This study explored teacher perceptions of their ability to implement the Self-Determined Learning Model of Instruction (SDLMI) with fidelity and the impact of these perceptions on student self-determination outcomes on the Self-Determination Inventory: Student Report (SDI:SR). Using a piece-wise growth model, we found stability in teacher perceptions of their implementation over a 2-year period even with the introduction of a second transition-focused intervention to a subset of the sample. Using a mediation model, we then found a complex relationship between teacher perceptions of fidelity and student outcomes on the SDI:SR. We found that teacher-perceived fidelity over the course of the year was influenced by students’ beginning of the year self-determination status and that teacher-perceived fidelity then affected students’ end of the year self-determination status. The findings suggest an interactive relationship between teacher perceptions of implementation and student outcomes. Implications for research and practice are discussed.
AsendorpfJ.ConnerM.De FruytF.De HouwerJ.DenissenJ.FiedlerK.. . . WichertsJ. (2013). Recommendations for increasing replicability in psychology. European Journal of Personality, 27, 108–119. doi:10.1002/per.1919
2.
BarnardJ.McCullochR.MengX.-L. (2000). Modeling covariance matrices in terms of standard deviations and correlations, with application to shrinkage. Statistica Sinica, 10, 1281–1312.
3.
BreitensteinS. M.GrossD.GarveyC. A.HillC.FoggL.ResnickB. (2010). Implementation fidelity in community-based interventions. Research in Nursing & Health, 33, 164–173. doi:10.1002/nur.20373
4.
BurkeK. M.ShogrenK. A.AntoshA. A.LaPlanteT.MastersonL. (2019). Implementing the SDLMI With Students With Significant Support Needs During Transition Planning. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/2165143419887858
5.
ChouC.YangD.PentzM. A.HserY. (2004). Piecewise growth curve modeling approach for longitudinal prevention study. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 46, 213–225. doi:10.1016/S0167-9473(03)00149-X
6.
CookB. G.OdomS. L. (2013). Evidence-based practices and implementation science in special education. Exceptional Children, 79, 135–144.
7.
DaneA. V.SchneiderB. H. (1998). Program integrity in primary and early secondary prevention: Are implementation effects out of control?Clinical Psychology Review, 18, 23–45.
8.
DurlakJ. A.DuPreE. P. (2008). Implementation matters: A review of research on the influence of implementation on program outcomes and the factors affecting implementation. American Journal of Community Psychology, 41, 327–350.
9.
DusenburyL.BranniganR.FalcoM.HansenW. B. (2003). A review of research on fidelity of implementation: Implications for drug abuse prevention in school settings. Health Education Research, 18, 237–256.
10.
EcclesM. P.MittmanB. S. (2006). Welcome to implementation science. Implementation Science, 1, Article 1. doi:10.1186/1748-5908-1-1
11.
FixsenD. L.BlaseK. A.DudaM. A.NaoomS. F.Van DykeM. (2010). Sustainability of evidence-based programs in education. Journal of Evidence-Based Practices for Schools, 11, 30–46.
12.
GelmanA.CarlinJ. B.SternH. S.RubinD. B. (2004). Bayesian data analysis. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall.
13.
HagiwaraM.ShogrenK. A.LaneK. L.RaleyS. K.SmithS. A. (in press). Development of the Self-Determined Learning Model of Instruction coaching model: Implications for research and practice. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities.
14.
HagiwaraM.ShogrenK. A.LekoM. L. (2017). Reviewing research on the Self-Determined Learning Model of Instruction: Mapping the terrain and charting a course to promote adoption and use. Advances in Neurodevelopmental Disorders, 1, 3–13. doi:10.1007/s41252-017-0007-7
15.
HarnB.ParisiD.StoolmillerM. (2013). Balancing fidelity with flexibility and fit: What do we really know about fidelity of implementation in schools?Exceptional Children, 79, 181–193. doi:10.1177/001440291307900204
16.
JackmanS. (2009). Bayesian analysis for the social sciences. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.
17.
KaplanD.DepaoliS. (2013). Bayesian statistical methods. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
18.
LeeS. Y.SongX. Y. (2004). Evaluation of the Bayesian and maximum likelihood approaches in analyzing structural equation models with small sample sizes. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39, 653–686. doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr3904_4
19.
