Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This study analyzed the key attributes and clusters of policies and systems of Korean Taekwondo based on Park Geun-Hye and Moon Jae-in’s regime changes using big data, including 8,030 data points on social media over a period of 8 years. Frequency analysis, term frequency inverse document frequency analysis, and degree centrality analysis were performed using TEXTOM 4.5. In addition, a convergent and correlation analysis was performed using UCINET 6 to visualize related words and analyze clusters. Frequency, term frequency inverse document frequency, and degree centrality analyses revealed 30 high-order terms. A convergence of iterated correlations analysis of the derived words identified three common clusters: improvement, problem, and support. In addition, there were two distinct clusters in the Park Geun-hye government (research and sports policy), and three in the Moon Jae-in government (interview, thoughts, and athlete). The Korean government attempted to improve and address problems related to policies and systems for the development of Taekwondo. However, as Taekwondo policies and systems were implemented from different perspectives by each regime, systematic policies and systems could not be implemented.

Keywords

Korea Taekwondo policy system big data

Introduction

Taekwondo is a traditional Korean martial art (International Olympic Committee, 2021). Since the late 1950s, the Korean government has made efforts to promote Taekwondo internationally (Moenig & Kim, 2021). The Korean government founded the Korea Taekwondo Association (KTA) in 1965 (Korea Taekwondo Association [KTA], 2022), Kukkiwon in 1972 (Kukkiwon, 2022), and World Taekwondo (WT; formerly World Taekwondo Federation) in 1973 (World Taekwondo [WT], 2022). WT was recognized by the International Olympic Committee (IOC) in 1980 due to the continued financial and political support of the Korean government (Moenig & Kim, 2016). Taekwondo has been recognized internationally as a global sport practiced in more than210 countries since its adoption as an official sport at the 2000 Sydney Olympic games (S. U. Park et al., 2022).

Taekwondo has been recognized as the national sport of Korea since 1971, when President Park Chung-Hee’s handwritten title was awarded (MOOKAS, 2021). Taekwondo, which has been passed down as a Korean custom, became an officially recognized national sport in 2018 (S. U. Park, 2021). According to Kwon and Lee (2015), and S. U. Park (2021), the Korean government’s Taekwondo promotion policy started with the Park Chung-Hee’s government (1963–1979); however, representative development began with the Roh Moo-Hyun government’s five-year national sports promotion plan (2003–2007). After that, the Taekwondo policy promulgated the enforcement decree of the “Taekwondo Laws” of Lee Myung-bak’s government (2008–2013), and Park Geun-Hye’s government (Park’s Government) launched “Sports Vision 2018” and “Cultural Prosperity Committee” (Korea Sports Promotion Foundation, 2018). Park’s government selected Taekwondo as one of the three major brands (Hangeul, Korean Alphabet; Arirang, Korean folk song; and Taekwondo) and promoted it as a cultural brand (Korea Ministry of Culture, Sports and Tourism, 2014). In addition, the Moon Jae-In government (Moon’s Government) selected Taekwondo as one of the top 100 national tasks and is promoting it as a cultural content (Korea Ministry of Culture, Sports and Tourism, 2017).

In 2007, to achieve sustainable development of Taekwondo into a world-class sport, Korea enacted “laws on the promotion of Taekwondo and the creation of Taekwondo Park” (Taekwondo Laws; Korea Ministry of Government Legislation, 2018; The Academy of Korean Studies, 2014). Furthermore, the Korean government (Ministry of Culture, Sports and Tourism) invested a budget of approximately KRW 170 billion to promote Taekwondo’s re-leap and sustainable growth for 2018 to 2022 (Korea Ministry of Culture, Sports and Tourism, 2018a). Since the enactment of the Taekwondo Laws, the Korean government has continuously revised Taekwondo policies and systems.

In general, policy decisions by the government can be said to be the result of selective actions that objectively identify a given problem and maximize the value of utility based on accurate information (Dye, 2012; S. J. Kim et al., 2016; S. U. Park, 2021; Pfeffer, 1981). However, Korean policies are generally not based on reliable evidence, but are rather opinion-based, relying on the judgment of experts or practitioners (Cho, 2013; Korean Educational Development Institute, 2011). Furthermore, studies on Taekwondo policies are limited (S. H. Park, 2020). S. J. Kim et al. (2016) noted that research on Taekwondo is not active. S. U. Park (2021) questioned whether the policies and systems of Taekwondo were reasonably established based on objective data and procedures. Therefore, research using objective tools is required to clarify the contents and attributes of Taekwondo policies and systems.

According to S. U. Park and Kim (2021), existing studies on Taekwondo policies and systems do not suggest specific improvements or appropriate alternatives. To solve these problems, a questionnaire survey could quantify and measure data; however, there are limitations in sampling and the possibility that measurement errors may occur depending on the form, term, and length of the questionnaire (Fowler, 2013; Groves, 2004; Lyberg & Weisberg, 2016). Big data analysis has research potential in diverse fields, including social phenomena, discourse analyses, cognitive analyses, social trend analyses to secure product competitiveness, and value creation through the examination of new convergences (S. U. Park et al., 2022). In addition, big data creates the potential for a revolution in many domains, including public health (Sahay, 2016).

