Nearly 1 million students with Individualized Education Programs (IEPs) live in rural communities in the United States and, to date, no reviews have examined the transition literature related to supporting students in rural settings. The purpose of this review was to examine transition-related functional skill interventions conducted in rural settings. We conducted a systematic review of the experimental literature and identified 19 articles. Interventions reviewed included transition curricula, skill-based interventions, or other interventions (e.g., occupational therapy, interagency collaboration). Few articles included substantive reporting on rurality or the effects of community context on intervention design and implementation. We discuss the paucity of rural transition research and provide recommendations for conducting and reporting future research. Understanding best practice for conducting transition interventions in rural settings requires a framework that considers how the multidimensional elements of a given community influence postsecondary needs and outcomes.
AultM. J.FergusonB. T.BerryA. B.Hawkins-LearS.MagieraK. (2019). The founding, evolution, and impact of the American Council on Rural Special Education. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 38(2), 67–78. https://doi.org/10.1177/8756870519833916
2.
*Askvig.B. A.NaslundM.BorisinkoffE. D.DaigneaultR. (2020). A pilot study of a self-determination curriculum on secondary students. Journal of the American Academy of Special Education Professionals. Spring Summer, 21–40. https://www.naset.org/index.php?id=5507
3.
*AyresK. M.LangoneJ.BoonR. T.NormanA. (2006). Computer-based instruction for purchasing skills. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 41(3), 253–263. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23880199
4.
BennettK. J.BordersT. F.HolmesG. M.KozhimannilK. B.ZillerE. (2019). What is rural? Challenges and implications of definitions that inadequately encompass rural people and place. Health Affairs, 38(12), 1985–1992. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2019.00910
5.
BerryA. B.GravelleM. (2013). The benefits and challenges of special education positions in rural settings: Listening to teachers. The Rural Educator, 34(2), 3. https://doi.org/10.35608/ruraled.v34i2.400
6.
BrendleJ.TuckerK. J.LockR. H. (2018). Rural vocational and transition assessment practices for students with intellectual disabilities: What do educators really know?The Journal of Special Education Apprenticeship, 7(1), 1–18. http://doi.org/10.58729/2167-3454.1066
7.
BronfenbrennerU. (1979). The ecology of human development. Harvard University Press.
8.
BrownD. L.SchafftK. A. (2011). Rural people and communities in the 21st century. Polity Press.
9.
*CarterE. W.GustafsonJ. R.SreckovicM. A.Dykstra SteinbrennerJ. R.PierceN. P.BordA.StableA.RogersS.CzerwA.MullinsT. (2017). Efficacy of peer support interventions in general education classrooms for high school students with autism spectrum disorder. Remedial and Special Education, 38(4), 207–221. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932516672067
10.
*Cease-CookJ.TestD. W.ScrogginsL. (2013). Effects of the CD-Rom version of the Self-Advocacy Strategy on quality of contributions in I.E.P. meetings of high school students with intellectual disability. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 48(2), 258–268. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23880644
ChambersD. A.GlasgowR. E.StangeK. C. (2013). The dynamic sustainability framework: Addressing the paradox of sustainment amid ongoing change. Implementation Science, 8(117), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-8-117
13.
DamschroderL. J.AronD. C.KeithR. E.KirshS. R.AlexanderJ. A.LoweryJ. C. (2009). Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: A consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. Implementation Science, 4, 50. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-4-50
14.
*DiegelmannK. M.TestD. W. (2018). Effects of a self-monitoring checklist as a component of the Self-Directed I.E.P. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 52(1), 73–83. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/26420428
15.
Equity in CTE Workgroup, Career and Technical Education Research Network. (2022). Equity framework for career and technical education research. American Institutes for Research, Career and Technical Education Research Network. https://cteresearchnetwork.org/equity-cte-research-framework
16.
EricksonW.LeeC.von SchraderS. (2022). Disability statistics from the American Community Survey (ACS). Cornell University Yang-Tan Institute (YTI).
FarmerT. W.HammJ. V. (2016). Promoting supportive contexts for minority youth in low-resource rural communities: The SEALS model, directed consultation, and the scouting report approach. In CrockettL. J.CarloG. (Eds.), Rural ethnic minority youth and families in the United States (pp. 247–265). Springer.
19.
*FlowersC.TestD. W.Povenmire-KirkT. C.DiegelmannK. M.Bunch-CrumpK. R.Kemp-InmnaA.GoodnightC. I. (2018). A demonstration model of interagency collaboration for students with disabilities: A multilevel approach. The Journal of Special Education, 51(4), 211-221. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022466917720
20.
HarveyM.RoweD. A.TestD. W.LombardiA.SzymanskiA.BarnettK.ConradM. (2019). Promoting career and technical education for students with disabilities: A position paper of the division on Career Development and Transition and Association for Career and Technical Education. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Children, 43(2), 67–77. https://doi.org/10.1177/2165143419887839
21.
