Most research investigates the effect of a defendant’s race on severity of imposed legal sanction at only one of several decision points that comprise the criminal justice system. This myopic focus on what can be termed episodic discrimination is problematic because racial discrimination evinced at one decision point may be amplified, negated, or even reversed at other decision points. Here we synthesize estimates of a defendant’s race on the severity of imposed legal sanction at each of the decision points encountered by a defendant as he or she progresses through the criminal justice system. Although initial results show that the effect of race on severity of outcome depends on the specific decision point analyzed, a synthesis of these race estimates in a meta-analysis reveals that the odds of receiving a severe sanction is approximately 42% higher for a Black defendant even after controlling for prior record and other legal and extralegal variables. Thus, although the influence of a defendant’s race on the severity of sanction is statistically discernible at just two of the eight criminal justice decision points, a substantive cumulative racial discriminatory effect is evident when all the individual decision points are considered in their totality.
AbramsonL. Y.SeligmanM. E.TeasdaleJ. D. (1978). Learned helplessness in humans: Critique and reformulation. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 87, 49–74.
2.
AikenL. S.WestS. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
3.
AlbonettiC. A. (1991) An integration of theories to explain judicial discretion. Social Problems, 38, 247–266.
4.
AlbonettiC. A. (1997) Sentencing under the federal sentencing guidelines: Effects of defendant characteristics, guilty pleas, and departures on sentence outcomes for drug offenders, 1991-1992. Law and Society Review, 31, 789–822.
5.
AlbonettiC. A.HauserR. M.HaganJ.NagelI. (1989). Criminal justice decision making as a stratification process: The role of race and stratification resources in pre-trial release. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 5, 57–82.
BalesW. D.PiqueroA. R. (2012). Racial/ethnic differentials in sentencing to incarceration. Justice Quarterly, 29, 742–773.
8.
BerkR. A. (1983). An introduction to sample selection bias in sociological data. American Sociological Review, 48, 386–398.
9.
BerkR. A.FreedmanD. (2003). Statistical assumptions as empirical commitments. In BlombergT. G.CohenS. (Eds.), Punishment and Social Control: Essays in Honor of Sheldon Messinger (2nd ed, pp. 245–254). Berlin, Germany: Aldine de Gruyter.
10.
BernsteinI. N.KellyW. R.DoyleP. A. (1977). Societal reaction to deviants: The case of criminal defendants. American Sociological Review, 42, 743–755.
11.
BorensteinM.HedgesL.HigginsJ.RothsteinH. (2005) Comprehensive meta-analysis, Version 2. Englewood, NJ: Biostat
12.
BlackD. (1983). Crime as social control. American Sociological Review, 48, 34–45.
13.
BlankR. M.DabadyM.CitroC. F. (2004). Measuring racial discrimination: Panel on methods for assessing discrimination. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
14.
BlumsteinA. (1982). On the racial disproportionality of United States prison populations. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 73, 1259–1281.
15.
BlumsteinA. (1993). Racial disproportionality of U.S. prison populations revisited. University of Colorado Law Review, 64, 743–760.
16.
BorensteinM.HedgesL. V.HigginsJ. P. T.RothsteinH. R. (2009). Introduction to meta-analysis. West Sussex, UK: John Wiley.
17.
BramanD. (2004). Doing time on the outside: Incarceration and family life in urban America. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
18.
BridgesG. S.SteenS. (1998). Racial disparities in official assessments of juvenile offenders: Attributional stereotypes as mediating mechanisms. American Sociological Review, 63, 554–570.
19.
Bureau of Justice Statistics. (2007a). Prisoners and jail inmates at midyear, 2006. Washington, DC: Department of Justice.
20.
Bureau of Justice Statistics. (2007b). State court processing statistics, 1990-2004: Felony defendants in large urban counties. Washington, DC: Department of Justice.
21.
ClearT. R. (2009). Imprisoning communities: How mass incarceration makes disadvantaged neighborhoods worse. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
22.
CochranW. G. (1954). The combination of estimates from different experiments. Biometrics, 10, 101–129.
23.
CrutchfieldR. D.BridgesG. S.PitchfordS. R. (1994). Analytical and aggregation biases in analyses of imprisonment: Reconciling discrepancies in studies of racial disparity. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 31, 166–182.
