Numerous studies document the positive ramifications of locally based crime prevention efforts, but also reveal that neighborhoods are not equally positioned to engage in such efforts. The same social–structural correlates of high crime rates also make locally based initiatives less likely to emerge and more difficult to sustain. Opportunities for organized anticrime work are therefore unequally allocated across neighborhoods. In this article, I adapt the differential opportunity structures framework to explore an additional dimension of unequal opportunities for crime prevention: those that exist within organizations themselves. Using an intersectional lens to analyze 3 years of ethnographic data on civilian-run anticrime efforts in a small east coast community, my findings illustrate how processes groups use to train and teach their members, the day-to-day realities of their work, and the contours of social interaction within a group all impact participation. Social status factors like race, gender, and age impact access to learning and performance structures associated with anticrime work at the local level.
AckerJ. (1990). Hierarchies, jobs, and bodies: A theory of gendered organizations. Gender & Society, 4, 139–158.
2.
AndersonE. (1990). Streetwise: Race, class, and change in an urban community. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
3.
ApplebaumB. (2006). Race ignore-ance, colortalk and white complicity: White is white isn’t. Educational Theory, 56, 345–362.
4.
ApplegateB. K.CullenF. T.FisherB. S. (2002). Public views toward crime and correctional policies: Is there a gender gap?Journal of Criminal Justice, 30, 89–100.
5.
BarkanS. E.CohnS. F. (2005). Why whites favor spending more money to fight crime: The role of racial prejudice. Social Problems, 52, 300–314.
6.
Beauboeuf-LafontantT. (2009). Behind the mask of the strong black woman: Voice and the embodiment of a costly performance. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
BeckerSarahMcCorkelJ. A. (2011). The gender of criminal opportunity: The impact of male co-offenders on women's crime. Feminist Criminology, 6, 79–110.
9.
BennettT.HollowayK.FarringtonD. P. (2006). Does neighborhood watch reduce crime? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 2, 437–458.
10.
BergerM. L. (1986). Women drivers!: The emergence of folklore and stereotypic opinions concerning feminine automotive behavior. Women’s Studies International Forum, 9, 257–263.
11.
BernsN. (2001). Degendering the problem and gendering the blame: Political discourse on women and violence. Gender & Society, 15, 262–281.
12.
BlauP. (1990). Structural constraints and opportunities: Merton’s contributions to general theory. In ClarkJ.ModgilC.ModgilS. (Eds.), Robert K. Merton: Consensus and controversy (pp. 141–158). London, England: Falmer Press.
13.
Bonilla-SilvaE. (2002). The linguistics of color blind racism: How to talk nasty about blacks without sounding “Racist.”Critical Sociology, 28, 41–64.
14.
BraithwaiteJ. (2000). The new regulatory state and the transformation of criminology. British Journal of Criminology, 40, 222–238.
15.
BrowningC. R. (2009). Illuminating the downside of social capital: Negotiated coexistence, property crime, and disorder in urban neighborhoods. American Behavioral Scientist, 52, 1556–1578.
16.
BrunsonR. K. (2007). “Police don’t like black people”: African-American young men’s accumulated police experiences. Criminology & Public Policy, 6, 71–102.
17.
BrunsonR. K.MillerJ. (2006). Gender, race, and urban policing: The experience of African American youths. Gender & Society, 20, 531–552.
18.
BursikR.GrasmickH. G. (1993). Neighborhoods and crime: The dimensions of effective community control. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
CarrP. J. (2003). The new parochialism: The implications of the beltway case for arguments concerning informal social control. American Journal of Sociology, 108, 1249–1291.
21.
CarrP. J. (2005). Clean streets: Controlling crime, maintaining order, and building community activism. New York: NYU Press.
22.
CarrP. J.NapolitanoL.KeatingJ. (2007). We never call the cops and this is why: A qualitative examination of legal cynicism in three Philadelphia neighborhoods. Criminology, 45, 445–480.
23.
CarvalhoI.LewisD. A. (2003). Beyond community: Reactions to crime and disorder among inner-city residents. Criminology, 41, 779–812.
24.
CavenderG.Bond-MaupinL.JurikN. C. (1999). The construction of gender in reality crime TV. Gender & Society, 13, 643–663.
25.
ChenE. Y. (2008). Impacts of “Three Strikes and You’re Out” on crime trends in California and throughout the US. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 24, 345–370.
26.
ChiricosT.EschholzS. (2002). The racial and ethnic typification of crime and the criminal typification of race and ethnicity in local television news. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 39, 400–420.
27.
ChiricosT.WelchK.GertzM. (2004). Racial typification of crime and support for punitive measures. Criminology, 42, 359–389.
28.
