Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Vascularized composite allotransplantation represents the final level of the reconstructive ladder, offering treatment options for severe tissue loss and functional deficiencies. Vascularized composite allotransplantation is particularly susceptible to ischemia–reperfusion injury and requires preservation techniques when subjected to extended storage times prior to transplantation. While static cold storage functions to reduce ischemic damage and is widely employed in clinical settings, there exists no consensus on the ideal preservation solution for vascularized composite allotransplantation. This review aims to highlight current clinical and experimental advances in preservation solution development and their critical role in attenuating ischemia–reperfusion injury in the context of vascularized composite allotransplantation.

Keywords

Vascularized composite allotransplantation ischemia–reperfusion injury preservation solution

Introduction

Vascularized composite allotransplantation (VCA) is the simultaneous transplant of units composed of several different tissues. The field of VCA has seen remarkable growth since 1998, when the first successful hand¹ and laryngeal transplantation² were performed. Advances in immunologic control, which aim to prevent acute and chronic allorejection,³ have been responsible for the progress in the field of VCA, and have facilitated successful expansion into lower extremity,⁴ facial,⁵ penile,⁶ and uterine transplantation.⁷ Despite these advancements in the field of VCA, acute rejection within the first year continues to occur in over 80% of all upper extremity and face transplants, thus highlighting the infancy of the field and the importance of continued development to reduce these effects and improve graft functionality to facilitate widespread use of VCA.⁸

VCA is particularly susceptible to ischemia–reperfusion injury (IRI) since it involves the transplantation of highly metabolically active tissues. This is known to be one of the primary determinants of tissue survival in VCA. IRI triggers an inflammatory cascade which ultimately results in tissue dysfunction, poor graft function, and survival. There is no effective treatment for IRI, and thus efforts center around prevention and minimization by reducing ischemia time and the metabolic activity of tissue during storage. Static cold storage (SCS) and limiting ischemia time to a maximum of 4–6 h are two such ways in which this is undertaken.^9–12 While many different preservation solutions exist, each with theoretical advantages, there is no gold standard preservation solution for use in experimental or clinical studies of VCA.¹³ This review aims to highlight current clinical and experimental advances in preservation solution development and their critical role in attenuating IRI.

Cellular and molecular events during IRI

IRI is considered the first insult in VCA, with a complex molecular and cellular pathophysiology. Mechanisms of IRI in skin,¹⁴ skeletal muscle,¹⁵ uterus,¹⁶ and penis¹⁷ have been previously described with differing injury responses related to unique properties of the individual tissues. Among the various tissue types contained in an allograft, muscle tissue is the most metabolically active, and is thus highly susceptibility to IRI.¹¹ Events during ischemic and reperfusion injuries are summarized in Figures 1 and 2, respectively.

Figure 1.

Pathophysiological events of ischemic injury.

Figure 2.

Pathophysiological events of reperfusion injury.

Ischemic injury

Ischemia indicates a loss of oxygenated blood supply resulting in a necessary transition from aerobic to anaerobic metabolism.¹⁸ Due to shunting of pyruvate to the homolactic fermentation pathway, an excess of lactate and protons are generated within the cytoplasm.¹⁸ In muscle tissue, it has been shown that lactate production occurs continuously for up to 6 h, after which exhaustive depletion of adenosine triphosphate (ATP) results in irreversible tissue death.^18,19 The limited ATP produced from lactic acid fermentation is primarily used for maintaining ion concentration gradients and membrane potential.^15,18 Under normal aerobic conditions, adenosine diphosphate (ADP) is reused for ATP production through oxidative phosphorylation. However, during prolonged ischemia, ADP accumulation results in an equilibrium shift toward synthesis of hypoxanthine, a substrate that contributes to reactive oxygen species (ROS) production during reperfusion.²⁰ Low cytosolic ATP eventually results in altered ion transporter function, leading to increased intracellular Na⁺, Ca²⁺, and H⁺ concentrations.^21–23 The high osmolarity buildup caused by intracellular Na⁺ and Ca²⁺ results in an influx of water that causes cell swelling.¹⁸ In ischemic tissues, high intracellular Ca²⁺ also contributes to the irreversible conversion of xanthine dehydrogenase (XDH) to xanthine oxidase (XO).^24,25 XO is considered to be critical in the generation of ROS upon reperfusion, using hypoxanthine and xanthine as a substrate.²⁴ In the event that reperfusion does not occur, accumulation of Ca²⁺ can cause degradation of important cellular enzymes, such as phospholipases, lysozymes, and proteases, which contribute to cell death.¹⁸

In the mitochondria, inhibition of the electron transport chain (ETC) caused by anoxia leads to a reduction in mitochondrial membrane potential (ΔΨ_M).^26,27 Through a positive feedback loop, the lowered ΔΨ_M further inhibits the Complex III of the ETC, producing superoxide (O₂^{• −}) molecules and other derived ROS.^18,24,28,29 The O₂^{• −} molecules are further oxidized to hydrogen peroxide (H₂O₂) by superoxide dismutase or spontaneous disproportionation.³⁰ These ROS are degraded by non-enzymatic antioxidants, such as glutathione, depleting available antioxidants, and making cells more vulnerable to oxidative stress from ensuing reperfusion.^18,31

The mitochondrial permeability transition pore (mPTP) is hypothesized to transiently open during ischemia to protect cells by reducing cytosolic Ca²⁺³² Opening of the mPTP further dissipates ΔΨ_M, impairing ATP production. The mPTP is regulated by many different signals, including pH, Ca²⁺, ROS, and ATP, however, the specific mechanisms by which these affect the mPTP remain unknown.^18,33 Although buildup of ROS and Ca²⁺ in mitochondria and decreased available ATP prime the mPTP for opening, low cellular pH prevents the pore from fully opening.^34,35

Reperfusion injury

Reintroduction of O₂ at the onset of reperfusion is the primary source of ROS.¹⁸ In the presence of O₂, XO catalyzes the conversion of hypoxanthine to xanthine and xanthine to urate in the extracellular environment and on the cell surfaces of endothelial and skeletal muscle cells.²¹ The ROS by-products of this reaction further convert nearby XDH to XO.²⁵ In this way, ROS represent a feed-forward mechanism by which XDH–XO conversion occurs and accounts for further ROS generation.²⁴ Urate, a type of damage-associated molecular pattern (DAMP), induces a sterile inflammatory response through binding to intracellular protein complexes known as inflammasomes.^36,37 Inflammasomes mediate cytokine production and in the context of IRI can trigger a cytokine storm.^15,36 In addition, DAMPs are recognized by toll-like receptors, a type of pattern recognition receptor on cell surfaces of innate immune cells.¹¹ Through this mechanism, and by chemokine signals provided by resident macrophages and endothelial cells, neutrophils are recruited and activated at the site of ischemic tissue.³⁸ Activated neutrophils are responsible for a significant burst of ROS and are implicated in the development of the no-reflow phenomenon, in which capillaries fail to reperfuse due to plugging by leukocytes.³⁹ In this way, tissues serviced by small blood vessels do not reperfuse and consequently do not receive O₂, making them more susceptible to cell death. Furthermore, DAMP-mediated activation of antigen-presenting cells results in an increase in effector T-cells.⁴⁰ Thus, reperfusion following prolonged ischemia enhances the adaptive immune response, contributing to both acute and chronic rejection of the VCA graft.^15,36,41

