Orally administered anti-eotaxin-1 monoclonal antibody is biologically active in the gut and alleviates immune-mediated hepatitis: A novel anti-inflammatory personalized therapeutic approach

Abstract

Personalized therapies are designed to optimize the safety-to-efficacy ratio by selecting patients with higher response rates based on specific biomarkers. Inflammation plays a vital role in the pathogenesis of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), a common liver disorder. Eotaxin-1 plays a role in innate and adaptive immune responses. High eotaxin-1 levels are associated with diabetes and fatty liver disease and, therefore, serves as a biomarker for patient selection. The anti-eotaxin-1 monoclonal antibody is tailored for the personalized therapy of patients with inflammatory conditions due to high levels of eotaxin-1. To evaluate the biological activity and immunomodulatory effect of orally administered anti-eotaxin-1. C57B1/6 mice were treated with either oral or intra-peritoneal anti-eotaxin-1 antibody before induction of immune-mediated hepatitis using an injection of concanavalin A (ConA) and checked for liver injury and eotaxin-1 serum levels. Oral administration of anti-eotaxin-1 alleviated the immune-mediated liver injury. Serum alanine aminotransferase levels decreased to 1807 U/L, compared with 19025 U/L in untreated controls and 3657 U/L in mice treated with parenteral anti-eotaxin-1 (P < 0.005). A trend toward reduced serum eotaxin-1 levels was observed in treated mice, ranging from 594 pg/mL in the controls to 554 and 561 pg/mL in mice treated orally and intraperitoneally (P = 0.08, P = 0.06, respectively). Oral administration of anti-eotaxin-1 antibody shows biological activity in the gut and exerts a systemic immunomodulatory effect to alleviate immune-mediated hepatitis. The data suggest that testing for eotaxin-1 serum levels may enable screening patients with high-eotaxin-1 levels-associated NASH.

Keywords

eotaxin-1 immune-mediated hepatitis NAFLD NASH

Introduction

Personalized therapy optimizes the safety-to-efficacy ratio by selecting patients with higher response rates based on specific biomarkers^1–3 and is becoming an important modality for improving patient care by enabling the use of optimized therapies for selected groups of patients.^4–7 Inflammation plays a key role in the pathogenesis of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), a common liver disorder.^8–10 Currently, there are no approved therapies for NASH, and several of the drugs tested over the last few years have shown efficacy only in a subset of patients.¹¹

Eotaxin-1 (CCL-11) is a potent eosinophil chemoattractant that contributes to tissue eosinophilia.¹² It plays a role in innate and adaptive immune responses. The main receptor for eotaxin-1 is chemokine receptor type 3 (CCR3). Recent evidence indicates that eotaxin-1 also binds to other receptors expressed on various cell types, suggesting a more widespread regulatory role for eotaxin-1.

Recent data suggest that eotaxin-1 may serve as a biomarker for obesity, diabetes, and NASH, as well as a potential therapeutic target. Serum levels of eotaxin-1 were found to be elevated in animal models of diabetes.^13,14 The autoimmune diabetic syndrome of the diabetes-prone BioBreeding rat serves as a model for type 1 diabetes,¹⁵ and a time-dependent, insulin-independent pancreatic upregulation of CCL-11 was described in this model. Overexpression of pancreatic CCL-11 was associated with enrichment in Th2 CD4+ T cells within the insulitis lesions.^15,16 Elevated levels of CCL-11 were described in patients with type 1 diabetes and may be associated with disease-related complications.¹⁷ Circulating eotaxin-1 and eotaxin-1 mRNA levels in visceral adipose tissue were reported to be increased in obese mice and humans.¹⁸ The stromal/vascular component of adipose tissue is the primary source of eotaxin-1. High eotaxin-1 levels were associated with obesity.^18–20 Weight loss in humans led to a reduction in plasma eotaxin-1 levels.¹⁸

