On May 31, 2021, Naomi Osaka, one of the top-ranked female tennis players, and one of the highest-paid female athletes in the world, announced her withdrawal from the French Open on her social media (Twitter) account, citing mental health issues. There exists a stigma around mental health; and people suffering from mental health conditions often experience “discrimination and stigma” (World Health Organization, 2019). Such disclosures by a noted sportsperson provide an opportunity to help combat the stigma. The present study uses unsupervised machine learning and qualitative thematic analysis to analyze 11,800 English language responses to her tweet. Results indicate that Osaka’s tweet mostly garnered a lot of support and encouragement. However, there also existed some negative comments. Additionally, 40% of the negative comments were disseminated by bot-like automated accounts. Practical implications for sports communication are also discussed.
AlbadiN.KurdiM.MishraS. (2019). Hateful people or hateful bots?: Detection and characterization of bots spreading religious hatred in Arabic social media. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 3(CSCW), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1145/3359163
BroniatowskiD. A.JamisonA. M.QiS.AlKulaibL.ChenT.BentonA.QuinnS. C.DredzeM. (2018). Weaponized health communication: Twitter bots and Russian trolls amplify the vaccine debate. American Journal of Public Health, 108(10), 1378–1384. https://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.2018.304567
5.
CalhounA. J.GoldJ. A. (2020). ‘I feel like I know them’: The positive effect of celebrity self-disclosure of mental illness. Academic Psychiatry, 44(2), 237–241. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40596-020-01200-5
6.
CassiloD. (2022). Royce white, DeMar DeRozan and media framing of mental health in the NBA. Communication & Sport, 10(1), 97–123. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167479520933548
7.
CoakleyJ. (2021). Sports in society: Issues and controversies (13th Edition). McGraw-Hill.
8.
CorriganP.BinkA. B. (2016). The stigma of mental illness. In FriedmanH. S. (Ed), Encyclopedia of mental health (2nd ed., pp. 230–234). Academic Press.
9.
CorriganP. W.PennD. L. (2015). Lessons from social psychology on discrediting psychiatric stigma. Stigma and Health, 1(S), 20. https://doi.org/10.1037/2376-6972.1.S.2
10.
CorriganP. W.ShapiroJ. R. (2010). Measuring the impact of programs that challenge the public stigma of mental illness. Clinical Psychology Review, 30(8), 907–922. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2010.06.004
11.
CorriganP. W.WatsonA. C. (2002). The paradox of self-stigma and mental illness. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 9(1), 35–53. https://doi.org/10.1093/clipsy.9.1.35
12.
DavisC. A.VarolO.FerraraE.FlamminiA.MenczerF. (2016). BotOrNot: A system to evaluate social bots. In Proceedings of the 25th international conference companion on world wide web,Montréal, Canada, 11–15, May, 2016, WWW ’16 Companion, 273–274https://doi.org/10.1145/2872518.2889302
13.
FerraraE.VarolO.DavisC.MenczerF.FlamminiA. (2016). The rise of social bots. Communications of the ACM, 59(7), 96–104. https://doi.org/10.1145/2818717
14.
GoffmanE. (1963). Stigma; notes on the management of spoiled identity. Prentice-Hall.
15.
GrimmeC.PreussM.AdamL.TrautmannH. (2017). Social bots: Human-like by means of human control?Big Data, 5(4), 279–293. https://doi.org/10.1089/big.2017.0044
16.
GuoL.VargoC. J.PanZ.DingW.IshwarP. (2016). Big social data analytics in journalism and mass communication: Comparing dictionary-based text analysis and unsupervised topic modeling. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 93(2), 332–359. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699016639231
17.
GwarjanskiA. R.ParrottS. (2018). Schizophrenia in the news: The role of news frames in shaping online reader dialogue about mental illness. Health Communication, 33(8), 954–961. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2017.1323320
18.
