A national sample of students with disabilities and their nondisabled peers in rural high schools responded to a survey about their postsecondary plans and how they were preparing for them. The study included 3,318 11th- and 12th-grade students from 73 randomly selected schools. Findings indicate that 78.5% of students with disabilities and 90.7% of their nondisabled peers plan to continue their education after high school. Only 4.5% of students with disabilities were enrolled in a college preparatory program. A greater percentage of students with disabilities participated in career exploration activities such as job mentoring, internships, and cooperative education programs than expected, and they found teachers and school staff important sources of information. Implications of these findings are discussed.
AlbrechtD. E.AlbrechtC. M.AlbrechtS. L. (2000). Poverty in nonmetropolitan America: Impacts of industrial, employment, and family structural variables. Rural Sociology, 65, 87–103.
2.
BenzM. R.LindstromL.YovanoffP. (2000). Improving graduation and employment outcomes of students with disabilities: Predictive factors and student perspectives. Exceptional Children, 66, 509–529.
3.
BenzM. R.YovanoffP.DorenB. (1997). School-to-work components that predict postschool success for students with and without disabilities. Exceptional Children, 63, 151–165.
4.
BurnellB. A. (2003). The “real world” aspirations of work-bound rural students. Journal of Research in Rural Education, 18, 104–113.
5.
deBettencourtL. U.ZigmondN.ThortonH. (1989). Follow-up of postsecondary-age rural learning disabled graduates and dropouts. Exceptional Children, 56, 40–49.
6.
DunnC.ShumakerL. (1997). A follow-up study of former special education students from a rural and urban county school system. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 20, 43–54. doi:10.1177/0885728897020000104
7.
ElderG. H.CongerR. D. (2000). Children of the land: Adversity and success in rural America. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
8.
EngbergM. E.WolniakG. C. (2010). Examining the effects of high school contexts on postsecondary enrollment. Research in Higher Education, 51, 132–153. doi:10.1007/s11162-009-9150-y
9.
EstellD. B.FarmerT. W.CairnsR. B.CairnsB. D. (2002). Social relations and academic achievement in inner-city early elementary classrooms. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 26, 518–528.
10.
FarmerT. W.EstellD. B.BishopJ. L.O’NealK.CairnsB. D. (2003). Rejected bullies or popular leaders? The social relations of aggressive subtypes of rural African-American early adolescents. Developmental Psychology, 39, 992–1004. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.39.6.992
11.
Garrison-WadeD. F.LehmannJ. P. (2009). A conceptual framework for understanding students with disabilities transition to community college. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 33, 417–445.
12.
GerberP. J.GinsburgR.ReiffH. B. (1992). Identifying alterable patterns in employment success for highly successful adults with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 25, 475–487.
GoldbergR. J.HigginsE. L.RaskindM. H.HermanK. L. (2003). Predictors of success in individuals with learning disabilities: A qualitative analysis of a 20-year longitudinal study. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 18, 222–236. doi:10.1111/1540-5826.00077
15.
HardréP. L.SullivanD. W. (2008). Student differences and environment perceptions: How they contribute to student motivation in rural high schools. Learning and Individual Differences, 18, 471–485. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2007.11.010
JohnsonC. (2008). Post-school outcomes for students in the state of Washington, USA, receiving special education services. Journal of the International Association of Special Education, 9, 78–88.
JohnsonM. K.ElderG. H.SternM. (2005). Attachments to family and community and the young adult transition of rural youth. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 15, 99–125.
20.
LeeS.WehmeyerM. L.PalmerS. B.SoukupJ. H.LittleT. D. (2008). Self-determination and access to the general education curriculum. The Journal of Special Education, 42, 91–107. doi:10.1177/0022466907312354
21.
LeyJ.NelsonS.BeltyukovaS. (1996). Congruence of aspirations of rural youth with expectations held by parents and school staff. Journal of Research in Rural Education, 12, 133–141.
22.
LiJ. Y.BassettD. S.HutchinsonS. R. (2009). Secondary special educators’ transition involvement. Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disability, 34, 163–172.
23.
LichterD.JohnsonK. (2007). The changing spatial concentration of America’s rural poor population. Rural Sociology, 72, 331–358.
24.
MeeceJ. L.IrvinM. J.ByunS. Y.FarmerT. W.HutchinsB.WeissM. P. (2010). Preparing for adulthood: A recent examination of rural youths’ future educational and vocational aspirations. Manuscript submitted for publication.
25.
MellardD. (2005). Strategies for transition to postsecondary educational settings. Focus on Exceptional Children, 37(9), 1–19.
26.
NewmanL.WagnerM.CametoR.KnokeyA.-M. (2009). The post-high school outcomes of youth with disabilities up to 4 years after high school. A report from the National Longitudinal Transition Study-2 (NLTS2) (NCSER 2009-3017). Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.
27.
NyeB.HedgesL. V.KonstantopoulosS. (2000). Effects of small classes on academic achievement: The results of the Tennessee class size experiment. American Educational Research Journal, 37, 123–151. doi:10.2307/1163474
28.
PlantyM.HussarW.SnyderT.KenaG.KewalRamaniA.KempJ.. . . DinkesR. (2009). The Condition of Education 2009 (NCES 2009-081). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
29.
ProvasnikS.KewalRamaniA.ColemanM. M.GilbertsonL.HerringW.XieQ. (2007). Status of education in rural America (NCES 2007-040). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2007/2007040.pdf
30.
ReschlyA. L.ChristensonS. L. (2006). Prediction of dropout among students with mild disabilities: A case for the inclusion of student engagement variables. Remedial and Special Education, 27, 276–292. doi:10.1177/07419325060270050301
31.
RojewskiJ. W. (1999). Occupational and educational aspirations and attainment of young adults with and without LD 2 years after high school completion. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 32, 533–552.
32.
RoscignoV. J.CrowleyM. L. (2001). Rurality, institutional disadvantage, and achievement/attainment. Rural Sociology, 66, 268–292.
33.
RuschF. R.HughesC.AgranM.MartinJ. E.JohnsonJ. R. (2009). Toward self-directed learning, post-high school placement, and coordinated support constructing new transition bridges to adult life. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 32, 53–59. doi:10.1177/0885728809332628
34.
SmithT. L.BeyerJ. F.PollowayE. A.SmithJ. D.PattonJ. R. (2008). Ethical considerations in teaching self-determination: Challenges in rural special education. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 27, 30–35.
35.
TestD. W.FowlerC. H.WhiteJ.RichterS.WalkerA. (2009). Evidence-based secondary transition practices for enhancing school completion. Exceptionality, 17, 16–29. doi:10.1080/09362830802590144
36.
TrainorA. (2005). Self-determination perceptions and behaviors of diverse students with LD during the transition planning process. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38, 233–249. doi:10.1177/0222194050380030501
WagnerM.NewmanL.CametoR.LevineP. (2006). The academic achievement and functional performance of youth with disabilities. A report of findings from the National Longitudinal Transition Study-2 (NLTS2). Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.
39.
WebbK. W.PattersonK. B.SyverudS. M.Seabrooks-BlackmoreJ. J. (2008). Evidenced based practices that promote transition to postsecondary education: Listening to a decade of expert voices. Exceptionality, 16, 192–206. doi:10.1080/09362830802412182
40.
ZhangD.BenzM. R. (2006). Enhancing self-determination of culturally diverse students with disabilities: Current status and future directions. Focus on Exceptional Children, 38, 1–12.
