The article uses a netnographic study to try to analyse the long-term sustainability of domestic recycling practices. By monitoring narratives and practices, it identifies two profiles for recyclers: leaders and followers. This categorization raises questions about the informality of recycling while differentiating between different degrees of long-term sustainability. It also reveals the role that the internet plays because of its ability to generate an ideological recycling of the recycling of materials.
AlbinssonPAPereraBY (2009) From trash to treasure and beyond: the meaning of voluntary disposition. Journal of Consumer Behaviour8(6): 340–353.
2.
AndersonC (2012) Makers: La nouvelle révolution industrielle. Paris: Pearson.
3.
ArmstrongAHagelJ (1996) The real value of online community. Havard Business Review74(3): 134–41.
4.
BergadaàM (2006) Giving gifts: core dimensions and profiles of givers. Recherche et Applications en Marketing21(1): 19–39.
5.
BurroughsJEMickDG (2004) Exploring antecedents and consequences of consumer creativity in a problem-solving context. Journal of Consumer Research31(2): 402–411.
6.
CampbellC (2005) The craft consumer: Culture, craft and consumption in a postmodern society. Journal of Consumer Culture5(1): 23–42.
7.
ChalamonIChoukIGuiotD (2012) La cyber-résistance du consommateur: quels enjeux pour les entreprises?Décisions Marketing62: 83–88.
8.
CherrierH (2010) Custodian behavior: A material expression of anti-consumerism. Consumption Markets & Culture13(3): 259–272.
9.
CherrierHPonnorT (2010) A study of hoarding behavior and attachment to material possessions. Qualitative Market Research13(1): 8–23.
10.
CovaVKreziakD (2013), Des riens aux biens: les pratiques de récup’création. Perspectives Culturelles de la Consommation, 3, 1, 47–78.
CovaVKreziakDManiZ (2012) La créativité du consommateur vis-à-vis des déchets. In: LazzeriYMoustierE (eds) Vulnérabilité, équité et créativité en Méditerranée. Aix en Provence: Publication Université de Provence, 235–247.
13.
DanielMSirieixL (2012) Les pratiques durables: une forme de résistance ordinaire ?Décisions Marketing68: 11–24.
14.
Denegri-KnottJMolesworthM (2009) I’ll sell this and I’ll buy them that: eBay and the management of possessions as stock. Journal of Consumer Behaviour8(6): 305–315.
15.
DobschaSProtheroAMcDonaghP (2011) Re-thinking distribution strategy: Principles from sustainability. In: PeñalozaLOzçaglar-ToulouseNViscontiLM (eds) Marketing Management: A Cultural Perspective. London: Routledge Publishing, pp.461–474.
16.
DouglasM (2001) De la souillure. Paris: La découverte.
17.
EdensorT (2005) Waste matter – the debris of industrial: Ruins and the disordering of the material world. Journal of Material Culture10(3): 311–332.
18.
French Senate. (n.d.) Recyclage and valorisation des déchets ménagers, report 415. Available at: www.senat.fr/rap/o98-415/o98-4152.html (accessed 1 August 2013).
GabrielP (2003) Le marketing comme moyen de légitimation des entreprises dans une perspective de développement durable. Décisions Marketing29: 67–76.
21.
GiannelloniJL (1998) Behaviors related to the protection of the environment, and their determinants: The state of research on marketing. Recherche et applications en marketing13(2): 49–72.
22.
GieslerM (2006) Consumer gift systems. Journal of Consumer Research33(2): 283–290.
23.
GregsonNMetcalfeACreweL (2007) Moving things along: The conduits and practices of divestment in consumption. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers32(2): 187–200.
24.
GuillardVPinsonC (2012) Toward a better understanding and measurement of consumer hoarding. Recherche et applications en marketing27(3): 57–79.
25.
HaberlHFischer-KowalskiMKrausmannFMartinez-AlierJWiniwarterV (2011) A socio-metabolic transition towards sustainability? Challenges for another great transformation. Sustainable Development19(1): 1–14.
