Creative workers in the social media industries face the imperative to brand themselves to audiences, corporate sponsors, and potential customers. This study complicates the role of self-branding on social media through the case of real-time creative labor on a social live streaming platform. Drawing on ethnographic fieldwork and in-depth interviews with live creators and viewers, this study suggests that the affordances of social live streaming platforms create a media and relational environment wherein personal branding practices are belabored by both creators and audiences. This phenomenon, which we term participatory branding, redistributes the labor of personal branding on social media and emphasizes the work of audiences in helping to shape the brand of a creative worker. We then advance a typology that maps the terrain of personal branding on social media as it relates to platform affordances, cross-platform promotion, and audience activity in content creation.
AbidinC (2016) Visibility labour: engaging with influencers’ fashion brands and #OOTD advertorial campaigns on Instagram. Media International Australia161: 86–100.
2.
AbidinC (2017) #familygoals: family influencers, calibrated amateurism, and justifying young digital labor. Social Media + Society3(2): 1–15.
3.
Banet-WeiserS (2012) AuthenticTM: The Politics of Ambivalence in a Brand Culture. New York: New York University Press.
4.
BaymNK (2015) Connect with your audience! The relational labor of connection. The Communication Review18: 14–22.
5.
boydd (2011) Social network sites as networked publics: affordances, dynamics, and implications. In: PapacharissiZ (ed.) A Networked Self: Identity, Community, and Culture on Social Network Sites. New York: Routledge, pp. 39–58.
6.
BucherTHelmondA (2017) The affordances of social media platforms. In: BurgessJPoellTMarwickA (eds) The SAGE Handbook of Social Media. New York: SAGE, pp. 223–253.
7.
CharmazK (2006) Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide through Qualitative Analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
8.
DuffyBE (2017) (Not) Getting Paid to Do What You Love: Gender, Social Media, and Aspirational Work. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
9.
DuffyBEHundE (2015) “Having it all” on social media: entrepreneurial femininity and self-branding among fashion bloggers. Social Media + Society1(2): 1–11.
FoxJMcEwanB (2017) Distinguishing technologies for social interaction: the perceived social affordances of communication channels scale. Communication Monographs84(3): 298–318.
GaverWW (1991) Technology affordances. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors, New Orleans, LA, 27 April–2 May, pp. 79–84. New York: ACM.
14.
GeertzC (1973) Thick Description: Toward an Interpretive Theory of Culture. New York: Basic Books.
15.
GibsonJJ (1979) The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Reading, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
16.
GlaserBGStraussAL (1967) The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Chicago, IL: Aldine Publishing.
17.
GoffmanE (1959) The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York: Anchor Books.
18.
GoldRL (1958) Roles in sociological field observation. Social Forces36(3): 217–223.
HayesRACarrCTWohnDY (2016) One click, many meanings: interpreting paralinguistic digital affordances in social media. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media60(1): 171–187.
21.
HearnA (2010) Structuring feeling: Web 2.0, online ranking and rating, and the digital “reputation” economy. Ephemera10: 421–438.
22.
HumphreysL (2018) The Qualified Self: Social Media and the Accounting of Everyday Life. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
23.
HutchbyI (2001) Technologies, texts and affordances. Sociology35(2): 441–456.
24.
JenkinsH (1992) Textual Poachers: Television Fans and Participatory Culture. New York: Routledge.
KuehnKCorriganTF (2013) Hope labor: the role of employment prospects in online social production. The Political Economy of Communication1(1): 9–25.
27.
LeonardiPM (2013a) Theoretical foundations for the study of sociomateriality. Information and Organization23(2): 59–76.
28.
LeonardiPM (2013b) When does technology use enable network change in organizations? A comparative study of feature use and shared affordances. MIS Quarterly37(3): 749–775.
29.
LindlofTRShatzerMJ (1998) Media ethnographies in virtual space: strategies, limits, and possibilities. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media42(2): 170–189.
PooleyJ (2010) The consuming self: from flappers to Facebook. In: AronczykMPowersD (eds) Blowing Up the Brand: Critical Perspectives on Promotional Culture. New York: Peter Lang, pp. 71–89.
36.
PostigoH (2016) The socio-technical architecture of digital labor: converting play into YouTube money. New Media & Society18(2): 332–349.
37.
ScheibeKFietkiewiczKJStockWG (2016) Information behavior on social live streaming services. Journal of Information Science Theory and Practice4(2): 6–20.
38.
SchrockAR (2015) Communicative affordances of mobile media: portability, availability, locatability, and multimediality. International Journal of Communication9: 1229–1246.
39.
ScolereLPruchniewskaUDuffyBE (2018) Constructing the platform-specific self-brand: the labor of social media promotion. Social Media + Society4(3): 1–11.
40.
SenftTM (2008) Camgirls: Celebrity and Community in the Age of Social Networks. New York: Peter Lang.
41.
TaylorTL (2018) Watch Me Play: Twitch and the Rise of Game Live Streaming. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