Eotaxin-1 levels correlated with liver triglycerides in a high-fat mouse model of NAFLD.^14,21 Serum eotaxin-1 concentrations in obese patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) were distinctly associated with pro-inflammatory cytokines, tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), interleukins (IL-6, IL-1β), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), and platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) levels.^21,22 Eotaxin-1 levels were predictive of insulin resistance, as expressed by homeostatic model assessment (HOMA) score, intima-media thickness, and severity of liver steatosis.²⁰ In obese patients with normal and ultrasonographic evidence of NAFLD, serum concentrations of IL-17 were related to eotaxin-1 and intimal thickening, suggesting that IL-17, released by the visceral adipose tissue, induces eotaxin-1 secretion via the smooth muscle cells present in the atheromatous vessels.²³

Bertilimumab is a first-in-class humanized anti-eotaxin-1 monoclonal antibody that lowers eotaxin-1 levels.^12,22 It is designed for personalized therapy of high eotaxin-1 level-mediated inflammatory conditions. Parenteral administration of bertilimumab is currently under evaluation in clinical trials in patients with high eotaxin-1 levels suffering from inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), bullous pemphigoid, and atopic dermatitis.^12,24

The present study aimed to assess the biological activity and the hepatoprotective and anti-inflammatory effects of orally administered anti-eotaxin-1 in a mouse model of immune-mediated hepatitis.

Materials and methods

Animals

Mice were maintained in the animal care facility of the Hebrew University Hadassah Medical School (Jerusalem, Israel). The mice were administered regular diet with free access to water and maintained in a 12-h light-dark cycle. All experiments were conducted according to the guidelines of the Hebrew University-Hadassah Institutional Committee for Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (No. EO/2017).

Induction of concanavalin A (ConA)-induced hepatitis

ConA (MP Biomedicals, USA) dissolved in a solution of 50 mM Tris pH 7, 150 mM NaCl, and 4 mM CaCl₂, was injected into the tail vein at a dose of 500 μg/mouse (15 mg/kg). Mice were sacrificed 16 h after ConA injection.

Experimental groups

Approximately 11–12-week-old C57/black male mice were purchased from Harlan Laboratories (Jerusalem, Israel). Mice were separated into three groups (A–C, n = 5) for testing. Mice in the control group A were treated with ConA alone. Mice in group B received 200 ng of anti-eotaxin-1 (BioTechne, Indianapolis, US, MAB420) orally 2 h before ConA administration and mice in group C received intraperitoneal (IP) administration of 200 ng anti-eotaxin-1 2 h before ConA administration. Serum from the three groups of mice was tested for liver enzymes, alanine aminotransferase, and aspartate aminotransferase (ALT and AST), and serum eotaxin-1 levels.

Liver enzyme measurement

Serum AST and ALT levels from all mice in all groups were determined with an automatic analyzer.

Determination of serum eotaxin-1 levels

Eotaxin-1 serum levels were measured by a sandwich ELISA (DuoSet ELISA for mouse CCL11/Eotaxin; R&D systems, Cat. No: DY420). The optical density between the wavelengths of 450 and 570 nm was measured using a microplate reader. Concentrations in test samples were extrapolated from the standard curve.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using the Student’s t-test. A P value <0.05 was considered significant.

Results

Figure 1 shows the effect of both oral and IP administered anti-eotaxin-1 monoclonal antibody on immune-mediated liver injury, as measured by its effect on liver enzymes. Both the oral and IP administration of anti-eotaxin-1 antibody showed a decrease in ALT and AST levels, and a statistically significant association with alleviation of liver injury was observed in groups B and C when compared to the untreated controls in group A (1807 vs 3657 vs 19025 U/L for ALT and 1399 vs 2418 vs 17138 U/L for AST, respectively, P < 0.0001). Moreover, the oral route of administration exerted a more profound effect on the reduction of liver enzymes as compared with the IP route (P < 0.001 and P = 0.34, for ALT and AST, respectively, normal levels up to 50 U/L).