Big data are large, complex datasets that are beyond the capabilities of traditional data management systems to store, manage, and process in a timely and economical manner (Nambiar et al., 2013). Furthermore, big data are different from conventional data in terms of volume, speed, and diversity (Beyer & Laney, 2012). With the recent rapid increase in unstructured data, analyzing big data has become an important part of research (Manju Priya & Gupta, 2019). Korea generates a huge amount of data due to its excellent global networks; therefore, it has the infrastructure and conditions to create big data (S. U. Park et al., 2020, 2022; D. Shin, 2014; D. H. Shin, 2016). Therefore, deriving key attributes and clusters from atypical texts that appear on social media can provide meaningful patterns and new insights into Taekwondo policies and systems.

This study aimed to examine the key attributes and clusters of Taekwondo policy and system using Korean social media. Specifically, this study compared the contents and differences of policies and systems under Park and Moon’s governments. Revealing previous unidentified Taekwondo policies and systems can contribute to deriving developmental and strategic directions for Taekwondo policies and systems.

Methods

Ethical Statements

This study was conducted in accordance with the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Institutional Review Board.

Data Collection

This study used TEXTOM 4.5 (The Imc Inc., Daegu, Korea) to collect unstructured texts expressed on social media, such as Naver and Google. Naver and Google are the most used portal sites in Korea and include on-line communities (T. H. Park et al., 2020). In addition, TEXTOM is a Korean-based big data collection and analysis solution, which has been used in several previous studies (Jang & Park, 2020; Jeon, 2020; S. Kim et al., 2020; M. S. Kim & Jeon, 2020; S. U. Park et al., 2020, 2022). Specifically, this data collection solution targets official documents and media coverage that can be found on Naver and Google, and does not include comments from netizens. The keywords used for data collection were “Taekwondo + policy + system.” The data collection period was divided equally between the government of Park and Moon. As President Park Geun-hye was impeached during her tenure, the Moon government’s data collection period was shortened in order to equalize the conditions. Details of the collected data are presented in Table 1.

Table 1.

Text Data Collection Information.

Collection category	Content
Language	Korean
Tool	TEXTOM (http://textom.co.kr)
Social media	Naver, Google
Keywords	Taekwondo, Policy, System
Period	February 25, 2013 to March 10, 2017 (Park’s government)
Period	May 10, 2017 to May 23, 2021 (Moon’s government)

Data Analysis

Text mining and social network analysis (SNA) were performed to analyze big data on Taekwondo policy and system.

Text mining analysis is the process of using data mining techniques to transform unstructured text into a structured format to identify meaningful patterns and new insights (IBM, 2020). The advantage of text mining analysis is the ability to extract new knowledge from vast and diverse sets of digital texts (Aggarwal, 2018; Aggarwal & Zhai, 2012; Feldman & Sanger, 2006; S. U. Park et al., 2022). This study conducted frequency and term frequency inverse document frequency (TF-IDF) analyses. Frequency analysis provides the number of times a term appears in a specific document, whereas TF-IDF analysis represents the calculated value of the weight of each term according to the uniqueness of the text document (S. U. Park et al., 2020; Trstenjak et al., 2014).

SNA is a strategic method for investigating the social structure of networks (Otte & Rousseau, 2002). The concept of a social network provides a convincing model for social structure and makes it possible to identify formal methods of social network analysis (Scott, 1988). This study used the most representative concepts of SNA: degree centrality and convergence of iterated correlations (CONCOR) analysis (S. U. Park et al., 2020). Degree centrality indicates the degree to which a particular node is positioned toward the center of the entire network (Bonacich, 1987; Csardi & Nepusz, 2006; Freeman, 2008). Degree centrality is the most representative method of centrality analysis, which represents the sum of nodes connected to the central node of the network (S. U. Park et al., 2022). In addition, CONCOR analysis was performed to classify potential sub-clusters to understand the relationship between derived terms (S. U. Park et al., 2022). The clusters derived through the CONCOR analysis were named through the categorization process. In the cluster naming process, the researcher repeatedly read the term’s contents based on the derived terms, and the subject and meaning were interpreted and created. In addition, in order to critically review the researcher’s own data analysis and interpretation process, triangulation was performed using data from word tree charts provided by TEXTOM.

Text mining analysis and SNA were performed on the collected data using TEXTOM (The Imc Inc., Daegu, Korea) and UCINET 6 (Analytic Technologies Corp., Lexington, KY, USA).

Result

Results of Data Collection

Table 2 shows the results of the big data analysis on Taekwondo policies and systems according to the Korean government. Analysis of Park’s government produced 3,403 data points with a volume of 1,798 KB, whereas that of Moon’s government produced 4,627 data points with a volume of 2,614 KB. In total, 8,030 data points and 4,412 KB were collected using TEXTOM.

Table 2.

Number of Data Points and Volume.