At the time of reperfusion, restoration of blood supply washes out accumulated H⁺ in the intravascular space resulting in normalization of the extracellular pH.¹⁸ The removal of extracellular ions creates an osmotic gradient, with high intracellular osmolarity caused by the Na⁺ and Ca²⁺ that accumulated during ischemia. Consequently, further cell swelling induced by hypoosmotic stress leads to water influx and irreversible damage to the plasma membrane, organelle breakdown, and cell membrane rupture.⁴²

While the return of oxygenated blood results in a transition from anaerobic back to aerobic respiration pathways, mitochondria damaged during ischemia continue to produce ROS due to aberrant oxidative phosphorylation caused by the altered-ETC (a-ETC). The ROS cannot be eliminated because the non-enzymatic antioxidant defenses are greatly reduced or entirely depleted during ischemic generation of ROS.¹⁸ Although the mitochondrion is not the predominant source of ROS, these ROS contribute to secondary tissue damage and inflammation.^18,43

After normalization of intracellular pH at the onset of reperfusion, the mPTP opens and allows cytosolic Ca²⁺ to enter the mitochondria.¹⁸ This results in uncoupling of oxidative phosphorylation and further reduction of ΔΨ_M.⁴⁴ In addition, water influx into the mitochondria, caused by the established osmolar gap, leads to mitochondrial swelling and rupture.⁴⁴ In this way, opening of the mPTP in a single mitochondria places additional strain on remaining mitochondria to meet the cellular energy demand.⁴⁴ ROS and cytosolic Ca²⁺ continue to increase due to other enzymatic activity, resulting in a vicious cycle in which total cellular dysfunction occurs after mitochondrial failure.^18,33 As such, opening of the mPTP represents an important step in tissue death following IRI.⁴⁴

Components of preservation solutions

Preservation solutions are formulated based on three broad principles: (1) providing a physical and biochemical environment that maintains viability of cells during ischemia, (2) minimizing damage associated with reperfusion injury, and (3) providing a temperature for preservation at which the solution does not freeze or coagulate.^45,46 Preservation solutions are commonly differentiated based on their Na⁺/K⁺ ratio, wherein high Na⁺ corresponds to an extracellular-type solution (ETS) and high K⁺ corresponds to an intracellular-type solution (ITS). An ITS maintains intracellular ion concentration by creating a temporary cation equilibrium that compensates for the lack of active transport during ischemia.⁴⁷ Euro-Collins solution (ECS) is one such ITS that was historically used widely in solid organ transplantation (SOT).^45,48 High K⁺ ITS perfusates were found to induce vasoconstriction and enhance the no-reflow phenomenon during IRI, and have thus fallen out of favor for use in some SOT.⁴⁹ ETS was developed to reduce vascular endothelial cell damage and creates a postischemic environment that enhances recovery of the Na⁺/K⁺–ATPase in ischemic cells.^45,48 ETS are most commonly used for tissues that are more tolerant to ischemic damage, wherein stabilization of cation flux is not as critical.⁴⁵ While ETS and ITS each have strengths and limitations, no conclusion on superiority of one over the other can be made as the protective effects are specific to tissue/organ type.^45,48 This trend is observed and particularly important in VCA. The susceptibility to IRI is dependent on the specific tissue composition of the whole graft and also of each component within the VCA.¹¹

Other ions

Calcium in preservation solutions has been shown to have varying effects on organ injury and survival based on the length of preservation time and type of tissue.⁵⁰ More specifically, Ca²⁺ addition to University of Wisconsin solution (UWS) showed improved preservation of rat liver that was preserved for 24 h, but no improved protection in liver stored for 48 h.⁵⁰ Magnesium demonstrates a protective effect on endothelial cells through preservation of membrane hyperpolarization and reversal of K⁺-induced membrane depolarization in smooth muscles.^51,52 Anions, including Cl⁻, PO₄³⁻, HCO³⁻, and SO₄²⁻, act as counterions and buffers. Buffers are crucial in maintaining physiological pH and thereby preserving cell membrane integrity and protein conformations.^45,48

Saccharides

Saccharides are used in some preservations solutions to act as osmotic barriers, thereby reducing cell edema during ischemia.⁵³ Glucose was initially used in early preservation solutions; however, slow penetration of glucose into the cell when added in large quantities exacerbates acidosis and is therefore no longer added to preservation solutions.⁴⁵ Sucrose, trehalose, raffinose, lactobionate, and mannitol are used as substitutes to glucose as they have all proven to be more effective impermeant agents.^45,54 Furthermore, raffinose and lactobionate are metabolically inert, thereby reducing contribution to lactate buildup during ischemia. Mannitol also acts as an indirect antioxidant by upregulating levels of catalase in tissue under oxidative stress.^55,56 Catalase catalyzes the breakdown of H₂O₂ to H₂O and O₂.⁵⁶ In general, antioxidants reduce oxidative stress in ischemic tissue and are key contributors in attenuating IRI.

Amino acids and derivatives

Amino acids are important metabolic substrates during glucose deprivation and are thus incorporated in some preservation solutions to serve as an alternative energy source in graft tissue.⁵³ Histidine is a commonly employed buffer in medicine and is also added to preservation solutions for this purpose. N-acetyl-L-histidine is used in place of histidine in newer perfusates as histidine was found to produce cell injury through iron-dependent ROS production.^57,58 Aspartate, α-ketoglutarate, and glutamate are important metabolites in the citric acid cycle.⁴⁸ Arginine has been shown to improve endothelial function of ischemic grafts through nitric oxide-mediated protection against IRI.^58,59 Experimental data have shown that glycine and alanine provide minor protection against hypoxic injury; however, the mechanism of their action remains unknown.^48,60 Partially oxidized tryptophan metabolites, such as serotonin and melatonin, have also been shown to have ROS scavenging capacity.⁶¹

Colloids

Colloids act as extracellular oncotic agents with the primary function of reducing cell swelling. The size of colloids used in preservation solutions is optimized to maximize surface area for H₂O adsorption and minimize clearance and entry into the lymphatic system.⁶² Early preservation solutions derived from whole blood used human serum albumin (HSA) as the primary oncotic agent; however, with the clinical success of UWS, pentafraction replaced HSA as the primary colloid of choice.⁶³ Pentafraction is a solution of biodegradable hydroxyethyl starch macromolecules with molecular weights between 10 and 100 kDa. Alternative colloids, such as dextran 40, a 40 kDa dextran solution, gluconate, and polyethylene glycol-20/35, a 20 or 35 kDa polyethylene glycol solution, have been shown to successfully substitute pentafraction in experimental models and clinical settings.^54,63,64 In addition, dextran 40 and gluconate are less expensive to prepare and are thus incorporated in newer perfusates.⁶³