ChooH. Y.FerreeM. M. (2010). Practicing intersectionality in sociological research: A critical analysis of inclusions, interactions, and institutions in the study of inequalities. Sociological Theory, 28, 129–149.
29.
ClearT. (2007). Imprisoning communities. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
30.
ClowardR. A.OhlinL. E. (1960). Delinquency and opportunity. New York, NY: The Free Press.
31.
CohnS. F.BarkanS. E.HaltemanW. A. (1991). Punitive attitudes toward criminals: Racial consensus or racial conflict?Social Problems, 38, 287–296.
32.
ColemanJ. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, S95–S120.
33.
CollinsP. H. (1991). Learning from the outsider within: The sociological significance of black feminist thought. Beyond methodology: Feminist scholarship as lived research (pp. 35–59). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
34.
CollinsP. H. (2004). Black sexual politics: African Americans, gender, and the new racism. New York, NY: Routledge.
35.
CrenshawK. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43, 1241–1299.
36.
DoobA. N.WebsterC. M. (2003). Sentence severity and crime: Accepting the null hypothesis. Crime and Justice, 30, 143–195.
37.
EnglandP. (1992). Comparable worth: Theories and evidence. New York, NY: Aldine.
38.
FaludiS. (2006). Backlash: The undeclared war against American women. New York, NY: Random House Digital, Inc.
39.
FineM. (2004). Witnessing whiteness/gathering intelligence. Off white: Readings on power, privilege, and resistance (2nd ed., pp. 245–256). New York, NY: Routledge.
40.
FloresG. (2011). Racialized tokens: Latina teachers negotiating, surviving and thriving in a white woman’s profession. Qualitative Sociology, 34, 313–335.
41.
GarlandD. (2001). The culture of control: Crime and social order in contemporary society. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
42.
GarofaloJ.McLeodM. (1989). The structure and operations of neighborhood watch programs in the United States. Crime & Delinquency, 35, 326–344.
43.
GreeneL. S. (1990). Tokens, role models, and pedagogical politics: Lamentations of an African American female law professor. Berkeley Women’s Law Journal, 6, 81.
44.
HalterM. (1993). Between race and ethnicity: Cape Verdean American immigrants, 1860–1965. Chicago, IL: University of Illinois Press, 1993.
45.
HollanderJ. A. (2001). Vulnerability and dangerousness. Gender & Society, 15, 83–109.
46.
HughesG. (2007). The politics of crime and community. London, England: Palgrave/Macmillan.
47.
HutchinsonR. N.PuttM. A.DeanL. T.LongJ. A.MontagnetC. A.ArmstrongK. (2009). Neighborhood racial composition, social capital and black all-cause mortality in Philadelphia. Social Science & Medicine, 68, 1859–1865.
48.
JohnsonD. (2001). Punitive attitudes on crime: Economic insecurity, racial prejudice, or both?Sociological Focus, 34, 33–54
49.
KasardaJ. D.JanowitzM. (1974). Community attachment in mass society. American Sociological Review, 39, 328–339.
50.
KleinL.LuxenburgJ.KingM. (1989). Perceived neighborhood crime and the impact of private security. Crime & Delinquency, 35, 365–377.
51.
KovandzicT. V.SloanJ.VieraitisL. M. (2004). “Striking out” as crime reduction policy: The impact of “three strikes” laws on crime rates in U.S. cities. Justice Quarterly, 21, 207–239.
52.
KrivoL. J.PetersonR. D. (2000). The structural context of homicide: Accounting for racial differences in process. American Sociological Review, 65, 547–560.
53.
KubrinC. E.WeitzerR. (2003). New directions in social disorganization theory. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 40, 374–402.
54.
LeeM. R. (2000). Concentrated poverty, race, and homicide. The Sociological Quarterly, 41, 189–206.
55.
LeeM. R. (2008). Civic community in the hinterland: Toward a theory of rural social structure and violence. Criminology, 46, 447–478.
56.
LeeM. R.BartkowskiJ. P. (2004a). Civic participation, regional subcultures, and violence: The differential effects of secular and religious participation on adult and juvenile homicide. Homicide Studies, 8, 5–39.
57.
LeeM. R.BartowskiJ. P. (2004b). Love thy neighbor? Moral communities, civic engagement, and juvenile homicide. Social Forces, 82, 1001–1035.
58.
LeeM. R.ThomasS. A. (2010). Civic community, population change, and violent crime in rural communities. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 47, 118–147.
59.
MadrizE. I. (1997). Images of criminals and victims: A study on women’s fear and social control. Gender & Society, 11, 342–356.
60.
MaherL. (2000). Sexed work: Gender, race, and resistance in a Brooklyn drug market. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
61.
MaimonD.BrowningC. R. (2010). Unstructured socializing, collective efficacy, and violent behavior among urban youth. Criminology, 48, 443–474.
62.
