This article provides a critical perspective on the political and policy history of probation in England and Wales to develop a better understanding of how TR came to be. TR was only the latest act in a longstanding process of changing probation to fit ideological ‘flavours’, and we suggest that it is the hidden nature of probation work in combination with a lack of public legitimation work by probation institutions and probation staff that has placed probation in such a vulnerable position.
Audit Commission (1989) Promoting Value for Money in the Probation Service. London: HMSO.
2.
BottomsAMcWilliamsW (1979) A non-treatment paradigm for probation practice. British Journal of Social Work9: 159–202.
3.
BurkeL (2011) Editorial: A comparative imagination. Probation Journal58(4): 311–316.
4.
BurkeL (2013) Editorial: Innovation and probation. Probation Journal60(3): 223–226.
5.
BurkeLCollettS (2010) People are Not Things: What New Labour has done to Probation. Probation Journal57(3): 232–249.
6.
BurnettR (2004) One-to-one ways of promoting desistance: In search of an evidence base. In: BurnettRRobertsC (eds) What Works in Probation and Youth Justice. Cullompton: Willan.
7.
CarterP (2003) Managing Offenders, Reducing Crime: The Correctional Services Review. London: Home Office Strategy Unit.
8.
CheliotisL (2006) How iron is the iron cage of new penology?: The role of human agency in the implementation of criminal justice policy. Punishment and Society8(3): 313–340.
DeeringJ (2011) Probation Practice and the New Penology: Practitioner Reflections. Aldershot: Ashgate.
15.
DeeringJFeilzerMY (2015) Transforming Rehabilitation: Is Privatisation the End of the Probation Deal?Bristol: Policy Press.
16.
DeeringJFeilzerMY (2017) Questions of legitimacy of probation practice after Transforming Rehabilitation. Howard Journal of Criminal Justice56(2): 158–175.
17.
ExworthyMHalfordS (1999) Professionals and managers in a changing public sector: Conflict, compromise and collaboration? In: ExworthyMHalfordS (eds) Professionals and the New Managerialism in the Public Sector. Buckingham: Open University Press.
18.
FarrowK (2004) Still committed after all these years? Morale in the modern-day probation service. Probation Journal51(3): 206–220.
19.
FlynnN (2002) Public Sector Management. Harlow: Pearson.
20.
GarlandD (2001) The Culture of Control. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
HM Inspectorate of Probation (2016c) Transforming Rehabilitation: Early Implementation 5. Manchester: HMIP.
24.
Home Office (1990) Crime, Justice and Protecting the Public. London: HMSO.
25.
Home Office (1992) National Standards for the Supervision of Offenders in the Community. London: HMSO.
26.
Home Office (1995) Strengthening Punishment in the Community. London: HMSO.
27.
Home Office (1996) Protecting the Public. London: HMSO.
28.
Home Office (2001) A New Choreography. An Integrated Strategy for the National Probation Service for England and Wales. London: HMSO.
29.
House of Commons Justice Committee (2018) Transforming Rehabilitation. London: House of Commons.
30.
KemshallH (2003) Understanding Risk in Criminal Justice. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
31.
KirtonGGuillaumeC (2015) Employment relations and working conditions in probation after Transforming Rehabilitation. Available at: https://www.napo.org.uk/advice-and-resource(accessed 9 December 2016).
32.
LeishmanFCopeSStarieP (1995) Reforming the police in Britain: New public management, policy networks and a tough ‘old bill’. International Journal of Public Sector Management8(4): 26–37.
33.
LiptonDMartinsonRWilksJ (1975) The Effectiveness of Correctional Treatment. New York: Praeger.
34.
MairG (2011) The Community Order in England and Wales – Policy and practice. Probation Journal58(3): 215–232.
35.
MarstonP (2010) Legislate in haste, repent at leisure. Probation Journal57(3): 296–303.
36.
MartinsonR (1974) What Works? Questions and answers about prison reform. The Public Interest35: 22–54.
37.
MawbyRCWorrallA (2013) Doing Probation Work: Identity in a Criminal Justice Occupation. London: Routledge.
Napo (2006) Restructuring Probation – What Works? Napo’s Response to the Home Office Consultation Paper ‘Restructuring Probation to Reduce Re-offending’. London: Napo.
46.
Napo (2010) Only 24% direct contact time – it’s official!Napo News 215. London: Napo.
47.
Napo (2013) Justice not for Sale: Time for Action!London: Napo.
PrattJBrownDBrownMHallsworthSMorrisonW (2005) The New Punitiveness: Trends, Theories, Perspectives. Cullompton: Willan.
53.
RaineJ (2002) Modernisation and criminal justice. In: WardDScottJLaceyM (eds) Probation: Working for Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
54.
RaynorPVanstoneM (2002) Understanding Community Penalties: Probation, Policy and Social Change. Buckingham: Open University Press.
55.
RaynorPUgwudikePVanstoneM (2014) The impact of skills in probation work: A reconviction study. Criminology & Criminal Justice14(2): 235–249.
56.
RobertsJStalansLIndermaurDHoughM (2003) Penal Populism and Public Opinion. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
57.
RobinsonGBurkeLMillingsM (2016) Criminal justice identities in transition: The case of devolved probation services in England and Wales. British Journal of Criminology56: 161–178.
58.
RobinsonGBurkeLMillingsM (2017) Probation, privatisation and legitimacy. Howard Journal of Crime and Justice56(2): 137–157.
59.
RobinsonGPriedeCFarrallSShaplandJMcNeillF (2014) Understanding ‘quality’ in probation practice: Frontline perspectives in England and Wales. Criminology and Criminal Justice14(2): 123–142.
60.
SeniorP (2013) Editorial. British Journal of Community Justice11(2–3): 1–8.
61.
SeniorPCrowther-DoweyCLongM (2007) Understanding Modernisation in Criminal Justice. Buckingham: Open University Press.
62.
StrawJ (2007) Letter to Neil Gerrard, M.P. London: Ministry of Justice.
TonryM (2004) Punishment and Politics: Evidence and Emulation in the Making of English Crime and Control Policy. Cullompton: Willan.
65.
UgelvikT (2016) Techniques of legitimation: The narrative construction of legitimacy among immigration detention officers. Crime, Media, Culture12(2): 215–232.
66.
VanstoneM (2004) Supervising Offenders in the Community: A History of Probation Theory and Practice. Aldershot: Ashgate.
67.
VanstoneM (2010) New Labour and criminal justice: Reflections on a wasteland of missed opportunity. Probation Journal57(3): 281–285.
WhiteheadPStathamR (2006) The History of Probation: Politics, Power and Cultural Change 1876–2005. Crayford: Shaw & Sons.
71.
WilsonJQ (1975) Thinking About Crime. New York: Basic Books.
72.
WilsonJQKellingGL (1982) Broken windows. Atlantic Monthly, March, pp. 29–38.
73.
WorrallA (2016) Probation in the genes? Personal reflections on the fortunes and misfortunes of an honourable profession. In: VanstoneMPriestleyP (eds) Probation and Politics: Academic Reflections from Former Practitioners. London: Palgrave Macmillan.