Himelein-WachowiakM.GiorgiS.DevotoA.RahmanM.UngarL.SchwartzH. A.EpsteinD. H.LeggioL.CurtisB. (2021). Bots and misinformation spread on social media: A mixed scoping review with implications for COVID-19. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 23(5). https://doi.org/10.2196/26933
19.
HowardP. N.KollanyiB.BradshawS.NeudertL. M. (2018). Social media, news and political information during the US election: Was polarizing content concentrated in swing states?arXiv preprint arXiv:1802.03573.
20.
JonesE. E.FarinaA.HastorfA. H.MarkusH.MilleD. T.ScottR. A. (1984). Social stigma: The psychology of marked relationships. W. H. Freeman & Co.
KavanaghE.JonesI.Sheppard-MarksL. (2016). Towards typologies of virtual maltreatment: Sport, digital cultures & dark leisure. Leisure Studies, 35(6), 783–796. https://doi.org/10.1080/02614367.2016.1216581
23.
KollanyiB. (2016). Where do bots come from?: An analysis of bot codes shared on GitHub. International Journal of Communication, 10, 4932–4951. https://doi.org/10.1932-8036/20160005
24.
KroshusE.HoopesT.BernsteinE.ChrismanS. P.RivaraF. P. (2019). Direct verbal communication by parents, pressure related to sport achievement, and concussion safety in youth football. Journal of Health Communication, 24(10), 770–779. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2019.1668512
25.
KwonS.ParkA. (2022). Understanding user responses to the COVID-19 pandemic on Twitter from a terror management theory perspective: Cultural differences among the US, UK and India. Computers in Human Behavior, 128, 107087. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.107087
26.
LindlofT. R.TaylorB. C. (2011). Qualitative communication research methods. SAGE Publications.
LockeA.LawthomR.LyonsA. (2018). Social media platforms as complex and contradictory spaces for feminisms: Visibility, opportunity, power, resistance and activism. Feminism & Psychology, 28(1), 3–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959353517753973
29.
LoperE.BirdS. (2002). NLTK: The natural language toolkit. ACL workshop on effective tools and methodologies for teaching natural language processing and computational linguistics, Philadelphia, PA.
30.
LydeckerJ. A.CotterE. W.PalmbergA. A.SimpsonC.KwitowskiM.WhiteK.MazzeoS. E. (2016). Does this tweet make me look fat?: A content analysis of weight stigma on twitter. Eating and Weight Disorders — Studies on Anorexia, Bulimia and Obesity, 21, 229–235. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40519-016-0272-x
31.
MaierD.WaldherrA.MiltnerP.WiedemannG.NieklerA.KeinertA.… AdamS. (2018). Applying LDA topic modeling in communication research: Toward a valid and reliable methodology. Communication Methods and Measures, 12(2-3), 93–118. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2018.1430754
32.
MajorL. H.JankowskiS. M. (2020). Thematic and episodic frames in depression news. In: Health news and responsibility: How frames create blame. Peter Lang.
33.
MarlowT.MillerS.RobertsJ. T. (2021). Bots and online climate discourses: Twitter discourse on President Trump’s announcement of U.S. withdrawal from the Paris Agreement. Climate Policy, 21(6), 765–777. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2020.1870098
ParrottS.BillingsA. C.BuzzelliN.ToweryN. (2021). ‘We all go through it’: Media depictions of mental illness disclosures from star athletes DeMar DeRozan and Kevin Love. Communication & Sport, 9(1), 33–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167479519852605
37.
ParrottS.BillingsA. C.HakimS. D.GentileP. (2020). From #endthestigma to #realman: Stigma-challenging social media responses to NBA players’ mental health disclosures. Communication Reports, 33(3), 148–160. https://doi.org/10.1080/08934215.2020.1811365
38.
PavelkoR. L.WangT. (2021). Love and basketball: Audience response to a professional athlete’s mental health proclamation. Health Education Journal, 80(6), 635–647. https://doi.org/10.1177/00178969211006161
39.
