This study proposes an integrated model explaining how consumer trust and the flow experience complementarily align in the process of purchase intention during live streaming commerce (LSC). This model, grounded in social exchange theory and flow theory, introduces two primary routes: the cognitive route establishes the link between streamer characteristics and trust in the product, while the affective route associates LSC characteristics with the flow experience. These two pathways converge toward purchase intention. The mixed route represents the relationship between trust and flow experience and demonstrates the sequential mechanisms leading to online purchase intention. First, a qualitative study consolidated the relevance of the concepts integrated into the research model. Subsequently, a quantitative study conducted in France with 555 respondents was used to test the proposed model. The results reveal the full mediation of trust regarding the effect of streamer characteristics on purchase intention. They also highlight the full mediation of flow experience. Trust thus represents a necessary cognitive basis but insufficient for increasing online purchase intention. It is only through its mediated effect via the flow experience that this intention is intensified. The interplay between trust (cognition) and flow (affect) sheds light on the underlying mechanisms of online purchase intention and opens up new avenues for research.
AlzaidiMSAgagG (2022) The role of trust and privacy concerns in using social media for e-retail services: The moderating role of COVID-19. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services68: 103042.
2.
BagozziRPYiY (1988) On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science16(1): 74–94.
3.
BerloDKLemertJBMertzRJ (1969) Dimensions for evaluating the acceptability of message sources. Public Opinion Quarterly33(4): 563.
4.
BhattacharyaSSharmaRPGuptaA (2023) Does e-retailer’s country of origin influence consumer privacy, trust and purchase intention?Journal of Consumer Marketing40(2): 248–259.
5.
ChenCZhangD (2023) Understanding consumers’ live-streaming shopping from a benefit–risk perspective. Journal of Services Marketing37(8): 973–988.
6.
ChenC-CLinY-C (2018) What drives live-stream usage intention? The perspectives of flow, entertainment, social interaction, and endorsement. Telematics and Informatics35(1): 293–303.
7.
ChenY-HBarnesS (2007) Initial trust and online buyer behaviour. Industrial Management & Data Systems107(1): 21–36.
8.
ChiuCWangETGFangYHHuangHY (2014) Understanding customers’ repeat purchase intentions in B2C e-commerce: The roles of utilitarian value, hedonic value and perceived risk. Information Systems Journal24(1): 85–114.
9.
ChiuCMHuangHYYenCH (2010) Antecedents of trust in online auctions. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications9(2): 148–159.
10.
CrosbyLAEvansKRCowlesD (1990) Relationship quality in services selling: An interpersonal influence perspective. Journal of Marketing54(3): 68–81.
11.
CsikszentmihalyiM (1990) Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience. New York: Harper et Row.
12.
CsikszentmihalyiM (2013) Flow: The Psychology of Happiness. New York: Random House.
13.
DabholkarPAThorpeDIRentzJO (1996) A measure of service quality for retail stores: Scale development and validation. Journal of Academy and Marketing Science24(1): 3–16.
14.
DwyerCHiltzSRPasseriniK (2007) Trust and privacy concern within social networking sites: A comparison of Facebook and MySpace. In: Proceedings of the Thirteenth Americas Conference on Information Systems, Keystone, CO, 9–12 August.
15.
ElshaerIAAlrawadMLutfiAAzazzAMS (2024) Social commerce and buying intention post COVID-19: Evidence from a hybrid approach based on SEM–fsQCA. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services76: 103–548.
16.
Escobar-RodríguezTCarvajal-TrujilloE (2014) Online purchasing tickets for low cost carriers: An application of the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT) model. Tourism Management43: 70–88.
17.
EttisSA (2017) Examining the relationships between online store atmospheric color, flow experience and consumer behavior. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services37: 43–55.
18.
FangJGeorgeBShaoYWenC (2016) Affective and cognitive factors influencing repeat buying in e-commerce. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications19: 44–55.
19.
FornellCLarckerDF (1981) Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics. Journal of Marketing Research18(3): 382–388.
20.
FuFQBolanderWJonesE (2009) Managing the drivers of organizational commitment and salesperson effort: An application of Meyer and Allen’s three-component model. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice17(4): 335–350.
21.