HawleyL. R.KoziolN. A.BovairdJ. A.McCormickC. M.WelchG. W.ArthurA. M.BashK. (2016). Defining and describing rural: Implications for rural special education research and policy. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 35(3), 3–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/875687051603500302
*IzzoM. V.YurickA.NagarajaH. N.NovakJ. A. (2010). Effects of a 21st-century curriculum on students’ information technology and transition skills. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 33(2), 95-105. https://doi.org/10.1177/0885728810369348
25.
LavalleyM. (2018). Out of the loop: Rural school are largely left out of research and policy discussions, exacerbating poverty, inequity, and isolation. Center for Public Education.
26.
LeeY.WehmeyerM.PalmerS. B.Williams-DiehmK.DaviesD. K.StockS. E. (2011). The effect of student-direct transition planning with a computer-based reading support program on the self-determination of students with disabilities. The Journal of Special Education, 45(2), 104-117. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022466909358916
27.
*LindstromL.DeGarmoD.KhuranaA.HiranoK.LeveL. (2020). Paths 2 the Future: Evidence for the efficacy of a career development intervention for young women with disabilities. Exceptional Children, 87(1), 54-73. https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402920924851
28.
LipscombS.HaimsonJ.LiuA. Y.BurghardtJ.JohnsonD. R.ThurlowM. L. (2017). Preparing for life after high school: The characteristics and experiences of youth in special education. Findings from the National Longitudinal Transition Study 2012. Volume 1: Comparisons with other youth [Executive summary] (NCEE 2017-4017). U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance.
29.
LiuA. Y.LacoeJ.LipscombS.HaimsonJ.JohnsonD. R.ThurlowM. L. (2018). Preparing for life after high school: The characteristics and experiences of youth in special education. Findings from the National Longitudinal Transition Study 2012. Volume 3: Comparisons over time [Executive summary] (NCEE 2018-4008). U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance.
30.
*LoY.BurkB.AndersonA. L. (2014). Using progressive video prompting to teach students with moderate intellectual disability to shoot a basketball. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 49(3), 354-367. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23881254
31.
*LombardiA. R.IzzoM. V.RifenbarkG. G.MurrayA.BuckA.MonahanJ.GelbarN. (2017). The impact of an online transition curriculum on secondary student reading: A multilevel examination. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 40(1), 15-24. https://doi.org/10.1177/2165143416681287
32.
MadausJ. W.GelbarN. W.DukesL. L.IIIFaggella-LubyM.LalorA. R.KowittJ. S. (2013). Thirty-five years of transition topics: A review of CDTEI issues from 1978-2012. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 36(1), 7–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/2165143413476734
33.
*MartinJ. E.Van DyckeJ. L.ChristensenW. R.GreeneB. A.GardnerJ. E.LovettD. L. (2006). Increasing student participation in I.E.P. meetings: Establishing the Self-Directed I.E.P. as an evidence-based practice. Exceptional Children, 72(3), 299-316. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290607200303
34.
MazzottiV. L.RoweD. A.KwiatekS.VoggtA.ChangW.FowlerC. H.PoppenM.SinclairJ.TestD. W. (2021). Secondary transition predictors of post-school success: An update for the field. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 44(1), 47–64. https://doi.org/10.1177/2165143420959793
35.
*McCormickS. T.KurthN. K.ChamblessC. E.IpsenC.HallJ. P. (2021). Case management strategies to promote employment for transition-age youth with disabilities. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 44(2), 120-131. https://doi.org/10.1177/2165143421991826
36.
McLeskeyJ.BarringerM.-D.BillingsleyB.BrownellM.JacksonD.KennedyM.LewisT.MaheadyL.RodriguezJ.ScheelerM. C.WinnJ.ZieglerD. (2017). High-leverage practices in special education. Council for Exceptional Children & CEEDAR Center.
37.
MonzalveM.HornerR. H. (2021). The impact of the Contextual Fit Enhancement Protocol on behavior support plan fidelity and student behavior. Behavioral Disorders, 46(4), 267–278. https://doi.org/10.1177/0198742920953497
PageM. J.McKenzieJ. E.BossuytP. M.BoutronI.HoffmannT. C.MulrowC. D.ShamseerL.TetzlaffJ. M.AklE. A.BrennaS. E.ChouR.GlanvilleJ.GrimshawJ. M.HrobjartssonA.LaluM. M.LiT.LoderE. W.Mayo-WilsonE.McDonaldS.. . .MoherD. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
40.
*PierceD.SakemillerL.SpenceA.LoBiancoT. (2020). Effectiveness of transition readiness interventions by school-based occupational therapy personnel. OTJR: Occupation, Participation, and Health, 40(1), 27-35. https://doi.org/10.1177/15394492198501
41.
RoweD. A.CarterE. W.GajjarS.MavesE. A.WallJ. C. (2020). Supporting strong transitions remotely: Considerations and complexities for rural communities. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 39(4), 220–232. https://doi.org/10.1177/8756870520958199
42.
