Mortality and complications following surgery for diverticulitis: Systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract

Background

The surgical treatment of diverticulitis is in a state of evolution. Clinicians across many disciplines need to counsel patients regarding surgical choices.

Objectives

A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to determine the mortality and complication rates following surgery for diverticulitis in both the emergent and elective setting.

Methods

We searched PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) for relevant articles published from 1980 to 2012. The primary outcome of interest was the point estimate of mortality, following surgery for diverticulitis.

Results

Of the 289 citations reviewed, we included 59 studies. Overall, the point estimate for mortality was 3.05%, with a 95% confidence intereval (CI) of 1.73–5.32 and p < 0.001. Mortality following emergent surgery was 10.64% (95% CI 7.95–14.11; p < 0.001), versus 0.50% (95% CI 0.46–0.54; p < 0.001) following elective operations. A laparoscopic approach had an estimated mortality of 0.75% (95% CI 0.35–1.58; p < 0.001), compared to an open surgical approach, which had a mortality of 4.69% (95% CI 2.29–9.36, p < 0.001). The mortality following a resection with primary anastomosis was 1.96% (95% CI 1.22–3.13; p < 0.001) and for the Hartmann’s procedure was 14.18% (95% CI 9.83–20.03; p < 0.001). A comparative analysis found that the risk of post-operative mortality was significantly higher following emergent surgery, compared to elective surgery (odds ratio (OR): 6.12 with 95% CI 1.62–23.10; p = 0.008; Q = 2.56, p = 0.46 and I²= 0); the open approach, compared to a laparoscopic approach (OR: 36.43 with 95% CI 9.94–133.6; p = 0.13; and Q = 2.79, p = 0.25 and I²= 28.26); and for Hartmann’s procedure, compared to primary anastomosis without diversion (OR: 25.45 with 95% CI 15.13–42.81, p < 0.001; and Q = 23.34, p = 0.14 and I²= 27.16). The overall reported post-operative complication rate was 32.64% (95% CI 27.43–38.32; p < 0.00). The overall surgical and medical complication rates were 18.96% and 13.93%, respectively.

Conclusions

Urgent surgical treatment of diverticulitis has a significant complication rate. Even elective surgery has a significant complication rate that needs to be considered when doing the clinical decision-making for recurrent diverticulitis.

Keywords

Anastomosis diverticulitis elective surgery Hartmann procedure laparoscopy mortality post-operative complications resection review surgery

Introduction

Diverticulitis is a common clinical condition and gastroenterologists are often involved in the decision-making regarding the need for surgery. Recent studies for the management of diverticulitis demonstrate a move away from routine sigmoid colectomy in patients, based on the number of episodes of diverticulitis, and suggest that elective sigmoid colectomy should be individualized, and should consider the risk of surgery and the impact of recurrent attacks on the patient’s lifestyle.¹ Despite this, the number of operative procedures for diverticulitis continues to grow in the USA; and a recent study that evaluated indications for surgery in the state of WA found that 70% of patients were treated with surgery for an episode-based indication and that 39% had ≤ 2 episodes.² There are a number of studies regarding surgical outcomes in diverticulitis, but no single source to guide patients, based on the risk of mortality and morbidity after surgical treatment for diverticulitis. The aim of our study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature, to determine the mortality and complication rate of surgery for diverticulitis in the emergent and elective settings.

Methods

Search strategy

The following databases were used to find relevant articles for this review: PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL). The keywords “diverticulitis”, “colon”, “colonic”, “incidence”, “prevalence”, “treatment”, “therapy” and “recurrence” were used. We used Boolean operators (AND, OR) to narrow and broaden the search. Our search was limited to studies published between 1980 and 2012, the English language and human subjects. We included studies or trials of any kind, including clinical trials, surveys, cohort studies, retrospective analyses, as well as meta-analyses and systematic reviews. Only published manuscripts were used. The initial search yielded a large number of studies. After the duplicate studies were removed, the remaining titles and abstracts were manually reviewed, removing all non-relevant studies. The studies that remained were reviewed in detail. Studies not meeting the inclusion criteria were removed. The cited references of the final set of studies were also reviewed and any relevant studies were included. Review articles were not included.