24.
CrutchfieldR. D.FernandesA.MartinezJ. (2010). Racial and ethnic disparity and criminal justice: How much is too much?Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 100, 903–932.
25.
D'AlessioS. J.StolzenbergL. (2003). Race and the probability of arrest. Social Forces, 81, 1381–1397.
DanzigeraS.LevavbJ.Avnaim-PessoaL. (2011). Extraneous factors in judicial decisions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108, 6889–6892.
28.
DavisA. J. (2007–2008). Racial fairness in the criminal justice system: The role of the prosecutor. Columbia Human Rights Law Review, 39, 202–232.
29.
DemuthS. (2003). Racial and ethnic differences in pretrial release decisions and outcomes: A comparison of Hispanic, Black, and White felony arrestees. Criminology, 41, 873–908.
30.
DemuthS.SteffensmeierD. (2004). The impact of gender and race/ethnicity in the pretrial release process. Social Problems, 51, 222–242.
31.
EngenR. L.GaineyR. R. (2000). Modeling the effects of legally relevant and extralegal factors under sentencing guidelines: The rules have changed. Criminology, 38, 1207–1225.
32.
EverettR. S.WojtkiewiczR. A. (2002). Difference, disparity and race/ethnic bias in federal sentencing. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 18, 189–211.
33.
FarnworthM.HoranP. M. (1980). Separate justice: An analysis of race differences in court processes. Social Science Research, 9, 381–399.
34.
FeaginJ. R.McKinneyK. D. (2003) The many costs of racism. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
35.
FraseR. S. (2009). What explains persistent racial disproportionality in Minnesota’s prison and jail populations?Crime and Justice, 38, 201–280.
36.
FreiburgerT. L.MarcumC. D.PierceM. (2010). The impact of race on the pretrial decision. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 35, 76–86.
37.
GabbidonS. L.GreeneH. T. (2008). Race and crime (2nd ed). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
38.
GibsonJ. L. (1978). Race as a determinant of criminal sentences: A methodological critique and a case study. Law & Society Review, 12, 455–478.
39.
HarelA.UziS. (1999). Criminal law and behavioral law and economics: Observations on the neglected role of uncertainty in deterring crime. American Law and Economics Review, 1, 276–312.
40.
HarrisonP. M.BeckA. J. (2006). Prison and jail inmates at midyear, 2005 (NCJ 213133). Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics.
41.
HartleyR. D.MaddanS.SpohnC. C. (2007). Prosecutorial discretion: An examination of substantial assistance departures in Federal crack-cocaine and powder-cocaine cases. Justice Quarterly, 24, 382–407.
42.
HawkinsD. F. (1987). Beyond anomalies: Rethinking the conflict perspective on race and criminal punishment. Social Forces, 65, 719–745.
43.
HeckmanJ. J. (1979). Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica, 47, 153–161.
44.
HolmesM. D.HoschH. M.DaudistelH. C.PerezD. A.GravesJ. B. (1996). Ethnicity, legal resources, and felony dispositions in two Southwestern jurisdictions. Justice Quarterly, 13, 11–30.
45.
JohnsonB. D.StewartE.PickettJ. A.GertzM. (2011). Ethnic threat and social control: Examining public support for judicial use of ethnicity in punishment. Criminology, 49, 401–441.
46.
JohnsonB. D.UlmerJ. T.KramerJ. H. (2008). The social context of guidelines circumvention: The case of federal district courts. Criminology, 46,737–783.
47.
KansalT. (2005). Racial disparity in sentencing: A review of the literature. Washington, DC: The Sentencing Project.
48.
KeenB.JacobsD. (2009). Racial threat, partisan politics and racial disparities in prison admissions: A panel analysis. Criminology, 47, 209–238.
49.
KingsnorthR. F.MacIntoshR. C.WentworthJ. (1999). Sexual assault: The role of prior relationship and victim characteristics in case processing. Justice Quarterly, 16, 275–302.
50.
KleinS.PetersiliaJ.TurnerS. (1990). Race and imprisonment decisions in California. Science, 247, 812–816.
51.
