This paper examines the impact of organisational change in the Belgian Houses of Justice, Department of Offender Guidance. The change that occurred in the Houses of Justice can be defined as incremental change. While Belgian probation has been managerialised in its processes and to a lesser extent its practices, it has not been subjected to the same shift in its purposes. However, one question currently remains: can the increasing emphasis on managerialism leave the social work values and aims of the Houses of Justice in place, or not?
BaetzM.BartC. (1996) ‘Developing mission statements which work’, Long Range Planning29 (4): 526–533
2.
BartC. (1998) ‘Mission statement rationales and organizational alignment in the not-for-profit health care sector’, Health Care Management Review, 23: 54–69.
3.
BartC.HupferM. (2004) ‘Mission statements in Canadian hospitals’, Journal of Health Organization and Management, 18 (2/3): 92–110.
4.
BartkusB.GlassmanM.McAfeeR. (2004) ‘A comparison of the quality of European, Japanese and US mission statements: A content analysis’, European Management Journal22 (4): 393–401
5.
BauwensA. (2010) ‘The use of method triangulation in probation research’, European Journal of Probation2 (2): 39–52
6.
BourdieuP. (1990) The logic of practice. Trans. NiceRichard. Cambridge: Polity Press.
7.
CallanV. (1993) ‘Individual and organisational strategies for coping with organisational change’, Work and Stress, 7: 63–75.
8.
ChanJ. (1996) ‘Changing police culture’, British Journal of Criminology36 (1): 109–134
9.
ClausV.SchoofsA. (forthcoming) ‘Justitieassistent vroeger en nu: ervaringen binnen een organisatie in beweging’, in publicatieboek van het Colloquium 10 Jaar Justitiehuizen. Balans en Perspectieven, Brussel, 2–3 December 2009.
10.
DerberC. (1983) ‘Managing professionals: Ideological proletarianization and post-industrial labor’, Theory and Society, 12: 309–341.
11.
Directorate General of the Houses of Justice (2009) Business Process Re-engineering for the Houses of Justice, PowerPoint presentation, internal document.
12.
DownesD.van SwaaningenR. (2007) ‘The Road to Dystopia? Changes in the Penal Climate of the Netherlands‘, in TonryM. (ed.) Crime and Justice in the Netherlands n°35 (pp. 31–71). Chicago: Chicago University Press.
13.
DunphyD.StaceD. (1993) ‘The strategic management of corporate change’, Human Relations46 (8): 905–920
14.
EadieT.CantonR. (2002) ‘Practising in a context of ambivalence: The challenge for youth justice workers’, Youth Justice2 (1): 14–26
15.
AasFranko K. (2004) ‘From narrative to database. Technological change and penal culture’, Punishment and Society6 (4): 379–393
16.
GarlandD. (2001) The Culture of Control: crime and social order in contemporary society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
17.
HughesG.GillingD. (2004) ‘Mission Impossible? The habitus of the community safety manager and the new expertise in the local partnership governance of crime and safety’, Criminology and Criminal Justice4 (2): 129–149
18.
JonckheereA. (2009) ‘Les assistants de justice aux prises avec SIPAR, un outil de gestion informatique’, Pyramides, 2009/1 (17): 93–109.
19.
KaminskiD. (2009) Pénalité, management, innovation. Travaux de la faculté de droit, n° 29. Namur: Presses Universitaires de Namur.
20.
LipskyM. (1980) Street-level bureaucracy: dilemmas of the individual in public services. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
21.
McNeillF.BurnsN.HallidayS.HuttonN.TataC. (2009) ‘Risk, responsibility and reconfiguration: Penal adaptation and misadaptation’, Punishment and Society11 (4): 419–442
22.
NellisM. (1995) ‘Probation values for the 1990's’, Howard Journal of Criminal Justice34 (1): 19–44
23.
NellisM. (2007) ‘Probation values‘, in CantonR.HancockD. (eds.), Dictionary of probation and offender management (pp. 238–240). Cullompton: Willan Publishing.
24.
NoordegraafM. (2007) ‘From ‘pure’ to ‘hybrid’ professionalism: Present-day professionalism in ambiguous public domains’, Administration and Society39 (6): 761–785
25.
PartonN. (2008) ‘Changes in the form of knowledge in social work: From the ‘social’ to the ‘informational’?’, British Journal of Social Work38 (2): 253–269
26.
PithouseA. (1987) Social work: the social organisation of an invisible trade. Aldershot: Ashgate.
27.
RaynorP. (2007) ‘Community penalties: Probation, ‘What Works’, and offender management’, in MaguireM.MorganR.ReinderR. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Criminology (4th ed.) (pp. 1061–1099). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
SnackenS. (2007) ‘Penal policy and practice in Belgium‘, in TonryM. (ed.), Crime, punishment and politics in comparative perspective. Crime and justice: A review of research n°36 (pp. 127–216). Chicago: Chicago University Press.
30.
VanstoneM. (2004) Supervising offenders in the community: a history of probation theory and practice. Aldershot: Ashgate.
