Anti-terrorism courts’ convictions in trials of sectarian-terrorism crimes: A case study of the Punjab province of Pakistan

Abstract

Sectarian activists in Pakistan are occasionally arrested by law enforcement agencies in sectarian-terrorism crimes but very rarely convicted by the courts. Contemporary research mainly relates slow convictions in sectarian crimes to defects in the state's criminal justice system. But this article connects anti-terrorism courts’ (ATCs) slow convictions and large-scale acquittals in sectarian-terrorism crimes to vague anti-terror laws, judges’ and witnesses’ security concerns and the incompetence of the prosecution and judges. The article applies the mixed method of research by using data from personal interviews, online sources, newspapers, research journals, articles and books. It argues that undefined anti-terrorism laws, judges’ security concerns and sectarian activists’ terrorization of judges and eyewitnesses add to the ATCs’ slow convictions in sectarian-terrorism crimes in the Punjab. Moreover, prosecution and judges’ incompetence and their inclination towards Islamic principles in judgements show bias in the application of sectarian-terrorism related laws that have been causing large-scale acquittals in the ATCs.

Keywords

convictions judges Punjab sectarianism security

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abbas

(2002) Sectarianism: The Players and the Game. Lahore: South Asia Partnership-Pakistan.

Abbas

(2010) Shiism and sectarian conflict in Pakistan: Identity politics, Iranian influence, and tit-for-tat violence. Combating Terrorism Center (CTC) Occasional Paper. Available at: https://www.ctc.usma.edu/posts/shiism-and-sectarian-conflict-in-pakistan (accessed 15 March 2017).

Ahmad

(2015) Legal provisions on fighting extremism: Pakistan. The Law Library of Congress. Available at: https://www.loc.gov/law/help/fighting-extremism/pakistan.php (accessed 3 June 2021).

Ahmed

(2007) Shari’a, custom, and statutory law: Comparing state approaches to Islamic jurisprudence, tribal autonomy, and legal development in Afghanistan and Pakistan. Global Jurist 7(1): Article 5.

Ahmed

(2016) Speaking up, saying it out loud. Indian Express, 13 May. Available at: http://indianexpress.com/article/opinion/columns/pakistani-newspapers-begin-to-talk-honestly-about-hafiz-saeed-and-his-operations-speaking-up-saying-it-out-loud-2797621/99/print/#sthash.LaQEeZG9.dpuf (accessed 30 May 2016).

Asad

(2017) IHC orders Lal Masjid caretaker removed from Fourth Schedule. Dawn, 15 January. Available at: https://www.dawn.com/news/1308796 (accessed 20 January 2017).

Chaudhry

(2014) Anti-Terror Laws, Policing and the Criminal Justice System: A Case Study of Anti-Terrorist Efforts in Punjab. Lahore: Centre for Public Policy and Governance FC College. Available at: http://cppg.fccollege.edu.pk/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/Anti-Terror-Laws-Policing-and-the-Criminal.pdf (accessed 29 July 2017).

Cordesman

Vira

(2011) Pakistan – Violence versus stability: A national net assessment. Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) Report. Washington, DC. Available at: https://www.csis.org/analysis/pakistan-violence-versus-stability (accessed 12 November 2016).

Davis

Rebeck

(2017) The Contractor: How I Landed in a Pakistan Prison and Ignited a Diplomatic Crisis. Dallas, TX: Benbella Books, Inc.

10.

Hameed

(2015) Challenges in Pakistan’s counter-terrorism legal regimes: Challenges, prospects, and recommendations. New America. Available at: https://www.newamerica.org/international-security/policy-papers/changes-in-pakistans-counter-terrorism-legal-regime/ (accessed 18 August 2021).

11.

Hamid

(2015) Prosecution services in Punjab and Sindh. Pakistan Institute of Legislative Development and Transparency (PILDAT) Position Paper. Islamabad. Available at: http://www.pildat.org/Publications/publication/ROLR/ProsecutionServicesinPunjabandSindh_PositionPaper.pdf (accessed 15 September 2017).

12.

Haq

(2013) Challenge of identity and governance. Quaid’s vision: The way forward. Islamabad Policy Research Institute (IPRI) Paper 17. Available at: http://www.ipripak.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/paper17.pdf (accessed 30 September 2017).

13.

Human Rights Watch (2014) ‘We are the walking dead’: Killings of Shia Hazaras in Balochistan, Pakistan. Available at: https://www.hrw.org/report/2014/06/29/we-are-walking-dead/killings-shia-hazara-balochistan-pakistan (accessed 22 April 2018).

14.

Hussain

(2016) ATCs fail to decide cases in 90 days. The Nation, 4 August. Available at: https://nation.com.pk/04-Aug-2016/atcs-fail-to-decide-cases-in-90-days (accessed 25 August 2016).

15.

Hussain

(2012) Punjabi Taliban: Driving Extremism in Pakistan. Translated by T Afzaal. New Delhi: Pentagon Press.

16.

International Crisis Group (2008) Reforming the judiciary in Pakistan. Asia Report No. 160, Brussels. Available at: http://www.iccnow.org/documents/160_reforming_the_judiciary_in_pakistan.pdf (accessed 10 January 2016).

17.

International Crisis Group (2010) Reforming Pakistan’s criminal justice system. Asia Report No. 196, Brussels. Available at: http://www.refworld.org/pdfid/4d00dee42.pdf (accessed 7 February 2017).

18.