GaoJZhaoXZhaiMZhangDLiG (2025) AI or human? The effect of streamer types on consumer purchase intention in live streaming. International Journal of Human–computer Interaction41(1): 305–317.
22.
GaoLBaiX (2014) Online consumer behaviour and its relationship to website atmospheric induced flow: Insights into online travel agencies in China. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services21(4): 653–665.
23.
GefenDKarahannaEStraubDW (2003) Trust and TAM in online shopping: An integrated model. MIS Quarterly27(1): 51–90.
24.
GuYChengXShenJ (2023) Design shopping as an experience: Exploring the effect of the live-streaming shopping characteristics on consumers’ participation intention and memorable experience. Information & Management60(5): 103810.
25.
GuoYZhangKWangC (2022) Way to success: Understanding top streamer’s popularity and influence from the perspective of source characteristics. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services64: 102786.
26.
HairJFBlackWCBabinBJAndersonRE (2018) Multivariate Data Analysis, 8th edition.Andover: Cengage Learning EMEA.
27.
HamiltonWAGarretsonOKerneA (2014) Streaming on twitch: Fostering participatory communities of play within live mixed media. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Toronto, ON, Canada, 26 April 2014, pp. 1315–1324. New York: ACM. Available at: https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/2556288.2557048 (accessed 23 September 2025).
28.
HausmanAVSiekpeJS (2009) The effect of web interface features on consumer online purchase intentions. Journal of Business Research62(1): 5–13.
29.
HayesAF (2017) Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-based Approach (Methodology in the social sciences). Second edition. New York: The Guilford Press.
30.
HoffmanDLNovakTP (1996) Marketing in hypermedia computer-mediated environments: Conceptual foundations. Journal of Marketing60(3): 50–68.
31.
HomansGC (1958) Social behavior as exchange. American Journal of Sociology63(6): 597–606.
32.
HongIBChaHS (2013) The mediating role of consumer trust in an online merchant in predicting purchase intention. International Journal of Information Management33(6): 927–939.
33.
HouFGuanZLiBChongAYL (2019) Factors influencing people’s continuous watching intention and consumption intention in live streaming. Internet Research30: 141–163.
34.
HovlandCIWeissW (1951) The influence of source credibility on communication effectiveness. Public Opinion Quarterly15(4): 635.
35.
HuMZhangMWangY (2017) Why do audiences choose to keep watching on live video streaming platforms? An explanation of dual identification framework. Computers in Human Behavior75: 594–606.
36.
KangKLuJGuoLLiW (2021) The dynamic effect of interactivity on customer engagement behavior through tie strength: Evidence from live streaming commerce platforms. International Journal of Information Management56: 102251
37.
KimHWXuYGuptaS (2012) Which is more important in Internet shopping, perceived price or trust?Electronic Commerce Research and Applications11(3): 241–252.
38.
KimJAhnSJ(Grace) KwonESReidLN (2017) TV advertising engagement as a state of immersion and presence. Journal of Business Research76: 67–76.
39.
KimSParkH (2013) Effects of various characteristics of social commerce (s-commerce) on consumers’ trust and trust performance. International Journal of Information Management33(2): 318–332.
40.
LadhariRMassaESkandraniH (2020) YouTube vloggers’ popularity and influence: The roles of homophily, emotional attachment, and expertise. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services54: 102027.
41.
LeeC-HChenC-W (2021) Impulse buying behaviors in live streaming commerce based on the stimulus-organism-response framework. Information12(6): 241.
42.
LeeMKOTurbanE (2001) A trust model for consumer internet shopping. International Journal of Electronic Commerce6(1): 75–91.
43.
LeeZWYLiuWZHChanTKHWeiGGZ (2025) Impulse buying in live streaming commerce: A literature review and research agenda. Information & Management62(8): 104220.
LiFPieńkowskiDVan MoorselASmithC (2012) A holistic framework for trust in online transactions. International Journal of Management Reviews14(1): 85–103.
46.
LiXWangQYaoXYanXLiR (2025) How do influencers’ impression management tactics affect purchase intention in live commerce? – Trust transfer and gender differences. Information & Management62(2): 104094.
47.
