Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2024-8
Stay Woke: An Analysis of How Referees Evaluate the In-Game Communication of a Historically Black College and University that Competes in a Predominantly White Institution Conference
The purpose of this investigation was to examine the personal fouls that were called against a historically black college and university (HBCU) that athletically participates in a conference which is comprised of predominantly white institutions (PWIs). The study introduction provided an overview of Tennessee State University (TSU) as it relates to their involvement in the Ohio Valley Conference (OVC). The cultural approach to organizations served as the communication-centric theoretical frame while the previous literature on referee bias was reviewed. The criterion of personal fouls per game (PFPG) was examined. Z-score analyses revealed that referees called more PFPG against the HBCU of TSU in men’s college basketball relative to the number of PFPG that were called against the PWI conference teams in the OVC. A similar effect was observed in women’s college basketball. Theoretical implications for the cultural approach to organizations were noted in the study discussion as were practical implications for TSU and other HBCUs.
AndrewsV. (1996). African American player codes on celebration, taunting, and sportsmanlike conduct. Journal of African American Men, 2(2), 57–92. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12111-996-1004-5
2.
BuraimoB.SimmonsR.MaciaszczykM. (2012). Favoritism and referee bias in European soccer: evidence from the Spanish league and the UEFA champions league. Contemporary Economic Policy, 30(3), 329–343. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-7287.2011.00295.x
3.
DixA. C. (2017). A decade of referee bias against college football programs from historically black colleges and universities. International Journal of Science Culture and Sport, 5(24), 197–212. https://doi.org/10.14486/IntJSCS670
4.
DixA. C. (2019). And 1” more piece of evidence of discrimination against black basketball players. Howard Journal of Communications, 30(3), 211–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/10646175.2018.1491434
5.
DixA. C. (2020a). Critical race theory, the NCAA, and college baseball: Contradiction on the diamond. In MilfordM.SmithL. R. (Eds.), Communication and contradiction in the NCAA: An unlevel playing field (pp. 213–233). Peter Lang.
6.
DixA. C. (2020b). And 10 more years of bias against HBCU female basketball players. Texas Speech Communication Journal, 44, 1–18.
7.
DixA. C. (2021a). Referee judgments of communication in the field of play: a study on historically black colleges and universities in division II college football. International Journal of Sport Communication, 14(4), 554–573. https://doi.org/10.1123/ijsc.2021-0032
8.
DixA. C. (2021b). Softball umpires call more walks than strikeouts when the pitcher plays for a historically black college and University. International Journal of Sport Culture and Science, 9(1), 91–103. https://doi.org/10.14486/IntJSCS.2021.629
9.
DixA. C. (2022). The non-sweet sixteen: Referee bias against historically black colleges and universities in men’s college basketball. Sociology of Sport Journal, 39(1), 118–124. https://doi.org/10.1123/ssj.2020-0187
10.
DownwardP.JonesM. (2007). Effects of crowd size on referee decisions. analysis of the FA Cup. Journal of Sports Sciences, 25(1), 541–545. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640410701275193
11.
GaricanoL.Palacios-HuertaI.PrendergastC. (2005). Favoritism under social pressure. Review of Economics and Statistics, 87(2), 208–216.
12.
GeertzC. (1973). The interpretation of cultures. Basic Books.
GriffinE. (2009). A first look at communication theory (7th ed.). McGraw-Hill.
15.
HallE. V.LivingstonR. W. (2012). The hubris penalty: biased responses to “celebration” is plays of black football players. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(4), 899–904. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2012.02.004
16.
HamrickJ.RaspJ. (2015). The connection between race and called strikes and balls. Journal of Sports Economics, 16(7), 714–734. https://doi.org/10.1177/1527002513509817
17.
KimJ. W.KingB. G. (2014). Seeing stars: Matthew effects and status bias in major league baseball umpiring. Management Science, 60(2), 619644–619652. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2014.1967
18.
MohrP. B.LarsenK. (1998). Ingroup favoritism in umpiring decisions in Australian football. The Journal of Social Psychology, 13(4), 495–504. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224549809600
19.
PacanowskyM. E. (1988). Communication yearbook. In AndersonJ. A. (Ed.), Communicating in the empowering organization (11, pp. 356–379). Sage.
20.
PacanowskyM. E.O’Donnell-TrujilloN. (1983). Organizational communication as cultural performance. Communication Monographs, 50(2), 126–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637758309390158
21.
PageL.PageK. (2010). Evidence of referees’ national favouritism in rugby. In NCER working paper series, 62. NCER.
22.
ParsonsC. A.SulaemanJ.YatesM. C.HamermeshD. S. (2011). Strike three: Umpires’ demand for discrimination. American Economic Review, 101(4), 410–435. https://doi.org/10.3386/w13665
23.
PopeB. R.PopeN. G. (2015). Own-nationality bias: Evidence from UEFA champions league football referees. Economic Inquiry, 53(1), 291304–291311. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecin.12180
24.
PradhanS.YacobianM. M. (2021). Touchdown! Sentenced: Investigating disciplinary actions against Black and White male athletes in the National Football League (NFL) and criminality in United States society. The International Journal of Sport and Society, 12(1), 205–222. https://doi.org/10.18848/2152-7857/CGP/v12i01/205-222
SandbergA. (2017). Competing identities: A field study of in-group bias among professional evaluators. The Economic Journal, 128(2), 131–2159. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecoj.12513
27.
SchwarzW. (2011). Compensating tendencies in penalty kick decisions of referees in professional football: Evidence from the German Bundesliga 1963-2006. Journal of Sports Sciences, 29(5), 441–447. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2010.538711
TainskyS.MillsB. M.WinfreeJ. A. (2015). Further examination of potential discrimination among MLB umpires. Journal of Sports Economics, 16(4), 353–374. https://doi.org/10.1177/1527002513487740
30.
TrujilloN. (1985). Organizational communication as cultural performance: Some managerial considerations. The Southern Speech Communication Journal, 50(3), 201–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/10417948509372632
31.
TrujilloN. (1992). Interpreting (the work and talk of) baseball: Perspectives on ballpark culture. Western Journal of Communication, 56(4), 350–371. https://doi.org/10.1080/10570319209374423
32.
TrujilloN.EkdomL. R. (1985). Sportswriting and American cultural values: The 1984 Chicago Cubs. Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 2(3), 262–281. https://doi.org/10.1080/15295038509360085
33.
ZitzewitzE. (2006). Nationalism in winter sports judging and its lesson for organizational decision making. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 15(1), 67–99. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-9134.2006.00092.x