Other additives

Heparin is a linear highly sulfated glycosaminoglycan which serves as an anticoagulant in preservation solutions. Reduced glutathione is a sulfur-based endogenously found non-enzymatic antioxidant. Allopurinol is a hypoxanthine structural isomer that competitively inhibits binding of hypoxanthine and xanthine to XO, thereby reducing ROS generation.¹⁸ Deferoxamine and LK-614 are iron chelators that also reduce the generation of ROS as caused by the Fenton reaction.⁶⁵ In the Fenton reaction, free Fe²⁺ catalyzes the breakdown of H₂O₂ to hydroxyl radicals, which greatly increases oxidative stress of ischemic tissue.⁶⁶ Deferoxamine and LK-614 are used in combination as deferoxamine has poor membrane permeability compared with LK-614, but is a stronger iron chelator.⁶⁵ Finally, adenosine is added in preservation solutions to serve as a precursor for ATP synthesis.

pH and osmolarity

Preservation solutions are maintained at or near physiological pH with added buffers to compensate for acidosis during ischemia.¹⁵ Osmolarity of perfusates vary based on the oncotic agents present. Generally, newer preservation solutions maintain a higher osmolarity than blood to prevent cellular edema in ischemic tissue.^15,18

History of preservation solutions in SOT

Significant strides have been made in the research of preservation solutions as they relate to SOT. While these organs have very different needs than VCA, much can be learned about techniques employed in SOT. Historically, solid organs were preserved at room temperature by dynamic perfusion with oxygenated blood;⁶⁷ however, this method was complex and was not economically feasible, which limited its availability and transportability.⁴⁶ In 1969, Collins et al.⁴⁷ developed SCS when they described successful preservation of canine kidneys using a hypothermic saline solution which proved to be far simpler and more cost-efficient for organ transportation. Today, SCS is a commonly employed preservation technique prior to transplantation.⁶⁸ The primary mode of action of SCS is to induce hypothermia of graft tissue to reduce cellular demand. As much as two-fold reductions in metabolic activity per 10°C reduction in temperature below 37°C have been reported.⁶⁸ In general, lower organ temperatures maintain reserves of ATP and its derivatives more effectively.⁶⁹ Notably, temperatures below 2°C significantly increase the risk of deleterious cold injury which incites protein denaturation and is thus detrimental to graft survival.⁶⁹ In contrast, temperatures above 8°C greatly increase metabolic activity, which can lead to a faster time to onset of irreversible hypoxic injury.⁶⁹ Thus, the ideal temperature range used for SCS is between 2°C and 8°C, and in most cases chosen to be 4°C.

Although there are a multitude of preservation solutions described and there is regional variation in protocols for organ transplant, common practices have been established in transplantation for organs, such as kidneys, liver, and lung.

In kidney transplant, UWS, histidine–tryptophan–ketoglutarate solution (HTKS), and Celsior solution have all demonstrated significantly lower rates of delayed graft function when compared with ECS.^53,70,71 Randomized clinical trials comparing these three solutions have demonstrated equivalent results.⁷² In the setting of kidney transplantation, these solutions are often administered through hypothermic machine perfusion rather than SCS alone.

The advent of UWS in 1987 also resulted in tremendous benefit to liver transplant outcomes.⁷³ This solution has been adopted as a gold-standard cold storage solution in liver transplant as it has resulted in improved cold ischemia tolerance.^73,74

In lung transplant, experimental and clinical models have demonstrated improved transplant outcomes with the use of Perfadex solution as compared with ECS.^75–77 Lung tissue has a unique property in that inflated lungs can continue to maintain aerobic metabolism during cold ischemia.⁷⁶ This means that the primary obstacle in successful lung transplant is not only IRI as is the case in the setting of most other organ transplant, and also a challenge of attaining adequate PaO₂ in donor patients to meet the criteria for lung transplant.⁷⁸ In this patient group, gas exchange is often impeded by clinical variables, such as excessive crystalloid administration during organ harvest, reduced oncotic pressure stemming from hemodilution, and the development of pulmonary edema.^78,79 To combat this obstacle, ex-vivo lung perfusion with Steen solution, a hyperoncotic serum that is designed to dehydrate the lungs, has been implemented. In the setting of lung transplant, edematous lungs that would otherwise be unsuitable for transplantation are effectively rehabilitated. This technique requires that the lungs be immersed in Steen solution while topical extracorporeal membrane oxygenation is undertaken around the lungs. Ex-vivo lung perfusion has been effectively implemented in a clinical setting to facilitate transplantation of donor lungs that would otherwise have been deemed unsuitable for transplant.⁷⁹

Preservation solutions used in VCA

To date, there have been no preservation solutions that have been specifically designed or studied for use in VCA. The preservation solutions that have been studied experimentally and employed clinically for use in VCA were initially designed for SOT. A detailed breakdown of the composition of the most commonly used preservation solutions in SOT and those used in VCA can be found in Table 1.

Table 1.

Composition of preservation solutions used in animal models and clinical practice for VCA.

Composition	UW	HTK	IGL-1	Celsior	Scot	EC	Perfadex	HTK-N	TiProtec	ETK	KH
Sodium	25	16	125	100	118	10	138	16	16	100	143
Chloride	0	50	0	41.5	128.9	15	142	30	103.1	0	125.2
Potassium	125	10	25	15	5	115	6	10	93	44	5.9
Calcium	0	15^a	0	0.26	1.75	0	0.3	0.02	0.05	0	1.25
Magnesium	5	4	5	13	1.2	0	0.8	8	8	0	1.2
Phosphate	25	0	25	0	0	57.5	0.8	0	1	25	1.2
Sulfate	5	0	5	0	0	0	0.8	0	0	0	1.2
Bicarbonate	0	0	0	0	0	10	1	0	0	0	25
Glucose	0	0	0	0	11	19.5	5	0	10	0	11
Mannitol	0	30	0	60	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
Sucrose	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	33	20	0	0
Raffinose	30	0	30	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
Trehalose	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	120	0
Lactobionate	100	0	100	80	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
Histidine	0	198	0	30	0	0	0	124	0	0	0
N-Acetyl-L-histidine	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	57	30	0	0
α-Ketoglutarate	0	1	0	0	0	0	0	2	2	0	0
Aspartate	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	5	5	0	0
Arginine	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	0	0	0
Glycine	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	10	10	0	0
Alanine	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	5	5	0	0
Tryptophan	0	2	0	0	0	0	0	2	2	0	0
Glutamate	0	0	0	20	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
Adenosine	5	0	5	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
Pentafraction	50	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	30	0
Dextran 40	0	0	0	0	0	0	50	0	0	0	0
Gluconate	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	100	0
PEG-35	0	0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
PEG-20	0	0	0	0	30	0	0	0	0	0	0
Glutathione	3	0	3	3	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
Allopurinol	1	0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
Deferoxamine	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	25^a	82^a	0	0
LK-614	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	7.5^a	17^a	0	0
pH	7.4	7.02–7.2	7.4	7.3	7.5	7.4	7.4	7.0–7.1	7	7.4	7.8
Osmolarity	320	310	290	360	302	355	295	302	305	370	380
Intracellular/extracellular	I	I	E	E	E	I	E	I	I	E	E
Clinical use reported in VCA	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	No	No	No	No	No	No

VCA: vascularized composite allotransplantation; E: extracellular; EC: Euro-Collins; ETK: extracellular-trehalose-Kyoto; HTK: histidine–tryptophan–ketoglutarate; HTK-N: histidine–tryptophan–ketoglutarate-new; I: intracellular; IGL-1: Institut Georges Lopez-1; KH: Krebs–Henseleit; PEG-20/35: polyethylene glycol-20/35; UW: University of Wisconsin.

