We examined the effect of eight components of transition planning on the postsecondary enrollment of English learners with disabilities, using quasi-experimental propensity score modeling and weighted data from the National Longitudinal Transition Study-2 (NLTS2). Results support the hypothesis that transition-planning experiences have a positive impact on the postsecondary enrollment of English learners with disabilities. Findings indicate that English learners with disabilities who were involved in their transition-planning meeting, either leading or being an active participant in the meeting, as well as being directly involved in developing their transition-planning goals, were more likely to continue their education after high school in a 2- or 4-year college. Having a transition plan goal specifically focused on attending a 2- or 4-year college affects whether ELs with disabilities are more likely to attend college. Students who attended a high school that actively collaborated with postsecondary programs by including a postsecondary representative in transition-planning meetings were more likely to continue their education at a 2- or 4- year college or a career/technical education school. The current study’s findings demonstrate the importance of equipping English learners with disabilities with the opportunities, knowledge, and skills to lead their transition goal setting and planning, as well as the importance of closer collaborations with postsecondary institutions.
AlcottB. (2017). Does teacher encouragement influence students’ educational progress? A propensity-score matching analysis. Research in Higher Education, 58, 773–804. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-017-9446-2
2.
AlversonC. Y.ReardonK.HowardC. D.WiebeG.FowlerC. H.RoweD. A.MazzottiV. L. (2024). Operationalizing predictors of postschool success in secondary transition: A Delphi study. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 48, 233–246. https://doi.org/10.1177/21651434241271408
3.
Barnard-BrakL.LechtenbergerD. (2010). Student IEP participation and academic achievement across time. Remedial and Special Education, 31(5), 343–349. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932509338382
4.
BourdieuP. (1986). The forms of capital. In RichardsonJ. (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241–258). Greenwood.
5.
BurkeK. M.RaleyS. K.ShogrenK. A.HagiwaraM.Mumbardo-AdamC.UyanikH.BehrensS. (2018). A meta-analysis of interventions to promote self-determination for students with disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 1, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932518802274
6.
CaliendoM.KopeingS. (2008). Some practical guidance for the implementation of propensity score matching. Journal of Economic Surveys, 22(1), 31–72. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6419.2007.00527.x
7.
CametoR. (1993). Support services provided by secondary schools. In WagnerM. (Ed.), The secondary school programs of students with disabilities. A report from the National Longitudinal Transition Study of Special Education Students (pp. 6:1–6:40). SRI International. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED365084
CarrollJ. M.PattisonE.MullerC.SuttonA. (2020). Barriers to bachelor’s degree completion among college students with a disability. Sociological Perspectives, 63(5), 809–832. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731121420908896
10.
CoxD. R. (1970). Analysis of binary data. Chapman & Hall/CRC.
11.
DuGoffE. H.SchulerM.StuartE. A. (2014). Generalizing observational study results: Applying propensity score methods to complex surveys. Health Services Research, 49(1), 284–303. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.12090
12.
Education for the Handicapped Act Amendments of 1983, Pub. L. No. 98-457, 97 Stat. 463 (1983).
13.
Education for the Handicapped Act Amendments of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-642, 100 Stat. 1292 (1986).
14.
EspositoJ.Evans-WintersV. (2022). Introduction to intersectional qualitative research. Sage.
15.
GothbergJ. E.GreenG.KohlerP. D. (2019). District implementation of research -based practices for transition planning with culturally and linguistically diverse youth with disabilities and their families. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 42(2), 77–86. https://doi.org/10.1177/2165143418762794
16.
HaberM. G.MazzottiV. L.MustianA. L.RoweD. A.BartholomewA. L.TestD. W.FowlerC. H. (2016). What works, when, for whom, and with whom: A meta-analytic review of predictors of postsecondary success for students with disabilities. Review of Educational Research, 86(1), 123–162. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315583135
17.
HoD.ImaiK.KingG.StuartE. A. (2007). Matching as nonparametric preprocessing for reducing model dependence in parametric causal inference. Political Analysis, 15(3), 199–236. https://doi.org/10.1093/pan/mpl013
18.
HussarB.ZhangJ.HeinS.WangK.RobertsA.CuiJ.SmithM.Bullock MannF.BarmerA.DiligR. (2020). The condition of education 2020 (NCES 2020-144). National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Department of Education. https://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfoasp?pubid=2020144
19.
The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act of 2004 (IDEA 2004). Implementing regulations, 34 C.F.R. § 300.321.
JavitzH.WagnerM. (2003). Analysis of potential bias in the sample of local education agencies (LEAs) in the National Longitudinal Transition Study-2 (NLTS2). SRI International.
22.
JavitzH.WagnerM. (2005). Analysis of potential bias in the Wave 1 and Wave 2 respondents to the National Longitudinal Transition Study-2 (NLTS2). SRI International.
KannoY.CromleyJ. G. (2013). English language learners’ access to and attainment in postsecondary education. TESOL Quarterly, 47(1), 89–121. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.49
25.
