbieA. (2016). Be creative: Making a living in the new culture industries. Polity Press.
30.
MirrleesT. (2024). Work in the digital media and entertainment industries. Routledge.
31.
NeffG. (2012). Venture labor: Work and the burden of risk in innovative industries. MIT Press.
32.
PercivalN.HesmondhalghD. (2014). Unpaid work in the UK television and film industries: Resistance and changing attitudes. European Journal of Communication, 29(2), 188–203. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323113516726
33.
RahikainenK.ToffolettiK. (2022). “I just don’t wanna deal with the headache of people fighting over the internet”: A study of sponsored female climbers’ digital labor. Sociology of Sport Journal, 39(3), 251–260. https://doi.org/10.1123/ssj.2020-0177
34.
RiedlM. J.LukitoJ.WoolleyS. C. (2023). Political influencers on social media: An introduction. Social Media + Society, 9(2), 20563051231177938. https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051231177938
35.
ScovelS. (2025). Navigating expressions of femininity in online influencer culture: A content analysis of collegiate women athlete branding in the age of “Name, Image, and Likeness.”. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.117/10776990241311854
36.
SenftT. M. (2008). Camgirls: Celebrity and community in the age of social networks. Lang.
37.
SerazioM. (2019). The power of Sports: Media and Spectacle in American Culture. NYU Press.
38.
SerazioM. (2025). Getting NIL for unpaid labor: Self-branding US “student-athletes” in the influencer marketplace. Television & New Media, 26(5), 586–603. https://doi.org/10.1177/15274764251314177
39.
The Collective. (2023). The new economy of sports: Part I: The unparalleled value of professional women athletes. Wasserman.
40.
ThorpeH. (2017). Action sports, social media, and new technologies: Towards a research agenda. Communication & Sport, 5(5), 554–578. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167479516638125
41.
ToffolettiK.ThorpeH. (2018). The athletic labour of femininity: The branding and consumption of global celebrity sportswomen on Instagram. Journal of Consumer Culture, 18(2), 298–316. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469540517747068
