Students with disabilities are enrolling in postsecondary education at record rates, but still fall behind their non-disabled peers academically. One factor contributing to these gaps is that many students enter college with underdeveloped academic skills, including executive functioning and study skills. Postsecondary disability resources offices (DROs) offer reasonable accommodations, and some also offer academic coaching programs to help students develop academic skills. The current study interviewed 12 students with disabilities who registered with their institution’s DRO and received academic peer coaching (APC). Participants sought coaching to receive guidance, develop academic skills, and replace previous support systems. Key elements supporting student progress included direct and collaborative skill instruction, peer relatability and professionalism, and flexible coaching formats. Participants viewed APC as an equally valuable accommodation that helped them strengthen academic skills and increase independence.
AhmannE.TuttleL. J.SavietM.WrightS. D. (2018). A descriptive review of ADHD coaching research: Implications for college students. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 31(1), 17–39. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1182373.pdf
2.
Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990, 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. (1990).
3.
AndersonK.MarinoM. T. (2024). Executive function coaching for college students with disabilities: A systematic literature review. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 37(2), 131–142. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1445898.pdf
4.
ArcherA. L.HughesC. A. (2011). Effective and efficient teaching. The Guilford Press.
BellmanS.BurgstahlerS.HinkeP. (2015). Academic coaching: Outcomes from a pilot group of postsecondary STEM students with disabilities. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 28(1), 103–108. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1066319
7.
BraunV.ClarkeV. (2019). Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 11(4), 589–597. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2019.1628806
8.
CampbellA. L.MogashanaD. (2025). Assessing the effectiveness of academic coaching interventions for student success in higher education: A systematic review. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 62(4), 1325–1347. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2024.2417173
9.
DawsonP.GuareR. (2012). Coaching students with executive skills deficits. The Guilford Press.
10.
DuPaulG. J.Dahlstrom-HakkiI.GormleyM. J.FuQ.PinhoT. D.BanerjeeM. (2017). College students with ADHD and LD: Effects of support services on academic performance. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 32(4), 246–256. https://doi.org/10.1111/ldrp.12143
11.
FedaJ. T.PucilloE. M.WengerL. E.ScalesM. H.AdamsK. R.MinahanC. A.MartinJ. G.SmithN. S. (2025). Validation of the Learning and Study Strategies Inventory (LASSI) in Doctor of Physical Therapy learners: A retrospective observational study. Physical Therapy, 105(10), pzaf108. https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/pzaf108
12.
GabelS. L. (2005). Disability studies in education. Peter Lang Publishing.
13.
HallM. M.WorshamR. E.ReavisG. (2021). The effects of offering proactive student-success coaching on community college students’ academic performance and persistence. Community College Review, 49(2), 202–237. https://doi.org/10.1177/0091552120982030
14.
HartungC. M.CanuW. H.SerranoJ. W.VaskoJ. M.StevensA. E.Abu-RamadanT. M.BodalskiE. A.NegerE. N.BridgesR. M.GleasonL. L.AnzaloneC.FloryK. (2022). A new organizational and study skills intervention for college students with ADHD. Cognitive and Behavioral Practice, 29(2), 411–424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbpra.2020.09.005
15.
HughesO. (2023). Pedagogies of lived experience: The perspectives of people with disabilities on their educational presentations about disability topics. Disability Studies Quarterly, 42(3–4), 1–40. https://doi.org/10.18061/dsq.v42i3-4.8120
16.
LombardiA. R.KowittJ. S.StaplesF. E. (2014). Correlates of critical thinking and college and career readiness for students with and without disabilities. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 38(3), 142–151. https://doi.org/10.1177/2165143414534888
17.
LombardiA. R.RifenbarkG. G.EspositoC.TaconetA. V.MazzottiV. L.MorningstarM. E. (2025). An intersectional examination of college and career readiness for youth with and without disabilities. Journal of Education, 205(2), 87–97. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220574241309818
18.
LombardiA. R.RifenbarkG. G.RogersH. J.SwaminathanH.TaconetA.MorningstarM. E.MazzottiV. L.WuR.LangdonS. (2023). Establishing construct validity of a measure of adolescent perceptions of college and career readiness. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 46(1), 4–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/21651434221081229
19.
MarinoM. T.VasquezE.BanerjeeM.ParsonsC. A.SalibaY. C.GallegosB.KochA. (2020). Coaching as a means to enhance performance and persistence in undergraduate STEM majors with executive function deficits. Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice, 20(5), 94–109. https://doi.org/10.33423/jhetp.v20i5.3040
20.
MouraO.AlbuquerqueC. P.VilarM.PereiraM.Seabra-SantosM. J.LopesA. F.MajorS.GaudêncioA.SimõesM. R. (2025). Psychometric properties of the behavior rating inventory of executive function—second edition adult version (BRIEF2A): Does it fit better than BRIEF-A?The Clinical Neuropsychologist. https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2025.2527695
21.
NelsonA.BuckleyJ. (2021, December9). Advancing research on students with disabilities in postsecondary education: Technical working group summary. National Center for Special Education Research. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED630866
22.
NowellL. S.NorrisJ. M.WhiteD. E.MoulesN. J. (2017). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847
23.
ParkerD. R.BoutelleK. (2009). Executive function coaching for college students with learning disabilities and ADHD: A new approach for fostering self-determination. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 24(4), 204–215. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540
24.
ParkerD. R.HoffmanS. F.SawilowskyS.RolandsL. (2013). Self-control in postsecondary settings: Students’ perceptions of ADHD college coaching. Journal of Attention Disorders, 17(3), 215–232. https://doi.org/10.1177/1087054711427561
RandoH.HuberM. J.OswaldG. R. (2016). An academic coaching model intervention for college students on the autism spectrum. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 29(3), 257–262. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1123790.pdf
RichmanE. L.RademacherK. N.MaitlandT. L. (2014). Coaching and college success. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 27(1), 33–50. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1029647.pdf
29.
SavietM.AhmannE. (2021). ADHD coaches’ experiences with and perceptions of between-session communication with clients: A focus group. Coaching: An International Journal of Theory, Research and Practice, 14(1), 5–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/17521882.2021.1877754
30.
SwartzS. L.PrevattF.ProctorB. E. (2005). A coaching intervention for college students with Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder. Psychology in the Schools, 42(6), 647–656. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.20101
31.
TaconetA.LangdonS.EspositoC.MazzottiV.MorningstarM.LombardiA. (2024). Using data to improve instruction and support college and career readiness for students with disabilities. Intervention in School and Clinic, 59(5), 295–302. https://doi.org/10.1177/10534512231183361
32.
TarconishE.TaconetA.MadausJ. W.GelbarN.Dukes IIIL.Faggella-LubyM. (2022). Perceptions of college students with disabilities regarding institutional and disbaility services offices’ response to sustaining education during COVID-19. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 35(2), 99–111. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1364197.pdf
YomtovD.PlunkettS. W.EfratR.MarinA. G. (2017). Can peer mentors improve first-year experiences of university students?Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, 19(1), 25–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/1521025115611398
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
