This study explored the impact of race/ethnicity on three of the four essential characteristics of self-determination—autonomy, self-realization, and psychological empowerment—directly assessed in the National Longitudinal Transition Study-2. Specifically, the impact of race/ethnicity was examined with six disability groups established in previous research: high incidence disabilities (learning disabilities, emotional disturbances, speech language impairments, and other health impairments), sensory disabilities (visual and hearing impairments), cognitive disabilities (autism, multiple disabilities, and deaf-blindness); intellectual disability, traumatic brain injury, and orthopedic impairments. Measurement equivalence was established across groups, but significant differences in the latent means, variances, and covariances were found suggesting a complex pattern of differences based on race/ethnicity within disability groups. Implications for future research and practice are discussed.
AgranM.HongS.BlankenshipK. (2007). Promoting the self-determination of students with visual impairments: Reducing the gap between knowledge and practice. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 101, 453–464.
2.
AlgozzineB.BrowderD.KarvonenM.TestD. W.WoodW. M. (2001). Effects of interventions to promote self-determination for individuals with disabilities. Review of Educational Research, 71, 219–277. doi:10.3102/00346543071002219
3.
BruininksR. H.WoodcockR. W.WeathermanR. F.HillB. K. (1996). Scales of Independent Behavior-Revised. Itasca, IL: Riverside Publishing.
4.
CametoR.LevineP.WagnerM. (2004). Transition planning for students with disabilities (A special topic report of findings from the National Longitudinal Transition Study-2 [NLTS2]). Retrieved from www.nlts2.org/reports/2004_11/nlts2_report_2004_11_complete.pdf
5.
CheungG. W.RensvoldR. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 233–255. doi:10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5
6.
CobbR. B.LehmannJ.Newman-GoncharR.AlwellM. (2009). Self-determination for students with disabilities: A narrative metasynthesis. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 32, 108–114. doi:10.1177/0885728809336654
7.
FranklandH. C.TurnbullA. P.WehmeyerM. L.BlackmountainL. (2004). An exploration of the self-determination construct and disability as it relates to the Dine (Navajo) culture. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 39, 191–205.
8.
HancockG. R.LawrenceF. R.NevittJ. (2000). Type I error and power of latent mean methods and MANOVA in factorially invariant and noninvariant latent variable systems. Structural Equation Modeling, 7, 534–556.
9.
LeakeD.BooneR. (2007). Multicultural perspectives on self-determination from youth, parent, and teacher focus groups. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 30, 104–115.
10.
LittleT. D. (1997). Mean and covariance structures (MACS) analyses of cross-cultural data: Practical and theoretical issues. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 32, 53–76. doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr3201_3
11.
LittleT. D. (in press). Longitudinal structural equation modeling. New York, NY: Guilford.
12.
MorrierM. J.HessK. L. (2012). Ethnic differences in autism eligibility in the United States public schools. Journal of Special Education, 46, 49–63. doi:10.1177/0022466910372137
13.
MuthénL. K.MuthénB. O. (1998-2010). Mplus user’s guide (6th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
14.
NewmanL.WagnerM.KnokeyA.-M.MarderC.NagleK.ShaverD.SchwartingM. (2011). The post-high school outcomes of young adults with disabilities up to 8 years after high school (A report from the National Longitudinal Transition Study-2 [NLTS2; NCSER 2011-3005]). Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.
15.
RindskopfD. (1984). Using phantom and imaginary latent variables to parameterize constraints in linear structural models. Psychometrika, 49, 37–47.
16.
ShogrenK. A. (2011). Culture and self-determination: A synthesis of the literature and directions for future research and practice. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 34, 115–127. doi:10.1177/0885728811398271
17.
ShogrenK. A. (2012). Hispanic mothers’ perceptions of self-determination. Research and Practice for Persons With Severe Disabilities, 37, 170–184.
18.
ShogrenK. A.BovairdJ. A.PalmerS. B.WehmeyerM. L. (2010). Examining the development of locus of control orientations in students with intellectual disability, learning disabilities, and no disabilities: A latent growth curve analysis. Research and Practice for Persons With Severe Disabilities, 35, 80–92.
19.
ShogrenK. A.KennedyW.DowsettC.LittleT. D. (in press). Autonomy, psychological empowerment, and self-realization: Exploring data on self-determination from NLTS2. Exceptional Children.
20.
ShogrenK. A.WehmeyerM. L.PalmerS. B.SoukupJ. H.LittleT. D.GarnerN.LawrenceM. (2008). Understanding the construct of self-determination: Examining the relationship between The Arc’s Self-Determination Scale and the AIR Self-Determination Scale. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 33, 94–107. doi:10.1177/1534508407311395
21.
SkibaR. J.SimmonsA. B.RitterS.GibbA. C.RauschM. K.CuadradoJ.ChungC.-G. (2008). Achieving equity in special education: History, status, and current challenges. Exceptional Children, 74, 264–288.
22.
SRI International. (2000). National Longitudinal Transition Study-2 (NLTS2): Study design, timeline and data collection plan. Menlo Park, CA: Author.
23.
TestD. W.FowlerC. H.RichterS. M.WhiteJ.MazzottiV.WalkerA. R.KorteringL. (2009). Evidence-based practices in secondary transition. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 32, 115–128. doi:10.1177/0885728809336859
24.
TrainorA. (2002). Self-determination for students with learning disabilities: Is it a universal value?International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 15, 711–725.
25.
TrainorA. (2005). Self-determination perceptions and behaviors of diverse students with LD during the transition planning process. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38, 233–248.
26.
TrainorA.LindstromL.Simon-BurroughsM.MartinJ. E.SorrellsA. M. (2008). From marginalized to maximized opportunities for diverse youths with disabilities: A position paper of the Division on Career Development and Transition. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 31, 56–64.
27.
WagnerM.NewmanL.CametoR.LevineP. (2006a). The academic achievement and functional performance of youth with disabilities (A report of findings from the National Longitudinal Transition Study-2 [NLTS2]). Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.
28.
WagnerM.NewmanL.CametoR.LevineP. (2006b). An overview of findings from Wave 2 of the National Longitudinal Transition Study-2 (NLTS2). Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.
29.
WehmeyerM. L. (1994). Perceptions of self-determination and psychological empowerment of adolescents with mental retardation. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 29, 9–21.
30.
WehmeyerM. L. (2003). A functional theory of self-determination: Model overview. In WehmeyerM. L.AberyB.MithaugD. E.StancliffeR. (Eds.), Theory in self-determination: Foundations for educational practice (pp. 182–201). Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas.
31.
WehmeyerM. L.KelchnerK. (1995). The Arc’s Self-Determination Scale. Arlington, TX: The Arc National Headquarters.
32.
WoodW. M.FowlerC. H.UpholdN.TestD. W. (2005). A review of self-determination interventions with individuals with severe disabilities. Research and Practice for Persons With Severe Disabilities, 30, 121–146. doi:10.2511/rpsd.30.3.121
