This study conducted secondary analysis of data from the National Longitudinal Transition Study-2 (NLTS2) to examine the degree to which student, family, and school constructs predicted self-determination outcomes. Multi-group structural equation modeling was used to examine predictive relationships between 5 student, 4 family, and 7 school constructs developed from NLTS2 data and self-determination outcomes (autonomy, psychological empowerment, and self-realization) across disability groups. The pattern of predictive relationship between the constructs and self-determination outcomes across disability groups was complex. Only one construct—self-concept—showed a positive predictive relationship with all three self-determination constructs across most disability groups. Implications of the complex pattern of findings for research and practice are discussed.
AlgozzineB.BrowderD.KarvonenM.TestD. W.WoodW. M. (2001). Effects of interventions to promote self-determination for individuals with disabilities. Review of Educational Research, 71, 219–277. doi:10.3102/00346543071002219
2.
BronfenbrennerU. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
3.
BronfenbrennerU. (Ed.). (2005). Making human beings human: Bioecological perspectives on human development. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
4.
BrownT. A. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
5.
BryanT.BursteinK.BryanJ. (2001). Students with learning disabilities: Homework problems and promising practices. Educational Psychologist, 36, 167–180. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep3603_3
6.
CarterE. W.LaneK. L.PiersonM. R.GlaeserB. (2006). Self-determination skills and opportunities of transition-age youth with emotional disturbance and learning disabilities. Exceptional Children, 72, 333–346.
7.
CookB. G.OdomS. (2013). Evidence-based practices and implementation science in special education. Exceptional Children, 79, 135–144.
8.
FarmerT. W.LeungM. C.WeissM. P.IrvinM. J.MeeceJ. L.HutchinsB. C. (2011). Social network placement of rural secondary students with disabilities: Affiliation and centrality. Exceptional Children, 78, 24–38.
9.
KlineR. B. (2010). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
10.
LeeS. H.SoukupJ. H.LittleT. D.WehmeyerM. L. (2009). Student and teacher variables contributing to access to the general education curriculum for students with intellectual and developmental disabilities. The Journal of Special Education, 43, 29–44. doi:10.1177/0022466907313449
11.
LeeS. H.WehmeyerM. L.SoukupJ H.PalmerS. B. (2010). Impact of curriculum modifications on access to the general education curriculum for students with disabilities. Exceptional Children, 76, 213–233.
12.
LeeY.WehmeyerM. L.PalmerS. B.Williams-DiehmK.DaviesD. K.StockS. E. (2012). Examining individual and instruction-related predictors of the self-determination of students with disabilities: Multiple regression analyses. Remedial and Special Education, 33, 150–161. doi:10.1177/0741932510392053
13.
LittleT. D. (2013). Longitudinal structural equation modeling. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
14.
MartinJ. E.Huber MarshallL.SaleP. (2004). A 3-year study of middle, junior, high, and high school IEP meetings. Exceptional Children, 70, 285–297.
15.
MartinJ. E.van DyckeJ. L.ChristensenW. R.GreeneB. A.GardnerJ. E.LovettD. L. (2006). Increasing student participation in IEP meetings: Establishing the self-directed IEP as an evidenced-based practice. Exceptional Children, 72, 299–316.
16.
MuthénL. K.MuthénB. O. (1998–2010). Mplus user’s guide (6th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Author.
17.
NotaL.FerrariL.SoresiS.WehmeyerM. L. (2007). Self-determination, social abilities and the quality of life of people with intellectual disability. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 51, 850–865. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2788.2006.00939.x
18.
SailorW. (2009). Making RTI work: How smart schools are reforming education through schoolwide response-to-intervention models. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
19.
SailorW.DunlopG.SugaiG.HornerR. (2009). Handbook of positive behavior support. New York, NY: Springer.
20.
SandsD. J.SpencerK. C.GlinerJ. A.SwaimR. (1999). Structural equation modeling of student involvement in transition-related actions: The path of least resistance. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 14, 17–27. doi:10.1177/108835769901400103
21.
SchalockR. L.Borthwick-DuffyS.BradleyV.BuntixW. H. E.CoulterD. L.CraigE. P. M.. . .YeagerM. H. (2010). Intellectual disability: Definition, classification, and systems of support (11th ed.). Washington, DC: American Association on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities.
22.
ShogrenK. A. (2011). Culture and self-determination: A synthesis of the literature and directions for future research and practice. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 34, 115–127. doi:10.1177/0885728811398271
23.
ShogrenK. A. (2013). A social-ecological analysis of the self-determination literature. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 51, 496–511. doi:10.1352/1934-9556-51.6.496
24.
ShogrenK. A.Garnier VillarrealM. (in press). Developing student, family, and school constructs from NTLS2 data. The Journal of Special Education. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/0022466913513336
25.
ShogrenK. A.KennedyW.DowsettC.Garnier VillarrealM.LittleT. D. (in press). Exploring essential characteristics of self-determination for diverse students using data from NLTS2. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/2165143413486927
26.
ShogrenK. A.KennedyW.DowsettC.LittleT. D. (2013). Autonomy, psychological empowerment, and self-realization: Exploring data on self-determination from NLTS2. Exceptional Children, 80, 221–235.
27.
ShogrenK. A.PalmerS. B.WehmeyerM. L.Williams-DiehmK.LittleT. D. (2012). Effect of intervention with the Self-Determined Learning Model of Instruction on access and goal attainment. Remedial and Special Education, 33, 320–330. doi:10.1177/0741932511410072
28.