LiYPengY (2021) What drives gift-giving intention in live streaming? The perspectives of emotional attachment and flow experience. International Journal of Human–computer Interaction37(14): 1317–1329.
48.
LiYLiXCaiJ (2021) How attachment affects user stickiness on live streaming platforms: A socio-technical approach perspective. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services60: 102478.
LuBChenZ (2021) Live streaming commerce and consumers’ purchase intention: An uncertainty reduction perspective. Information & Management58(7): 103509.
51.
LuoXCheahJHJeanLXNgSI (2022) A Bibliometric Review of User Behaviors Research in Live Streaming Commerce. Journal of Marketing Advances Et Practices4(1): 32–49.
52.
MaY (2021) Elucidating determinants of customer satisfaction with live-stream shopping: An extension of the information systems success model. Telematics and Informatics65: 101–707.
MalhotraNKKimSSPatilA (2006) Common method variance in IS research: A comparison of alternative approaches and a reanalysis of past research. Management Science52(12): 1865–1883.
55.
MilesMBHubermanAM (2017) Analyse Des Données Qualitatives. 2e édition. Bruxelles: De Boeck Supérieur.
56.
NgCS-P (2013) Intention to purchase on social commerce websites across cultures: A cross-regional study. Information & Management50(8): 609–620.
57.
OhanianR (1991) The impact of celebrity spokespersons’ perceived image on consumers’ intention to purchase. Journal of Advertising Research31(1): 46–54.
58.
OzkaraBYOzmenMKimW (2017) Examining the effect of flow experience on online purchase: A novel approach to the flow theory based on hedonic and utilitarian value. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services37: 119–131.
59.
PailléPMucchielliA (2021) L’analyse Qualitative En Sciences Humaines Et Sociales. Cinquième édition. S.l: Armand Colin.
60.
PappasIOKourouthanassisPEGiannakosMNChrissikopoulosV (2016) Explaining online shopping behavior with fsQCA: The role of cognitive and affective perceptions. Journal of Business Research69(2): 794–803.
61.
Picot-CoupeyKBouragbaYLachaudICGallarzaMGOuazzaniY (2023) Live streaming shopping as a new retail format: Insights from a qualitative study of consumers and retailers. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management51(9/10): 1313–1351.
62.
PodsakoffPMMacKenzieSBLeeJ-YPodsakoffNP (2003) Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology88(5): 879–903.
63.
QureshiIFangYRamseyEMcColePIbbotsonPCompeauD (2009) Understanding online customer repurchasing intention and the mediating role of trust–an empirical investigation in two developed countries. European Journal of Information Systems18: 205–222.
64.
RoloffME (1981) Interpersonal Communication: The Social Exchange Approach. New York: Sage.
65.
ShafieizadehKAlotaibiSTaoCW (2023) Information processing of food safety messages: What really matters for restaurant customers?International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management35(10): 3638–3661.
66.
ShangQMaHWangCGiaoL (2023) Effects of background fitting of e-commerce live streaming on consumers’ purchase intentions: A cognitive-affective perspective. Psychology Research and Behavior Management16: 149–168.
67.
SharmaSMenardPMutchlerLA (2019) Who to trust? Applying trust to social commerce. Journal of Computer Information Systems59(1): 32–42.
68.
Statista (2018) Classement des enseignes les plus appréciées par les consommateurs français pour la qualité des produits et services proposés. Available at: www.statista.com/statistiques/945440
69.
StolK-JSchaarschmidtMMorganL (2024) Does adopting inner source increase job satisfaction? A social capital perspective using a mixed-methods approach. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems33(1): 101819.
70.
SunYShaoXLiXGuoYNieK (2019) How live streaming influences purchase intentions in social commerce: An IT affordance perspective. Electronic Commerce Research Application37: 1008–1086.
71.
SunYZhongYZhangZWangYZhuM (2024) How technical features of virtual live shopping platforms affect purchase intention: Based on the theory of interactive media effects. Decision Support Systems: 114–189.
72.
TuncerI (2021) The relationship between IT affordance, flow experience, trust, and social commerce intention: An exploration using the SOR paradigm. Technology in Society65: 101567.
73.