KochelT. R.WilsonD. B.MastrofskiS. D. (2011). Effect of suspect race on officers’ arrest decisions. Criminology, 49, 473–512.
52.
KramerJ. H.UlmerJ. T. (1996). Sentencing disparity and departures from guidelines. Justice Quarterly, 13, 81–106.
53.
KramerJ. H.UlmerJ. T. (2009). Sentencing guidelines: Lessons from Pennsylvania. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
54.
LaFreeG. D. (1980). The effect of sexual stratification by race on official reactions to rape. American Sociological Review, 45, 842–854.
55.
MauerM. (1997). Intended and unintended consequences: State racial disparities in imprisonment. Washington, DC: Sentencing Project.
56.
MauerM.Chesney-LindM. (eds.). (2002). Invisible punishment: The collateral consequences of mass imprisonment. New York, NY: The New Press.
57.
MelossiD. (1989). An introduction: Fifty years later, punishment and social structure in comparative analysis. Contemporary Crisis, 13, 311–326.
58.
MertonR. K. (1968). The Matthew effect in science. Science159, 56–63.
59.
MietheT. D.MooreC. A. (1986). Racial differences in criminal processing: The consequences of model selection on conclusions about differential treatment. Sociological Quarterly, 27, 217–237.
60.
MitchellO. (2005). A meta-analysis of race and sentencing research: Explaining the inconsistencies. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 21, 439–466.
61.
MyersM. A. (1987). Economic inequality and discrimination in sentencing. Social Forces, 65, 746–766.
62.
MyersM. A.TalaricoS. M. (1987). The social contexts of criminal sentencing. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
63.
NadlerJ.RoseM. R. (2002–2003). Victim impact testimony and the psychology of punishment. Cornell Law Review, 88, 419–456.
64.
NobilingT.SpohnC.DeLoneM. (1998). A tale of two counties: Unemployment and sentence severity. Justice Quarterly, 15, 459–485.
65.
PagerD. (2003). The mark of a criminal record. American Journal of Sociology, 108, 937–975.
66.
PeffleyM.HurwitzJ. (2010). Justice in America: The separate realities of blacks and whites. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
67.
PetersiliaJ.1983. Racial disparities in the criminal justice system. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation.
68.
PetersiliaJ. (2002). Community corrections. In WilsonJ. Q.PetersiliaJ. (Eds.), Crime: Public polices for crime control (pp. 483–508). Oakland, CA: Institute for Contemporary Studies.
69.
PoundR. (1996). Social control through law. Piscataway, NJ: Transaction.
70.
PrattT. C. (1998). Race and sentencing: A meta-analysis of conflicting empirical research results. Journal of Criminal Justice, 26, 513–523.
71.
RobertsD. E. (2004). The social and moral cost of mass incarceration in African American communities. Stanford Law Review, 35, 1272–1305.
72.
RockenbachB.MilinskiM. (2006). The efficient interaction of indirect reciprocity and costly punishment. Nature, 444, 718–723.
73.
RosichK. J. (2007). Race, ethnicity, and the criminal justice system. Washington, DC: American Sociological Association.
74.
SampsonR. J.LaubJ. H. (1993). Structural variations in juvenile court processing: Inequality, the underclass, and social control. Law and Society Review, 27, 285–212.
75.
SampsonR. J.LaubJ. H. (1997). A life-course theory of cumulative disadvantage and the stability of delinquency. In ThornberryT. P. (ed.) Advances in criminological theory. Developmental theories of crime and delinquency (Vol 7, pp. 133–161). Piscataway, NJ: Transaction.
76.
SampsonR. J.LauritsenJ. L. (1997). Racial and ethnic disparities in crime and criminal justice in the United States. In TonryM. (ed.) Crime and justice: A review of research. (Vol. 21, pp. 311–374). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
77.
SchlesingerT. (2005). Racial and ethnic disparity in pretrial criminal processing. Justice Quarterly, 22, 170–192.
78.
SchlesingerT. (2007). The cumulative effects of racial disparities in criminal processing. Journal of the Institute of Justice & International Studies, 7, 261–278.
79.
SchrantzD.McElroyJ. (2000). Reducing racial disparity in the criminal justice system: A manual for practitioners and policymakers. Washington, DC: Sentencing Project.