Study selection

Studies were included into this meta-analysis if mortality and/or complications were reported following surgical intervention for complicated or uncomplicated diverticulitis. The following surgical complications were included: intra-abdominal abscess, anastomotic leak, bleeding, wound infection, wound dehiscence, pulmonary embolism, pneumonia, urinary tract infection and myocardial infarction. These complications were chosen for analysis because they were the most frequently reported. A number of studies were excluded for the following reasons: missing or incomplete data, surgical resection of the sigmoid colon for a reason other than diverticulitis (i.e. cancer or bleeding) and studies focusing on or including diverticular bleeding or right-sided diverticulitis.

Data extraction

The remaining studies were thoroughly reviewed. Data extracted from each study included: first author; year of publication; country of study origin; study design; number of patients in study; patient characteristics, including Hinchey class at presentation; number of patients undergoing surgical intervention; timing of surgery (emergent versus elective); surgical technique and method of surgery (laparoscopic versus open). The following surgical outcomes were extracted: mortality, intra-abdominal abscess, anastomotic leak, bleeding, wound infection, wound dehiscence, pulmonary embolism, pneumonia, urinary tract infection and myocardial infarction. Only the reported complications were included. The post-operative complications were divided into two categories: surgical complications and medical complications. To reduce errors, each study was reviewed in detail three times.

Primary and secondary outcomes of interest

The primary outcome of interest for this analysis was the point estimate of mortality, following emergent, elective, laparoscopic, open, resection with primary anastomosis, and Hartmann’s surgery for complicated or uncomplicated diverticulitis. This also included several subgroup comparative analyses (emergent versus elective, laparoscopic versus open, primary anastomosis without diversion versus Hartmann’s surgery). Secondary outcomes of interest included the point estimate complications after emergent, elective, laparoscopic, open, primary anastomosis and Hartmann’s surgery.

Definitions

Mortality was defined as death occurring within 30 days of surgery. Surgical intervention included patients undergoing sigmoid resection, with or without a proximal diversion. We did not include patients undergoing intra-abdominal lavage alone. Emergency surgery was defined as surgery within 48 hours of admission. Elective surgery was defined as surgery performed after discharge from the initial hospitalization for acute diverticulitis. Patients whom were converted to open surgery from an initial laparoscopic approach were included in the open surgical subgroup. Regarding primary resection with anastomosis, we did not include the patients whom had had a diverting ostomy in the subgroup comparative analysis versus Hartmann’s; however, we did include these patients in the point estimate mortality data. Intra-operative complications were not analyzed. A number of studies used the Hinchey classification system to grade the severity of diverticulitis, and this is as follows: Class I disease is a localized pericolic inflammation, Class II is a localized pericolic abscess, Class III is diffuse purulent peritonitis and Class IV is diffuse feculent peritonitis.³ Subgroup analysis was performed according to the Hinchey grade, when this was reported.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis for the category variables only with the proportions of events was performed using counts for the event and the total sample in the studies. We computed the effect size of the proportions for all the studies that had complete data for the events and for the total sample size. Heterogeneity among studies was computed as I². For category variables across more than one group, the effect size for odds ratios (ORs) with 95% CIs were computed along with I². Similarly, for continuous variables, we computed the effect size for the point estimate of the mean and standard error (SE). For all computations, an alpha level of 0.05 was used. In the present study, we computed both the fixed and random effects. The statistical analyses and computations were done using Comprehensive Meta Analysis version 2.0.

Results

The initial search strategy yielded 289 studies. Of these articles, 59 met the inclusion criteria (Figure 1).^4–62 The mean age of patients presenting with acute diverticulitis was 62.4 ± years, SE 1.38 years. Males represented 46% of the population.

Figure 1.

Search results: Initial search and final selection of articles.

