This study investigated K–12 experiences individuals with disabilities perceived as influencing their transition to and participation in postsecondary education. Using a convergent transformative mixed methods research design, the study integrated findings from interviews and surveys (n = 13) using multiple correspondence analysis. Qualitative analyses yielded eight K–12 facilitators of postsecondary education participation. Quantitative results showed participants reported access to at least one previously identified high school predictor, high levels of self-determination, and neutral identification with a disability community. Finally, integrated findings revealed that endorsement of facilitators was associated with experiencing a challenging transition to postsecondary education. Research and practice implications are discussed.
Americans With Disabilities Act [ADA] of 1990, Public Law No. 101-336, 104 Stat. 328 (1990).
2.
AndersonN. (2019, March29). Abuse of “extended time” on SAT and ACT outrages learning disability community. The Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/
3.
BazeleyP. (2018). Integrating analyses in mixed methods research. SAGE.
4.
BelascoA. S.RosingerK. O.HearnJ. C. (2015). The test-optional movement at America’s selective liberal arts colleges: A boon for equity or something else?Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 37(2), 206–223.
5.
BrantlingerE.JimenezR.KlingnerJ.PugachM.RichardsonV. (2005). Qualitative studies in special education. Exceptional Children, 71, 195–207. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290507100205
CarterE. W.TrainorA.OwensL.SwedenB.SunY. (2010). Self-determination prospects of youth with high-incidence disabilities: Divergent perspectives and related factors. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 18, 67–81. https://doi.org/10.1177/1063426609332605
8.
CoxB. E.ThompsonK.AndersonA.MintzA.LocksT.MorganL.EdelsteinJ.WolzA. (2017). College experiences for students with autism spectrum disorder: Personal identity, public disclosure, and institutional support. Journal of College Student Development, 58, 71–87. https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.2017.0004
9.
CreswellJ. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (3rd ed.). SAGE.
10.
CreswellJ. W.Plano ClarkV. L. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (2nd ed.). SAGE.
11.
DukesL. L.IIIMadausJ. W.Faggella-LubyM.LombardiA.GelbarN. (2017). PASSing college: A taxonomy for students with disabilities in postsecondary education. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 30, 111–122.
12.
Forber-PrattA. J.LyewD. A.MuellerC.SamplesL. B. (2017). Disability identity development: A systematic review of the literature. Rehabilitation Psychology, 62, 198–207.
13.
GetzelE. E.ThomaC. A. (2008). Experiences of college students with disabilities and the importance of self-determination in higher education settings. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 31, 77–84. https://doi.org/10.1177/0885728808317658
HaberM. G.MazzottiV. L.MustianA. L.RoweD. A.BartholomewA. L.TestD. W.FowlerC. H. (2016). What works, when, for whom, and with whom: A meta-analytic review of predictors of postsecondary success for students with disabilities. Review of Educational Research, 86, 123–162. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315583135
JamesonD. R. (2007). Self-determination and success outcomes of two-year college students with disabilities. Journal of College Reading and Learning, 37, 26–46.
18.
KlingnerJ. K.BoardmanA. G. (2011). Addressing the “research gap” in special education through mixed methods. Learning Disability Quarterly, 34, 208–218. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731948711417559
19.
KutscherE. L. (2019). A mixed methods exploration of persistence in postsecondary education among young adults with disabilities or learning differences (Publication No. 10981464) [Doctoral dissertation, The George Washington University]. ProQuest Dissertations.
20.
KutscherE. L.TuckwillerE. D. (2019). Persistence in higher education for students with disabilities: A mixed systematic review. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 12, 136–155. https://doi.org/10.1037/dhe0000088
21.
MaxwellJ. A. (2012). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach. SAGE.
22.
MazzottiV. L.RoweD. A.SinclairJ.PoppenM.WoodsW. E.ShearerM. L. (2015). Predictors of post-school success: A systematic review of NLTS2 secondary analyses. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 39, 196–215. https://doi.org/10.1177/2165143415588047
MilesM. B.HubermanA. M.SaldañaJ. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE.
25.
Nario-RedmondM. R.NoelJ. G.FernE. (2013). Redefining disability, re-imagining the self: Disability identification predicts self-esteem and strategic responses to stigma. Self and Identity, 12, 468–488. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15298868.2012.681118
26.
National Technical Assistance Center on Transition. (2015). Predictor implementation school/district self-assessment.
27.
NewmanL. A.MadausJ. W. (2015). Reported accommodations and supports provided to secondary and postsecondary students with disabilities: National perspective. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 38, 173–181. https://doi.org/10.1177/2165143413518235
28.
NewmanL. A.WagnerM.KnokeyA. M.MarderC.NagleK.ShaverD.WeiX.CametoR.ContrerasE.FergusonK.GreeneS.SchwartingM. (2011). The post-high school outcomes of young adults with disabilities up to 8 years after high school: A report from the national longitudinal transition study-2 (NLTS2) (No. NCSER 2011-3005). SRI International.
29.
OnwuegbuzieA. J.CorriganJ. A. (2018). What is happening now? An overview of mixed methods applications in special education. Research in the Schools, 25(2), 1–22.
30.
OnwuegbuzieA. J.LeechN. L.CollinsK. M. (2008). Interviewing the interpretive researcher: A method for addressing the crises of representation, legitimation, and praxis. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 7(4), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1.1.674.2371&rep=rep1&type=pdf
31.
OnwuegbuzieA. J.RosliR.IngramJ. M.FrelsR. K. (2014). A critical dialectical pluralistic examination of the lived experience of select women doctoral students. The Qualitative Report, 19(3), 1–35.
32.
PattonL. D.RennK. A.GuidoF. M.QuayeS. J. (2016). Student development in college: Theory, research, and practice (3rd ed.). Jossey-Bass.
33.
RoweD. A.AlversonC. Y.UnruhD. K.FowlerC. H.KellemsR.TestD. W. (2015). A Delphi study to operationalize evidence-based predictors in secondary transition. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 38, 113–126. https://doi.org/10.1177/2165143414526429
34.
SaldañaJ. (2013). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. SAGE.
35.
SenA. (1993). Capability and well-being. In NussbaumM. C.SenA. (Eds.), The quality of life (pp. 30–53). Oxford University Press.
36.
ShakespeareT. (2014). Disability rights and wrongs revisited (2nd ed.). Routledge.
37.
SourialN.WolfsonC.ZhuB.QuailJ.FletcherJ.KarunananthanS.Bandeen-RocheK.BélandF.BergmanH. (2010). Correspondence analysis is a useful tool to uncover the relationships among categorical variables. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 63, 638–646. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.08.008
38.
TestD. W.MazzottiV. L.MustianA. L.FowlerC. H.KorteringL.KohlerP. D. (2009). Evidence-based secondary transition predictors for improving postschool outcomes for students with disabilities. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 32, 160–181. https://doi.org/10.1177/0885728809346960
39.
TrainorA. A. (2017). Transition by design: Improving equity and outcomes for adolescents with disabilities. Teachers College Press.
40.
WolmanJ.CampeauP.DuboisP.MithaugD.StolarskiV. (1994). AIR Self-Determination Scale and user guide. American Institute for Research.