International Crisis Group (2011) Islamic parties in Pakistan. Asia Report No. 216, Brussels. Available at: https://d2071andvip0wj.cloudfront.net/216%20Islamic%20Parties%20in%20Pakistan.pdf (accessed 10 July 2018).

19.

Khan

(n.d.) Guidelines for scrutiny of police reports. Punjab Prosecution Department. Available at: http://prosecution.punjab.gov.pk/ (accessed 14 May 2018).

20.

Kharal

(2011) LeJ’s Malik received monthly stipend from Punjab government. Express Tribune, 16 July. Archived at: https://tribune.com.pk/story/210827/lejs-malik-received-monthly-stipend-from-punjab-govt/ (accessed 16 June 2016).

21.

Lamb

Hameed

(2012) Subnational governance, service delivery and militancy in Pakistan. Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) report. Washington, DC. Available at: https://www.csis.org/analysis/subnational-governance-service-delivery-and-militancy-pakistan (accessed 27 June 2016).

22.

Mahmood

(2016) All Fourth Schedule suspects to be arrested. Dawn, 29 March. Available at: https://www.dawn.com/news/1248604 (accessed 13 April 2019).

23.

Malik

(2015) Punjab courts yet to adjudicate on 85% of terror related cases: AGP tells SC. Express Tribune, 23 June. Available at: https://tribune.com.pk/story/908460/punjab-courts-yet-to-adjudicate-85-of-terror-related-cases-agp-tells-sc/ (accessed 24 June 2015).

24.

Mehdi

(1994) The Islamization of the Law in Pakistan. London: Curzon Press Ltd.

25.

Mohmand

Gazdar

(2007) Social structures in rural Pakistan. Asian Development Bank. Available at: http://www.researchcollective.org/Documents/Social_Structure_in_Rural_Pakistan.pdf (accessed 22 July 2015).

26.

Najam

(2015) Archaic legal system leads to destruction of Punjab Prosecution Department. News Lens Pakistan, 19 October. Online page of Prosecution Department. Available at: http://www.newslens.pk/archaic-legal-system-leads-destruction-punjab-prosecution-department/ (accessed 17 November 2018).

27.

Naseer

(2017) Benazir murder case: ATC acquits 5 accused, declares Musharraf an absconder. Dawn Newspaper, 31 August. Available at: https://www.dawn.com/news/1355153 (accessed 7 September 2017).

28.

Noor

(2008) Evolution of counter-terrorism legislation in Pakistan. Conflict and Peace Studies 1(1). Pakistan Institute for Peace Studies. Islamabad.

29.

O’Donnell

(2004) Why the rule of law matters. Journal of Democracy 15(4): 32–46. Available at: http://muse.jhu.edu/article/175988 (accessed 24 September 2015).

30.

Parvez

Rani

(2015) An appraisal of Pakistan’s Anti-Terrorism Act. The United States Institute of Peace. Special Report 377. Available at: https://www.usip.org/sites/default/files/SR377-An-Appraisal-of-Pakistan%E2%80%99sAnti-Terrorism-Act.pdf (accessed 19 August 2021).

31.

Rehman

(2018) Why is DNA evidence not given weight in Pakistani Courts? Dawn, 25 January. Available at: https://www.dawn.com/news/1385125 (accessed 26 January 2018).

32.

Shams

(2016) Analyst: ‘Jihadist courts exist all across Pakistan’. Deutsche Welle, 11 April. Available at: http://www.dw.com/en/analyst-jihadist-courts-exist-all-across-pakistan/a-19178039 (accessed 15 April 2016).

33.

Sheikh

(2016) Sharia court dispenses justice in Lahore. Dawn, 7 April. Available at: https://www.dawn.com/news/1250430 (accessed 10 April 2016).

34.

Siddiqa

(2018) Counter-Terrorism Yearbook 2018. Australian Strategic Policy Institute. Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/resrep16819 (accessed 9 March 2019).

35.

Smentkowski

(2019) Court. Encyclopedia Britannica, 30 August. Available at: https://www.britannica.com/topic/court-law (accessed June 2021).

36.

Strasser

(2014) The evolving Pakistani criminal justice system: A study of the Raymond Davis matter. Tulane Journal of International and Comparative Law 23(1): 107–149.

37.

Umar

Hippler

(2020) Sectarian infrastructure and Sunni-Shia parties in Punjab and their links with Jihadi and extremist organizations. Journal of Historical Studies 6(2): 277–301.

38.

Waseem M (2010) Dilemmas of Pride and Pain: Sectarian Conflict and Conflict Transformation in Pakistan. Religions Development Research Programme (RaD) Working Paper 48. University of Birmingham.

39.

Warraich

(2017) Patriarchal justice. Dawn, 7 August. Available at: https://www.dawn.com/news/1350085 (accessed 8 August 2017).

40.

Yusuf

(2010) Pakistan’s anti-terrorism courts. Combating Terrorism Center (CTC) Sentinel 3(3): 22–25.

41.

Yusuf

(2012) Sectarian violence: Pakistan’s greatest security threats? Norwegian Peacebuilding Resource Centre (NOREF) Report. Available at: https://www.ciaonet.org/attachments/21361/uploads (accessed 10 May 2016).

42.

Zaidi

SMA

(2016) Terrorism prosecution in Pakistan: A critical appraisal. United States Institute of Peace (USIP) report. Available at: https://www.acadmia.edu/24780558/Terrorism_Prosecution_in_Pakistan (accessed 21 August 2018).