Post-operative mortality

Overall, there were 982 deaths following 134,428 surgical operations for diverticulitis. This yielded a point estimate for mortality of 3.05%, with 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.73–5.32, p < 0.001. We further broke down mortality into the timing of the surgery (emergent or elective), modality (laparoscopic or open), technique (resection with primary anastomosis or Hartmann’s), severity of perforation (Hinchey Class 1 and 2, or Hinchey Class 3 and 4) and the calculated point estimate data.

There were 2079 emergent operations performed, resulting in 260 deaths (mortality of 10.64% with 95% CI 7.95–14.11; p < 0.001); and following 127,169 elective operations, there were 624 deaths (mortality of 0.50% with 95% CI 0.46–0.54; p < 0.001).

A laparoscopic approach was used in 16,170 procedures that had 24 deaths (mortality 0.75%, with 95% CI 0.35–1.58; p < 0.001). An open surgical approach was used in 113,701 cases, with 840 deaths (mortality 4.69%, with 95% CI 2.29–9.36; p < 0.001).

Resection with primary anastomosis was successfully completed in 5546 patients, and 59 of these patients died (mortality 1.96%, with 95% CI 1.22–3.13; p < 0.001). The Hartmann’s procedure was used in 952 patients, resulting in 158 deaths (mortality 14.18%, with 95% CI 9.83–20.03; p < 0.001).

Of the 595 patients presenting with Hinchey Class 3–4, there were 44 deaths post-operatively (mortality 7.87%, with 95% CI 5.86–10.48, p < 0.001). Of the 1186 patients presenting with Hinchey Class 1–2, there were 22 deaths post-operatively (mortality 2.05%, with 95% CI 0.63–6.48; p < 0.001).

Comparative analysis of emergent and elective surgery

There were four studies that reported mortality following emergent and elective surgery separately, within the same cohort, and these were used for a comparative analysis between these two clinical situations.^4–7 There were 493 patients in the emergent surgery group and 199 patients in the elective surgery group. The mortality in the emergent surgery group was 9.78% (95% CI 4.13–21.43) and in the elective surgery group mortality was 1.93% (95% CI 0.53–6.70). The risk of post-operative mortality was significantly higher following emergent surgery, compared to elective surgery (OR: 6.12 with 95% CI 1.62–23.10; p = 0.008; Q = 2.56; p = 0.46; I²= 0).

There were three studies that reported mortality separately, following a laparoscopic approach and an open approach.^8–10 There were 14,671 patients in the laparoscopic group and 110,295 patients in the open group. The mortality in the open surgery group was 0.54% (95% CI 0.49–0.59) and in the laparoscopic surgery group mortality was 0.47% (95% CI 0.07–3.26). Post-operative mortality was significantly higher following an open approach, compared to a laparoscopic approach (OR: 36.43; with 95% CI 9.94–133.6; p < 0.001; Q = 2.79; p = 0.25; I²= 28.26).

There were 18 studies that reported mortality following resection with primary anastomosis without diversion and Hartmann’s procedure.^4,6,11–26 There were 829 patients in the primary anastomosis group and 766 patients in the Hartmann’s procedure group. Post-operative mortality was significantly higher following the Hartmann’s procedure, compared to resection with primary anastomosis without diversion (OR: 25.45; with 95% CI 15.13–42.81; p < 0.001; Q = 23.34; p = 0.14; I²= 27.16).

Post-operative complications

There were 40 studies that reported post-operative complications and these were reviewed in detail.^{8–11,14–16,18–23,25,27–52} Post-operative complications were divided into two categories: surgical and medical. The most commonly reported surgically related complications included: intra-abdominal abscess, anastomotic leak, bleeding, wound infection and wound dehiscence. The most commonly reported medically related complications were: pulmonary embolism, pneumonia, urinary tract infection and myocardial infarction.

Overall and individual complication rates

The overall reported post-operative complication rate was 32.64%; with 95% CI 27.43–38.32; p < 0.001. The overall surgical and medical complication rates were 18.96% and 13.93%, respectively.

