Pathway to Independence: Validity Evidence of a Transition Assessment Tool for Students With Disabilities

Abstract

This study investigated the preliminary psychometric properties of the Pathway to Independence Inventory (P2I), a transition assessment tool designed to meet the needs of transition-age students with disabilities (SWD) with support needs in the areas of adaptive skills, executive functions, and social skills. Analyses examined the item-total correlations (ITC), factor structure, internal consistency, and concurrent validity evidence of the instrument and group differences based on gender identity, age, geographic location, and disability status. Results of the ITC and exploratory factor analysis (EFA) supported dimension reduction of items that did not discriminate well, resulting in separate versions of the instrument for students and informants. Results also indicated evidence of internal consistency, limited concurrent validity evidence for the informant version, and differences in mean scores based on gender identity and age for the informant report version and on disability status for both versions. Implications for both research and practice are discussed.

Keywords

transition assessment students with disabilities executive function postsecondary education college and career readiness

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Brigance

A. H.

(2010). Brigance transition skills inventory. Curriculum Associates, Inc.

Bruininks

R. H.

Woodcock

R. W.

Weatherman

R. F.

Hill

B. K.

(1996). Scales of Independent Behavior–Revised (SIB-R). Riverside Publishing.

Chou

Y. C.

Wehmeyer

M. L.

Shogren

K. A.

Palmer

S. B.

Lee

(2017). Autism and self-determination: Factor analysis of two measures of self-determination. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 32(3), 163–175. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088357615611391

Costello

A. B.

Osborne

J. W.

(2005). Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 10(7), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.7275/jyj1-4868

Dell’Armo

K. A.

Tassé

M. J.

(2019). The role of adaptive behavior and parent expectations in predicting post-school outcomes for young adults with intellectual disability. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 49(4), 1638–1651. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-018-3857-6

Erickson

Lee

von Schrader

(2019). 2017 disability status report: United States. Cornell University Yang Tan Institute on Employment and Disability (YTI). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED583258

Guilford

J. P.

(1954). Psychometric methods (2nd ed.). McGraw-Hill. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1955-00102-000

Hambleton

R. K.

(1989). Principles and selected applications of item response theory. In Linn

R. L

. (Ed.), Educational measurement (3rd ed., pp. 147–200). https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1989-97348-004

Harrison

P. L.

Oakland

(2015). Adaptive Behavior Assessment System (3rd ed.). Western Psychological Services.

10.

Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004, 20 U.S.C. § 1401 et seq. (2004).

11.

Jarratt

K. P.

Riccio

C. A.

Siekierski

B. M.

(2005). Assessment of Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) using the BASC and BRIEF. Applied Neuropsychology, 12(2), 83–93. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15324826an1202_4

12.

Kane

(2002). Validating high stakes testing programs. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 21(1), 31–41. http:/doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3992.2002.tb00083.x

13.

Kline

R. B.

(2016). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4th ed.). The Guilford Press.

14.

Kohler

P. D.

Gothberg

J. E.

Fowler

Coyle

(2016). Taxonomy for transition programming 2.0: A model for planning, organizing, and evaluating transition education, services, and programs. Western Michigan University. www.transitionta.org

15.

Ladhari

(2010). Developing e-service quality scales: A literature review. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 17(6), 464–477. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2010.06.003

16.

Lipscomb

Haimson

Liu

A. Y.

Burghardt

Johnson

D. R.

Thurlow

M. L.

(2017). Preparing for life after high school: The characteristics and experiences of youth in special education. Findings from the National Longitudinal Transition Study 2012. Volume 2: Comparisons across disability groups: Full report (NCEE 2017-4018). U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance. https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/pubs/20184011/

17.

Martin

J. E.

Hennessey

M. N.

McConnell

A. E.

Terry

R. A.

Willis

D. M.

(2015). Transition assessment and goal generator. https://tagg.ou.edu/tagg/

18.

Mazzotti

V. L.

Rowe

D. A.

Kwiatek

Voggt

Chang

Fowler

C. H.

Poppen

Sinclair

Test

D. W.

(2021). Secondary transition predictors of postschool success: An update to the research base. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 44(1), 47–64. https://doi.org/10.1177/2165143420959793

19.

McDonald

R. P.

(1999). Test theory: A unified treatment. Lawrence Arlbaum Associates Publishers. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1999-02770-000

20.

McNeish

(2018). Thanks coefficient alpha, we’ll take it from here. Psychological Methods, 23(3), 412–433. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000144

21.

Morningstar

M. E.

Lombardi

Fowler

C. H.

Test

D. W.

(2017). A college and career readiness framework for secondary students with disabilities. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 40(2), 79–91. http://doi.org/10.1177/2165143415589926

22.

National Center for Education Statistics. (2023). Students with disabilities. https://nces.ed.gov/fastfacts/display.asp?id=60

23.

National Technical Assistance Center on Transition: The Collaborative. (2024). Collaborative assessment guide for transition planning ( Stoehr

Diehl

Morningstar

Rowe

Simmons

B. K.

Fowler

Lattin

Vicchio

Wall

). www.transitionta.org

24.