Figure 1.

Effect of oral and IP administration of anti-eotaxin-1 antibody on immune mediated hepatitis. There was a significant decrease in liver enzymes (ALT and AST) in treated group B and C compared to group A (P < 0.0001).

Figure 2 shows the effect of administration of anti-eotaxin-1 monoclonal antibody on serum eotaxin-1 levels. Both oral and IP administration showed a reduced serum eotaxin-1 level in comparison with group A, from 594 pg/mL in the controls to 554 and 561 pg/mL, (P = 0.08, P = 0.06) respectively, in mice treated orally and intraperitoneally. However, there was no significant difference in the decrease between the two treated groups B and C (P = 0.38).

Figure 2.

Effect of oral and IP administration of anti-eotaxin-1 antibody on serum eotaxin levels. There was a trend toward reduced serum eotaxin levels in the both orally and IP administered anti-eotaxin-1 antibody compared to control group A (P = 0.08 and 0.06, respectively).

Discussion

The results of the present study show that both orally and parenterally administered anti-eotaxin-1 antibody exert hepatoprotective and anti-inflammatory effects in a mouse model of immune-mediated hepatitis, as assessed by a significant reduction in liver enzymes. The effect was associated with a decrease in serum eotaxin-1 levels. The observed decline in eotaxin-1 levels was not significant, and this result could be due to the interference of the injected anti-eotaxin-1 antibody in the eotaxin-1 ELISA. A similar artifact was reported in pharmacokinetic studies in humans (data not shown).

Eotaxin-1 belongs to the chemokine family and has a role in peripheral immune cell migration, augmentation of the pro-inflammatory cascade, and leukocyte activation. Eotaxin-1 is considered an important mediator in allergic diseases such as asthma and atopic dermatitis.^25–29 Furthermore, elevated eotaxin-1 levels are shown in various pathologic conditions, ranging from airway inflammation to Hodgkin’s lymphoma, coronary artery disease, and various autoimmune diseases.^{25–28,30,31} Eotaxin-1 also plays a role in the pathogenesis of IBD.¹²

Eotaxin-1 is strongly associated with insulin resistance, diabetes, and fatty liver disease.^{14,20,21,23,32–34} It plays a role in the pathogenesis of several chronic liver diseases wherein the immune system contributes to liver damage. Eotaxin-1 is secreted from the liver, and its levels correlate with the degree of lymphocyte recruitment, which augments the inflammatory cascade.³⁵ ConA injection in mice mimics a model for T cell-mediated liver injury. ConA injection induces expression of eotaxin-1 in the liver and elevates eotaxin-1 serum levels along with those of IL-5.³⁶ The induction was attenuated in IL-4 (–/–) and STAT6 (–/–) mice. Similarly, eotaxin-1 mRNA levels were elevated in the livers of animals with alcoholic hepatitis.³⁷ Eotaxin-1 blockade atten-uates ConA-induced liver injury and leukocyte infiltration.³⁶ The results of the present study, showing alleviated liver damage by parenteral administration of anti-eotaxin-1, lends support to the above data. However, oral administration of anti-eotaxin-1 was not tested previously in this model.

In humans, eotaxin-1 levels were elevated in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis but were lower in primary biliary cirrhosis and autoimmune hepatitis.³⁸ Immunohistochemical studies on livers of patients with the drug-induced liver disease showed high expression of eotaxin-1.³⁹ An elevated eotaxin-1 expression is associated with the pathogenesis of chronic liver diseases,⁴⁰ and eotaxin-1 is also up-regulated in senescent human hepatic stellate cells. Eotaxin-1 levels were correlated with hepatic biosynthetic capacity and other inflammatory cytokines, and higher eotaxin-1 levels were associated with hepatic necroinflammation and fibrosis in liver histology. An elevated serum level of eotaxin-1 is present in patients with cirrhosis correlated with the Child-Pugh and model of end-stage liver disease (MELD) score.⁴⁰ Serum eotaxin-1 levels were suggested as a biomarker for disease severity in cirrhosis.⁴⁰ High levels correlated with liver complications and predicted an unfavorable prognosis.