The individual surgical complication rates were: intra-abdominal abscess, 3.59% with 95% CI 2.69–4.78, p < 0.001; anastomotic leak, 3.99% with 95% CI 3.07–5.18, p < 0.001; bleeding, 2.13% with 95% CI 1.5–3.02, p < 0.001; wound infection, 6.78% with 95% CI 4.17–10.85, p < 0.001; and wound dehiscence, 2.16% with 95% CI 1.06–4.36, p < 0.001.

The individual medical complications were: pulmonary embolism, 0.83% with 95% CI 0.51–1.35, p < 0.001; pneumonia, 3.7% with 95% CI 1.98–6.81, p < 0.001; urinary tract infection, 3.12% with 95% CI 1.67–5.76, p < 0.001; and myocardial infarction, 1.4% with 95% CI 0.81–2.4, p < 0.001.

The post-operative complication rate following emergent surgery was 53.6% with 95% CI 38.82–67.79, p = 0.046; and following elective surgery was 22.52% with 95% CI 18.54–27.07, p < 0.001. The post-operative complication rate following a laparoscopic approach was 22.48% with 95% CI 17.1–28.96, p < 0.001; and following an open approach, was 41.26% with 95% CI 31.32–51.96, p < 0.001. The overall post-operative complication rate following resection with primary anastomosis was 27.62%, with 95% CI 21.56–34.63, p < 0.001; and following the Hartmann’s procedure, it was 40.55% with 95% CI 6.62–87.72, p = 0.092.

We further analyzed the post-operative surgical complications for each surgical procedure (Table 1).

Table 1.

Surgical variable and complication rate.

Surgical variable and complication	Rate (%)	95% CI	p value
Emergent
Abdominal abscess	5.92	4.36–7.98	< 0.001
Anastomotic leak	8.08	3.41–17.97	< 0.001
Bleeding	2.78	1.50–5.10	< 0.001
Wound infection	16.0	8.71–27.54	< 0.001
Pulmonary embolism	1.66	0.66–4.12	< 0.001
Pneumonia	8.41	4.74–14.49	< 0.001
Urinary tract infection	4.36	1.60–11.36	< 0.001
Elective
Abdominal abscess	1.69	0.96–2.95	< 0.001
Anastomotic leak	3.21	2.18–4.71	< 0.001
Bleeding	2.85	1.89–4.27	< 0.001
Wound infection	4.38	2.30–8.16	< 0.001
Pulmonary embolism	0.62	0.25–1.54	< 0.001
Pneumonia	2.27	1.45–3.55	< 0.001
Urinary tract infection	2.87	1.21–6.66	< 0.001
Laparoscopic
Abdominal abscess	1.72	0.99–2.97	< 0.001
Anastomotic leak	2.38	2.15–2.63	< 0.001
Bleeding	2.50	1.35–4.60	< 0.001
Wound infection	3.74	1.53–8.85	< 0.001
Pulmonary embolism	0.68	0.24–1.93	< 0.001
Pneumonia	0.99	0.84–1.17	< 0.001
Urinary tract infection	2.21	1.32–3.66	< 0.001
Open
Abdominal abscess	4.74	3.48–6.42	< 0.001
Anastomotic leak	5.71	3.56–9.04	< 0.001
Bleeding	2.10	1.41–3.10	< 0.001
Wound infection	8.63	4.01–17.62	< 0.001
Pulmonary embolism	1.56	0.85–2.83	< 0.001
Pneumonia	4.96	2.05–11.55	< 0.001
Urinary tract infection	3.41	1.21–9.22	< 0.001
Primary anastomosis
Abdominal abscess	2.12	1.15–3.87	< 0.001
Anastomotic leak	3.99	3.07–5.18	< 0.001
Bleeding	2.72	1.85–3.98	< 0.001
Wound infection	6.34	4.27–9.33	< 0.001
Wound dehiscence	2.01	0.96–4.18	< 0.001
Pulmonary embolism	0.82	0.41–1.64	< 0.001
Pneumonia	3.33	2.29–4.81	< 0.001
Urinary tract infection	2.57	1.55–4.22	< 0.001
Myocardial infarction	1.46	0.82–2.60	< 0.001
Hartmann’s
Abdominal abscess	8.55	6.44–11.27	< 0.001
Bleeding	2.05	0.81–5.07	< 0.001
Wound infection	17.05	8.11–32.39	< 0.001
Wound dehiscence	6.93	3.66–12.76	< 0.001
Pulmonary embolism	2.83	1.38–5.69	< 0.001
Pneumonia	8.29	3.68–17.64	< 0.001
Urinary tract infection	3.22	0.62–15.03	< 0.001
Myocardial infarction	4.76	2.53–8.78	< 0.001