Valette-FlorenceRValette-FlorenceP (2020) Effets des émotions et de la personnalité de la marque sur l’engagement du consommateur via les effets médiateurs de la confiance et de l’attachement à la marque. Recherche Et Applications En Marketing (French Edition35(1): 87–116.
74.
Van Der HeijdenHVerhagenTCreemersM (2003) Understanding online purchase intentions: Contributions from technology and trust perspectives. European Journal of Information Systems12(1): 41–48.
75.
WangBXieFKandampullyJWangJ (2022) Increase hedonic products purchase intention through livestreaming: The mediating effects of mental imagery quality and customer trust. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services69: 103109.
76.
WangXWuD (2019) Understanding user engagement mechanisms on a live streaming platform. In: HCI in Business, Government and Organizations. Information Systems and Analytics: 6th International Conference, HCIBGO 2019, Held as Part of the 21st HCI International Conference, HCII 20192019212019, Orlando, FL, pp. 266–275. New York: Springer.
77.
WhiteheadJL (1968) Factors of source credibility. Quarterly Journal of Speech54(1): 59–63.
78.
WilsonEJSherrellDL (1993) Source effects in communication and persuasion research: A meta-analysis of effect size. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science21(2): 101–112.
79.
WongkitrungruengAAssarutN (2020) The role of live streaming in building consumer trust and engagement with social commerce sellers. Journal of Business Research117: 543–556.
80.
WuCH-JLiH-JChiuC-W (2014) Understanding consumer responses to travel websites from online shopping value and flow experience perspectives. Tourism Economics20(5): 1087–1103.
81.
WuDWangXYeHJ (2023) Transparentizing the “black box” of live streaming: Impacts of live interactivity on viewers’ experience and purchase. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management71: 3820–3831.
82.
XuXWuJHLiQ (2020) What drives consumer shopping behavior in live streaming commerce?Journal of Electronic Commerce Research21(3): 144–167.
83.
YeMChingTC (2023) Research and application flow-based live-streaming shopping towards compulsive buying. Annals of Operations Research: 1–29.
84.
YoonSJ (2002) The antecedents and consequences of trust in online-purchase decisions. Journal of Interactive Marketing16(2): 47–63.
85.
YuTTeohAPBianQLiaoJWangC (2025) Can virtual influencers affect purchase intentions in tourism and hospitality e-commerce live streaming? An empirical study in China. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management37(1): 216–238.
86.
ZhangFZhuSYeZ (2022a) The influence mechanism of mainstream media E-commerce live streaming on consumers’ purchase decision: An exploratory study based on grounded theory. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Management Science and Industrial Engineering, Chiang Mai, Thailand, 28 April 2022, pp. 1–8. New York: ACM. Available at: https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3535782.3535783 (accessed 23 September 2025).
87.
ZhangHLuYGaoPChenZ (2014) Social shopping communities as an emerging business model of youth entrepreneurship: Exploring the effects of website characteristics. International Journal of Technology Management66(4): 319.
88.
ZhangMLiuYWangYZhaoL (2022b) How to retain customers: Understanding the role of trust in live streaming commerce with a socio-technical perspective. Computers in Human Behavior127: 107052.
89.
ZhangMQinFWangGALuoC (2020) The impact of live video streaming on online purchase intention. The Service Industries Journal40(9–10): 656–681.
90.
ZhaoLXuYXuX (2023) The effects of trust and platform innovation characteristics on consumer behaviors in social commerce: A social influence perspective. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications60: 101284.
91.
ZhaoYWangLTangHZhangY (2020) Electronic word-of-mouth and consumer purchase intentions in social e-commerce. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications41: 100980.
92.
ZhengSChenJLiaoJHuHL (2023) What motivates users’ viewing and purchasing behavior motivations in live streaming: A stream-streamer-viewer perspective. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services72: 103240.
93.
ZuoRXiaoJ (2021) Exploring consumers’ impulse buying behavior in live streaming shopping. In: XuJGarcía MárquezFPAli HassanMH, et al. (eds) Proceedings of the Fifteenth International Conference on Management Science and Engineering Management. Lecture Notes on Data Engineering and Communications Technologies. Cham: Springer, pp. 610–622. Available at: https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3−030-79203-9_47 (accessed 22 September 2025).