Collection/Period		Park’s government	Moon’s government	Total
Category	Channel	Park’s government	Moon’s government	Total
Number of data points	Naver	2,998	4,235	7,233
	Google	405	392	797
	Total	3,403	4,627	8,030
Volume	Naver	1,632 KB	2,448 KB	4,080 KB
	Google	166 KB	166 KB	332 KB
	Total	1,798 KB	2,614 KB	4,412 KB

Results of Text-Mining

Frequency Analysis

Table 3 summarizes the results of frequency analysis of terms related to Taekwondo policies and systems according to the Korean government. The findings indicated that the top 10 most frequently used words in Park’s government were Taekwondo (1,255), system (671), policy (651), Korea (177), sports (169), government (147), improvement (145), propulsion (143), implementation (120), and need (118), in descending order. The most frequently used words in Moon’s government were policy (2,887), Taekwondo (2,824), general (2,579), interview (1,417), relation (1,321), lately (1,090), thoughts (1,074), leader (1,041), international (1,022), and country (1,019), in descending order.

Table 3.

Results of Frequency Analysis.

	Park’s government		Moon’s government
	Term	Freq.	Term	Freq.
1	Taekwondo	1,255	Policy	2,887
2	System	671	Taekwondo	2,824
3	Policy	651	General	2,579
4	Korea	177	Interview	1,417
5	Sports	169	Relation	1,321
6	Government	147	Lately	1,090
7	Improvement	145	Thoughts	1,074
8	Propulsion	143	Leader	1,041
9	Implementation	120	International	1,022
10	Need	118	Country	1,019
11	World	114	Abolition	1,009
12	President	113	Influence	1,000
13	Support	107	Taekwondo studies	998
14	Kukkiwon	106	Volunteer	989
15	Culture	102	Security service	983
16	Event	98	Honorable	981
17	Hosting	97	Death penalty	980
18	Research	93	Violent crime	980
19	Physical education	92	System	839
20	Problem	91	Query	519
21	Education	90	Myself	432
22	Chairman	90	Guard	399
23	Society	87	Support	321
24	Athlete	86	Government	234
25	Content	85	Preparations	214
26	Enforcement	84	Kukkiwon	212
27	Management	82	Athlete	179
28	Representation	80	Improvement	175
29	Korean Ministry of CST	77	Propulsion	174
30	Enlargement	76	Korea	171

Freq. = frequency; CST = Culture, sports and tourism.

TF-IDF Analysis

Table 4 summarizes the results of TF-IDF analysis of terms related to Taekwondo policies and systems according to the Korean government. The findings indicated that the top 10 most frequently used words in Park’s government were Taekwondo (899.680), policy (751.470), system (746.322), sports (469.894), Korea (459.619), improvement (398.369), government (392.374), propulsion (386.064), Kukkiwon (372.750), and president (345.752), in descending order. The most frequently used words in Moon’s government were general (3,363.710), interview (2,024.207), policy (1,620.776), relation (1,438.192), lately (1,230.859), thoughts (1,226.301), abolition (1,177.957), system (1,177.039), leader (1,176.528), and international (1,175.923), in descending order.

Table 4.

Results of TF-IDF Analysis.

	Park’s government		Moon’s government
	Term	Freq.	Term	Freq.
1	Taekwondo	899.680	General	3,363.710
2	Policy	751.470	Interview	2,024.207
3	System	746.322	Policy	1,620.776
4	Sports	469.894	Relation	1,438.192
5	Korea	459.619	Lately	1,230.859
6	Improvement	398.369	Thoughts	1,226.301
7	Government	392.374	Abolition	1,177.957
8	Propulsion	386.064	System	1,177.039
9	Kukkiwon	372.750	Leader	1,176.528
10	President	345.752	International	1,175.923
11	Implementation	339.861	Volunteer	1,174.568
12	Need	337.371	Country	1,174.475
13	World	334.543	Influence	1,172.457
14	Support	322.740	Taekwondo studies	1,170.112
15	Physical education	320.346	Security service	1,165.440
16	Research	317.728	Honorable	1,165.067
17	Culture	313.234	Death penalty	1,164.879
18	Chairman	311.869	Violent crime	1,164.879
19	Event	308.978	Query	1,138.106
20	Hosting	307.0157	Taekwondo	1,052.633
21	Education	295.4604	Myself	883.6643
22	Judgment	286.3571	Guard	832.810
23	Athlete	284.7515	Support	789.4781
24	Problem	284.7156	Kukkiwon	686.8636
25	Society	280.9079	Government	639.7256
26	Olympics	278.2059	Propulsion	633.0571
27	Content	277.8735	Athlete	564.964
28	Management	271.5073	Korea	534.793
29	Enforcement	269.0395	Sports	531.9345
30	Representation	259.3657	Korean Ministry of CST	525.5072

Freq. = frequency; CST = Culture, sports and tourism.

Results of Social Network Analysis

Degree Centrality Analysis

Table 5 summarizes the results of degree centrality analysis of terms related to Taekwondo policies and systems according to the Korean government. The findings indicated that the top 10 most frequently used words in Park’s government were Taekwondo (0.080722), system (0.049522), policy (0.047046), Korea (0.015564), sports (0.013017), government (0.012381), propulsion (0.011249), world (0.009904), Kukkiwon (0.009834), and chairman (0.009268), in descending order. The most frequently used words in Moon’s government were Taekwondo (0.082606), interview (0.063448), policy (0.046283), system (0.044467), general (0.031695), query (0.026422), volunteer (0.021911), relation (0.014119), government (0.013943), and preparation (0.012830), in descending order.