All units are in mmol/L except Dextran 40, pentafraction, and PEG-20/35, which are in g/L.

× 10⁻³.

Animal models

Over the past four decades, innovations in VCA animal models have helped expand the geographic boundaries of the VCA donor pool, reduce occurrence of transplant rejection, and improve long-term graft functionality. Many early IRI studies in animal models utilized replantation and syngeneic transplantation to simulate allotransplantation without the need for immunosuppression. These studies provided detailed procedures of surgical technique, useful histopathology and immunohistochemistry grading scales, and upper limits on critical ischemia times; the last of which are clinically relevant for advising policies on maximum ischemia times today.^80–84 However, recently published studies on mechanistic progression of IRI provide new insights on the enhanced IRI effect observed in allografts versus autografts, isografts, and syngrafts.^85–88 Thus, studies using autograft, isograft, and syngraft animal models do not provide a complete picture of IRI in VCA and were excluded from this review. Studies focused on developing and evaluating the feasibility of new human VCA analogs primarily contribute to advances in surgical technique and have minimal ischemia time.^89,90 As such, these were also excluded from this review. Given these constraints, this section of the review focused on advances in VCA research described in studies using allograft VCA animal models to assess the effect of preservation solution and ischemia time on graft outcome. The specific search criteria and PRISMA flow diagram used for this section are provided in Table 2 and Figure 3, respectively.

Table 2.

Search strategy used for “Animal models” section. The search was run using Embase, Medline, and Ovid, and was performed on 1 August 2020. MeSH terms are marked with the syntax [MeSH].

Search #	Search strategy	Items found
#1	“Vascularized Composite Allotransplantation” [MeSH]	1897
#2	“Composite Tissue Allografts” [MeSH]	881
#3	“Facial Transplantation” [MeSH]	2191
#4	“Hand Transplantation” [MeSH]	2307
#5	“Skin Transplantation” [MeSH]	75,406
#6	“Isografts” [MeSH]	5268
#7	“Transplantation, Isogeneic” [MeSH]	5414
#8	#1 OR #2 OR #3 OR #4 OR #5 OR #6 OR #7	91,017
#9	“Organ Preservation” [MeSH]	35,325
#10	“Organ Preservation Solution” [MeSH]	5045
#11	“Solutions” [MeSH]	1,158,484
#12	#9 OR #10 OR #11	1,185,882
#13	“Reperfusion Injury” [MeSH]	177,820
#14	“Perfusion” [MeSH]	834,830
#15	“Reperfusion” [MeSH]	360,011
#16	“Ischemia” [MeSH]	1,131,249
#17	#13 OR #14 OR #15 OR #16	1,910,233
#18	#8 AND #12 AND #17	434

Figure 3.

The PRISMA flow diagram for “Animal models” section detailing the database searches, the number of abstracts screened, and the full texts retrieved.

In 1994, Strome et al.⁹¹ published the first laryngeal allotransplant model that survived an ischemic interval longer than 3 h subject to SCS. Here, the efficacy of heparinized saline solution (HSS) and UWS on mitigating IRI were compared using histopathology after 24-h sacrifice.⁹¹ The authors demonstrated superior preservation qualities of UWS versus HSS, as most transplanted larynxes preserved for 20 h in UWS remained fully histologically viable and none of the 6-h specimen preserved in HSS showed signs of viability.⁹¹ In 2005, Cendales et al.⁹² compared ECS and UWS for SCS preservation of an osteomyocutaneous radial forearm flap transplanted orthotopically in cynomolgus monkeys. The grafts were subject to 3 h of ischemia, and all but two animals recovered fully and had full active range of motion of upper extremities.⁹² Histopathological markers of IRI were not noted, and no difference in preservation quality between ECS and UWS was observed.⁹² The conclusion from this study was that the 3-h ischemia time was too short to assess the superiority of ECS or UWS. Pradka et al.⁹³ studied transplantation of vascularized rat epigastric flaps. Flaps were flushed with HSS and exposed to either 1 or 3 h of room temperature ischemia.⁹³ Higher rejection scores were noted in the 3 versus 1-h ischemia group with histopathological assessment.⁹³ The authors noted that skin histopathological scores did not convey the status of other tissues of the composite allograft or predict the graft’s eventual outcome.⁹³ They also found that muscle and fat were found to be highly susceptible to IRI.⁹³

There is a paucity of studies assessing IRI in VCA that utilize allograft animal models. In contrast, studies using autograft, isograft, and syngraft animal models have shown the usefulness of certain preservation solutions in attenuating IRI, such as Institut Georgez Lopez-1 (IGL-1), Perfadex, histidine-tryptophan-ketoglutarate-new, TiProtec, extracellular-trehalose-Kyoto, Krebs–Henseleit solutions.^10,49,65,81 To truly validate the utility of these solutions in preclinical studies, further studies should be conducted using allograft animal models.

Applications in clinical practice

While VCA has been successfully performed in the clinical setting, little attention has been paid to preservation solutions used in VCA. The International Registry on Hand and Composite Tissue Allotransplantation has reported over 100 cases of upper extremity and face allotransplants that have been conducted up to May 2017.⁸⁴ UWS, IGL-1, HTKS, Celsior solution, Scot solution, and heparinized saline, have all been reported as perfusates used for these surgeries, with UWS used in 70% of cases.⁸⁴ Many case reports demonstrate recognition of the importance of minimizing cold ischemia through a described focus on the transport of donor and recipient to the same site prior to transplant as the primary strategy by which to reduce cold ischemic time, but do not provide information on why a particular preservation solution was chosen. The following review focuses on articles published after May 2017. The specific search criteria and PRISMA flow diagram used for this section are provided in Table 3 and Figure 4, respectively.

Table 3.

Search strategy used for “Applications in clinical practice” section. The search was run using Embase, Medline, and Ovid, and was performed on 16 September 2020.

Search #	Search strategy	Items found
#1	“Facial Transplantation” [MeSH]	1561
#2	“Hand Transplantation” [MeSH]	1072
#3	#1 OR #2	2529
#4	“Vascularized Composite Allotransplantation” [MeSH]	3315
#5	“Composite Tissue Allotransplantaion”	2
#6	“Composite Tissue Allografts” [MeSH]	887
#7	#4 OR #5 OR #6	3992
#8	“Surgical technique”	538,726
#9	#7 AND #8	132
#10	#7 (from 2017 to 2020)	25

Figure 4.