High levels of eotaxin-1 before anti-viral therapy with pegylated interferon and ribavirin in chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) patients were predictive of a sustained virologic response.⁴¹ Higher plasma eotaxin-1 levels before HCV anti-viral therapy were also useful in predicting virologic response to HCV treatment with interferon-α + ribavirin in HIV/HCV co-infected patients.⁴²

The data of the present study show a beneficial effect of oral administration of anti-eotaxin-1. Interestingly, an enhanced statistically significant effect was documented with the oral delivery as compared with the parenteral route. As oral administration is not expected to be associated with clinically significant absorption of the antibody, the mechanism of action of the two routes of administration is different. Parenteral administration of the antibody alleviates inflammation by targeting eotaxin-1 in the blood or tissues.³⁶ In contrast, the oral mode of administration is more likely to exert a systemic anti-inflammatory effect by exerting a local effect on the gut immune system. Eotaxin-1 is ubiquitous throughout the normal gastrointestinal tract.⁴³ Eotaxin-1 is a regulator of homing of eosinophils to the gut,⁴⁴ and eosinophilic infiltrates in the esophagus, stomach, small bowel, or colon are observed in a variety of disease states. In addition, lower eosinophil numbers are present in the lamina propria of the healthy intestinal tissues.⁴⁵ Eotaxin-1-deficient mice had lower numbers of eosinophils in the gut mucosa, and these changes occurred with normal eosinophil numbers in the hematopoietic compartments. Eotaxin-1 is produced by mononuclear cells within the lamina propria of the gut.⁴⁶ Oxazolone-challenged L2-IL5 mice developed dose-dependent pan-esophageal eosinophilia, and their esophagi showed increased eotaxin-1.⁴⁷ In the dextran sodium sulfate-induced colitis model, increased eotaxin-1 levels localized to inflammatory cells were observed.⁴⁸

Oral immunotherapy using non-absorbable antibodies was effective in both inflammatory bowel diseases and NASH.^10,49–56 It is based on the assumption that generating signals in the gut may re-direct the systemic immune system to an anti-inflammatory route. One of the major advantages of this method is its ability to induce immunomodulation without immunosuppression.¹⁰ It is hypothesized that oral administration of anti-eotaxin-1 functions similarly by binding to eotaxin-1 in the gut mucosa.

Limitations

Future studies will determine the effect of therapy on liver histology and the cellular and humoral mechanisms which mediate the effect. Power calculation for estimation of sample size selected was not done in this feasibility study.

Conclusions

Oral administration of the non-absorbable anti-eotaxin-1 antibody shows biological activity in the gut and exerts a systemic immunomodulatory effect to alleviate immune-mediated hepatitis. The data suggest that testing for serum eotaxin-1 levels and using oral anti-eotaxin may enable the selection and treatment of patients with high-eotaxin-1 level-associated fatty liver disease.

Footnotes

Animal welfare

The present study followed international, national, and/or institutional guidelines for humane animal treatment and complied with relevant legislation.

Mice were maintained in the animal care facility of the Hebrew University Hadassah Medical School (Jerusalem, Israel). The mice were administered a regular diet with free access to water and maintained in a 12-hour light-dark cycle. Or, Or, *.

Declaration of conflicting interests

The author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: YI is a consultant for Immune Pharma

Ethics approval

Ethical approval for this study was obtained from the Hebrew University-Hadassah Institutional Committee for Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (No. EO/2017).

Funding

The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

ORCID iD

Yaron Ilan

References

Chen

Huang

Chung

, et al. (2015) Label-free cytokine micro- and nano-biosensing towards personalized medicine of systemic inflammatory disorders. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews 95: 90–103.

