Abstract

Health systems worldwide are facing unprecedented challenges as they seek to deliver better value healthcare against a backdrop of increasing levels of chronic disease, ageing populations, global financial crises and reduced public spending, and digital health tools and services are widely touted as being part of the answer, offering low-cost and patient-centred solutions. 1 The notion of a digitally sophisticated health service user, situated at the heart of the health service, is one which catches the public and commercial imagination but is yet to be realised. To achieve this ‘citizen health’ vision of a technology-enabled upstream health system centred around users who are provided with the tools and opportunities to be active participants in the consumption and production of their health and health services, the digital health citizen needs to take on new responsibilities, alongside their digital ‘rights’, and health services need to support and harness these. At the same time, it is obviously important to be mindful of issues of digital exclusion, where there are potential issues of unequal access, unequal use and unequal outcomes for people using digital tools.
In England, the National Health Service (NHS) has stated a clear commitment to a digital future, 2 but in order to achieve its aims the current model of service provision – in the NHS and elsewhere – needs fundamental transformation. Health services are perhaps better characterised as sickness services designed around expensive secondary care facilities. A genuine focus on prevention and well-being promotion is likely to be far more effective in reducing costs downstream. But the prioritisation and maintenance of a preventive focus is hindered by the frequency of the political election cycle and the need for health services to demonstrate short-term benefits. To be sustainable, state-funded health systems must find innovative ways to engage citizens in their own care both when ill and, critically, when healthy. The leading US physician and patient safety expert Professor Bob Wachter has recently led a review to examine the implementation of digital technology in the NHS, but in the terms of reference of this review ‘patients’ were only mentioned once, in respect of their relationship with clinicians. Healthy citizens were not mentioned at all. 3 Yet, digital health offers a way to not only bridge the gap between professional care and self-management, but also to engage people in changing health behaviours.
In an influential 2014 article in the Harvard Business Review, Jeremy Heimans and Henry Timms argued that new digital technologies are causing a shift in the business sector from a model of ‘old power’ which is principally a consumption model grounded in what a few individuals or organisations know, own or control, to a model of ‘new power’ which is characterised by a participatory approach of peer coordination and harnessing the agency of the crowd. 4 If the business of healthcare is to harness the benefits of new power, to be truly patient-centred and participatory, then it is vital that we embrace open debate about the rights, responsibilities and expectations of future digital health citizens. This debate needs to happen not only amongst healthcare professionals and patients within the NHS, but also within society as a whole.
Potential rights and responsibilities of a digital health citizen.
Establishing a patient-centred culture of digital innovation and improvement could lead to an NHS that better serves its users. Engagement could include using a personal health record which shares data with the NHS and health service researchers, contributing data from wearable technologies that monitor parameters of health or illness, using mobile apps that support decision making or deliver interventions, participating in remote care and consultations, and providing online ratings and reviews of experiences of care. Digital health citizenship could play a crucial role in ensuring that patients and the public are firmly placed at the heart of the health service, a popular message that is not yet the reality of healthcare practice.
Footnotes
Contributorship
JP discussed the ideas with NN, A-MB and VW. All authors debated the issues and contributed to draft versions of the manuscript.
Declaration of Conflicting Interests
The author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: JP is employed part-time as a Consultant Clinical Adviser in the Centre for Health Technology Evaluation, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). The other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Ethical approval
Not applicable.
Funding
The authors disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: JP and AMB are supported by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care Oxford at Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust. JP and VW are funded by the MQ charity for a digital health intervention study under its PsyIMPACT funding stream. NN is conducting a PhD funded by a Medical Research Council (MRC) Studentship (MR/K501268/1). The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the MQ charity, the MRC, the NHS, the NIHR or the Department of Health.
Guarantor
John Powell.
Peer review
Editorial content: internally reviewed, not externally peer-reviewed.