The PRISMA flow diagram for “Applications in clinical practice” section detailing the database searches, the number of abstracts screened, and the full texts retrieved.

Two face transplant articles were identified with successful outcomes. Both reports outlined that UWS was the preservation solution of choice, but provided no rationale for their selection.^94,95 Similarly, in the hand transplant literature, two papers were identified wherein preservation solution was described. One hand transplant technique paper from the University of Utah with a series of two bilateral and five unilateral hand transplants describes an SCS preservation technique with the use of three liters of HTKS.⁹⁶ This article did not provide a rationale for the use of HTKS over other solutions.⁹⁶ Another case report describes the first bilateral hand transplant in the Netherlands where UWS at 4°C was used.⁹⁷ Again, this technique article did not provide a rationale for the selection of UWS over other preservation solutions.⁹⁷

Although the benefits of preservation solutions for decreasing IRI are widely accepted, there is a lack of consensus on the optimal preservation solution for use in VCA. Our review finds that UWS is most commonly used in the clinical setting; however, there is currently no large study comparing the effect of different preservation solutions on the short- or long-term outcomes of VCA. This provides an opportunity for further research to determine the ideal preservation solution for use in clinical VCA, with the potential to increase the critical ischemia time and expand the donor pool greatly.

Future strategies

Although SCS is commonly used for VCA graft preservation in clinical settings, a number of limitations exist, including: (1) extensive tissue damage after prolonged hypothermic preservation, (2) difficulty in assessing graft viability prior to transplantation, and (3) limited preservation time, wherein most VCA grafts are limited to less than 6 h of SCS.^46,98,99 These inherent limitations of SCS have encouraged research into new technologies that would allow for better graft preservation. Emerging techniques in VCA preservation can be broadly classified into two categories: (1) machine perfusion and (2) cryopreservation.

Machine perfusion

The goal of machine perfusion is to preserve organ viability through provision of oxygen and nutrients, and removal of metabolic by-products.¹⁰⁰ In this way, grafts are preserved extracorporeally for longer periods of time, thereby greatly increasing their geographic accessibility.¹⁰¹ Grafts can be preserved under a variety of a perfusion temperatures; these include hypothermic (0°C–12°C), mid-thermic (13°C–24°C), sub-normothermic (25°C–34°C), and normothermic (35°C–38°C) conditions.^102,103 Studies on both small and large animal VCA models have demonstrated successful preservation of graft tissue for up to 24 h using machine perfusion.^104–106 In 2017, Werner et al.¹⁰⁷ applied sub-normothermic machine perfusion to preserve human limbs for 24 h with a plasma-based perfusate. The grafts remained viable after 24 h of preservation, showing no signs of myocyte injury as well as continued response to neuromuscular electrostimulation.¹⁰⁷ Although recent studies on viability of machine perfusion in preserving graft tissue demonstrate extended preservation times, limitations include: (1) few studies utilizing allografts, (2) no studies investigating long-term follow-up, and (3) a lack of consensus on ideal temperature or perfusate for use in a clinical settings.^99,100

Cryopreservation

Cryopreservation aims to slow deterioration of graft tissue by reducing the rate of metabolism. This requires freezing of the graft to temperatures below 0°C and offers the possibility of storage for many weeks.¹⁰⁸ Several techniques of cryopreservation exist, wherein different temperatures are used for biological tissue preservation.^99,109 These are broadly classified as: (1) sub-zero and high sub-zero temperatures suitable for supercooling (< 0°C to −30°C), (2) temperatures suitable for directional freezing of water (−80°C to −196°C), and (3) temperatures suitable for vitrification of water (< −137°C).^99,110 Each technique requires meticulous control on the rate of cooling and addition of cryoprotectants to prevent formation of intracellular ice crystals, which is detrimental to tissue viability.¹¹⁰ Studies on cryopreservation of single-cell systems, blood vessels, cutaneous tissue, bone, and nervous tissue have been previously described.¹¹¹ In 2008, Rinker et al.¹¹² successfully cryopreserved rat epigastric flaps at −140°C for 2 weeks followed by isotransplantation. Flaps remained viable for up to 60 days after transplantation, retaining normal pigmentation and hair growth, and showing no histological signs of inflammation or necrosis.¹¹² In 2017, Friedman and Gur¹¹³ were the first to apply directional freezing and vitrification for preserving a syngeneic heterotopic rat hindlimb for 7 days. The authors observed histologically viable myocytes, blood vessels, and skin layers three days after transplantation.¹¹³ Currently, there exist no studies measuring the effects of cryopreservation on human VCA grafts. Although cryopreservation provides the opportunity for long-term VCA graft storage, the complex and variable response of different tissues to freezing, thawing, and cryoprotectants render a unified protocol difficult to obtain today.⁹⁹

Conclusion

Experience and focused research in the field of SOT has facilitated an understanding of the pathophysiology of cold IRI.^53,72 This understanding has in-turn facilitated advances in clinical outcomes stemming from technical modifications, including adaptations to preservation solutions that aim to mitigate the deleterious effects of IRI.^53,72 VCA often includes tissue that is highly metabolically active and thus particularly susceptible to the effects of reperfusion injury. Despite this, preservation solutions in the setting of VCA have been largely overlooked without a consensus on the optimal solution to improve outcomes and accommodate the specific needs of these tissues.¹¹⁴ This can be attributed to the complexity of IRI in composite tissue and the multiple mechanistic pathways that must be targeted. In addition, given the infancy of VCA in the clinical setting, large-scale clinical trials that assess the efficacy of various preservation solutions are yet to be conducted.

Given the current theoretical understanding of IRI pathophysiology, we hypothesize that an ideal preservation solution for attenuation of IRI in VCA will allow for protection of the microvasculature and reduction of ROS generation. Dextran 40 has been used effectively as a colloid agent to reduce cellular edema and protect the endothelial cells following reperfusion. In addition, deferoxamine, LK-614, and allopurinol are important for reducing production of iron-mediated and XO-mediated ROS. Finally, glutathione is an important antioxidant to reduce the cellular ROS load. Moreover, the ideal preservation solution depends on the type of VCA and its unique composition. Focused research is required to facilitate thoughtful selection of preservation solutions with the potential to improve clinical outcomes in VCA.

Footnotes

Declaration of conflicting interests

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Funding

The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

ORCID iDs

Shaishav Datta

Siba Haykal

References

Dubernard

Owen

Herzberg

, et al. Human hand allograft: report on first 6 months. Lancet 1999; 353: 1315–1320.

Strome

Stein

Esclamado

, et al. Laryngeal transplantation and 40-month follow-up. N Engl J Med 2001; 344: 1676–1679.

Kueckelhaus

Fischer

Seyda

, et al. Vascularized composite allotransplantation: current standards and novel approaches to prevent acute rejection and chronic allograft deterioration. Transpl Int 2016; 29(6): 655–662.