Goyette

Labbe

Trinh

, et al. (2007) Molecular pathogenesis of inflammatory bowel disease: Genotypes, phenotypes and personalized medicine. Annals of Medicine 39: 177–199.

Kzhyshkowska

Gudima

Riabov

, et al. (2015) Macrophage responses to implants: Prospects for personalized medicine. Journal of Leukocyte Biology 98: 953–962.

Breedveld

(2014) TNF antagonists opened the way to personalized medicine in rheumatoid arthritis. Molecular Medicine 20(Suppl. 1): S7–S9.

Christaki

Giamarellos-Bourboulis

(2014) The beginning of personalized medicine in sepsis: Small steps to a bright future. Clinical Genetics 86: 56–61.

Brasier

(2013) Identification of innate immune response endotypes in asthma: Implications for personalized medicine. Current Allergy and Asthma Reports 13: 462–468.

Pinheiro da Silva

Cesar Machado

(2015) Personalized medicine for sepsis. The American Journal of the Medical Sciences 350: 409–413.

Arrese

Cabrera

Kalergis

, et al. (2016) Innate immunity and inflammation in NAFLD/NASH. Digestive Diseases and Sciences 61: 1294–1303.

Haas

Francque

Staels

(2016) Pathophysiology and mechanisms of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Annual Review of Physiology 78: 181–205.

10.

Ilan

(2016) Review article: Novel methods for the treatment of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis - targeting the gut immune system to decrease the systemic inflammatory response without immune suppression. Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics 44: 1168–1182.

11.

Rotman

Sanyal

(2017) Current and upcoming pharmacotherapy for non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Gut 66: 180–190.

12.

Adar

Shteingart

Ben Ya’acov

, et al. (2014) From airway inflammation to inflammatory bowel disease: Eotaxin-1, a key regulator of intestinal inflammation. Clinical Immunology 153: 199–208.

13.

Shanmugam

Figarola

, et al. (2008) Proinflammatory effects of advanced lipoxidation end products in monocytes. Diabetes 57: 879–888.

14.

Boi

Buchta

Pearson

, et al. (2016) Obesity alters immune and metabolic profiles: New insight from obese-resistant mice on high-fat diet. Obesity (Silver Spring) 24: 2140–2149.

15.

Chao

Wallis

Marandi

, et al. (2014) Iddm30 controls pancreatic expression of Ccl11 (Eotaxin) and the Th1/Th2 balance within the insulitic lesions. Journal of Immunology 192: 3645–3653.

16.

Hessner

Wang

Meyer

, et al. (2004) Involvement of eotaxin, eosinophils, and pancreatic predisposition in development of type 1 diabetes mellitus in the BioBreeding rat. Journal of Immunology 173: 6993–7002.

17.

Jamali

Nazari

Khoramdelazad

, et al. (2013) Expression of CC chemokines CCL2, CCL5, and CCL11 is associated with duration of disease and complications in type-1 diabetes: A study on Iranian diabetic patients. Clinical Laboratory 59: 993–1001.

18.

Vasudevan

Xydakis

, et al. (2006) Eotaxin and obesity. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 91: 256–261.

19.

Molofsky

Liang

, et al. (2011) Eosinophils sustain adipose alternatively activated macrophages associated with glucose homeostasis. Science 332: 243–247.

20.

Tarantino

Costantini

Finelli

, et al. (2014) Carotid intima-media thickness is predicted by combined eotaxin levels and severity of hepatic steatosis at ultrasonography in obese patients with Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease. PLoS One 9: e105610.

21.

Duval

Thissen

Keshtkar

, et al. (2010) Adipose tissue dysfunction signals progression of hepatic steatosis towards nonalcoholic steatohepatitis in C57BL/6 mice. Diabetes 59: 3181–3191.

22.