Table 5.

Results of Degree Centrality Analysis.

	Park’s government		Moon’s government
	Term	Centrality	Term	Centrality
1	Taekwondo	0.080722	Taekwondo	0.082606
2	System	0.049522	Interview	0.063448
3	Policy	0.047046	Policy	0.046283
4	Korea	0.015564	System	0.044467
5	Sports	0.013017	General	0.031695
6	Government	0.012381	Query	0.026422
7	Propulsion	0.011249	Volunteer	0.021911
8	World	0.009904	Relation	0.014119
9	Kukkiwon	0.009834	Government	0.013943
10	Chairman	0.009268	Preparation	0.012830
11	Implementation	0.009268	Lately	0.012772
12	Improvement	0.008985	Problem	0.012362
13	Hosting	0.008914	Kukkiwon	0.011717
14	Society	0.008843	Korea	0.011424
15	Need	0.008773	Sports	0.010780
16	President	0.008631	Propulsion	0.010253
17	Support	0.008490	Need	0.009608
18	Culture	0.008207	Athlete	0.009374
19	Management	0.007994	School	0.009081
20	America	0.007924	Hosting	0.008729
21	Education	0.007924	Student	0.008671
22	Problem	0.007782	Improvement	0.008612
23	Event	0.007428	Announcement	0.008319
24	Representation	0.007287	Thoughts	0.008319
25	Research	0.007004	Person	0.008319
26	Preparation	0.007004	This year	0.008143
27	Present	0.007004	World	0.008026
28	Enforcement	0.006933	Operation	0.007909
29	Nation	0.006933	Expected questions	0.007850
30	Relation	0.006862	College	0.007733

CONCOR Analysis

A CONCOR analysis was performed to classify homogeneous groups based on the relevance of correlations on the network. The results revealed six clusters for Park’s government: improvement, research, problem, support, and sports policy in Table 6.

Table 6.

CONCOR analysis results of Park’s government.

	Cluster	Terms
1	Improvement	System, Korea, world, improvement, Kukkiwon, event, education, chairman, athlete, management, representation
2	Research	Research, content
3	Problem	Need, physical education, problem
4	Support	Taekwondo, government, propulsion, support, hosting, enforcement
5	Sports policy	Policy, sports, implementation, president, culture, society, Korean ministry of culture sports and tourism, enlargement

The first cluster comprised the following terms: system, Korea, world, improvement, Kukkiwon, event, education, chairman, athlete, management, and representation. These terms were categorized as “improvement.” The second cluster comprised the following terms: research and content. These terms were categorized as “research.” The third cluster comprised the following terms: need, physical education, and problem. These terms were categorized as “problem.” The fourth cluster comprised the following terms: Taekwondo, government, propulsion, support, hosting, and enforcement. These terms were categorized as “support.” The fifth cluster comprised the following terms: policy, sports, implementation, president, culture, society, Korean Ministry of Culture, sports and tourism, and enlargement. These terms were categorized as “sports policy.” The derived clusters are shown in Figure 1.

Figure 1.

CONCOR analysis results of Park’s government.

The results of the CONCOR analysis for Moon’s government revealed six clusters: thoughts, interview, support, problem, improvement, and athlete in Table 7.

Table 7.

CONCOR Analysis Results of Moon’s Government.

	Cluster	Terms
1	Thoughts	Policy, general, lately, thoughts, leader, international, country, abolition, influence, Taekwondo studies, volunteer, security service, honorable, death penalty, violent crime, myself, guard
2	Interview	Interview, relation, query, preparations
3	Support	Taekwondo, support
4	Problem	System, government
5	Improvement	Improvement, propulsion
6	Athlete	Kukkiwon, athlete

The first cluster comprised the following terms: policy, general, lately, thoughts, leader, international, country, abolition, influence, Taekwondo studies, volunteer, security service, honorable, death penalty, violent crime, myself, and guard. These terms were categorized as “thoughts.” The second cluster comprised the following terms: interview, relation, query, and preparations. These terms were categorized as “interview.” The third cluster comprised the following terms: Taekwondo and support. These terms were categorized as “support.” The fourth cluster comprised the following terms: system and government. These terms were categorized as “problem.” The fifth cluster comprised the following terms: improvement and propulsion. These terms were categorized as “improvement.” The sixth cluster comprised the following terms: Kukkiwon and athlete. These terms were categorized as “athlete.” Korea did not form a cluster. The derived clusters are shown in Figure 2.

Figure 2.

CONCOR analysis results of Moon’s government.

Discussion

Despite the differences in characteristics of frequency, TF-IDF, and degree centrality analyses and differences in Korea’s Taekwondo policy between governments, similar results were obtained. Under Park’s government, Taekwondo policy and system were considered from a macro perspective, with keywords such as Korea, sports, government, improvement, and propulsion taking priority. However, under Moon’s government, Taekwondo policies and systems were prioritized in terms of words like general, interview, relationship, recent, and thoughts, from a microscopic point of view.