Zuker

Redett

Alman

, et al. First successful lower-extremity transplantation: technique and functional result. J Reconstr Microsurg 2006; 22(4): 239–244.

Dubernard

Lengelé

Morelon

, et al. Outcomes 18 months after the first human partial face transplantation. N Engl J Med 2007; 357: 2451–2460.

Bateman

World’s first successful penis transplant at Tygerberg Hospital. S Afr Med J 2015; 105(4): 251–252.

Brännström

Johannesson

Bokström

, et al. Livebirth after uterus transplantation. Lancet 2015; 385: 607–616.

Iske

Nian

Maenosono

, et al. Composite tissue allotransplantation: opportunities and challenges. Cell Mol Immunol 2019; 16(4): 343–349.

Datta

Devaney

Busuttil

, et al. Prolonged cold ischemia time results in local and remote organ dysfunction in a murine model of vascularized composite transplantation. Am J Transplant 2017; 17(10): 2572–2579.

10.

Messner

Hautz

Blumer

MJF

, et al. Critical ischemia times and the effect of novel preservation solutions HTK-N and TiProtec on tissues of a vascularized tissue isograft. Transplantation 2017; 101(9): e301–e310.

11.

Messner

Grahammer

Hautz

, et al. Ischemia/reperfusion injury in vascularized tissue allotransplantation: tissue damage and clinical relevance. Curr Opin Organ Transplant 2016; 21(5): 503–509.

12.

Gok

Ozer

Treating the donor: strategies to prolong VCA preservation. Curr Transplant Rep 2017; 4: 304–310.

13.

Hautz

Engelhardt

Weissenbacher

, et al. World experience after more than a decade of clinical hand transplantation: update on the Innsbruck program. Hand Clin 2011; 27(4): 423–431.

14.

Wang

Baynosa

Zamboni

WA.

Update on ischemia-reperfusion injury for the plastic surgeon: 2011. Plast Reconstr Surg 2011; 128(6): 685e–692e.

15.

Kalogeris

Baines

Krenz

, et al. Cell biology of ischemia/reperfusion injury. Int Rev Cell Mol Biol 2012; 298: 229–317.

16.

Celik

Aksoy

, et al. Sildenafil reduces ischemia-reperfusion injury in rat ovary: biochemical and histopathological evaluation. Gynecol Obstet Invest 2014; 78(3): 162–167.

17.

Parsons

Kalejaiye

Mohammed

, et al. The penile tourniquet. Asian J Androl 2013; 15: 364–367.

18.

Paradis

Charles

Meyer

, et al. Chronology of mitochondrial and cellular events during skeletal muscle ischemia-reperfusion. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 2016; 310: C968–C982.

19.

Harris

Walker

Mickle

DAG

, et al. Metabolic response of skeletal muscle to ischemia. Am J Physiol 1986; 250: H213–H220.

20.

Bushell

Klenerman

Davies

, et al. Ischaemic preconditioning of skeletal muscle: 2. Investigation of the potential mechanisms involved. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2002; 84(8): 1189–1193.

21.

Gillani

Cao

Suzuki

, et al. The effect of ischemia reperfusion injury on skeletal muscle. Injury 2012; 43: 670–675.

22.

Eliason

Wakefield

TW.

Metabolic consequences of acute limb ischemia and their clinical implications. Semin Vasc Surg 2009; 22(1): 29–33.

23.

Ivanics

Miklós

Ruttner

, et al. Ischemia/reperfusion—induced changes in intracellular free Ca2+ levels in rat skeletal muscle fibers—an in vivo study. Pflügers Arch 2000; 440(2): 302–308.

24.

Granger

Kvietys

PR.

Reperfusion injury and reactive oxygen species: the evolution of a concept. Redox Biol 2015; 6: 524–551.

25.

McKelvey

Höllwarth

Granger

, et al. Mechanisms of conversion of xanthine dehydrogenase to xanthine oxidase in ischemic rat liver and kidney. Am J Physiol 1988; 254: G753–G760.

26.

Kowalska

Piekut

Prendecki

, et al. Mitochondrial and nuclear DNA oxidative damage in physiological and pathological aging. DNA Cell Biol 2020; 39(8): 1410–1420.

27.

Brandão

Roselino

Piccinato

, et al. Mitochondrial alterations in skeletal muscle submitted to total ischemia. J Surg Res 2003; 110(1): 235–240.

28.

Bleier

Dröse

Superoxide generation by complex III: from mechanistic rationales to functional consequences. Biochim Biophys Acta 2013; 1827(11–12): 1320–1331.

29.

Thompson

Narayanan

Perez-Pinzon

MA.

Redox signaling pathways involved in neuronal ischemic preconditioning. Curr Neuropharmacol 2012; 10(4): 354–369.

30.

Mouithys-Mickalad

Sluse

FE.

Generation of superoxide anion by mitochondria and impairment of their functions during anoxia and reoxygenation in vitro. Free Radic Biol Med 1998; 25(9): 1066–1074.

31.

Sheu

Nauduri

Anders

MW.

Targeting antioxidants to mitochondria: a new therapeutic direction. Biochim Biophys Acta 2006; 1762(2): 256–265.

32.

Halestrap

Richardson

AP.

The mitochondrial permeability transition: a current perspective on its identity and role in ischaemia/reperfusion injury. J Mol Cell Cardiol 2015; 78: 129–141.

33.

Miura

Tanno

The mPTP and its regulatory proteins: final common targets of signalling pathways for protection against necrosis. Cardiovasc Res 2012; 94: 181–189.

34.

Griffiths

Halestrap

AP.

Mitochondrial non-specific pores remain closed during cardiac ischaemia, but open upon reperfusion. Biochem J 1995; 307: 93–98.

35.

Griffiths

Ocampo

Savage

, et al. Mitochondrial calcium transporting pathways during hypoxia and reoxygenation in single rat cardiomyocytes. Cardiovasc Res 1998; 39(2): 423–433.

36.

Slegtenhorst

Dor

FJMF

Rodriguez

, et al. Ischemia/reperfusion injury and its consequences on immunity and inflammation. Curr Transplant Rep 2014; 1: 147–154.

37.

Ogura

Sutterwala

Flavell

RA.

The inflammasome: first line of the immune response to cell stress. Cell 2006; 126: 659–662.

38.

Phillipson

Kubes

The neutrophil in vascular inflammation. Nat Med 2011; 17: 1381–1390.

39.

Kalogeris

Korthuis

RJ.

Reactive species-induced microvascular dysfunction in ischemia/reperfusion. Free Radic Biol Med 2019; 135: 182–197.

40.

Duehrkop

Rieben

Ischemia/reperfusion injury: effect of simultaneous inhibition of plasma cascade systems versus specific complement inhibition. Biochem Pharmacol 2014; 88: 12–22.

41.

De Perrot

Liu

Waddell

, et al. Ischemia-reperfusion-induced lung injury. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2003; 167: 490–511.

42.

Cao

Wang

Chen

, et al. Beneficial effects of hyperosmotic perfusion in the myocardium after ischemia/reperfusion injury in isolated rat hearts. Rev Bras Cir Cardiovasc 2013; 28(1): 54–60.