Sindhu

Akhter

Shenouda

, et al. (2016) Plasma fetuin-A/alpha2-HS-glycoprotein correlates negatively with inflammatory cytokines, chemokines and activation biomarkers in individuals with type-2 diabetes. BMC Immunology 17: 33.

23.

Tarantino

Costantini

Finelli

, et al. (2014) Is serum Interleukin-17 associated with early atherosclerosis in obese patients? Journal of Translational Medicine 12: 214.

24.

Adar

Shteingart

Ben-Ya’acov

, et al. (2016) The importance of intestinal eotaxin-1 in inflammatory bowel disease: New insights and possible therapeutic implications. Digestive Diseases and Sciences 61: 1915–1924.

25.

Ahmadi

Hassanshahi

Khorramdelazad

, et al. (2016) An overlook to the characteristics and roles played by eotaxin network in the pathophysiology of food allergies: Allergic asthma and atopic dermatitis. Inflammation 39: 1253–1267.

26.

Williams

(2015) Eotaxin-1 (CCL11). Frontiers in Immunology 6: 84.

27.

Zhou

, et al. (2014) CCL11 as a potential diagnostic marker for asthma? Journal of Asthma 51: 847–854.

28.

Bhardwaj

Ghaffari

(2012) Biomarkers for eosinophilic esophagitis: A review. Annals of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology 109: 155–159.

29.

White

Lee

Dede

, et al. (2000) Identification of potent, selective non-peptide CC chemokine receptor-3 antagonist that inhibits eotaxin-, eotaxin-2-, and monocyte chemotactic protein-4-induced eosinophil migration. The Journal of Biological Chemistry 275: 36626–36631.

30.

Zweifel

Matozan

Dahinden

, et al. (2010) Eotaxin/CCL11 levels correlate with myocardial fibrosis and mast cell density in native and transplanted rat hearts. Transplantation Proceedings 42: 2763–2766.

31.

Syversen

Goll

Haavardsholm

, et al. (2008) A high serum level of eotaxin (CCL 11) is associated with less radiographic progression in early rheumatoid arthritis patients. Arthritis Research & Therapy 10: R28.

32.

Ignacio

Gibbs

Lee

, et al. (2016) Differential chemokine signature between human preadipocytes and adipocytes. Immune Network 16: 189–194.

33.

Perlman

Chevalier

Wilkinson

, et al. (2015) Serum inflammatory and immune mediators are elevated in early stage diabetic nephropathy. Annals of Clinical and Laboratory Science 45: 256–263.

34.

Gauss

Klinghammer

Steinhoff

, et al. (2015) Association of systemic inflammation with epicardial fat and coronary artery calcification. Inflammation Research 64: 313–319.

35.

Heydtmann

Adams

(2009) Chemokines in the immunopathogenesis of hepatitis C infection. Hepatology 49: 676–688.

36.

Jaruga

Hong

Sun

, et al. (2003) Crucial role of IL-4/STAT6 in T cell-mediated hepatitis: Up-regulating eotaxins and IL-5 and recruiting leukocytes. Journal of Immunology 171: 3233–3244.

37.

Pennington

Wilce

Worrall

(1998) Chemokine and cell adhesion molecule mRNA expression and neutrophil infiltration in lipopolysaccharide-induced hepatitis in ethanol-fed rats. Alcoholism, Clinical and Experimental Research 22: 1713–1718.

38.

Landi

Weismuller

Lankisch

, et al. (2014) Differential serum levels of eosinophilic eotaxins in primary sclerosing cholangitis, primary biliary cirrhosis, and autoimmune hepatitis. Journal of Interferon & Cytokine Research 34: 204–214.

39.

Pham

Bemuau

Durand

, et al. (2001) Eotaxin expression and eosinophil infiltrate in the liver of patients with drug-induced liver disease. Journal of Hepatology 34: 537–547.

40.

Tacke

Trautwein

Yagmur

, et al. (2007) Up-regulated eotaxin plasma levels in chronic liver disease patients indicate hepatic inflammation, advanced fibrosis and adverse clinical course. Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology 22: 1256–1264.