KeelJ. M.CushingL. S.AwsumbJ. M. (2018). Post-school visions and expectations of Latino students with learning disabilities, their parents, and teachers. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 41(2), 88–98. https://doi.org/10.1177/2165143417708997
26.
KlingnerJ. K.ArtilesA. J.BarlettaL. M. (2006). English language learners who struggle with reading: Language acquisition or LD?Journal of Learning Disabilities, 39, 108–128. https://doi.org/10.1177/00222194060390020101
27.
KoD.MaweneD.RobertsK.HongJ. J. (2021). A systematic review of boundary-crossing partnerships in designing equity-oriented special education services for culturally and linguistically diverse students with disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 42, 412–425. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932520983474
28.
KohlerP. D.GothbergJ. E.FowlerC.CoyleJ. (2016). Taxonomy for transition programming 2.0: A model for planning, organizing, and evaluating transition education, services, and programs. Western Michigan University. www.transitionta.org
LinD.PsatyB.KronmalR. (1988). Assessing the sensitivity of regression results to unmeasured confounders in observational studies. Biometrics, 54(3), 948–963. https://doi.org/10.1080/19345747.2015.1078862
31.
LiuA. Y.LipscombS.JohannA. (2017). The characteristics and experiences of English learner students with disabilities in secondary school: Evidence from the National Longitudinal Transition Study 2012 (Working Paper No. 56). Mathematica Policy Research. file:///C:/Users/e16208/Downloads/Characteristics%20Experiences%20WP56.pdf
LombardiA. R.RifenbarkG. G.TaconetA. V. (2023). Quality Indicators of secondary data analyses in special education research: A pre-registration guide. Exceptional Children, 89(4), 397–411. https://doi.org/10.1177/00144029221141029
34.
LongM. C.CongerD.IatarolaP. (2012). Effects of high school course-taking on secondary and postsecondary success. American Education Research Journal, 49(2), 285–322. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831211431952
MartinJ. E.Van DyckeJ. L.ChristensenW. R.GreeneB. A.GardnerJ. E.LovettD. L. (2006). Increasing student participation in IEP meetings: Establishing the Self-Directed IEP as an evidence-based practice. Exceptional Children, 72(3), 299–316. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290607200303
37.
MartinJ. E.Williams-DiehmK. (2013). Student Engagement and Leadership of the transition planning process. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 36, 43–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/2165143413476545
38.
MatusevichH. A.ShogrenK. A.RaleyS. K.MatusevichD. W. (2023). Student-led transition planning using the Self-Determined Learning Model of Instruction. Exceptional Children, 56(4), 230–223. https://doi.org/10.1177/00400599231155604
39.
MazzottiV. L.RoweD. A.KwiatekS.VoggtA.ChangW.FowlerC. H.PoppenM.SinclairJ.TestD. W. (2021). Secondary transition predictors of postschool success: An update to the research base. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 44(1), 47–64. https://doi.org/10.1177/2165143420959793
40.
MazzottiV. L.RoweD. A.SinclairJ.PoppenM.WoodsW. E.ShearerM. L. (2016). Predictors of post-school success: A systematic review of NLTS2 secondary analyses. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 39(4), 196–215. https://doi.org/10.1177/2165143415588047
41.
McNaughtJ.BiegunD.SwartzentruberK. (2024). Student-led individualized education programs: A gateway to self-determination. Language Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 55(2), 276–302. https://doi.org/10.1044/2023
42.
MorningstarM.FreyB.NoonanP.NgJ.Clavenna-DeaneB.GravesP.KellemsR.McCallZ.PearsonM.WadeD.Williams-DiehmK. (2010). A preliminary investigation of the relationship of transition preparation and self-determination for students with disabilities in postsecondary educational settings. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 33, 80–94. https://doi.org/10.1177/0885728809356568
National Center for Education Statistics. (2020). English language learners in public schools. The condition of education. National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. https://nces.ed.gov/programs/coe/pdf/coe_cgf.pdf
46.
NewmanL. A.TrainorA. A.RomanoL. (2023). Factors related to accessing postsecondary school supports by English learners with disabilities. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 47(2), 80–91. https://doi.org/10.1177/21651434231154584
47.
NewmanL. A.WagnerM.KnokeyA.MarderC.NagleK.ShaverD.WeiX. (2011). The post-high school outcomes of young adults with disabilities up to 8 years after high school: A report from NLTS2 (NCSER 2011-3005). SRI International.
48.
NguyenH. V.DaoA. T.DoD. V. (2011). Propensity score matching in estimating the effect of managerial education on academic planning behavior. Study design: A cross-sectional study. BMC Medical Education, 11, Article 102. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-11-102
ParisD. (2012). Culturally sustaining pedagogy: A needed change in stance, terminology, and practice. Educational Researcher, 41(3), 93–97. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X12441244
52.