43.

Chouchani

Pell

James

, et al. A unifying mechanism for mitochondrial superoxide production during ischemia-reperfusion injury. Cell Metab 2016; 23: 254–263.

44.

Lemasters

JJ.

The mitochondrial permeability transition and the calcium, oxygen and pH paradoxes: one paradox after another. Cardiovasc Res 1999; 44(3): 470–473.

45.

Guibert

Petrenko

Balaban

, et al. Organ preservation: current concepts and new strategies for the next decade. Transfus Med Hemother 2011; 38(2): 125–142.

46.

Jing

Yao

Zhao

, et al. Organ preservation: from the past to the future. Acta Pharmacol Sin 2018; 39: 845–857.

47.

Collins

Bravo-Shugarman

Terasaki

PI.

Kidney preservation for transportation. Initial perfusion and 30 hours’ ice storage. Lancet 1969; 2: 1219–1222.

48.

Petrenko

Carnevale

Somov

, et al. Organ preservation into the 2020s: the era of dynamic intervention. Transfus Med Hemother 2019; 46(3): 151–172.

49.

Iwai

Kikuchi

Kasahara

, et al. Impact of normothermic preservation with extracellular type solution containing trehalose on rat kidney grafting from a cardiac death donor. PLoS ONE 2012; 7(3): e33157.

50.

Ametani

D’Alessandro

Southard

JH.

The effect of calcium in the UW solution on preservation of the rat liver. Ann Transplant 1997; 2(1): 34–38.

51.

Yang

Liu

Zou

, et al. Protective effect of magnesium on the endothelial function mediated by endothelium-derived hyperpolarizing factor in coronary arteries during cardioplegic arrest in a porcine model. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2002; 124(2): 361–370.

52.

Fremes

Zhang

Furukawa

, et al. Cardiac storage with University of Wisconsin solution, calcium, and magnesium. J Heart Lung Transplant 1995; 14(5): 916–925.

53.

Chen

Shi

Xia

, et al. Preservation solutions for kidney transplantation: history, advances and mechanisms. Cell Transplant 2019; 28(12): 1472–1489.

54.

Omasa

Hasegawa

Bando

, et al. Application of ET-Kyoto solution in clinical lung transplantation. Ann Thorac Surg 2004; 77: 338–339.

55.

Andrews

Cooper

Verbesey

, et al. Mannitol infusion within 15 min of cross-clamp improves living donor kidney preservation. Transplantation 2014; 98: 893–897.

56.

Liu

Chen

Huang

, et al. Therapeutic effects and mechanisms of action of mannitol during H₂O₂-induced oxidative stress in human retinal pigment epithelium cells. J Ocul Pharmacol Ther 2010; 26(3): 249–257.

57.

Rauen

Klempt

de Groot

Histidine-induced injury to cultured liver cells, effects of histidine derivatives and of iron chelators. Cell Mol Life Sci 2007; 64(2): 192–205.

58.

Koch

Radovits

Loganathan

, et al. Myocardial protection with the use of L-arginine and N-α-acetyl-histidine. Transplant Proc 2009; 41: 2592–2594.

59.

Phillips

Toledo

Lopez-Neblina

, et al. Nitric oxide mechanism of protection in ischemia and reperfusion injury. J Invest Surg 2009; 22(1): 46–55.

60.

Gohrbandt

Fischer

Warnecke

, et al. Glycine intravenous donor preconditioning is superior to glycine supplementation to low-potassium dextran flush preservation and improves graft function in a large animal lung transplantation model after 24 hours of cold ischemia. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2006; 131(3): 724–729.

61.

Nayak

Buttar

HS.

Evaluation of the antioxidant properties of tryptophan and its metabolites in in vitro assay. J Complement Integr Med 2016; 13: 129–136.

62.

Conhaim

Rosenfeld

Schreiber

, et al. Effects of intravenous pentafraction on lung and soft tissue liquid exchange in hypoproteinemic sheep. Am J Physiol 1993; 265: H1536–H1543.

63.

Candinas

Largiadèr

Binswanger

, et al. A novel dextran 40-based preservation solution. Transpl Int 1996; 9(1): 32–37.

64.

Oto

Griffiths

Rosenfeldt

, et al. Early outcomes comparing Perfadex, Euro-Collins, and Papworth solutions in lung transplantation. Ann Thorac Surg 2006; 82(5): 1842–1848.

65.

Wohlschlaeger

de Groot

, et al. Evaluation of a modified HTK solution containing the new iron chelator LK 614 in an isolated rat liver perfusion model. J Invest Surg 2009; 22(5): 340–347.

66.

Winterbourn

CC.

Toxicity of iron and hydrogen peroxide: the Fenton reaction. Toxicol Lett 1995; 82–83: 969–974.

67.

Belzer

Ashby

Dunphy

JE.

24-hour and 72-hour preservation of canine kidneys. Lancet 1967; 2: 536–538.

68.

Salehi

Tran

Grayson

WL.

Advances in perfusion systems for solid organ preservation. Yale J Biol Med 2018; 91(3): 301–312.

69.

Michel

LaMuraglia

II Madariaga

MLL

, et al. Innovative cold storage of donor organs using the Paragonix Sherpa Pak^TM devices. Hear Lung Vessel 2015; 7: 246–255.

70.

Ploeg

Goossens

McAnulty

, et al. Successful 72-hour cold storage of dog kidneys with UW solution. Transplantation 1988; 46(2): 191–196.

71.

Alshaibani

Nizamuddin

Raza

, et al. University of Wisconsin versus Eurocollins solution for kidney preservation: analysis of clinical outcome. Transplant Proc 1998; 30(7): 3681–3682.

72.

O’Callaghan

Knight

Morgan

, et al. Preservation solutions for static cold storage of kidney allografts: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Transplant 2012; 12: 896–906.

73.

Adam

Delvart

Karam

, et al. Compared efficacy of preservation solutions in liver transplantation: a long-term graft outcome study from the European Liver Transplant Registry. Am J Transplant 2015; 15: 395–406.

74.

Stewart

ZA.

UW solution: still the “gold standard” for liver transplantation. Am J Transplant 2015; 15(2): 295–296.

75.

Keshavjee

Yamazaki

Cardoso

, et al. A method for safe twelve-hour pulmonary preservation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1989; 98(4): 529–534.

76.

Fischer

Matte-Martyn

De Perrot

, et al. Low-potassium dextran preservation solution improves lung function after human lung transplantation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2001; 121(3): 594–596.

77.

Strüber

Hohlfeld

Fraund

, et al. Low-potassium dextran solution ameliorates reperfusion injury of the lung and protects surfactant function. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2000; 120(3): 566–572.

78.

Van Raemdonck

Neyrinck

Cypel

, et al. Ex-vivo lung perfusion. Transpl Int 2015; 28: 643–656.

79.

Steen

Ingemansson

Eriksson

, et al. First human transplantation of a nonacceptable donor lung after reconditioning ex vivo. Ann Thorac Surg 2007; 83(6): 2191–2194.