41.

Yoneda

Umemura

Joshita

, et al. (2011) Serum chemokine levels are associated with the outcome of pegylated interferon and ribavirin therapy in patients with chronic hepatitis C. Hepatology Research 41: 587–593.

42.

Vargas

Berenguer

Catalan

, et al. (2010) Association between plasma levels of eotaxin (CCL-11) and treatment response to interferon-alpha and ribavirin in HIV/HCV co-infected patients. The Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 65: 303–306.

43.

Furuta

Sherman

(2000) Eotaxin and eosinophilic homing to the gut. Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition 30: 229.

44.

Mishra

Hogan

Lee

, et al. (1999) Fundamental signals that regulate eosinophil homing to the gastrointestinal tract. The Journal of Clinical Investigation 103: 1719–1727.

45.

Lowichik

Weinberg

(1996) A quantitative evaluation of mucosal eosinophils in the pediatric gastrointestinal tract. Modern Pathology 9: 110–114.

46.

Matthews

Friend

Zimmermann

, et al. (1998) Eotaxin is required for the baseline level of tissue eosinophils. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 95: 6273–6278.

47.

Masterson

McNamee

Hosford

, et al. (2014) Local hypersensitivity reaction in transgenic mice with squamous epithelial IL-5 overexpression provides a novel model of eosinophilic oesophagitis. Gut 63: 43–53.

48.

Vieira

Fagundes

Alessandri

, et al. (2009) Treatment with a novel chemokine-binding protein or eosinophil lineage-ablation protects mice from experimental colitis. The American Journal of Pathology 175: 2382–2391.

49.

Ilan

(2016) Oral immune therapy: Targeting the systemic immune system via the gut immune system for the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease. Clinical & Translational Immunology 5: e60.

50.

Ilan

Ben Ya’acov

Shabbat

, et al. (2016) Oral administration of a non-absorbable plant cell-expressed recombinant anti-TNF fusion protein induces immunomodulatory effects and alleviates nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. World Journal of Gastroenterology 22: 8760–8769.

51.

Ilan

(2016) Compounds of the sphingomyelin-ceramide-glycosphingolipid pathways as secondary messenger molecules: New targets for novel therapies for fatty liver disease and insulin resistance. American Journal of Physiology-Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology 310: G1102–G1117.

52.

Khoury

Ben Ya’acov

Shabat

, et al. (2015) Altered distribution of regulatory lymphocytes by oral administration of soy-extracts exerts a hepatoprotective effect alleviating immune mediated liver injury, non-alcoholic steatohepatitis and insulin resistance. World Journal of Gastroenterology 21: 7443–7456.

53.

Israeli

Zigmond

Lalazar

, et al. (2015) Oral mixture of autologous colon-extracted proteins for the Crohn’s disease: A double-blind trial. World Journal of Gastroenterology 21: 5685–5694.

54.

Lalazar

Mizrahi

Turgeman

, et al. (2015) Oral administration of OKT3 MAb to patients with NASH, promotes regulatory T-cell induction, and alleviates insulin resistance: Results of a Phase IIa blinded placebo-controlled trial. Journal of Clinical Immunology 35: 399–407.

55.

Israeli

Goldin

Fishman

, et al. (2015) Oral administration of non-absorbable delayed release 6-mercaptopurine is locally active in the gut, exerts a systemic immune effect and alleviates Crohn’s disease with low rate of side effects: Results of double blind Phase II clinical trial. Clinical and Experimental Immunology 181: 362–372.

56.

Halota

Ferenci

Kozielewicz

, et al. (2015) Oral anti-CD3 immunotherapy for HCV-nonresponders is safe, promotes regulatory T cells and decreases viral load and liver enzyme levels: Results of a phase-2a placebo-controlled trial. Journal of Viral Hepatitis 22: 651–657.