Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Since the 2004 reauthorization of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act, the field of secondary transition has focused on advancing the quality of special education research to ensure students with disabilities are provided instruction to improve both in-school and postschool outcomes. Mixed-methods research (MMR), which integrates qualitative and quantitative approaches, can provide unique insights into postsecondary outcomes for students with disabilities, but recommendations related to quality indicators for mixed-methods (QIMM) research in special education could be improved by offering explicit guidelines. Therefore, the purpose of this discussion article is to present a refined version of the National Technical Assistance Center on Transition: the Collaborative’s (NTACT:C) QIMM Checklist as a useable tool for researchers, editors, and policymakers for guiding the design of high-quality MMR in the field of secondary transition. We provide an overview of revisions to the checklist, exemplars of MMR studies that met MMR-specific items on the QIMM Checklist in secondary transition, and recommendations for using the checklist and supporting and facilitating MMR in the field of secondary special education and transition.

Keywords

mixed-methods qualitative quantitative quality indicators students with disabilities secondary transition

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Banks

González

Mueller

Pacheco

Scott

L. A.

Trainor

A. A.

(2023). Reflexive quality criteria: Questions and indicators for purpose-driven special education qualitative research. Exceptional Children, 89(4), 449–466. https://doi.org/10.1177/00144029231168106

Bazeley

(2018). Integrating analyses in mixed methods research. Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781526417190

Brantlinger

Jimenez

Klingner

Pugach

Richardson

(2005). Qualitative studies in special education. Exceptional Children, 71(2), 195–207. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290507100205

Brock

(2019). Mixed-methods research through the lens of a funding agency. Teachers College Record, 121(10), 20–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811912101014

Collins

K. M. T.

Onwuegbuzie

A. J.

Jiao

Q. G.

(2007). A mixed methods investigation of mixed methods sampling designs in social and health science research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(3), 267–294. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689807299526

Cook

A. L.

Wilczenski

F. L.

Vanderberg

(2017). Inclusive concurrent enrollment: A promising postsecondary transition practice for building self-determination among students with intellectual disability. Journal of the American Academy of Special Education Professionals, 12(1), 25–44. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1129638. https://doi.org/10.64546/jaasep.324

Corr

Snodgrass

M. R.

Love

Scott

I. M.

Kim

Andrews

(2021). Exploring the landscape of published mixed methods research in special education: A systematic review. Remedial and Special Education, 42(5), 317–328. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0741932520924030

Coyle

C. E.

Schulman-Green

Feder

Toraman

Prust

M. L.

Plano Clark

V. L.

Curry

(2016). Federal funding for mixed methods research in the health sciences in the United States: Recent trends. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 12(3), 305–324. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689816662578

Creamer

(2018). An introduction to fully integrated mixed methods research. Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781071802823

10.

Creswell

J. W.

Plano Clark

V. L.

(2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (2nd ed.). Sage.

11.

Creswell

J. W.

Plano Clark

V. L.

(2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). Sage.

12.

Curry

Nunez-Smith

(2015). Mixed methods in health sciences research: A practical primer. Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483390659

13.

Daly

A. J.

(Ed.). (2010). Social network theory and educational change. Harvard Education Press.

14.

Every Student Succeeds Act. (2015). P. L. 114-95, 20 U.S.C. § 6301 et seq.

15.

Fàbregues

Molina-Azorín

J. F.

(2017). Addressing quality in mixed methods research: A review and recommendations for a future agenda. Quality & Quantity, 51(6), 2847–2863. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-016-0449-4

16.

Fetters

M. D.

Curry

L. A.

Creswell

J. W.

(2013). Achieving integration in mixed methods designs—Principles and practices. Health Services Research, 48(6pt2), 2134–2156. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.12117

17.

Fetters

M. D.

Molina-Azorin

J. F.

(2020). Call for papers for a special issue on COVID-19 and novel mixed methods methodological approaches during catastrophic social changes. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 14(3), 281–287. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689820920098

18.

Gersten

Fuchs

L. S.

Compton

Coyne

Greenwood

Innocenti

M. S.

(2005). Quality indicators for group experimental and quasi-experimental research in special education. Exceptional Children, 71(2), 149–164. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290507100202

19.

Greene

J. C.

Caracelli

V. J.

Graham

W. F.

(1989). Toward a conceptual framework for mixed-method evaluation designs. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 11(3), 255–274. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1163620. https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737011003255

20.