26.
HalitimN (1996) La vie des objets. Paris: L’Harmattan.
27.
HetzelPVolleP (2003) Marketing et consommation responsable (editorial). Décisions Marketing2: 5–6.
28.
HewerPBrownlieD (2007) Cultures of consumption of caraficionados: aesthetics and consumption communities. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy27(3/4): 106–119.
29.
HibbertSHorneSTaggS (2005) Charity retailers in competition for merchandise: Examining how consumers dispose of used goods, Journal of Business Research58: 819–828.
30.
IyerSEKashyapRK (2007) Consumer recycling: role of incentives, information, and social class. Journal of Consumer Behaviour6(1): 32–47.
31.
JacobyJChestnutRSilbermanW (1977) Consumer use and comprehension of nutrition information. Journal of Consumer Research4(2): 119–128.
32.
KozinetsRV (2002) The field behind the screen: Using netnography for marketing research in on-line communities. Journal of Marketing Research39(1): 61–72.
33.
KozinetsRV (2007) Netnography 2.0, in BelkRW (ed.) Handbook of Qualitative Research Methods in Marketing. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp.129–142.
34.
KreziakD (2013) L’or du rien: comment la récup’ modifie le regard sur les déchets?Jitec, Le dossier Technologique des Pays de Savoie171: 1–4.
LeeMSWRouxDCherrierHCovaB (2011) Anti-consumption and consumer resistance: concepts, concerns, conflicts, and convergence. European Journal of Marketing45(11/12): 1680–1687.
37.
LinBHuangEM (2010) Reuse: Promoting repurposing through an online DIY Community. In: 28th International Conference on Human–Computer Interactions, Atlanta, pp.4177–4182.
McCartyJAShrumLJ (1994) The recycling of solid wastes: Personal values, value orientations, and attitudes about recycling as antecedents of recycling behavior. Journal of Business Research30(1): 53–62.
40.
McDonoughWBraungartM (2003) Cradle to Cradle: Remaking the way we make things. New York: Rodale Press.
41.
MoreauCPDahlDW (2005) Designing the solution: The impact of the constraints on consumer’s creativity. Journal of Consumer Research32: 13–22.
Ozçaglar-ToulouseN (2009) What meaning do responsible consumers give to their consumption? An Approach by Narratives. Recherches et Applications en Marketing24(3): 3–23.
44.
PailléP (1996) De l’analyse qualitative en général et de l’analyse thématique en particulier. Recherches Qualitatives15: 179–194.
45.
PailléPMucchielliA (2003) L’analyse qualitative en sciences humaines et sociales. Paris: Armand Colin.
46.
ParsonsL (2008) Thompsons’ rubbish theory: Exploring the practices of value creation. European Advances in Consumer Research8: 390–393.
47.
RichinsML (1994), Valuing things: The public and private meanings of possessions. Journal of Consumer Research21: 504–521.
48.
RochefortR (2007) Le bon consommateur et le mauvais citoyen. Paris: Odile Jacob.
49.
SalernoA (2009) Consumer creative experience: the role of motivational orientation in creative leisure activity. Recherche et Applications en Marketing24(1): 69–92.
50.
SandlinJACallahanJL (2009) Deviance, dissonance, and detournement: culture jammers’ use of emotion in consumer resistance. Journal of Consumer Culture9(1): 79–115.
51.
ThompsonM (1979) Rubbish Theory. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
52.
TisdellCFairbairnT.I (1984) Subsistence economies and unsustainable development and trade: Some simple theory. Journal of Development Studies20(2): 227–242.
53.
Van de WalleIHébelPSiounandanN (2012) Les secondes vies des objets: les pratiques d’acquisition et de délaissement des produits de consummation. Cahier de recherche CREDOC n°290, 1–87. Available at: www.credoc.fr/pdf/Rech/C290.pdf (accessed 10 August 2013).
54.
WatsonMShoveE (2008) Product, competence, project and practice: DIY and the dynamics of craft consumption, Journal of Consumer Culture8(1): 69–89.