Figure 2 shows the funnel plot for publication bias. The point estimate of the mortality rate out of the number of surgeries in 57 studies showed that there was significant publication bias. The Begg-Mazumdar Test of interdependence of variance and effect size, using the Kendall method, showed bias (Kendall's tau = −0.4825; p < 0.0001). The test for asymmetry of the funnel plot also showed bias (Egger: bias = 0.96343 (95% CI 1.67338–5.53488); p = 0.00044).

Figure 2.

Funnel plot of published articles.

Discussion

The results of this study showed that there was a substantial risk for mortality after emergent surgery for diverticulitis, which needs to be considered in clinical decision-making. In emergency situations, the estimated mortality was 10%, with the highest rates seen in patients with disease rated at Hinchey 3 and Hinchey 4. On the other hand, elective surgery for diverticulitis was associated with a significantly lower mortality rate of 0.5%. In that latter group, the morbidity after surgery may be a more important factor in clinical decision-making.

Recent guidelines recommend urgent sigmoid colectomy for patients with acute diverticulitis in whom non-operative therapy fails.⁶³ The literature is replete with uncontrolled studies. Given the shortcomings in the literature, the clinician must weigh the risk of surgery with a protracted post-operative course, with a primary colorectal anastomosis performed at the time of the initial procedure; versus the alternative, a proximal diversion procedure that could well become permanent.

Surgical treatment of diverticulitis is in a state of evolution. In 2006, the guidelines of the American College of Colon and Rectal Surgeons stopped recommending surgery after two episodes of diverticulitis.⁶⁴ The most recently published guidelines now recommend that the decision should be individualized.⁶⁵ The decisions that are based on the severity of symptoms, disruption of quality of life and the number of attacks have significant limitations. The guidelines do not provide estimates of how many patients remain symptomatic despite surgery; and the risk of surgical complications is often poorly understood by patients and their caregivers. Therefore, patients are often confused about their choices and some studies suggest that patients expect surgery to cure them of symptoms. Many patients remain symptomatic after surgery; it is unclear whether their symptoms are due to diverticulosis, irritable bowel syndrome or other factors.

Our analysis has some limitations, due to the variable nature of reporting in the studies reviewed. The impact of individual patient variables (age, co-morbidities, gender and number of previous attacks of diverticulitis) could not be assessed, as they were not reported in detail. Similarly, we cannot make any conclusions in this paper about the quality or training of the surgeon, nor the hospital setting (community hospitals versus academic centers), nor the impact of high-volume centers, compared to low volume ones; as these data were not reported.

In the past, surgery was considered for diverticulitis when the patient had suffered two or more episodes of acute diverticulitis. Recent data on the natural history of diverticulitis suggests that only one-third of patients with an attack of diverticulitis will have another attack; and roughly 30% of those whom have two will have another episode later. Most of these episodes retain the same degree of severity as the initial episode. Our study provided a summary of the risks associated with emergent and elective surgery for diverticulitis. While surgery may be inevitable in the complicated cases with diverticulitis, the ambulatory patient with a history of one or two episodes of diverticulitis presents a more difficult challenge in clinical practice. We agree with the views expressed in a recent Italian consensus on diverticulitis, in which the authors state that a recommendation for surgery has to balance the severity of symptoms, the risk of recurrence and the morbidity of surgery.⁶⁶ We hope that the quantitative data on the complications that we have provided in our study will help a clinician managing a patient with diverticulitis to evaluate the risks and benefits of a planned procedure. Quantitative data may also help patients to determine if they wish to undertake the risk of surgery, compared to the risk of another attack of diverticulitis.

