Field insurgency in lifestyle journalism: How lifestyle journalists marginalize Instagram influencers and protect their autonomy

Abstract

While Facebook and Twitter have received significant scholarly attention for their role in shaping the journalistic field, Instagram has received sparse attention in comparison. The present study examines how lifestyle journalists (n = 63) from Austria and the United States perceive Instagram influencers operating in relation to the journalistic field. Instagram influencers, empowered by the digital medium, would seem to be in direct competition with lifestyle journalists in terms of content. Through the theoretical lenses of boundary work and field, this study argues that lifestyle journalists—long relegated to the periphery of the journalistic field—discursively leverage the presence of influencers to protect their autonomy within the field while pushing influencers to its boundaries.

Keywords

Boundary work field theory influencers Instagram lifestyle journalism

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Allan

Thorsen

(eds) (2009) Citizen Journalism: Global Perspectives. London: Peter Lang.

Amoruso

(Director) (2019) Chiara Unposted [Film]. Memo Films.

Banjac

Hanusch

(2022) A question of perspective: exploring audiences’ views of journalistic boundaries. New Media & Society 24(3): 705–723.

Barnard

(2018) Tweeting #Ferguson: mediatized fields and the new activist journalist. New Media & Society 20(7): 2252–2271.

Barnwell

Neves

Ravn

(2021) Captured and captioned: representing family life on Instagram. New Media & Society. Epub ahead of print 28 May. DOI: 10.1177/14614448211012791.

Belair-Gagnon

Holton

(2018) Strangers to the game? Interlopers, intralopers, and shifting news production. Media and Communication 6(4): 70–78.

Benson

(1999) Field theory in comparative context: a new paradigm for media studies. Theory and Society 28(3): 463–498.

Benson

(2004) Bringing the sociology of media back in. Political Communication 21(3): 275–292.

Benson

Neveu

(Eds.) (2005) Bourdieu and the Journalistic Field. Cambridge: Polity Press.

10.

Bossio

(2021) Journalists on Instagram: presenting professional identity and role on image-focused social media. Journalism Practice. Epub ahead of print 23 November. 10.1080/17512786.2021.2001359.

11.

Bowker

Star

(2000) Sorting things out: Classification and its consequences. Cambridge: MIT press.

12.

Bourdieu

(1977) Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

13.

Bourdieu

(1986) The forms of capital. In: Richardson

(ed.) Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education. Westport, CT: Greenwood, pp. 241–258.

14.

Bourdieu

(1987) Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

15.

Bourdieu

(1991) Language and Symbolic Power. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

16.

Cairney

(2013) Standing on the shoulders of giants: how do we combine the insights of multiple theories in public policy studies? Policy Studies Journal 41(1): 1–21.

17.

Carlson

(2015a) Introduction: the many boundaries of journalism. In: Carlson

Lewis

(eds) Boundaries of Journalism: Professionalism, Practices and Participation. London: Routledge. pp. 1–17.

18.

Carlson

(2015b) When news sites go native: redefining the advertising–editorial divide in response to native advertising. Journalism 16(7): 849–865.

19.

Carlson

(2016) Metajournalistic discourse and the meanings of journalism: definitional control, boundary work, and legitimation. Communication Theory 26(4): 349–368.

20.

Driessens

(2013) Celebrity capital: redefining celebrity using field theory. Theory and Society 42(5): 543–560.

21.

Duffy

(2013) Remake, Remodel: Women’s Magazines in the Digital Age. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.

22.

Duffy

(2017) (Not) Getting Paid to Do What You Love: Gender, Social Media, and Aspirational Work. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

23.

Duffy

(2020) Social media influencers. In: Ross

Bachmann

Cardo

, et al. (eds) The International Encyclopedia of Gender, Media, and Communication, Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, pp. 1–4.

24.

Emerson

Fretz

Shaw

(2011) Writing Ethnographic Fieldnotes. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

25.

Esser

(1998) Editorial structures and work principles in British and German newsrooms. European Journal of Communication 13(3): 375–405.

26.

Fast

Örnebring

Karlsson

(2016) Metaphors of free labor: a typology of unpaid work in the media sector. Media, Culture & Society 38(7): 963–978.

27.

Ferrucci

Perreault

(2021) The liability of newness: journalism, innovation and the issue of core competencies. Journalism Studies 22(11): 1436–1449.

28.

Fram

(2013) The constant comparative analysis method outside of grounded theory. Qualitative Report 18: 11–25.

29.

Franklin

(2014) The future of journalism: in an age of digital media and economic uncertainty. Journalism Studies 15(5): 481–499.

30.

Fürsich

(2012) Lifestyle journalism as popular journalism: strategies for evaluating its public role. Journalism Practice 6(1): 12–25.

31.

Gieryn

(1983) Boundary-work and the demarcation of science from non-science: strains and interests in professional ideologies of scientists. American Sociological Review 48: 781–795.

32.

Glaser

Strauss

(2017) The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New York: Routledge.

33.

Hallin

Mancini

(2004) Comparing Media Systems: Three Models of Media and Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

34.

Hanitzsch

Vos

(2018) Journalism beyond democracy: a new look into journalistic roles in political and everyday life. Journalism 19(2): 146–164.

35.

Hanusch

(2010) The dimensions of travel journalism: exploring new fields for journalism research beyond the news. Journalism Studies 11(1): 68–82.

36.

Hanusch

(2012) Broadening the focus: the case for lifestyle journalism as a field of scholarly inquiry. Journalism Practice 6(1): 2–11.

37.

Hanusch

(2018) Lifestyle Journalism. In: Vos

(ed.) Journalism: Handbooks of Communication Science. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. pp. 433–450.

