The purpose of this study is to examine microsocial and macrosocial contextual moderators of adolescent depressive contagion. Using data from the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health (Add Health), the authors find evidence supporting the depressive contagion thesis. This effect is observed above and beyond key social relationship and sociodemographic controls. To examine the role of social context in moderating the effect of depressive contagion, the authors utilize a longitudinal mixed effects model using Wave 1 and Wave 2 of the Add Health survey. The results reveal that depressive contagion is more salient for adolescents who are embedded in dense peer networks and attend schools with high network density and mutuality. Furthermore, popular students, measured as the number of received friendship nominations, are more vulnerable to depressive contagion. Overall, the findings in this study demonstrate a differential vulnerability to depressive contagion dependent on microsocial and macrosocial context.
AkersRonald L.KrohnMarvin D.Lanza-KaduceLonnRadosevichMarcia. 1979. “Social Learning and Deviant Behavior: A Specific Test of a General Theory.”American Sociological Review44(4):636-55.
2.
Aloise-YoungPatricia A.GrahamJohn W.HansenWilliam B.1994. “Peer Influence on Smoking Initiation during Early Adolescence: A Comparison of Group Members and Group Outsiders.”Journal of Applied Psychology79(2):281-87.
3.
BallerRobert D.RichardsonKelly K.2009. “The ‘Dark Side’ of the Strength of Weak Ties: The Diffusion of Suicidal Thoughts.”Journal of Health and Social Behavior50(3):261-76.
CheadleJacob E.GoosbyBridget J.2012. “The Small-school Friendship Dynamics of Adolescent Depressive Symptoms.”Society and Mental Health2(2):99-119.
6.
ChristakisNicholas A.FowlerJames H.2013. “Social Contagion Theory: Examining Dynamic Social Networks and Human Behavior.”Statistics in Medicine32(4):556-77.
7.
ConwayChristopher C.RancourtDianaAdelmanCaroline B.BurkWilliam J.PrinsteinMitchell J.2011. “Depression Socialization within Friendship Groups at the Transition to Adolescence: The Roles of Gender and Group Centrality as Moderators of Peer Influence.”Journal of Abnormal Psychology120(4):857-67.
8.
DishionThomas J.2013. “Stochastic Agent-based Modeling of Influence and Selection in Adolescence: Current Status and Future Directions in Understanding the Dynamics of Peer Contagion.”Journal of Research on Adolescence23(3):596-603.
9.
DurkheimEmile. [1897] 1951. Suicide: A Study in Sociology. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
10.
El-SayedAbdulrahman M.ScarboroughPeterSeemannLarsGaleaSandro. 2012. “Social Network Analysis and Agent-based Modeling in Social Epidemiology.”Epidemiologic Perspectives & Innovations9(1):1-9.
11.
EntwisleBarbaraFaustKatherineRindfussRonald R.KanedaToshiko. 2007. “Networks and Contexts: Variation in the Structure of Social Ties.”American Journal of Sociology112(5):1495-533.
12.
FalciChristinaMcNeelyClea. 2009. “Too Many Friends: Social Integration, Network Cohesion and Adolescent Depressive Symptoms.”Social Forces87(4):2031-61.
13.
HaynieDana L.2001. “Delinquent Peers Revisited: Does Network Structure Matter?”American Journal of Sociology106(4):1013-57.
14.
HogueAaronSteinbergLaurence. 1995. “Homophily of Internalized Distress in Adolescent Peer Groups.”Developmental Psychology31(6):897-906.
15.
HouseJames S.LandisKarl R.UmbersonDebra. 1988. “Social Relationships and Health.”Science241(4865):540-45.
16.
JoynerKaraUdryJ. Richard. 2000. “You Don’t Bring Me Anything but Down: Adolescent Romance and Depression.”Journal of Health and Social Behavior41(4):369-91.
17.
KatzLeoPowellJames H.1955. “Measurement of the Tendency toward Reciprocation of Choice.”Sociometry18(4):403-09.
18.
National Institute of Mental Health. 2007. Children’s Mental Health Awareness: Depression in Children and Adolescents Fact Sheet. Bethesda: National Institute of Mental Health.
19.
PearlinLeonard I.1989. “The Sociological Study of Stress.”Journal of Health and Social Behavior30(3):241-56.
20.