Park’s government (the Ministry of Culture, Sports and Tourism) evaluated that the public’s sensitivity to cultural prosperity was low, such as low public participation in culture and arts and regional cultural gaps; therefore, policy capabilities were concentrated on experiencing cultural prosperity in daily life (Korea Ministry of Culture, Sports and Tourism, 2014). In addition, as part of cultural prosperity under the strategy of “spreading cultural values,” Park’s government established and implemented a strategic plan to spread the “Hallyu: Korean wave” as one of Korea’s three major cultural brands, along with Hangeul and Arirang (Korea Ministry of Culture, Sports and Tourism, 2014). The results indicated that Park’s government was implementing Taekwondo policies and systems to spread cultural values, such as the Korean wave. However, despite these efforts, Taekwondo is still not recognized as Hallyu compared to K-pop and Korean films.

Moon’s government selected Taekwondo as one of the 100 national tasks, discovered the 10 cultural contents of Taekwondo, and promoted it as a key policy task (Korea Ministry of Culture, Sports and Tourism, 2018a). The “Taekwondo Future Development Strategy and Policy Tasks” announced by the Korean Ministry of Culture, Sports and Tourism in 2018 (Korea Ministry of Culture, Sports and Tourism, 2018b), planned to discover and promote the top 10 cultural contents of Taekwondo as a key policy task by 2022. Furthermore, as part of this policy, the “Cultural Contents Research Group” was formed in 2017 to investigate the status of Taekwondo and discover the best content-related ideas. Therefore, micro terms of Taekwondo policy and system for the development of 10 Taekwondo cultural contents were found in Moon’s government. However, as of 2022, Taekwondo’s top 10 cultural contents have not yet been announced.

The results of CONCOR analysis on Korea’s Taekwondo policies and systems identified five clusters in Park’s government and six clusters in Moon’s government. Among the clusters that repeatedly interpret the meaning and content of terms and create meanings, three clusters (improvement, problem, and support) were similar, whereas five clusters (research, sports policy, thoughts, interview, and athlete) were different.

The clusters of improvement, problem, and support were equal. Korea’s Ministry of Culture, Sports and Tourism oversees sports-related policies (Won & Hong, 2014). The Korean Ministry of Culture, Sports and Tourism planned and implemented the first and third “Basic Plan for Taekwondo Promotion” every 5 years, in 2008, 2013, and 2019 (Korea Ministry of Culture, Sports and Tourism, 2019). This is Korea’s representative Taekwondo policy, based on specific laws and regulations (S. H. Park, 2020). However, despite these policies, S. U. Park and Kim (2021) pointed out that, while policies and systems related to Taekwondo should be established based on objective data and reasonable procedures, these are not being implemented. Therefore, Taekwondo policies and systems should be established and implemented on the basis of reliable evidence and systematic analyses, including through a process of collecting opinions through public hearings. To establish such a policy task system, financial and material support from the government is required.

The cluster of research and sports policy in Park’s government differed from Moon’s government. The Taekwondo financial support project of the Korea Ministry of Culture, Sports and Tourism (2017) included Taekwondo Promotion and Taekwondo Promotion Foundation (TPF) auxiliary support projects. Taekwondo promotion projects were divided into Taekwondo globalization, education and research, industrialization, and content development (S. H. Park, 2019). TPF was established by the Korean Ministry of Culture, Sports and Tourism in 2005 for the development of Taekwondo (Taekwondo Promotion Foundation, 2022). As such, through the Korean Ministry of Culture, Sports and Tourism, which is in charge of sports policy, Park’s government attempted to promote the globalization of Taekwondo and education and research projects with the priority of promoting the value of the Korean wave as a subfield of sports policy.

Moreover, the thoughts, interview, and athlete clusters in Moon’s government differed from Park’s government. In other words, Moon’s government planned and implemented Taekwondo policies and systems through a more microscopic approach than Park’s government. According to a newspaper article published in South Korea in 2015, South Korea’s Su-jeong Im, who was a gold medalist in the women’s 58 kg class in Taekwondo at the 2008 Beijing Olympics, was appointed to the police as a special martial arts recruit (Yonhap News Agency, 2015). This special recruitment was expanded from four to nine people under Moon’s government (MOOKAS, 2020). The Korean National Police Agency (2019) stated that the Taekwondo special recruitment would be applied only until 2020, and subsequently unified into the National Police Agency general Taekwondo competition (Korean National Police Agency, 2019). According to S. U. Park et al. (2022), Korean Taekwondo athletes practice harsh training 6 days per week, four times per day, while neglecting their studies. Retired Taekwondo athletes in Korea do not receive a formal education at school under the elite sports system. In Korea, it is difficult to clear the exam to become a police officer as it is extremely challenging; hence, 2020 is the last opportunity for them to become police officers through a special recruitment based on their Taekwondo careers. In other words, the interview is an important part of becoming a police officer through the special recruitment process. Thus, interviews and thoughts on specific social issues that were the content of interviews were major clusters. As such, Park’s government adopted a macro approach to globalization of Taekwondo, whereas Moon’s government adopted micro approaches, such as job creation for Taekwondo athletes.