Povenmire-KirkT. C.LindstromL.BullisM. (2010). De escuela a la vida adulta/From school to adult life: Transition needs for Latino youth with disabilities and their families. Career Development and Exceptional Individuals, 33(1), 41–51. https://doi.org/10.1177/0885728809359004
53.
RomanoL. E.TrainorA. A.NewmanL. A. (2023). Triad transition planning for students receiving special education and English learner services, families, and teachers. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 46(4), 211–222. https://doi.org/10.1177/21651434221143514
54.
RosenbaumP. R.RubinD. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41–55. https://doi.org/10.2307/2335942
55.
RosenbaumP. R.RubinD. B. (1985). Constructing a control group using multivariate matched sampling methods that incorporate the propensity score. American Statistician, 39(1), 33–38. https://doi.org/10.2307/2683903
56.
RoystonP.CarlinJ. B.WhiteI. R. (2009). Multiple imputation of missing values: New features for mim. Stata Journal, 9(2), 252–264. https://doi.org/10.1177/1536867X0900900205
57.
ScheefA. R.YeagerK. H.DeardorffM. E. (2024). Barriers to implementing student-led IEPs. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 47(3), 184–197. https://doi.org/10.1177/21651434231190301
58.
ShogrenK. A.ShawL. A.RaleyS. K.WehmeyerM. L. (2018). Exploring the effect of disability, race-ethnicity, and socioeconomic status on scores on the self-determination inventory: Student report. Exceptional Children, 85(1), 10–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402918782150
59.
SRI International. (2000). National Longitudinal Transition Study-2 (NLTS2) sampling plan.
60.
TestD. W.MazzottiV. L.MustianA. L.FowlerC. H.KorteringL.KohlerP. D. (2009). Evidence-based secondary transition predictors for improving postschool outcomes for students with disabilities. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 32(3), 160–181. https://doi.org/10.1177/1044207312460888
61.
TrainorA. A. (2010). Diverse approaches to parent advocacy during special education home-school interactions: Identification and use of cultural and social capital. Remedial and Special Education, 31(1), 34–47. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932508324401
62.
TrainorA. A.CarterE. W.KarpurA.MartinJ.MazzottiV.MorningstarM. E.NewmanL. A.RojewskiJ. W. (2020). A framework for research in transition: Identifying important areas and intersections for future research. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 43(1), 5–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/2165143419864551
63.
TrainorA. A.MurrayA.KimH. (2016). English learners with disabilities in high school: Population characteristics, transition programs, and postschool outcomes. Remedial and Special Education, 37(3), 146–158. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932515626797
64.
TrainorA. A.NewmanL.GarciaE.WoodleyH.TraxlerR. E.DescheneD. N. (2019). Postsecondary education-focused transition planning experiences of English learners with disabilities. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 42(1), 43–55. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F2165143418811830
65.
TrainorA.RomanoL.E.NewmanL. (2024). Building asset-based transitions to postsecondary education with multilingual students with disabilities. Routledge.
ValdesK.GodardP.WilliamsonC.Van CampenJ.McCrackenM.JonesR. (2013). National Longitudinal Transition Study-2 (NLTS2) data documentation and dictionary. SRI International. https://www.nlts2.org/data_dictionary/index.html
69.
WaitollerF. R.King ThoriusK. A. (2016). Cross-pollinating culturally sustaining pedagogy and universal design for learning: Toward an inclusive pedagogy that accounts for dis/ability. Harvard Educational Review, 86(3), 366–389. https://doi.org/10.17763/1943-5045-86.3.366
70.
WehmeyerM. L.ShogrenK. A.LittleT. D.LopezS. J. (Eds.). (2017). Development of self-determination through the life-course. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1042-6
71.
WeiX.WagnerM.HudsonJ.YuJ.JavitzH. (2016). The effect of transition planning participation and goal setting on college enrollment among youth with autism spectrum disorders. Remedial and Special Education, 37(1), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932515581495
72.
What Works Clearinghouse. (2022). What Works Clearinghouse procedures and standards handbook (Version 5.0). National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/Handbooks
73.
WhiteI. R.RoystonP.WoodA. M. (2011). Multiple imputation using chained equations: Issues and guidance for practice. Statistics in Medicine, 30(4), 377–399. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.4067
74.
WillM. (1984). OSERS program for the transition of youth with disabilities: Bridges from school to working life. Office of Special Education and Rehabilitation Services, U.S. Department of Education. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED256132.pdf
75.
Williams-DiehmK.WehmeyerM. L.PalmerS. B.SoukupJ. H.GarnerN. W. (2008). Self-determination and student involvement in transition planning: A multivariate analysis. Journal on Developmental Disabilities, 14(1), 27–39. https://oadd.org/wp-content/uploads/2008/01/williamsdiehmEtAl.pdf
76.
WuY.-C.ThurlowM. L.LiuK. K. (2021, October). Understanding the characteristics of English learners with disabilities to meet their needs during state and districtwide assessments (NCEO Brief #24). National Center on Educational Outcomes. https://nceo.umn.edu/docs/OnlinePubs/NCEOBrief24.pdf
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