*RoweD. A.Cease-CookJ.TestD. W. (2011). Effects of simulation training on making purchases with a debit card and tracking expenses. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 34(2), 107-114. https://doi.org/10.1177/0885728810395744
43.
RoweD. A.MazzottiV. L.FowlerC. H.TestD. W.MitchellV. J.ClarkK. A.HolzbergD.OwensT. L.RusherD.Seaman-TullisR. L.GushanasC. M.CastleH.ChangW.-H.VoggtA.KwiatekS.DeanC. (2021). Updating the secondary transition research base: Evidence- and research-based practices in functional skills. Career Development and Transition in Exceptional Individuals, 44(1), 28–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/2165143420958674
44.
*RoweD. A.TestD. W. (2012). Effects of simulation to teach students with disabilities basic finance skills. Remedial and Special Education, 34(4), 237-248. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932512448218
45.
RudeH.MillerK. J. (2018). Policy challenges and opportunities for rural special education. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 37(1), 21–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/8756870517748662
46.
SeamanR. L.Cannella-MaloneH. I. (2016). Vocational skills intervention for adults with autism spectrum disorder: A review of the literature. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 28, 479–494. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10882-016-9479-z
SiddawayA. P.WoodA. M.HedgesL. V. (2019). How to do a systematic review: A best practice guide for conducting and reporting narrative reviews, meta-analyses, and meta-syntheses. Annual Review of Psychology, 70, 747–770. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-102803
49.
SinghR. L.MoodyE. J.RiglesB.SmithE. B. (2019). What it takes to raise children with autism in a rural state. Advances in Neurodevelopmental Disorders, 3, 17–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41252-018-0082-4
50.
*SmithM. J.SherwoodK.RossB.SmithJ. D.DaWaltL.BishopL.HummL.ElkinsJ.SteachC. (2021). Virtual interview training for autistic transition age youth: A randomized controlled feasibility and effectiveness trial. Autism, 25(6), 1536-1552. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1362361321989928
Stewart-GinsburgJ. H.KwiatekS. M. (2020). Partnerships from the pews: Promoting interagency collaboration with religious organizations. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 43(3), 187–192. https://doi.org/10.1177/2165143420929660
54.
*TaberT. A.AlbertoP. A.HughesM.SeltzerA. (2002). A strategy for students with moderate disabilities when lost in the community. Research & Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 27(2), 141-152. https://doi.org/10.2511/rpsd.27.2.141
55.
*TaberT.A.AlbertoP. A.SeltzerA.HughesM. (2003). Obtaining assistance when lost in the community using cell phones. Research & Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 28(3), 105-116. https://doi.org/10.2511/rpsd.28.3.105
56.
TestD. W.FowlerC. H. (2018). A look at the past, present, and future of rural secondary transition. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 37(2), 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1177/8756870517751607
57.
TestD. W.FowlerC. H.KohlerP. (2012). Evidence-based practices and predictors in secondary transition: What we know and what we still need to know. National Secondary Transition Technical Assistance Center.
58.
TestD. W.FowlerC. H.RichterS.WhiteJ. A.MazzottiV. L.WalkerA. R.KohlerP.KorteringL. (2009). Evidence-based practices in secondary transition. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 32(2), 115–128. https://doi.org/10.1177/0885728809336859
59.
TestD. W.MazzottiV. L.MustianA. L.FowlerC. H.KorteringL.KohlerP. (2009). Evidence-based secondary transition predictors for improving postschool outcomes for students with disabilities. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 32(3), 160–181. https://doi.org/10.1177/0885728809346960
60.
TorresC.FarleyC. A.CookB. G. (2014). A special educator’s guide to successfully implementing evidence-based practices. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 47(2), 85–93. https://doi.org/10.1177/0040059914553209
61.
TrainorA. A.CarterE. W.KarpurA.MartinJ. E.MazzottiV. L.MorningstarM. E.NewmanL.RojewskiJ. W. (2020). A framework for research in transition: Identifying important areas and intersections for future study. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 43(1), 5–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/2165143419864551
WeissM. P.RoweD. A.MimsP. J.FarmerT. W. (2023). There’s no place like us: Beyond fidelity of implementation in rural contexts. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders31(2), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/10634266231155856
65.
WestbrookJ. D.FongC. J.NyeC.WilliamsA.WendtO.CortopassiT. (2015). Transition services for youth with autism: A systematic review. Research on Social Work Practice, 25(1), 10–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/104973151452483
66.
WittigK. M.HollandL. D.DaltonA. G. (2014). Implementing Project SEARCH in rural counties: A case study approach. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 40, 213–221. https://doi.org/10.3233/JVR-140686
67.
*WoodsL. L.SylvesterL.MartinJ. E. (2010). Student-directed transition planning: Increasing student knowledge and self-efficacy in the transition planning process. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 33(2), 106-114. https://doi.org/10.1177/0885728810368056
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