The Ministry of Culture, Sports and Tourism has one minister and two vice ministers; moreover, from the Park’s government, a former elite athlete has been serving as the second vice minister (Won & Hong, 2014). The appointment of a former elite athlete is seen as a historic and symbolic step, suggesting that the sport has finally become a top priority on the Ministry of Culture, Sports and Tourism’s agenda, and that it has more support than in previous years (Won & Hong, 2014). Furthermore, the Korean government recognizes that its current diploma policy, which is primarily based on hard power, can be more valuably complemented by the use of soft power (Kang & Houlihan, 2021). Taekwondo is regarded as a great resource for South Korea to demonstrate its soft power through sports (Kang & Houlihan, 2021). Specifically, the Korean government has included Taekwondo in Korea’s major international development programs and promoted it as a traditional Korean martial art and national sport (Na & Dallaire, 2022). Despite these positive changes, the total expenditure of the National Sports Promotion Fund of Korea is an average of KRW 1822.2 billion over the past 3 years (2016–2018), of which KRW 37.5 billion is a fairly small scale for the Taekwondo sector (S. H. Park, 2019). Moon’s government was launched after Park’s government; however, Park’s government was based on conservative tendencies, whereas Moon’s government was based on progressive party politics. Regardless of the political orientation, approximately KRW 37.5 billion was spent annually on Taekwondo policies and systems. Therefore, to establish Taekwondo policies and systems, a thorough investigation into the overall status and current situation of the Taekwondo field should be conducted rather than globalization or job creation for Taekwondo athletes due to political instability. To develop Taekwondo into a martial art practiced by people around the world and content as a sport, mid- to long-term policies and strategic systems are required.

Conclusion and Limitations

This study conducted big data analysis to understand the perceptions, key attributes, and clusters of the Taekwondo policies and systems of Park’s and Moon’s governments in Korea appearing on social media. The results revealed 30 high-frequency terms based on frequency, TF-IDF, and degree centrality analyses, which provided pivotal information regarding Taekwondo policies and systems according to the set period. CONCOR analysis focusing on the derived frequent terms identified three clusters: improvement, problem, and support. In addition, the cluster of research and sports policy differed in Park’s government, and the clusters of thoughts, interview, and athletes differed in Moon’s government. In other words, a common point was drawn to improve and support problems related to Taekwondo policies and systems. The difference between the Taekwondo policies and systems of Park’s and Moon’s governments was that they focused on macroscopic and microscopic approaches, respectively. More specifically, Park’s government planned and implemented Taekwondo policies and systems as a sub-field of sports policy, whereas Moon’s government planned and implemented Taekwondo policies and systems with a focus on job creation. Although the Korean government’s will and efforts to develop Taekwondo were discovered, systematic Taekwondo policies and systems were not implemented, as the perspectives of the regimes differed.

Taekwondo policies and systems appearing on social media were analyzed based on the 8,030 data points and 4,412 KB of data volumes. However, this study had some limitations. First, it was limited in finding objective grounds for planning Taekwondo policies and systems. Second, despite the globalization of Taekwondo in Korea and implementation of active Taekwondo policies and systems, these data were based on the Korean social media; due to the nature of social media, the process of collecting and analyzing data does not accurately represent the population predicted by the model, which can potentially introduce bias. Third, due to the characteristics of big data analysis, these results may be interpreted differently depending on the researcher’s point of view.

Based on the results of this study, the Korean government could suggest improvement measures for policies and systems for the development of Taekwondo. In addition, as Taekwondo is practiced in more than 200 countries around the world, Taekwondo policies and systems developed in Korea could provide an academic foundation that can contribute to international peace and social responsibility for human society as required by the IOC. Therefore, future studies should establish macro- and micro-Taekwondo policies and systems that can influence the development of this martial art.

Footnotes

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Declaration of Conflicting Interests

The author declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Funding

The author disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This work was supported by the Ministry of Education of the Republic of Korea and the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF-2020S1A5A8047529).

ORCID iD

Sung-Un Park

Data Availability Statement

The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Note

Not applicable.

References

Aggarwal

C. C.

(2018). Machine learning for text (Vol. 848). Springer.

Aggarwal

C. C.

Zhai

(2012). An introduction to text mining. In Aggarwal

Zhai

(Eds.), Mining text data (pp. 1–10). Springer.

Beyer

M. A.

Laney

(2012). The importance of “Big Data”: A definition. Gartner.

Bonacich

(1987). Power and centrality: A family of measures. American Journal of Sociology, 92(5), 1170–1182.

Cho

(2013). Evidence-based policy: Principles and requirements in sport & physical education field. The Korean Journal of Measurement and Evaluation in Physical Education and Sport Science, 15(3), 1–14.

Csardi

Nepusz

(2006). The igraph software package for complex network research. InterJournal, Complex Systems, 1695(5), 1–9.

Dye

T. R.

(2012). Understanding public policy (14th ed.). Pearson Publishers.

Feldman

Sanger

(2006). The text mining handbook: Advanced approaches in analyzing unstructured data. Cambridge University Press.

Fowler

F. J.

Jr. (2013). Survey research methods. Sage Publications.