MatsuedaR. L. (1988). The current state of differential association theory. Crime & Delinquency, 34, 277–306.
63.
MayD. C.RaderN. E.GoodrumS. (2010). A gendered assessment of the “Threat of Victimization”: examining gender differences in fear of crime, perceived risk, avoidance, and defensive behaviors. Criminal Justice Review, 35, 159–182.
64.
MazerolleL.RansleyJ. (2005). Third party policing. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
65.
MertonR. K. (1995). Opportunity structure: The emergence, diffusion, and differentiation of a sociological concept, 1930s–1950s. In AdlerF.LauferW. S. (Eds.), The legacy of Anomie theory (pp. 3–78). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
66.
MessnerS. F.SouthS. J. (1986). Economic deprivation, opportunity structure, and robbery victimiztion: Intra- and interracial patterns. Social Forces, 64, 975–991.
67.
MinichielloV.BrowneJ.KendigH. (2000). Perceptions and consequences of ageism: Views of older people. Ageing & Society, 20, 253–278.
68.
MitchellA. (2004). Determinants of safety in urban and suburban areas. Race, Gender & Class, 11, 98.
69.
MyersK. A.WilliamsonP. (2002). Race talk: The perpetuation of racism through private discourse. Race & Society, 4, 3–26.
70.
PainR. (2001). Gender, race, age and fear in the city. Urban Studies, 38, 899–913.
71.
Pattillo-McCoyM. (1999). Black picket fences. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
72.
Pattillo-McCoyM. (2007). Black on the block. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
73.
PennellS.CurtisC.HendersonJ.TaymanJ. (1989). Guardian angels: A unique approach to crime prevention. Crime & Delinquency, 35, 378–400.
74.
PetersonR. D.KrivoL. J. (2005). Macrostructural analyses of race, ethnicity, and violent crime: Recent lessons and new directions for research. Annual Review of Sociology, 31, 331–356.
75.
PutnamR. D. (1993). The prosperous community: Social capital and public life. The American Prospect, 13, 35–42.
76.
QuillianL.PagerD. (2001). Black neighbors, higher crime? The role of racial stereotypes in evaluations of neighborhood crime. American Journal of Sociology, 107, 717–767.
77.
RenL.ZhaoJ. S.LovrichN. P.GaffneyM. J. (2006). Participation community crime prevention: Who volunteers for police work?Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management, 29, 464–481.
78.
RiceS.WhiteM. D. (2010). Race, ethnicity, and policing: New and essential readings. New York, NY: NYU Press.
79.
RismanB. J. (2004). Gender as a social structure. Gender & Society, 18, 429–450.
80.
RosenfeldR.JacobsB. A.WrightR. (2003). Snitching and the code of the street. British Journal of Criminology, 43, 291–309.
81.
RosenfeldR.MessnerS. F.BaumerE. P. (2001). Social capital and homicide. Social Forces, 80, 283–309.
82.
Russell-BrownK. (2007). Can blue help you?Criminology & Public Policy, 6, 1–4.
83.
SampsonR. J.GraifC. (2009). Neighborhood social capital as differential social organization: Resident and leadership dimensions. American Behavioral Scientist, 52, 1579–1605.
84.
SampsonR. J.MorenoffJ. D.EarlsF. (1999). Beyond social capital: Spatial dynamics of collective efficacy for children. American Sociological Review, 64, 633–660.
85.
SampsonR. J.RaudenbushS. W.EarlsF. (1997). Neighborhoods and violent crime: A multilevel study of collective efficacy. Science, 277, 918–924.
86.
SassonT. (1995). Crime talk: How citizens construct a social problem. New York, NY: Aldine deGruyter.
87.
ShawC. R.McKayH. D. (1942). Juvenile delinquency and urban areas, a study of rates of delinquents in relation to differential characteristics of local communities in American cities. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago press.
88.
SimonsR. L.GrayP. A. (1989). Perceived blocked opportunity as an explanation of delinquency among lower-class black males: A research note. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 26, 90–101.
89.
SkoganW. (1990). Disorder and decline. New York, NY: The Free Press.
90.
SkoganW. G. (1989). Communities, crime, and neighborhood organization. Crime & Delinquency, 35, 437–457.
91.
SteeleC. M. (1997). A threat in the air: How stereotypes shape intellectual identity and performance. American Psychologist, 52, 613–629.
92.
SteeleC. M.SpencerS. J.AronsonJ. (2002). Contending with group image: The psychology of stereotype and social identity threat (Vol. 34, pp. 379–440). Salt Lake City, UT: Academic Press.
93.
UnneverJ. D.CullenF. T.JonesJ. D. (2008). Public support for attacking the “Root Causes” of crime: The impact of egalitarian and racial beliefs. Sociological Focus, 41, 1–33.
