The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of a system of least prompts procedure with a video prompt serving as the model in teaching office tasks to three high school students with moderate intellectual disability. A multiple probe across behaviors design replicated across participants was used to evaluate the intervention. The dependent variable was percentage of steps completed independently on collating and stapling papers, organizing a binder, and preparing a letter. Generalization was assessed across materials for each participant in a pre-/post-test format. Results indicated the three participants learned all three skills after the introduction of intervention and generalized the majority of steps to novel materials.
AyresK.GastD. L. (2010). Dependent measures and measurement procedures. In GastD. L. (Ed.), Single subject research methodology in behavioral sciences (pp. 329–381). New York, NY: Routledge.
2.
AyresK. M.LangoneJ. (2005). Intervention and instruction with video for students with autism: A review of the literature. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 40, 183-196.
3.
BanduraA. (1977). Social Learning Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
4.
BoyleC. A.BouletS.SchieveL.CohenR. A.BlumbergS. J.Yeargin-AllsoppM.. . .KoganM. D. (2011). Trends in the prevalence of developmental disabilities in US Children, 1997–2008. Pediatrics, 127, 1034–1042.
Canella-MaloneH.SigafoosJ.O’ReillyM.de la CruzB.EdrisinhaC.LancioniG. E. (2006). Comparing video prompting to video modeling for teaching daily living skills to six adults with developmental disabilities. Education and Treatment in Developmental Disabilities, 41, 344–356.
7.
CihakD.AlbertoP. A.Taber-DoughtyT.GamaR. I. (2006). A comparison of static picture prompting and video prompting simulation strategies using group instructional procedures. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 21, 89–99.
8.
CihakD.FahrenkrogC.AyresK. M.SmithC. (2010). Transitional behaviors for students with autism spectrum disorders in the general education classroom. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 12, 103–115.
9.
CooperJ. O.HeronT. E.HewardW. L. (2007). Applied behavior analysis (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill.
10.
GastD. L. (2010). Single subject research methodology in behavioral sciences. New York, NY: Routledge.
11.
GastD. L.AultM. J.WoleryM.DoyleP. M. (1988). Comparison of constant time delay and the system of least prompts in teaching sight word reading to students with moderate retardation. Education and Training in Mental Retardation, 23, 117–128.
12.
GodbyS.GastD. L.WoleryM. (1987). A comparison of time delay and system of least prompts in teaching object identification. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 8, 283–305.
13.
GravesT. B.CollinsB. C.SchusterJ. W.KleinertH. (2005). Using video prompting to teach cooking skills to secondary students with moderate disabilities. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 40, 34–46.
14.
HammondD.WhatleyA.Ayres.K.GastD. L. (2010). Effectiveness of video modeling to teach iPod use to students with moderate intellectual disabilities. Education and Training in Autism and Develompental Disabilities, 45, 525-538.
15.
HornerR. D.KeilitzI. (1975). Training mentally retarded adolescents to brush their teeth. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 8, 301-309.
16.
JonesG. Y.CollinsB. C. (1997). Teaching microwave skills to adults with disabilities: Acquisition of nutrition and safety facts presented as nontargeted information. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 9, 59–78.
17.
ManleyK.CollinsB. C.StenhoffD. M.KleinertH. (2008). Using a system of least prompts procedure to teach telephone skills to elementary students with cognitive disabilities. Journal of Behavioral Education, 17, 221–236.
18.
MechlingL. C.GastD. L.FieldsE. A. (2008). Evaluation of a portable DVD player and system of least prompts to self-prompt cooking task completion by young adults with moderate intellectual disabilities. Journal of Special Education, 42, 179–190.
19.
MechlingL. C.GastD. L.SeidN. H. (2010). Evaluation of a personal digital assistant as a self-prompting device for increasing multi-step task completion by students with moderate intellectual disabilities. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 45, 422-439.
20.
MechlingL. C.SavidgeE. J. (2011). Using a personal digital assistant to increase completion of novel tasks and independent transitioning by students with autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 41, 687–704.
21.
RoidG.MillerL. (1997). Leiter International Performance Scale-Revised. Wood Dale, IL: Stoelting.
22.
SigafoosJ.O’ReillyM.CannellaH.UpadhyayaM.EdrisinhaC.LancioniG. E.. . .YoungD. (2005). Computer-presented video prompting for teaching microwave oven use to three adults with developmental disabilities. Journal of Behavioral Education, 14, 189–201.
23.
SmithT. L.CollinsB. C.SchusterJ. W.KleinertH. (1999). Teaching table cleaning skills to secondary students with moderate/severe disabilities: Facilitating observational learning during instructional downtime. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 34, 342–353.
24.
Van LaarhovenT.Van Laarhoven-MyersT.ZuritaL. M. (2007). The effectiveness of using a pocket PC as a video modeling and feedback device for individuals with developmental disabilities in vocational settings. Assistive Technology Outcomes and Benefits, 4, 28–45.
25.
WoleryM.AultM. J.GastD. L.DoyleP. M.GriffenA. K. (1990). Comparison of constant time delay and the system of least prompts in teaching chained tasks. Education and Training in Mental Retardation, 25, 243-257.