10.

Freeman

L. C.

(2008). Social network analysis. Sage Publications.

11.

Groves

R. M.

(2004). Survey errors and survey costs (Vol. 536). John Wiley & Sons.

12.

IBM. (2020). What is text mining? Retrieved October 7, 2021, from https://www.ibm.com/cloud/learn/text-mining

13.

International Olympic Committee. (2021). Description of Taekwondo. Retrieved October 7, 2021, from https://olympics.com/en/news/description-of-taekwondo

14.

Jang

Park

(2020). Social media, media and urban transformation in the context of overtourism. International Journal of Tourism Cities, 6, 233–260.

15.

Jeon

S. W.

(2020). A study on the social phenomenon and perception of sports sexual violence through big data analysis of social media. Ethiopian Journal of Health Development, 34(3), 28–39.

16.

Kang

Houlihan

(2021). Sport as a diplomatic resource: The case of South Korea, 1970-2017. International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics, 13(1), 45–63.

17.

Kim

M. S.

Jeon

S. W.

(2020). Semantic network analysis of conflict in Korean society regarding the WHO classification of gaming disorder (disease code 6C51). Ethiopian Journal of Health Development, 34(3), 67–77.

18.

Kim

Park

Lee

(2020, February). The diffusion barriers of AI mobility service: The case of TADA. 2020 International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Information and Communication (ICAIIC) (pp.666−670). IEEE.

19.

Kim

S. J.

Jeon

I. K.

Park

T. S.

(2016). Study on Taekwondo promotion policy plan through case analysis on special incorporation of Kukkiwon. Korean Journal of Sports Science, 25(5), 29–41.

20.

Korea Ministry of Culture, Sports and Tourism. (2014). Cultural prosperity, emphasis on raising public awareness. Retrieved October 7, 2021, from https://www.mcst.go.kr/kor/s_notice/press/pressView.jsp?pSeq=13342&pMenuCD=0302000000&pCurrentPage=1&pType=&pSearchType=01&pSearchWord=

21.

Korea Ministry of Culture, Sports and Tourism. (2017). Promotion of ‘Taekwondo Cultural Contents’, one of the 100 national tasks. Retrieved October 7, 2021, from https://www.mcst.go.kr/kor/s_notice/press/pressView.jsp?pMenuCD=0302000000&pSeq=16170&pTypeDept=&pSearchType=01&pSearchWord=&pCurrentPage=1

22.

Korea Ministry of Culture, Sports and Tourism. (2018a). Taekwondo is made into a daily sport enjoyed by people of all ages. Retrieved October 7, 2021, from https://www.korea.kr/news/policyNewsView.do?newsId=148851563

23.

Korea Ministry of Culture, Sports and Tourism. (2018b). The government and four Taekwondo organizations announce future development strategies and policy tasks for Taekwondo. Retrieved October 7, 2021, from https://www.mcst.go.kr/kor/s_notice/press/pressView.jsp?pSeq=16735

24.

Korea Ministry of Culture, Sports and Tourism. (2019). 3rd Taekwondo promotion basic plan (2019-2023). Retrieved October 7, 2021, from https://www.mcst.go.kr/kor/s_notice/press/pressView.jsp?pMenuCD=0302000000&pSeq=17669

25.

Korea Ministry of Government Legislation. (2018). Taekwondo promotion and Taekwondo park creation law. Retrieved October 7, 2021, from https://www.law.go.kr/lsInfoP.do?lsiSeq=206066&efYd=20181224#0000

26.

Korean Educational Development Institute. (2011). Evidence-based education policy analysis method. Retrieved October 7, 2021, from https://www.kedi.re.kr/khome/main/announce/selectVdataForm.do.

27.

Korean National Police Agency. (2019). Job posting. Retrieved June 8, 2022, from https://www.police.go.kr/user/bbs/BD_selectBbs.do?q_bbsCode=1004&q_bbscttSn=1B000001221783000&q_tab=&q_searchKeyTy=sj___1002&q_searchVal=%EB%AC%B4%EB%8F%84&q_rowPerPage=10&q_currPage=1&q_sortName=&q_sortOrder=&

28.

Korea Sports Promotion Foundation. (2018). 2016 sports white paper. Retrieved October 7, 2021, from https://www.sports.re.kr/front/board/bs/boardView.do?board_seq=47&pageNo=1&menu_seq=597&con_seq=2914&keyKind3=&keyKind4=&keyKind5=&keyKind6=&keyKind7=&keyKind=TITLE&keyWord=

29.

Korea Taekwondo Association. (2022). Korea Taekwondo association history. Retrieved June 8, 2022, from https://www.koreataekwondo.co.kr/c001/c0011

30.

Kukkiwon. (2022). History. Retrieved June 8, 2022, from https://www.kukkiwon.or.kr/base/contents/view?contentsNo=62&menuLevel=3&menuNo=55

31.

Kwon

K. S.

Lee

J. Y.

(2015). Taekwondo promotion policy of the Korean government and changes in the Taekwondo demonstration culture. Korean Journal of Physical Education, 54(4), 515–526.

32.