ShogrenK. A.WehmeyerM. L.PalmerS. B.RifenbarkG. G.LittleT. D. (in press). Relationships between self-determination and postschool outcomes for youth with disabilities. The Journal of Special Education. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/0022466913489733
29.
ShogrenK. A.WehmeyerM. L.PalmerS. B.SoukupJ. H.LittleT. D.GarnerN.LawrenceM. (2007). Examining individual and ecological predictors of the self-determination of students with disabilities. Exceptional Children, 73, 488–509.
30.
ShogrenK. A.WehmeyerM. L.PressgroveC. L.LopezS. J. (2006). The application of positive psychology and self-determination to research in intellectual disability: A content analysis of 30 years of literature. Research and Practice for Persons With Severe Disabilities, 31, 338–345.
31.
SipersteinG. N.NorinsJ.MohlerA. (2007). Social acceptance and attitude change: Fifty years of research. New York, NY: Springer.
32.
SnyderC. R.LopezS. J. (Eds.). (2002). Handbook of positive psychology. London, England: Oxford University Press.
33.
SoresiA.NotaL.WehmeyerM. L. (2007). Self-determination, social abilities, and the quality of life of people with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 51, 850–865.
34.
SRI International. (2000). National Longitudinal Transition Study-2 (NLTS2): Study design, timeline and data collection plan. Menlo Park, CA: Author.
35.
TaylorA. B. (2008). Two new methods of studying the performance of SEM fit indicators (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Arizona State University, Phoenix.
36.
TestD. W.MazzottiV. L.MustianA. L.FowlerC. H.KorteringL.KohlerP. (2009). Evidence-based secondary transition predictors for improving postschool outcomes for students with disabilities. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 32, 160–181. doi:10.1177/0885728809346960
37.
WagnerM. (1992). Analytic overview: NLTS design and longitudinal analysis approach. In WagnerM.D’AmicoR.MarderC.NewmanL.BlackorbyJ. (Eds.), What happens next? Trends in postschool outcomes of youth with disabilities: The second comprehensive report from the National Longitudinal Transition Study of special education students (pp. 2.1–2.14). Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.
38.
WagnerM.NewmanL.CametoR.LevineP. (2006a). The academic achievement and functional performance of youth with disabilities (A report of findings from the National Longitudinal Transition Study-2 [NLTS2]). Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.
39.
WagnerM.NewmanL.CametoR.LevineP. (2006b). An overview of findings from Wave 2 of the National Longitudinal Transition Study-2 (NLTS2). Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.
40.
WalkerH. M.CalkinsC.WehmeyerM. L.WalkerL.BaconA.PalmerS. B.. . .JohnsonD. R. (2011). A social-ecological approach to promote self-determination. Exceptionality, 19, 6–18. doi:10.1080/09362835.2011.537220
41.
WehmeyerM. L. (2003). A functional theory of self-determination: Model overview. In WehmeyerM. L.AberyB.MithaugD. E.StancliffeR. (Eds.), Theory in self-determination: Foundations for educational practice (pp. 182–201). Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas Publishing.
42.
WehmeyerM. L. (2006). Self-determination and individuals with severe disabilities: Re-examining meanings and misinterpretations. Research and Practice for Persons With Severe Disabilities, 30, 113–120. doi:10.2511/rpsd.30.3.113
43.
WehmeyerM. L. (Ed.). (2013). The Oxford handbook of positive psychology and disability. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
44.
WehmeyerM. L.AberyB.MithaugD. E.StancliffeR. (2003). Theory in self-determination: Foundations for educational practice. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas Publishing.
45.
WehmeyerM. L.LattinD.AgranM. (2001). Achieving access to the general curriculum for students with mental retardation: A curriculum decision-making model. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 36, 327–342.
46.
WehmeyerM. L.KelchnerK. (1995). The Arc’s Self-Determination Scale. Arlington, TX: The Arc National Headquarters.
47.
WehmeyerM. L.PalmerS. B.ShogrenK. A.Williams-DiehmK.SoukupJ. (2013). Establishing a causal relationship between interventions to promote self-determination and enhanced student self-determination. The Journal of Special Education, 46, 195–210. doi:10.1177/0022466910392377
48.
WoodW. M.FowlerC. H.UpholdN.TestD. W. (2005). A review of self-determination interventions with individuals with severe disabilities. Research and Practice for Persons With Severe Disabilities, 30, 121–146. doi:10.2511/rpsd.30.3.121
49.
World Health Organization. (2007). International classification of functioning, disability and health: Children and youth version. Geneva, Switzerland: Author.
50.
ZhangD. (2001). Self-determination and inclusion: Are students with mild mental retardation more self-determined in regular classrooms?Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 36, 357–362.
51.
ZhangD. (2005). Parent practices in facilitating self-determination skills: The influences of culture, socioeconomic status, and children’s special education status. Research and Practice for Persons With Severe Disabilities, 30, 154–162. doi:10.2511/rpsd.30.3.154
52.
ZhangD.WehmeyerM. L.ChenL.-J. (2005). Parent and teacher engagement in fostering the self-determination of students with disabilities: A comparison between the United States and the Republic of China. Remedial and Special Education, 26, 55–64. doi:10.1177/07419325050260010701
53.
ZimmermanB. J.KitsantasA. (2005). Homework practices and academic achievement: The mediating role of self-efficacy and perceived responsibility beliefs. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 30, 397–417. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2005.05.003
