While at least 1900 Dutch prisoners are imprisoned abroad annually, existing knowledge on this group of prisoners is often limited to descriptions about detention conditions. The current study explores latent classes of criminal careers before entrance in foreign prisons and whether reoffending behavior differed between the distinct typologies of Dutch prisoners. Using registration and reconviction data, the results show four typologies: (a) high persistent offenders, (b) low-rate offenders, (c) sporadic offenders, and (d) long-term incarcerated offenders. Furthermore, the results indicate that high persistent offenders are more likely to get reconvicted after release from foreign prisons than other typologies.
AebiMFTiagoMM (2021) SPACE I - 2020 - Council of Europe Annual Penal Statistics: Prison Populations. Strasbourg, France: Council of Europe.
2.
AtabayT (2009) Handbook on Prisoners with Special Needs. Vienna, Austria: United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime.
3.
BanksJ (2011) Foreign national prisoners in the UK: Explanations and implications. The Howard Journal of Criminal Justice50(2): 184–198.
4.
BarnouxMFWoodJL (2013) The specific needs of foreign national prisoners and the threat to their mental health from being imprisoned in a foreign country. Aggression and Violent Behavior18(2): 240–246.
5.
BhuiHS (2009) Foreign national prisoners: Issues and debates. In: BhuiHS (ed), Race and criminal justice. London, UK: SAGE, pp. 154–169.
6.
BosworthMHasselbergITurnbullS (2016) Punishment, citizenship and identity: An introduction. Criminology and Criminal Justice16(3): 257–266.
7.
ClarkSLMuthénBO (2009) Relating Latent Class Analysis Results to Variables Not Included in the Analysis. Unpublished manuscript.
8.
CrouxFBrosensDVandeveldeS, et al. (2019) Foreign national prisoners in Flanders (Belgium): Motivations and barriers to participation in prison programmes. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research25(2): 171–188.
9.
DirkzwagerAJEKruttschnittC (2012) Prisoners’ perceptions of correctional officers’ behavior in English and Dutch prisons. Journal of Criminal Justice40(5): 404–412.
10.
DurnescuIMontero Perez de TudelaERavagnaniL (2017) Prisoner transfer and the importance of the 'release effect. Criminology & Criminal Justice17(4): 450–467.
11.
Dutch Prison Service (2019) Gevangeniswezen (Prison System). The Hague, The Netherlands: Dutch Prison Services.
12.
Hofstee-van der MeulenFBAM (2015) Detained Abroad: Assisting Dutch Nationals in Foreign Detention. 's Hertogenbosch. The Netherlands: BOXPress.
13.
KruttschnittCDirkzwagerAJE (2011) Are there still contrasts in tolerance? Imprisonment in the Netherlands and England 20 years later. Punishment & Society13(3): 283–306.
14.
KruttschnittCDirkzwagerAJEKennedyL (2013) Strangers in a strange land: Coping with imprisonment as a racial or ethnic foreign national inmate. The British Journal of Sociology64(3): 478–500.
15.
MasynKE (2013) Latent class analysis and finite mixture modeling. In: LittleTD (ed) The Oxford Handbook of Quantitative Methods. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, pp. 551–611.
16.
MiedemaFStolzS (2008) Stuck in Stranger: An Investigation into the High Number of Dutch People in Foreign Detention. The Hague, The Netherlands: WODC.
17.
Ministry of Foreign Affairs (2019) The State of the Consular: For the Netherlands and Dutch People Worldwide. The Hague, The Netherlands: Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
18.
MoffittTE (1993) Adolescence-limited and life-course-persistent antisocial Behavior: A Developmental Taxonomy. Psychological Review100(4): 674–701.
19.
MoffittTE (1997) Adolescence-limited and life-course persistent offending: A complementary pair of developmental theories. In: ThornberryT (ed) Developmental Theories of Crime and Delinquency. New Brunswick, Canada: Transaction, pp. 11–54.
20.
MuthénB (2001) Latent mixture modelling. In: MarcoulidesGASchumackerRA (eds) New Developments and Techniques in Structural Equation Modeling. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 1–33.
21.
MuthénBOMuthénLK (2000) Integrating person-centered and variable-centered analyses: Growth mixture modeling with latent trajectory classes. Alcoholism: Clinical & Experimental Research24(6): 882–891.
NaginDS (2005) Group-based Modeling of Development. Cambridge, UK: Harvard University Press.
24.
NylundKLAsparouhovTMuthénBO (2007) Deciding on the number of classes in latent class analysis and growth mixture modeling: A Monte Carlo simulation study. Structural Equation Modeling14(4): 535–569.
25.
Nylund-GibsonKChoiAY (2018) Ten frequently asked questions about latent class analysis. Translational Issues in Psychological Science4(4): 440–461.
26.
RichardsMMcWilliamsBBattenN, et al. (1995a) Foreign nationals in English prisons: I. Family ties and their maintenance. The Howard Journal of Crime and Justice34(2): 158–175.
27.
RichardsMMcWilliamsBBattenN, et al. (1995b) Foreign nationals in English prisons: II. Some policy issues. The Howard Journal of Criminal Justice34(3): 195–208.
28.
RoystonP (2001) Flexible paramtric alternatives to the cox model, and more. The Stata Journal1(1): 1–28.
29.
TurnbullSHasselbergI (2017) From prison to detention: The carceral trajectories of foreign-national prisoners in the United Kingdom. Punishment & Society19(2): 135–154.
30.
UgelvikT (2014) The incarceration of foreigners in European prisons. In: PickeringSHamJE (eds) The Routledge Handbook on Crime and International Migration. London, UK: Routledge, pp. 107–120.
31.
UgelvikTDamsaD (2018) The pains of crimmigration imprisonment: Perspectives from a Norwegian all-foreign prison. The British Journal of Criminology58(5): 1025–1043.
32.
United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (2006) Custodial and Non-Custodial Measures: Alternatives to Incarceration. New York, NY: UNODC.
33.
Van HallMCleofa-Van der ZwetL (2021) Released from foreign detention: Examining reoffending rates among returning Dutch detainees in The Netherlands. European Journal of Probation13(3): 242–261.
34.
van KalmthoutAMvan der MeulenFBAMDünkelF (2007) Foreigners in European Prisons. Nijmegen, The Netherlands: Wolf Legal Publishers.
35.
VogelvangBHeemskerkIAlthoffH (2015) Recruited, Gambled, Arrested and Supported: The International Office of the Dutch Probation Service: Practice and Legitimisation of its Work With Dutch Citizens in Foreign Prisons. ‘s-Hertogenbosch. Utrecht, The Netherlands: Avans University of Applied Sciences; Dutch Probation Service.
36.
WartnaBSJBlomMTollenaarN (2011) The Dutch Recidivism Monitor. The Hague, The Netherlands: Research and Documentation Centre.
37.
WeijtersGVerweijSTollenaarN, et al. (2019) Recidivism Among Offenders in the Netherlands: Report on the Period 2006-2018. The Hague, The Netherlands: WODC.
38.
WellerBEBowenNKFaubertSJ (2020) Latent class analysis: A guide to best practice. Journal of Black Psychology46(4): 287–311.