National Technical Assistance Center on Transition. (2016). Evidence-based practices and predictors in secondary transition: What we know and what we still need to know. Charlotte, NC: Author.
R Core Team. (2003). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
22.
RispoliM.ZainiS.MasonR.BrodheadM.BurkeM. D.GregoriE. (2017). A systematic review of teacher self-monitoring on implementation of behavioral practices. Teaching and Teacher Education, 63, 58–72.
23.
SanettiL. M. H.Collier-MeekS. M. (2015). Multi-tiered implementation support for educators. Psychology in the Schools, 52, 815–828.
24.
ShogrenK. A.AndersonM. A.RaleyS. K.HagiwaraM. (2018). Exploring the relationship between student and teacher/proxy-respondent scores on the Self-Determination Inventory. Manuscript submitted for publication.
25.
ShogrenK. A.BurkeK. M.AndersonM. A.AntoshA. A.WehmeyerM. L.LaPlanteT.ShawL. A. (2018). Evaluating the differential impact of interventions to promote self-determination and goal attainment for transition-age youth with intellectual disability. Research and Practice for Persons With Severe Disabilities, 43, 165–180. doi:10.1177/1540796918779775
26.
ShogrenK. A.BurkeK. M.AntoshA. A.WehmeyerM. L.LaPlanteT.ShawL. A.RaleyS. K. (2019). Impact of the Self-Determined Learning Model of Instruction on self-determination and goal attainment in adolescents with intellectual disability. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 30, 22–34. doi:10.1177/1044207318792178
27.
ShogrenK. A.LittleT. D.GrandfieldE.RaleyS. K.WehmeyerM. L.LangK. M.ShawL. A. (2018). The Self-Determination Inventory-student report: Confirming the factor structure of a new measure. Assessment for Effective Intervention. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/1534508418788168
28.
ShogrenK. A.RaleyS. K.BurkeK. M.WehmeyerM. L. (2018). The Self-Determined Learning Model of Instruction: Teacher’s guide. Lawrence: Kansas University Center on Developmental Disabilities.
29.
ShogrenK. A.ShawL. A. (2016). The role of autonomy, self-realization, and psychological empowerment in predicting early adulthood outcomes for youth with disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 37, 55–62. doi:10.1177/0741932515585003
30.
ShogrenK. A.WehmeyerM. L. (2017). Self-Determination Inventory: Student-report. Lawrence: Kansas University Center on Developmental Disabilities.
31.
ShogrenK. A.WehmeyerM. L.AntoshA. A.NaoomS. (2015). Self-Determined Learning Model of Instruction teacher fidelity measure. Lawrence: Kansas University Center on Developmental Disabilities.
32.
ShogrenK. A.WehmeyerM. L.LaneK. L.QuirkC. (2017). The Self-Determined Learning Model of Instruction: Examining the impact of implementation supports on teacher and student outcomes. Washington, DC: U.S. Dept. of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Special Education Research, Special Education Research Grants competition, Goal 3: Efficacy and Replication, CFDA #84.324A.
33.
ShogrenK. A.WehmeyerM. L.PalmerS. B.Forber-PrattA. J.LittleT. J.LopezS. J. (2015). Causal agency theory: Reconceptualizing a functional model of self-determination. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 50, 251–263.
34.
ShogrenK. A.WehmeyerM. L.PalmerS. B.RifenbarkG. G.LittleT. D. (2015). Relationships between self-determination and postschool outcomes for youth with disabilities. Journal of Special Education, 53, 30–41. doi:10.1177/0022466913489733
35.
van de SchootR.KaplanD.DenissenJ.AsendorpfJ. B.NeyerF. J.van AkenM. A. G. (2014). A gentle introduction to Bayesian analysis: Applications to developmental research. Child Development, 85, 842–860. doi:10.1111/cdev.12169
36.
WehmeyerM. L.PalmerS. B. (2003). Adult outcomes for students with cognitive disabilities three-years after high school: The impact of self-determination. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 38, 131–144.
37.
WehmeyerM. L.PalmerS. B. (2011). Whose future is it?Verona, WI: Attainment Company.
38.
WehmeyerM. L.SchwartzM. (1997). Self-determination and positive adult outcomes: A follow-up study of youth with mental retardation or learning disabilities. Exceptional Children, 63, 245–255.