80.
ShermerL. O.JohnsonB. D. (2010). Criminal prosecutions: Examining prosecutorial discretion and charge reductions in U.S. Federal district courts. Justice Quarterly, 27, 394–430.
81.
SorensenJ.HopeR.StemenD. (2003). Racial disproportionality in state prison admissions: Can regional variation be explained by differential arrest rates?Journal of Criminal Justice, 31, 73–84.
82.
SpohnC. C. (2000) Thirty years of sentencing reform: The quest for a racially neutral sentencing process. In HorneyJ. (ed.), Policies, processes, and decisions of the criminal justice system (vol.3, pp. 427–501). Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
83.
SpohnC.SpearsJ. (1996). The effect of offender and victim characteristics on sexual assault case processing decisions. Justice Quarterly, 13, 649–79.
84.
SpohnC.HolleranD. (2000). The imprisonment penalty paid by young, unemployed black and Hispanic male offenders. Criminology, 25, 175–191.
85.
SpohnC.GruhlJ.WelchS. (1981–1982). The effect of race on sentencing: A re-examination of an unsettled question. Law & Society Review, 16, 71–88.
86.
StataCorp. (2009). Stata statistical software, Release 11. College Station, TX: StataCorp LP.
87.
TittleC. R.CurranD. A. (1988). Contingencies for dispositional disparities in juvenile justice. Social Forces, 67: 23–58.
88.
TonryM. (1998). Sentencing matters. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
89.
TonryM. (2011). Punishing race: A continuing American dilemma. New York, NY: Oxford University.
90.
TurnerK. B.SecretP. E.JohnsonJ. B. (2003). Race as a factor in the judicial decision of bail amount in a Midwestern jurisdiction. Journal of Ethnicity in Criminal Justice, 1, 21–39.
91.
UlmerJ. T. (2012). Recent developments and new directions in sentencing research. Justice Quarterly, 29, 1–40.
92.
UnneverJ. D.GabbidonS. L. (2011). A theory of African American offending: Race, racism, and crime. New York, NY: Routledge.
93.
VigoritaM. S. (2001). Prior offense type and the probability of incarceration: The importance of current offense type and sentencing jurisdiction. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 17, 167–193.
94.
VisherC. A.Debus-SherrillS. A.YahnerJ. (2011). Employment after prison: A longitudinal study of former prisoners. Justice Quarterly, 28, 698–718.
95.
WalshA. (1987). The sexual stratification hypothesis and sexual assault in light of the changing conceptions of race. Criminology, 25, 153–173.
96.
WangX.MearsD. P. (2010). Examining the direct and interactive effects of changes in racial and ethnic threat on sentencing decisions. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 47, 522–557.
97.
WarrenP.ChiricosT.BalesW. (2012). The imprisonment penalty for young Black and Hispanic males: A crime-specific analysis. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 49, 56–80.
98.
WarrenP.Tomaskovic-DeveyD.SmithW.ZingraffM.MasonM. (2006). Driving while black: Bias processes and racial disparity in police stops. Criminology, 44, 709–738.
99.
WesternB. (2006). Punishment and inequality in America. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
100.
WilsonW. J. (1996). When work disappears: The world of the new urban Poor. New York, NY: Knopf.
101.
WooldredgeJ. (2012). Distinguishing race effects on pre-trial release and sentencing decisions. Justice Quarterly, 29, 41–74.
102.
WooldredgeJ.ThistlethwaiteA. (2004). Bilevel disparities in court dispositions for intimate assault. Criminology, 42, 417–456.
103.
ZatzM. S. (1984). Race, ethnicity, and determinate sentencing: A new dimension to an old controversy. Criminology, 22, 147–171.
104.
ZatzM. S. (1985). Pleas, priors and prison: Racial/ethnic differences in sentencing. Social Science Research, 14, 169–193.
105.
ZatzM. S. (1987). The changing forms of racial/ethnic biases in sentencing. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 24, 69–92.
106.
ZatzM. S. (2000). The convergence of race, ethnicity, gender, and class on court decision-making: Looking toward the 21st century. In HorneyJ. (ed.), Policies, processes, and decisions of the criminal justice system (Vol. 3, pp. 503–552). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