Footnotes

Funding

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Conflict of interest

None declared.

References

Regensbogen

Hardiman

Hendren

. Surgery for diverticulitis in the 21st century. J Am Med Ass Surg 2014; 149: 292–302.

Simianu

Bastawrous

Billingham

. Addressing the appropriateness of elective colon resection for diverticulitis. Ann Surg 2014; 260: 533–539.

Hinchey

Schaal

Richards

. Treatment of perforated diverticular disease of the colon. Adv Surg 1978; 12: 85–109.

Ambrosetti

Robert

Witzig

. Acute left colonic diverticulitis: A prospective analysis of 226 consecutive cases. Surgery 1994; 115: 546–550.

Biondo

Borao

Kreisler

. Recurrence and virulence of colonic diverticulitis in immunocompromised patients. Am J Surg 2012; 204: 172–179.

Gregg

. An ideal operation for diverticulitis of the colon. Am J Surg 1987; 153: 285–290.

Nylamo

. Diverticulitis of the colon: Role of surgery in preventing complications. Ann Chir Gynaecol 1990; 79: 139–142.

Klarenbeek

Veenhof

Bergamaschi

. Laparoscopic sigmoid resection for diverticulitis decreases major morbidity rates: A randomized control trial. Short-term results of the Sigma Trial. Ann Surg 2009; 249: 39–44.

Masoomi

Buchberg

Nguyen

. Outcomes of laparoscopic versus open colectomy in elective surgery for diverticulitis. World J Surg 2011; 35: 2143–2148.

10.

Senagore

Duepree

Delaney

. Cost structure of laparoscopic and open sigmoid colectomy for diverticular disease. Dis Colon Rectum 2002; 45: 485–490.

11.

Alvarez

Baldonedo

Bear

. Outcome and prognostic factors of morbidity and mortality in perforated sigmoid diverticulitis. Int Surg 2009; 94: 240–248.

12.

Binda

Saccomani

Gramegna

. Emergency surgery of complicated colonic diverticulitis. Acta Chir Belg 1993; 93: 253–257.

13.

Biondo

Pares

Marti Rague

. Acute colonic diverticulitis in patients under 50 years of age. Br J Surg 2002; 89: 1137–1141.

14.

Blair

Germann

. Surgical management of acute sigmoid diverticulitis. Am J Surg 2002; 18: 252–528.

15.

Eisenstat

Rubin

Salvati

. Surgical management of diverticulitis: The role of the Hartmann procedure. Dis Colon Rectum 1983; 26: 429–432.

16.

Herzog

Janot

Belyaev

. Complicated sigmoid diverticulitis: Hartmann’s procedure or primary anastomosis? Acta Chir Belg 2011; 111: 378–383.

17.

Kirson

. Diverticulitis: Management patterns in a community hospital. Southern Med J 1988; 81: 972–977.

18.

Maggard

Chandler

Schmit

. Surgical diverticulitis: Treatment options. Am Surg 2001; 67: 1185–1189.

19.

Makela

Kiviniemi

Laitinen

. Prognostic factors of perforated sigmoid diverticulitis in the elderly. Dig Surg 2005; 22: 100–106.

20.

Medina

Papanicolaou

Tadros

. Acute perforated diverticulitis: Primary resection and anastomosis? Conn Med 1991; 55: 258–261.

21.

Netri

Verbo

Coco

. The role of surgical treatment in colon diverticulitis: Indications and results. Ann Ital Chir 2000; 71: 209–215.

22.

Pasternak

Dietrich

Woodman

. Use of severity classification systems in the surgical decision making process in emergency laparotomy for perforated diverticulitis. Int J Colorectal Dis 2010; 25: 463–470.

23.