Guetterman

T. C.

Fetters

M. D.

Creswell

J. W.

(2015). Integrating quantitative and qualitative results in health science mixed methods research through joint displays. The Annals of Family Medicine, 13(6), 554–561. https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.1865

21.

Horner

R. H.

Carr

E. G.

Halle

McGee

Odom

Wolery

(2005). The use of single-subject research to identify evidence-based practice in special education. Exceptional Children, 71(2), 165–179. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290507100203

22.

Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. (2004). P. L. 108-446, 20 U.S.C. § 6301 et seq.

23.

Institute of Education Sciences. (2015, May 29). Mixed methods in education research: IES technical working group meeting summary. https://ies.ed.gov/ncer/whatsnew/techworkinggroup/

24.

Knoke

Yang

(2008). Social network analysis. Sage.

25.

Krueger

R. A.

Casey

(2000). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research (3rd ed.). Sage.

26.

Kutscher

E. L.

Mazzotti

V. L.

McDaniel

S. L.

Zeng

Reardon

Bumble

J. L.

Voggt

Harris

(2024). Mixed methods research in secondary transition: A systematic literature review. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/21651434241268003

27.

Kutscher

E. L.

Tuckwiller

E. D.

(2020). A mixed methods study of K–12 influences on college participation for students with disabilities. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 43(2), 101–114. https://doi.org/10.1177/2165143420905104

28.

Kutscher

E. L.

Zeng

Reardon

McDaniel

S. L.

Mazzotti

V. L.

(2025). Pursuing equity through transformative mixed methods research: The case of secondary transition. Methods in Psychology, 12, 100188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.metip.2025.100188

29.

Lauterbach

A. A.

Bettini

Mathews

H. M.

Rossetti

Hugher

O. E.

(2022). Beyond exploratory: How varied qualitative methodologies can inform and advance the field of special education. In Farmer

T. W.

Talbott

McMaster

Lee

Aceves

T. C.

(Eds.) Handbook of special education research (Vol. 1, pp. 131–143). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003156857

30.

Ledford

J. R.

Lambert

J. M.

Pustejovsky

J. E.

Zimmerman

K. N.

Hollins

Barton

E. E.

(2023). Single-case-design research in special education: Next-generation guidelines and considerations. Exceptional Children, 89(4), 379–396. https://doi.org/10.1177/00144029221137656

31.

Leech

N. L.

Onwuegbuzie

A. J.

(2010). Guidelines for conducting and reporting mixed research in the field of counseling and beyond. Journal of Counseling & Development, 88(1), 61–69. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1556-6678.2010.tb00151.x

32.

Leko

M. M.

Hitchcock

J. H.

Love

H. R.

Houchins

D. E.

Conroy

M. A.

(2023). Quality indicators for mixed-methods research in special education. Exceptional Children, 89(4), 432–448. https://doi.org/10.1177/00144029221141031

33.

Lombardi

A. R.

Rifenbark

G. G.

Taconet

(2023). Quality indicators of secondary data analyses in special education research: A preregistration guide. Exceptional Children, 89(4), 397–411. https://doi.org/10.1177/00144029221141029

34.

Love

H. R.

Cook

B. G.

Cook

(2022). Mixed-methods approaches in special education research. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 37(4), 314–323. https://doi.org/10.1111/ldrp.12295

35.

Mastropieri

M. A.

Berkeley

McDuffie

K. A.

Graff

Marshak

Conners

N. A.

Diamond

C. M.

Simpkins

Bowdey

F. R.

Fulcher

Scruggs

T. E.

Cuenca-Sanchez

(2009). What is published in the field of special education? An analysis of 11 prominent journals. Exceptional Children, 76(1), 95–109. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290907600105

36.

Mazzotti

V. L.

Rowe

Kwiatek

Voggt

Chang

Fowler

C. H.

Poppen

Sinclair

Test

D. W.

(2021). Secondary transition predictors of post-school success: An update for the field. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 44(1), 47–64. https://doi.org/10.1177/2165143420959793

37.

Mazzotti

V. L.

Rowe

Sinclair

Poppen

Woods

Shearer

(2015). Predictors of post-school success: A systematic review of NLTS2 secondary analyses. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 39(4), 196–215. https://doi.org/10.1177/2165143415588047

38.

National Technical Assistance Center on Transition: The Collaborative. (n.d.). Quality indicator checklists. https://transitionta.org/quality-indicator-checklists/

39.

No Child Left Behind Act. (2001). P. L. 107-110, 20 U.S.C. § 6301 et seq.

40.