Neubert

D. A.

Leconte

P. J.

(2013). Age-appropriate transition assessment: The position of the Division on Career Development and Transition. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 36(2), 72–83. http://doi.org/10.1177/2165143413487768

25.

Newman

Wagner

Knokey

A. M.

Marder

Nagle

Shaver

Wei

with Cameto

Contreras

Ferguson

Greene

Schwarting

(2011). The post-high school outcomes of young adults with disabilities up to 8 years after high school. A report from the National Longitudinal Transition Study-2 (NLTS2) (NCSER 2011–3005). SRI International. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.20600.57600

26.

Pepperdine

C. R.

McCrimmon

A. W.

(2018). Test review: Vineland adaptive behavior scales, third edition (Vineland-3) by Sparrow, S. S., Cicchetti, D. V., & Saulnier, C. A. Canadian Journal of School Psychology, 33(2), 157–163. https://doi.org/10.1177/0829573517733845

27.

Preacher

K. P.

MacCullum

R. C.

(2003). Repairing Tom Swift’s electric factor analysis machine. Understanding Statistics, 2(1), 13–43. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328031US0201_02

28.

R Core Team. (2022). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/

29.

Revelle

(2018). psych: Procedures for personality and psychological research (R version 1.8.12). https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=psych

30.

Roth

R. M.

Isquith

P. K.

Gioia

G. A.

(2005). Behavior rating inventory of executive function: Professional manual. Psychological Assessment Resources.

31.

Rowe

D. A.

Mazzotti

V. L.

Fowler

C. H.

Test

D. W.

Mitchell

V. J.

Clark

K. A.

Holzberg

Owens

T. L.

Rusher

Seaman-Tullis

R. L.

Gushanas

C. M.

Castle

Chang

Voggt

Kwiatek

Dean

(2021). Updating the secondary transition research base: Evidence- and research-based practices in functional skills. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 44(1), 28–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/2165143420958674

32.

Salkind

N. J.

(2010). Encyclopedia of research design (Vols. 1-0). Sage Publications, Inc. http://doi.org/10.4135/9781412961288

33.

Shogren

K. A.

Little

T. D.

Grandfield

Raley

Wehmeyer

M. L.

Lang

K. M.

Shaw

L. A.

(2018). The Self-Determination Inventory–Student Report: Confirming the factor structure of a new measure. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 45(2), 110–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534508418788168

34.

Shogren

K. A.

Ward

M. J.

(2018). Promoting and enhancing self-determination to improve the post-school outcomes of people with disabilities. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 48 (2), 187–196. http://doi.org/10.3233/JVR-180935

35.

Shogren

K. A.

Wehmeyer

M. L.

Palmer

S. B.

Forber-Pratt

A. J.

Little

T. J.

Lopez

S. J.

(2015). Causal agency theory: Reconceptualizing a functional model of self-determination. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 50(3), 251–263. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24827508

36.

Test

D. W.

(2016). Revision to Test, D. W., Fowler, C., & Kohler, P. (2013). Evidence-based practices and predictors in secondary transition: What we know and still need to know. National Technical Assistance Center on Transition. https://transitionta.org/wp-content/uploads/docs/EBPP_Exec_Summary_2016_12-13.pdf.

37.

Test

D. W.

Fowler

C. H.

Richter

S. M.

Mazzotti

White

Walker

A. R.

Kohler

Kortering

(2009). Evidence-based practices in secondary transition. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 32(2), 155–128. http://doi.org/10.1177/0885728809336859

38.

Toplak

M. E.

Bucciarelli

S. M.

Jain

Tannock

(2009). Executive functions: Performance-based measures and the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF) in adolescents with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Child Neuropsychology, 15(1), 53–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/09297040802070929

39.

Trainor

A. A.

Carter

E. W.

Karpur

Martin

J. E.

Mazzotti

V. L.

Morningstar

M. E.

Newman

Rojewski

J. W.

(2020). A framework for research in transition: Identifying important areas and intersections for future study. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 43(1), 5–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/2165143419864551

40.

U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2024). Persons with a disability: Labor force characteristics summary. https://www.bls.gov/news.release/disabl.nr0.htm

41.

van Buuren

Groothuis-Oudshoorn

. (2011). mice: Multivariate Imputation by Chained Equations in R. Journal of Statistical Software, 45(3), 1–67. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v045.i03

42.

Wehmeyer

M. L.

(1996). A self-report measure of self-determination for adolescents with cognitive disabilities. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 31(4), 282–293. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ542660

43.

Wolman

Campeau

Dubois

Mithaug

Stolarski

(1994). AIR Self-Determination Scale and user guide. American Institute for Research.

44.

Zinbarg

R. E.

Revelle

Yovel

(2005). Cronbach’s α, Revelle’s β, and McDonald’s ωh: Their relations with each other and two alternative conceptualizations of reliability. Psychometrika, 70(1), 123–133. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-003-0974-7