PearlinLeonard I.MenaghanElizabeth G.LiebermanMorton A.MullanJoseph T.1981. “The Stress Process.”Journal of Health and Social Behavior22(4):337-56.
21.
PerreiraKrista M.Deeb-SossaNataliaHarrisKathleen MullanBollenKenneth. 2005. “What Are We Measuring? An Evaluation of the CES-D across Race/Ethnicity and Immigrant Generation.”Social Forces83(4):1567-601.
22.
PrinsteinMitchell J.2007. “Moderators of Peer Contagion: A Longitudinal Examination of Depression Socialization between Adolescents and Their Best Friends.”Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology36(2):159-70.
23.
RadloffLenore Sawyer. 1977. “The CES-D Scale: A Self-report Depression Scale for Research in the General Population.”Applied Psychological Measurement1(3):385-401.
24.
RambaranAshwin J.DijkstraJan KornelisStarkTobias H.2013. “Status-based Influence Processes: The Role of Norm Salience in Contagion of Adolescent Risk Attitudes.”Journal of Research on Adolescence23(3):574-85.
25.
RaudenbushStephen W.BrykAnthony S.2002. Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
26.
RosenquistJ. Niels.FowlerJames H.ChristakisNicholas A.2011. “Social Network Determinants of Depression.”Molecular Psychiatry16(3):273-81.
27.
SchaeferDavid R.KornienkoOlgaFoxAndrew M.2011. “Misery Does Not Love Company: Network Selection Mechanisms and Depression Homophily.”American Sociological Review76(5):764-85.
28.
ShaliziCosma RohillaThomasAndrew C.2011. “Homophily and Contagion Are Generically Confounded in Observational Social Network Studies.”Sociological Methods & Research40(2):211-39.
29.
SnijdersTom A. B.Van de BuntGerhard G.SteglichChristian E. G.2010. “Introduction to Stochastic Actor-based Models for Network Dynamics.”Social Networks32(1):44-60.
30.
StataCorp. 2013. Stata Multiple-imputation Reference Manual Release 13. College Station, TX: StataCorp LP.
31.
StevensElizabeth A.PrinsteinMitchell J.2005. “Peer Contagion of Depressogenic Attributional Styles among Adolescents: A Longitudinal Study.”Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology33(1):25-37.
32.
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. 2013. Results from the 2012 National Survey on Drug Use and Health: Mental Health Findings. Rockville, MD: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration.
33.
SutherlandEdwin. 1947. Principles of Criminology. 4th ed.Philadelphia: J. B. Lippincott.
34.
UmbersonDebra. 1987. “Family Status and Health Behaviors: Social Control as a Dimension of Social Integration.”Journal of Health and Social Behavior28(3):306-19.
35.
UmbersonDebraMontezJennifer Karas. 2010. “Social Relationships and Health: A Flashpoint for Health Policy.”Journal of Health and Social Behavior51:S54-66.
36.
UmbersonDebraWilliamsKristiPowersDaniel A.LiuHuiNeedhamBelinda. 2006. “You Make Me Sick: Marital Quality and Health over the Life Course.”Journal of Health and Social Behavior47(1):1-16.
37.
UrbergKathryn A.LuoQingPilgrimColleenDegirmenciogluSerdar M.2003. “A Two-stage Model of Peer Influence in Adolescent Substance Use: Individual and Relationship-specific Differences in Susceptibility to Influence.”Addictive Behaviors28(7):1243-56.
38.
WethingtonElaineKesslerRonald C.1986. “Perceived Support, Received Support, and Adjustment to Stressful Life Events.”Journal of Health and Social Behavior27(1):78-89.
39.
World Health Organization. 2014. Health for the World’s Adolescents. A Second Chance in the Second Decade. Geneva: World Health Organization.
40.
ZalkMaarten Herman Walter vanKerrMargaretBranjeSusan J. T.StattinHakanMeeusWim H. J.2010a. “It Takes Three: Selection, Influence, and De-selection Processes of Depression in Adolescent Friendship Networks.”Developmental Psychology46(4):927-38.
41.
ZalkMaarten Herman Walter vanKerrMargaretBranjeSusan J. T.StattinHakanMeeusWim H. J.2010b. “Peer Contagion and Adolescent Depression: The Role of Failure Anticipation.”Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology39(6):837-48.
