This study explores perceptions and awareness of disproportionate minority contact (DMC) by stakeholders in juvenile justice, youth-serving community organizations, schools, social services, and the faith community. This study is derived from a statewide assessment, which included in-person interviews with individuals that have personal and professional relationships within the juvenile justice system. Findings support the contention that individuals are either unaware of the prevalence of DMC, have already formed prejudices about minority youth within the system, or do not appreciate the degree of importance DMC has on the development of minority youth.
BishopD. M. (2005). The role of race and ethnicity in juvenile justice system processing. In HawkinsD. F.Kempf-LeonardK. (Eds.), Our children, their children: Confronting racial and ethnic differences in American juvenile justice (pp. 170–189). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
2.
CharmazK. (1983). The grounded theory method: An explication and interpretation. In EmersonR. (Ed.), Contemporary field research (pp. 109–126). Boston, MA: Little and Brown.
3.
CharmazK. (2006). Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide to Qualitative Analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
4.
FeinsteinR. (2015). A qualitative analysis of police interactions and disproportionate minority contact. Journal of Ethnicity in Criminal Justice, 13, 159–178. doi:10.1080/15377938.2014.936645
5.
FeyerhermW. (2011). Measuring DMC: The origins and use of the relative rate index. In Parsons-PollardN. (Ed.), Disproportionate minority contact: Current issues and policies (pp. 35–50). Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press.
6.
FeyerhermW.SnyderH.VillarruelF. (2009). Identification and monitoring. In Disproportionate minority contact technical assistance manual (4th ed., pp. 1–45). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice. https://www.ojjdp.gov/compliance/dmc_ta_manual.pdf.
HendersonD. X.BaffourT. (2015). Applying a socio-ecological framework to thematic analysis using a statewide assessment of disproportionate minority contact in the United States. The Qualitative Report, 20, 1960–1973. Retrieved fromhttp://nsuworks.nova.edu/tqr/vol20/iss12/2
HsiaH. (1999). OJJDP formula grants program (Juvenile Justice Bulletin). Washington, DC: Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
11.
JonesC. A. (2016). Is disproportionate minority contact improving? An exploratory analysis of the arrest, confinement, and transfer stages in rural and urban settings. Journal of Ethnicity in Criminal Justice, 14, 40–57. doi:10.1080/15377938.2015.1052172
12.
KakarS. (2006). Understanding the causes of disproportionate minority contact: Results of focus group discussions. Journal of Criminal Justice, 34, 369–381.
13.
Kempf-LeonardK. (2007). Minority youths and juvenile justice disproportionate minority contact after nearly 20 years of reform efforts. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 5, 71–87.
14.
LauritsenJ. L. (2005). Racial and ethnic difference in juvenile offending. In HawkinsD. F.Kempf-LeonardK. (Eds.), Our children, their children: Confronting racial and ethnic differences in American juvenile justice (pp. 83–104). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
15.
LeiberM. J. (2003). The contexts of juvenile justice decision making: When race matters. Albany: State University of New York Press.
16.
MearsD. P.ShollenbergerT. L.WillisonJ. B.OwensC. E.ButtsJ. A. (2010). Practitioner views of priorities, policies, and practices in juvenile justice. Crime & Delinquency, 56, 535–563.
17.
MooradianJ. K. (2003). Disproportionate Minority Confinement of African-American Juvenile Delinquency. New York, NY: LFB Scholarly Publishing, LLC.
18.
Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention. (2009). Disproportionate minority contact technical assistance manual (4th ed.). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
PeckJ. H. (2016). The importance of evaluation and monitoring within the Disproportionate Minority Contact (DMC) mandate: Future directions juvenile justice research. Race and Justice. doi:10.1177/2153368716675923
21.
PopeC. E.LeiberM. J. (2005). Disproportionate Minority Confinement/Contact (DMC): The federal initiative. In HawkinsD.Kempf-LeonardK. (Eds). Our Children, Their Children: Confronting Racial and Ethnic Differences in American Juvenile Justice. (pp. 351–389). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
SullivanC. J.MuellerD. J.GannS. M.SpiegelS. N.McManusH. D. (2016) Weapon and drug offenses and juvenile disproportionate minority contact: An impact assessment and practical discussion. Journal of Crime and Justice, 39, 107–130. doi:10.1080/0735648X.2015.1133505
26.
VitoG. F.KunselmanJ.TewksburyR. (2014). Introduction to criminal justice research methods: An applied approach (2nd ed.). Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.
27.
WardG.KupchikA.ParkerL.StarksB. C. (2011). Racial politics of juvenile justice policy supports: Juvenile court worker orientations toward disproportionate minority contact. Race and Justice, 1, 154–184.