Regenet

Pessaux

Hennekinne

. Primary anastomosis after intraoperative colonic lavage versus Hartmann’s procedure in generalized peritonitis complicating diverticular disease of the colon. Int J Colorectal Dis 2003; 18: 503–507.

24.

Smirniots

Tsoutsos

Fotopouls

. Perforated diverticulitis: A surgical dilemma. Int Surg 1991; 76: 44–47.

25.

Stumpf

Vinces

Edwards

. Is primary anastomosis safe in the surgical management of complications of acute diverticulitis? Am Surg 2007; 73: 787–791.

26.

Vermeulen

Akkersdijk

Gosselink

. Outcome after emergency surgery for acute perforated diverticulitis in 200 cases. Dig Surg 2007; 24: 361–366.

27.

Acosta

Grebenc

Doberneck

. Colonic diverticular disease in patients 40 years old or younger. Am Surg 1992; 58: 605–607.

28.

Backmann

Krause

Rawnaq

. Impact of early or delayed elective resection in complicated diverticulitis. World J Gastroenterol 2011; 17: 5274–5279.

29.

Bell

Panton

ONM

. Hartmann resection for perforated sigmoid diverticulitis. Dis Colon Rectum 1984; 27: 253–256.

30.

Bouillot

Berthou

Champault

. Elective laparoscopic colonic resection for diverticular disease: Results in a multicenter study in 179 patients. Surg Endosc 2002; 16: 1320–1323.

31.

Bretagnol

Pautrat

Mor

. Emergency laparoscopic management of perforated sigmoid diverticulitis: A promising alternative to more radical procedures. J Am Coll Surg 2008; 206: 654–657.

32.

Bruce

Coller

Murray

. Laparoscopic resection for diverticular disease. Dis Colon Rectum 1996; 39: S1–6.

33.

Caballero

Olmo

Alvarez

. Acute diverticulitis and diverticular disease of the colon: A safe indication for laparoscopic surgery. Rev Esp Enferm Dig 2000; 92: 718–721.

34.

Chouillard

Maggiori

Ata

. Laparoscopic two-stage left colonic resection for patients with peritonitis caused by acute diverticulitis. Dis Colon Rectum 2007; 50: 1–7.

35.

Gervaz

Inan

Perneger

. A prospective, randomized, single-blind comparison of laparoscopic versus open sigmoid colectomy for diverticulitis. Ann Surg 2010; 252: 3–8.

36.

Hoemke

Treckmann

Schmitz

. Complicated diverticulitis of the sigmoid: A prospective study concerning primary resection with secure primary anastomosis. Dig Surg 1999; 16: 420–424.

37.

Illert

Engemann

Thiede

. Success in treatment of complicated diverticular disease is stage related. Int J Colorectal Dis 2001; 16: 276–279.

38.

Jones

Stevenson

ARL

Clark

. Laparoscopic resection for diverticular disease follow-up of 500 consecutive patients. Ann Surg 2008; 248: 1092–1097.

39.

Kaiser

Jiang

Lake

. The management of complicated diverticulitis and the role of computed tomography. Am J Gastroenterol 2005; 100: 910–917.

40.

Killingback

Barron

Dent

. Elective surgery for diverticular disease: An audit of surgical pathology and treatment. A NZ J Surg 2004; 74: 530–536.

41.

Kirchhoff

Matz

Dincler

. Predictive risk factors for intra- and post-operative complications in 526 laparoscopic sigmoid resections due to recurrent diverticulitis: A multivariate analysis. World J Surg 2011; 35: 677–683.

42.

. Elective laparoscopic surgical management of recurrent and complicated sigmoid diverticulitis. Tech Coloproctol 2008; 12: 201–206.

43.

Mallonga

Brummelkamp

Van Gulik

. The Hartmann procedure: Its role in acute complicated diverticulitis. Nether J Surg 1986; 38: 171–174.

44.

Martel

Bouchard

Soto

. Laparoscopic colectomy for complex diverticular disease: A justifiable choice? Surg Endosc 2010; 24: 2273–2280.