38.

Hanusch

(2019) Journalistic roles and everyday life: an empirical account of lifestyle journalists’ professional views. Journalism Studies 20(2): 193–211.

39.

Hanusch

Hanitzsch

(2013) Mediating orientation and self-expression in the world of consumption: Australian and German lifestyle journalists’ professional views. Media, Culture & Society 35(8): 943–959.

40.

Hanusch

Hanitzsch

(2017) Comparing journalistic cultures across nations: what we can learn from the worlds of journalism study. Journalism Studies 18(5): 525–535.

41.

Hanusch

Hanitzsch

Lauerer

(2017) “How much love are you going to give this brand?” Lifestyle journalists on commercial influences in their work. Journalism 18(2): 141–158.

42.

Hermida

Young

(2019) From peripheral to integral? A digital-born journalism not for profit in a time of crises. Media and Communication 7(4): 92–102.

43.

Hurley

(2019) Imagined affordances of Instagram and the fantastical authenticity of female Gulf-Arab social media influencers. Social Media+ Society, 5(1).

44.

Kananovich

Perreault

(2021) Audience as Journalistic boundary worker: the rhetorical use of comments to critique media practice, assert legitimacy and claim authority. Journalism Studies 22(3): 322–341.

45.

Koerber

McMichael

(2008) Qualitative sampling methods: a primer for technical communicators. Journal of Business and Technical Communication 22(4): 454–473.

46.

Kotisova

(2022) An elixir of life? Emotional labour in cultural journalism. Journalism 23(4): 789–805.

47.

Lasica

(2003) Blogs and journalism need each other. Nieman Reports, Fall, pp. 70–74. Available at: http://www.nieman.harvard.edu/reports/03-3NRfall/V57N3.pdf

48.

Leech

Onwuegbuzie

(2008) Qualitative data analysis: a compendium of techniques and a framework for selection for school psychology research and beyond. School Psychology Quarterly 23(4): 587–604.

49.

Maares

Hanusch

(2020) Exploring the boundaries of journalism: Instagram micro-bloggers in the twilight zone of lifestyle journalism. Journalism 21(2): 262–278.

50.

Maares

Hanusch

(2022) Interpretations of the journalistic field: a systematic analysis of how journalism scholarship appropriates Bourdieusian thought. Journalism 23(4): 736–754.

51.

Maares

Banjac

Hanusch

(2021) The labour of visual authenticity on social media: exploring producers’ and audiences’ perceptions on Instagram. Poetics 84: 101502.

52.

Otterman

(2007) Does the veiled look sell? Egyptian advertisers grapple with the Hijab. Arab Media & Society.

53.

Pedroni

(2015) ‘Stumbling on the heels of my blog’: career, forms of capital, and strategies in the (sub)field of fashion blogging. Fashion Theory 19(2): 179–199.

54.

Perreault

Bell

(2022) Towards a “digital” sports journalism: field theory, changing boundaries and evolving technologies. Communication and Sport 10(3): 398–416.

55.

Perreault

Ferrucci

(2020) What is digital journalism? Defining the practice and role of the digital journalist. Digital Journalism 8(10): 1298–1316.

56.

Perreault

Johnson

Klein

(2020) Covering hate: field theory and journalistic role conception in reporting on white nationalist rallies. Journalism Practice. Epub ahead of print 21 October. DOI: 10.1080/17512786.2020.1835525.

57.

Perreault

Maares

(2022) Metajournalistic discourse as a stabilizer within the journalistic field: Journalistic practice in the COVID-19 pandemic. Journalism Practice 16(2–3): 365–383.

58.

Perreault

Stanfield

(2019) Mobile journalism as lifestyle journalism? Field theory in the integration of mobile in the newsroom and mobile journalist role conception. Journalism Practice 13(3): 331–348.

59.

Perreault

Stanfield

Luttman

(2019) “Why the h** l is there a White House correspondents’ dinner?” Boundary work in political journalism. Journalism Practice 14(9): 1142–1158.

60.

Perreault

Vos

(2018) The GamerGate controversy and journalistic paradigm maintenance. Journalism 19(4): 553–569.

61.

Perreault

Vos

(2020) Metajournalistic discourse on the rise of gaming journalism. New Media & Society 22(1): 159–176.

62.

Pham

MHT

(2015) Asians wear clothes on the Internet. In Asians Wear Clothes on the Internet. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

63.

Price

Smith

(2021) Procedures for reliable cultural model analysis using semi-structured interviews. Field Methods 33(2): 185–201.

64.

Rowe

(2005) Fourth estate or fan club? Sports journalism engages the popular. In: Allen

(ed.) Journalism: Critical Issues. Maidenhead: Open University Press, pp. 125–136.

65.

Savolainen

Uitermark

Boy

(2022) Filtering feminisms: Emergent feminist visibilities on Instagram. New Media & Society 24(3): 557–579.

66.

Siapera

Spyridou

(2012) The field of online journalism: a Bourdieusian analysis. In: Siapera

Veglis

(eds) The Handbook of Global Online Journalism. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 77–97.

67.

Tandoc

Jenkins

(2018) Out of bounds? How Gawker’s outing a married man fits into the boundaries of journalism. New Media & Society 20(2): 581–598.

68.

Vos

Wolfgang

(2018) Journalists’ normative constructions of political viewpoint diversity. Journalism Studies 19(6): 764–781.

69.

Yin

(2011) Qualitative Research from Start to Finish. New York: Guilford.

70.

Zietsma

Lawrence

(2010) Institutional work in the transformation of an organizational field: the interplay of boundary work and practice work. Administrative Science Quarterly 55(2): 189–221.