Noonan

McCall

Zheng

Gaumer Erickson

(2012). An analysis of collaboration in a state-level interagency transition team. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 35(3), 143–154. https://doi.org/10.1177/2165143412443083

41.

Odom

S. L.

Brantlinger

Gersten

Horner

R. H.

Thompson

Harris

K. R.

(2005). Research in special education: Scientific methods and evidence-based practices. Exceptional Children, 72(2), 137–148. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290507100201

42.

Onwuegbuzie

A. J.

Collins

K. M.

(2007). A typology of mixed methods sampling designs in social science research. The Qualitative Report, 12(2), 281–316. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2007.1638

43.

Page

S. J.

Persch

A. C.

(2013). Recruitment, retention, and blinding in clinical trials. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 67, 154–161. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2013.006197

44.

Patton

M. Q.

(2015). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Sage.

45.

Persch

Cleary

Rutkowski

Malone

Darragh

Case-Smith

(2015). Current practices in job matching: A project SEARCH perspective on transition. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 43(3), 259–273. https://doi.org/10.3233/JVR-150774

46.

Plano Clark

V. L.

(2019). Meaningful integration within mixed methods studies: Identifying why, what, when, and how. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 57, 106–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2019.01.007

47.

Plano Clark

V. L.

Ivankova

N. V.

(2016). Mixed methods research: A guide to the field. Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483398341

48.

Rowe

D. A.

Mazzotti

V. L.

Fowler

C. H.

Test

D. W.

Mitchell

V. J.

Clark

K. A.

Holzberg

Owens

T. L.

Rusher

Seaman-Tullis

R. L.

Gushanas

C. M.

Castle

Chang

W.-H.

Voggt

Kwiatek

Dean

(2021). Updating the secondary transition research base: Evidence- and research-based practices in functional skills. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 44(1), 28–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/2165143420958674

49.

Schneider

Chahine

Hattie

(2016). Examining life course transitions of young people with disabilities: The ACEE alumni study. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 4(10), 126–138. https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v4i10.1768

50.

Schoonenboom

(2024). Design patterns in mixed methods research: Embedding mixed methods matched comparisons sampling in previous design decisions. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 18(3), 383–392. https://doi.org/10.1177/15586898241257284

51.

Scott

L. A.

Shogren

K. A.

(2023). Advancing anti-racism and anti-ableism in transition: Equity-oriented indicators for research. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 46(4), 237–248. https://doi.org/10.1177/21651434231189665

52.

Snodgrass

M. R.

Love

H. R.

Roberts

C. A.

Gilson

C. B.

Yang

Badgett

N. M.

(2023). Is mixed methods bridging educational research divides? Using prevalence as an indicator of change. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 18(4), 430–446. https://doi.org/10.1177/15586898231184663

53.

Tashakkori

Creswell

J. W.

(2007). Editorial: The new era of mixed methods. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(1), 3–7. https://doi.org/10.1177/2345678906293042

54.

Test

D. W.

Fowler

C. H.

Richter

S. M.

Mazzotti

White

Walker

A. R.

Kohler

Kortering

(2009). Evidence-based practices in secondary transition. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 32(2), 155–128. https://doi.org/10.1177/0885728809336859

55.

Thompson

Diamond

K. E.

McWilliam

Snyder

S. W.

(2005). Evaluating the quality of evidence from correlational research for evidence-based practice. Exceptional Children, 71(2), 181–194. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290507100204

56.

Toste

J. R.

Logan

J. A.

Shogren

K. A.

Boyd

B. A.

(2023). The next generation of quality indicators for group design research in special education. Exceptional Children, 89(4), 359–378. https://doi.org/10.1177/00144029221150801

57.

Toste

J. R.

Talbott

Cumming

M. M.

(2023). Special issue preview: Introducing the next generation of quality indicators for research in special education. Exceptional Children, 89(4), 357–358. https://doi.org/10.1177/00144029231174106

58.

Trainor

A. A.

Carter

E. W.

Karpur

Martin

J. E.

Mazzotti

V. L.

Morningstar

M. E.

Newman

Rojewski

J. W.

(2020). A framework for research in transition: Identifying important areas and intersections for future study. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 43(1), 5–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/2165143419864551

59.

Trainor

A. A.

Romano

(2023). Intersectional research as a methodology for shaping transition research in support of equitable postschool outcomes. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 46(3), 169–180. https://doi.org/10.1177/21651434231169990

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.03 MB

0.01 MB

Quality Assessment in Secondary Transition Mixed-Methods Research

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material