45.

Oomen

JLT

Engel

Cuesta

. Mortality after acute surgery for complications of diverticular disease of the sigmoid colon is almost exclusively due to patient-related factors. Colorect Dis 2005; 8: 112–119.

46.

Pendlimari

Touzios

Azodo

. Short-term outcomes after elective minimally invasive colectomy for diverticulitis. Br J Surg 2011; 98: 431–435.

47.

Reissfelder

Buhr

Ritz

. Can laparoscopically assisted sigmoid resection provide uncomplicated management even in cases of complicated diverticulitis? Surg Endosc 2006; 20: 1055–1059.

48.

Scheidbach

Schneider

Rose

. Laparoscopic approach to treatment of sigmoid diverticulitis: Changes in the spectrum of indications and results of a prospective, multicenter study on 1545 patients. Dis Colon Rectum 2004; 47: 1883–1888.

49.

Schwandner

Farke

Fischer

. Laparoscopic colectomy for recurrent and complicated diverticulitis: A prospective study of 396 patients. Arch Surg 2004; 389: 97–103.

50.

Tabbara

Velmahos

Butt

. Missed opportunities for primary repair in complicated acute diverticulitis. Surgery 2010; 148: 919–924.

51.

Thorn

Graf

Stefansson

. Clinical and functional results after elective colonic resection in 75 consecutive patients with diverticular disease. Am J Surg 2002; 183: 7–11.

52.

Tuech

Pessaux

Rouge

. Laparoscopic versus open colectomy for sigmoid diverticulitis: A prospective comparative study in the elderly. Surg Endosc 2000; 14: 1031–1033.

53.

Thale

Weiss

Nogueras

. Recurrence rates at a minimum 5-year follow-up: Laparoscopic versus open sigmoid resection for uncomplicated diverticulitis. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2003; 13: 325–327.

54.

Pittet

Kotzampassakis

Schmidt

. Recurrent left colonic diverticulitis episodes: More severe than the initial diverticulitis? World J Surg 2009; 33: 547–552.

55.

Kronborg

. Treatment of perforated sigmoid diverticulitis: A prospective randomized trial. Br J Surg 1993; 80: 505–507.

56.

John

SKP

Teo

Forster

. A prospective study of acute admissions in a surgical unit due to diverticular disease. Dig Surg 2007; 24: 186–190.

57.

Egger

Peter

Candinas

. Persistent symptoms after elective sigmoid resection for diverticulitis. Dis Colon Rectum 2008; 51: 1004–1048.

58.

Chandra

Nelson

Larson

. Impact of primary resection on the outcome of patients with perforated diverticulitis. Arch Surg 2004; 139: 1221–1224.

59.

Benn

Wolff

Ilstrup

. Level of anastomosis and recurrent colonic diverticulitis. Am J Surg 1986; 151: 269–271.

60.

Bergamaschi

Arnaud

. Anastomosis level and specimen length in surgery for uncomplicated diverticulitis of the sigmoid. Surg Endosc 1998; 12: 1149–1151.

61.

Bahadursingh

Virgo

Kaminski

. Spectrum of disease and outcome of complicated diverticular disease. Am J Surg 2003; 186: 696–701.

62.

Ambrosetti

Grossholz

Becker

. Computed tomography in acute left colonic diverticulitis. Br J Surg 1997; 84: 532–534.

63.

Andersen

Bundagaard

Elbrond

. Danish national guidelines for treatment of diverticular disease. Danish Med J 2012; 59: C4453–C4453.

64.

Rafferty

Shellito

Hyman

. Practice parameters for sigmoid diverticulitis. Dis Colon Rectum 2006; 49: 939–944.

65.

Feingold

Steele

Lee

. Practice parameters for the treatment of sigmoid diverticulitis. Dis Colon Rectum 2014; 57: 284–294.

66.

Cuomo

Barbara

Pace

. Italian consensus conference for colonic diverticulosis and diverticular disease. Unit Europ Gastroenterol J 2014; 2: 413–442.