80.

Kevorkian

Sercarz

, et al. Extended canine laryngeal preservation for transplantation. Laryngoscope 1997; 107: 1623–1626.

81.

Hautz

Hickethier

Blumer

MJF

, et al. Histomorphometric evaluation of ischemia-reperfusion injury and the effect of preservation solutions histidine-tryptophan-ketoglutarate and University of Wisconsin in limb transplantation. Transplantation 2014; 98: 713–720.

82.

Angel

Knight

Becker

, et al. Amelioration of secondary ischaemic injury by perfusion with University of Wisconsin (UW) solution in rat skin flaps. Br J Plast Surg 1993; 46(4): 288–291.

83.

Kohout

Lepore

Knight

, et al. Cool perfusion solutions for skin flaps: a new mixture of pharmacological agents which improves skin flap viability. Br J Plast Surg 1995; 48(3): 132–144.

84.

Petruzzo

Sardu

Lanzetta

, et al. Report (2017) of the international registry on hand and composite tissue allotransplantation (IRHCTT). Curr Transplt Rep 2017; 4: 294–303.

85.

Friedman

Carmel

Sela

, et al. Immunological and inflammatory mapping of vascularized composite allograft rejection processes in a rat model. PLoS ONE 2017; 12(7): e0181507.

86.

Issa

Vascularized composite allograft-specific characteristics of immune responses. Transpl Int 2016; 29(6): 672–681.

87.

Reichenbach

Hoffman

, et al. Allograft outcomes in outbred mice. Am J Transplant 2013; 13(3): 580–588.

88.

Unadkat

Schneeberger

Goldbach

, et al. Investigation of antibody-mediated rejection in composite tissue allotransplantation in a rat limb transplant model. Transplant Proc 2009; 41(2): 542–545.

89.

Fries

Tuder

Davis

MR.

Preclinical models in vascularized composite allotransplantation. Curr Transplant Rep 2015; 2: 284–289.

90.

Ramly

Kantar

Alfonso

, et al. Preclinical animal models in facial transplantation. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2019; 7(9): e2455.

91.

Strome

, et al. A comparison of preservation techniques in a vascularized rat laryngeal transplant model. Laryngoscope 1994; 104: 666–668.

92.

Cendales

Bacher

, et al. Composite tissue allotransplantation: development of a preclinical model in nonhuman primates. Transplantation 2005; 80: 1447–1454.

93.

Pradka

Ong

Zhang

, et al. Increased signs of acute rejection with ischemic time in a rat musculocutaneous allotransplant model. Transplant Proc 2009; 41(2): 531–536.

94.

Lassus

Lindford

Vuola

, et al. The Helsinki face transplantation: surgical aspects and 1-year outcome. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2018; 71(2): 132–139.

95.

Kantar

Ceradini

Gelb

, et al. Facial transplantation for an irreparable central and lower face injury: a modernized approach to a classic challenge. Plast Reconstr Surg 2019; 144(2): 264e–283e.

96.

Mendenhall

Lutfy

Graham

, et al. Technique for rapid hand transplant donor procurement through the elbow. Hand 2021; 16: 391–396.

97.

Kruit

Ulrich

DJO

Abdo

, et al. Is the first bilateral hand transplantation feasible in the Netherlands? Neth J Crit Care 2019; 27: 74–80.

98.

Rezaei

Figueroa

Orfahli

, et al. Composite vascularized allograft machine preservation: state of the art. Curr Transplant Rep 2019; 6: 265–276.

99.

Burlage

Tessier

Etra

, et al. Advances in machine perfusion, organ preservation, and cryobiology: potential impact on vascularized composite allotransplantation. Curr Opin Organ Transplant 2019; 23: 561–567.

100.

Taylor

Baicu

Current state of hypothermic machine perfusion preservation of organs: the clinical perspective. Cryobiology 2010; 60: S20–S35.

101.

Dutkowski

Guarrera

de Jonge

, et al. Evolving trends in machine perfusion for liver transplantation. Gastroenterology 2019; 156(6): 1542–1547.

102.

Messner

Guo

Etra

, et al. Emerging technologies in organ preservation, tissue engineering and regenerative medicine: a blessing or curse for transplantation? Transpl Int 2019; 32: 673–685.

103.

Krezdorn

Tasigiorgos

, et al. Tissue conservation for transplantation. Innov Surg Sci 2017; 2: 171–187.

104.

Ozer

Rojas-Pena

Mendias

, et al. The effect of ex situ perfusion in a swine limb vascularized composite tissue allograft on survival up to 24 hours. J Hand Surg Am 2016; 41(1): 3–12.

105.

Schweizer

Oksuz

Banan

, et al. Subnormothermic machine perfusion (SNMP) with a novel hemoglobin-based oxygen carrier (HBOC) solution for ex vivo preservation in vascularized composite allotransplantation (VCA). Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2017; 5: 25–26.

106.

Burlage

Lellouch

Saviane

, et al. First vascularized composite allotransplantations in rats after 6 hours of ex vivosubnormothermic machine perfusion using an hemoglobin oxygen carrier: a proof of concept study. J Burn Care Res 2019; 40: S133–S134.

107.

Werner

Alghanem

Rakestraw

, et al. Ex situ perfusion of human limb allografts for 24 hours. Transplantation 2017; 101(3): e68–e74.

108.

Taylor

Weegman

Baicu

, et al. New approaches to cryopreservation of cells, tissues, and organs. Transfus Med Hemother 2019; 46(3): 197–215.

109.

Jang

Park

Yang

, et al. Cryopreservation and its clinical applications. Integr Med Res 2017; 6: 12–18.

110.

Bahari

Bein

Yashunsky

, et al. Directional freezing for the cryopreservation of adherent mammalian cells on a substrate. PLoS ONE 2018; 13(2): e0192265.

111.

Bakhach

The cryopreservation of composite tissues: principles and recent advancement on cryopreservation of different type of tissues. Organogenesis 2009; 5(3): 119–126.

112.

Rinker

Cui

Cibull

, et al. Cryopreservation of composite tissue transplants. Hand 2008; 3(1): 17–23.

113.

Friedman

Gur

Directional freezing and vitrification of whole limbs for future transplantation and organ banking. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2017; 5: 216–217.

114.

Morelon

Kanitakis

Petruzzo

, et al. Immunological challenges in vascularised composite allotransplantation. Curr Transplant Rep 2015; 2: 276–283.

Preservation solutions for attenuation of ischemia–reperfusion injury in vascularized composite allotransplantation

Abstract

Keywords

Introduction

Cellular and molecular events during IRI

Ischemic injury

Reperfusion injury

Components of preservation solutions

Other ions

Saccharides

Amino acids and derivatives

Colloids

Other additives

pH and osmolarity

History of preservation solutions in SOT

Preservation solutions used in VCA

Animal models

Applications in clinical practice

Future strategies

Machine perfusion

Cryopreservation

Conclusion

Footnotes

Declaration of conflicting interests

Funding

ORCID iDs

References