PedersenP. M.LaucellaP. C.KianE. M.GeurinA. N. (2020). Strategic sport communication (3rd Edition). Human Kinetics Inc.
ReavleyN. J.PilkingtonP. D. (2014). Use of Twitter to monitor attitudes toward depression and schizophrenia: An exploratory study. PeerJ, 2, e647. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.647
42.
RehurekR.SojkaP. (2011). Gensim—statistical semantics in python. Org. Retrieved from genism.
43.
RoderM.BothA.HinneburgA. (2015). Exploring the space of topic coherence measures. Proceedings of the eighth ACM international conference on Web search and data mining (pp. 399–408). https://doi.org/10.1145/2684822.2685324
44.
SandersonJ.KassingJ. W. (2016). New media and the evolution of fan-athlete interaction. In BillingsA. C.HardinM. (Eds), Routledge Handbook of sport and new media (pp. 247–258). Routledge.
45.
ScanlonT. F. (2006). Sports and media in the ancient Mediterranean. In RaneyA. A.BryantJ. (Eds), Handbook of sports and media (pp. 3-19). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
ShaoC.CiampagliaG. L.VarolO.YangK. C.FlamminiA.MenczerF. (2018). The spread of low-credibility content by social bots. Nature Communications, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-06930-7
48.
ShiW.LiuD.YangJ.ZhangJ.WenS.SuJ. (2020). Social bots’ sentiment engagement in health emergencies: A topic-based analysis of the COVID-19 pandemic discussions on Twitter. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(22), 8701. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17228701
49.
SievertC.ShirleyK. (2014, June). LDAvis: A method for visualizing and interpreting topics. Proceedings of the workshop on interactive language learning (pp. 63-70): Visualization, and Interfaces. https://doi.org/10.3115/v1/W14-3110
ThompsonK.CarterG.LeeE.AlshamraniT.BillingsA. C. (2022). ‘We’re human too’:Media coverage of Simone Biles’ mental health disclosure during the 2020 Tokyo Olympics. Electronic News, 16(3), 187–201.
52.
UyhengJ.CarleyK. M. (2020). Bots and online hate during the COVID-19 pandemic: Case studies in the United States and the Philippines. Journal of Computational Social Science, 3(2), 445-468. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42001-020-00087-4
53.
VarolO.FerraraE.DavisC.MenczerF.FlamminiA. (2017). Online human-bot interactions: Detection, estimation, and characterization. Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, 11(1), 280–289. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1703.03107
54.
WannD. L.AllenB.RochelleA. R. (2004). Using sport fandom as an escape: Searching for relief from under-stimulation and over-stimulation. International Sports Journal, 8(1), 104–113.
55.
WatsonA. C.CorriganP.LarsonJ. E.SellsM. (2007). Self-stigma in people with mental illness. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 33(6), 1312–1318. https://doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sbl076
56.
WeinerB. (1995). Judgments of responsibility: A foundation for a theory of social conduct. Guilford Press.
World Health Organization (2019). The WHO special initiative for mental health (2019-2023): Universal health coverage for mental health. World Health Organization. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/310981
59.
YanG.PegoraroA.WatanabeN. M. (2021). Examining IRA bots in the NFL anthem protest: Political agendas and practices of digital gatekeeping. Communication & Sport, 9(1), 88–109. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167479519849114
60.
YangK. C.FerraraE.MenczerF. (2022). Botometer 101: Social bot practicum for computational social scientists. arXiv preprint arXiv:2201.01608.
61.
YooJ. J.MinB.KohY. (2024). Cross-national news narratives of the Paralympic Games: Computational text analysis of the media coverage in the United States and South Korea. Communication & Sport, 12(2), 230–253. https://doi.org/10.1177/21674795221090420
62.
YuanX.SchuchardR. J.CrooksA. T. (2019). Examining emergent communities and social bots within the polarized online vaccination debate in Twitter. Social Media + Society, 5(3), 2056305119865465. https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051198654