Lyberg

Weisberg

(2016). Total survey error: A paradigm for survey methodology (pp. 27–42). Sage.

33.

Manju Priya

A. R.

Gupta

(2019, September). Two-phase machine learning approach for extractive single document summarization. International Conference on Computational Vision and Bio Inspired Computing (pp.871−881). Springer.

34.

Moenig

Kim

(2016). The invention of Taekwondo tradition, 1945–1972: When mythology becomes’ history. Acta Koreana, 19(2), 131–164.

35.

Moenig

Kim

Y. I.

(2021). The early globalization process of taekwondo, from the 1950s to 1971. International Journal of the History of Sport, 37(17), 1–20.

36.

MOOKAS. (2020). Taekwondo Police Martial Arts Special Forces expanded to 9… 12 candidates selected. Retrieved June 8, 2022, from https://mookas.com/news/17716

37.

MOOKAS. (2021). The origin of Taekwondo, the national flag, and the belated enactment of legislation. Retrieved October 7, 2021, from https://mookas.com/news/17955

38.

Dallaire

(2022). An archaeology of Korean sport for international development discourse in Korea International Cooperation Agency (KOICA). International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics, 14(2), 273–290.

39.

Nambiar

Bhardwaj

Sethi

Vargheese

(2013, October). A look at challenges and opportunities of big data analytics in healthcare. 2013 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (pp.17−22). IEEE.

40.

Otte

Rousseau

(2002). Social network analysis: A powerful strategy, also for the information sciences. Journal of Information Science, 28(6), 441–453.

41.

Park

S. H.

(2019). A study on the diagnosis and development plan of the Taekwondo budgetary programs: Focused on the Korea sports promotion fund. Taekwondo Journal of Kukkiwon, 10(3), 57–80.

42.

Park

S. H.

(2020). Analysis and change of Taekwondo policy: Focusing on the basic plan for the promotion of Taekwondo. The Korean Journal of Sport, 18(2), 1105–1114.

43.

Park

S. U.

(2021). Big data analysis of the Korean government’s Taekwondo policy and system. Taekwondo Journal of Kukkiwon, 12(2), 39–47.

44.

Park

S. U.

Ahn

Kim

D. K.

W. Y.

(2020). Big data analysis of sports and physical activities among Korean adolescents. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(15), 5577.

45.

Park

S. U.

Jeon

J. W.

Ahn

Yang

Y. K.

W. Y.

(2022). Big Data Analysis of the key attributes related to stress and mental health in Korean taekwondo student athletes. Sustainability, 14(1), 477.

46.

Park

S. U.

Kim

D. K.

(2021). Improvement plans for Taekwondo policies and systems. Taekwondo Journal of Kukkiwon, 12(4), 1–12.

47.

Park

T. H.

Kim

W. I.

Park

Ahn

Cho

M. K.

Kim

(2020). Public interest in acne on the internet: Comparison of search information from google trends and Naver. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 22(10), e19427.

48.

Pfeffer

(1981). Power in organizations. Pitman Publishers.

49.

Sahay

; University of Oslo. (2016). Big data and public health: Challenges and opportunities for low and middle income countries. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 39(1), 419–438.

50.

Scott

(1988). Social network analysis. Sociology, 22(1), 109–127.

51.

Shin

(2014). A socio-technical framework for Internet-of-Things design: A human-centered design for the Internet of Things. Telematics and Informatics, 31(4), 519–531.

52.

Shin

D. H.

(2016). Demystifying big data: Anatomy of big data developmental process. Telecommunications Policy, 40(9), 837–854.

53.

Taekwondo Promotion Foundation. (2022). About the foundation. Retrieved June 8, 2022, from https://www.tpf.or.kr/tpf/contents/tpf010101.do

54.

The Academy of Korean Studies. (2014). Taekwondo promotion and Taekwondo park creation law. Retrieved October 7, 2021, from http://encykorea.aks.ac.kr/Contents/Item/E0074286

55.

Trstenjak

Mikac

Donko

(2014). KNN with TF-IDF based framework for text categorization. Procedia Engineering, 69, 1356–1364.

56.

Won

H. J.

Hong

(2015). The development of sport policy and management in South Korea. International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics, 7(1), 1–12.

57.

World Taekwondo. (2022). Introduction. Retrieved June 8, 2022, from http://w-tkd.org/

58.

Yonhap News Agency. (2015). Taekwondo Im Su-jeong and Judo Jeong Gyeong-mi passed the Police Special Appointment. Retrieved June 8, 2022, from https://www.yna.co.kr/view/MYH20150611007800038

Derivation of Key Attributes and Clusters of Korean Taekwondo Policies and Systems on Social Media: Comparative Big Data Analysis Based on Regime Change

Abstract

Keywords

Introduction

Methods

Ethical Statements

Data Collection

Data Analysis

Result

Results of Data Collection

Results of Text-Mining

Frequency Analysis

TF-IDF Analysis

Results of Social Network Analysis

Degree Centrality Analysis

CONCOR Analysis

Discussion

Conclusion and Limitations

Footnotes

Acknowledgements

Declaration of Conflicting Interests

Funding

ORCID iD

Data Availability Statement

Note

References