Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Objectives:

Non-communicable diseases are non-infectious health conditions caused by genetic, physiological, environmental, and behavioral factors. Currently, non-communicable diseases account for almost two-thirds of deaths globally. This study aimed to explore the patients’ adherence level to the key recommendations, and the main barriers toward the practice of healthy behaviors among non-communicable diseases patients.

Method:

This cross-sectional study was conducted among a representative sample of non-communicable diseases patients, receiving care in five primary healthcare centers in the Gaza Strip, Palestine. An interview-based questionnaire about demographics, medical history, and barriers toward the practice of healthy behaviors was developed and collected based on the health belief model and the theory of planned behaviors. Independent samples t-test, one-way analysis of variance, chi-square, and Fisher’s exact test were used for analysis.

Results:

Four hundred patients with non-communicable diseases, aged (53.06 ± 10.03) years old, (56.8% females and 43.3% males) were included in this study. The patient’s adherence was reported as 50.1%, standard deviation = 18.3 in terms of attended regular physical activity, and 44.0%, standard deviation = 15.4 in terms of eating a healthy diet. The main barriers to being active among patients were lack of accessibility to materials, lack of social support, and lack of reminder; while in terms of eating a healthy diet were lack of accessibility to materials, lack of social support, and lack of self-efficacy.

Conclusion:

The non-communicable diseases patients’ adherence to healthy behaviors is suboptimal. Varied implementation strategies targeting the main barriers are extremely required to enhance the access to physical activity infrastructure, affordable healthy diet options, and to reinforce the change toward healthy behaviors at all levels.

Keywords

Adherence barriers non-communicable diseases package of essential non-communicable diseases primary healthcare

Introduction

Non-communicable diseases (NCDs) are non-infectious health conditions caused by genetic, physiological, environmental, and behavioral factors.¹ Chronic diseases are identified as a major public health concern worldwide, and contribute to a large burden of diseases in high-income countries, and increasing rapidly in low- and middle-income countries.² The World Health Organization (WHO) estimated that NCDs including cardiovascular diseases (CVDs), cancer, diabetes, and chronic respiratory diseases were responsible for 41 million deaths yearly and account for 71% of all deaths worldwide; most of NCDs death (74%) and the majority of premature deaths (82%) occur in low- and middle-income states.³ By 2030, around 80% of those deaths will come from low- and middle-income countries, with the prediction of about 52 million deaths yearly.⁴ Like other low- and middle-income countries, Palestine is experiencing a quick epidemiological transition, with increasing the burden of NCDs.⁵ It was estimated that nearly two-thirds of elderly Palestinians complain from NCDs.⁶ Gaza Strip is part of Occupied Palestinian Territory which characteristic by high densely peopled territory, with a total number of populations around two million, more than 70% of them are registered as refugees, it was estimated that the prevalence of overweight and obesity among the Palestinian population was 62.4% and 24.4%, respectively.^7,8 Gaza Strip since 2007 under siege which influencing all aspects of life, more than half of the population suffering from poverty, majority of the people had received aids, around 80% of peoples are dependent on food aids.⁹ In 2016, CVDs remain the first leading cause of death among Palestinians, accounting for 30.6% of deaths recorded; cancer was the second leading cause of death, with 14.0% of deaths; complications of diabetes came in the fourth rank with a proportion of 8.0%.¹⁰ The four main diseases that account for the majority of deaths from NCDs include CVDs, cancers, chronic respiratory diseases, and diabetes.⁴ Importantly, these four NCDs share common behavioral risk factors including tobacco use, unhealthy diet, physical inactivity, and harmful use of alcohol.⁴ Recently, there is a wide scientific and public health policy agreement that these factors contribute significantly to NCDs morbidity and mortality.¹¹ The WHO developed a package of essential NCDs interventions (WHO-PEN), which is the minimum standard for NCDs to strengthen national capacity to integrate and scale up care of NCDs in primary health care centers (PHCs) in low-resource settings.¹² In 2013, the Palestinian Ministry of Health introduced the WHO-PEN in primary health care.¹³ The introduction of the WHO-PEN approach, including the training of employees, adapting record keeping and the health information system, and support supervision, has delegated most NCDs management responsibilities to general physicians and nurses working in PHCs.¹³ Besides, WHO-PEN protocol 2 is a significant tool in the implementation process, which is concerned with health education and counseling on healthy behaviors for NCDs patients.¹² It included instructions to educate the NCDs patients to take regular physical activity, eat a healthy diet, stop tobacco and harmful use of alcohol, and attend regular medical follow-up.¹⁴ In Gaza Strip, Palestine, a recent study demonstrated that more than half (57.7%) of PHCs had all of the counseling services recommended by the WHO-PEN protocol 2 including counseling on healthy behaviors for NCDs patients and family in terms of smoking, diet, alcohol and physical activity.¹⁵ Another study conducted in Gaza Strip showed that only 12.5% of health care professionals claimed that they are rarely or never adherence to counseling on healthy behaviors in terms of physical activity and 19.5% in terms of a healthy diet based on WHO-PEN protocol 2.¹⁶

Modifications of barriers toward the practice of healthy behaviors can lead to great benefits for NCDs patients.¹⁴ Based on the health belief model and theory of planned behavior,^17,18 there were seven main determinants of human behaviors including perceived self-efficacy, perceived social acceptability, perceived action efficacy, cues for action, accessibility of materials, perceived susceptibility, and perceived severity. In addition, to encourage people to follow a healthy lifestyle, a suitable understanding of the barriers, particularly changeable barriers, faced by patients who received counseling on healthy behaviors is essential, and identifying these barriers by healthcare providers can help behavior alteration.¹⁹ This study aimed to explore the NCDs patients’ adherence level to the key recommendations on healthy behaviors provided by general physicians and nurses working in the PHCs, and the main barriers toward the practice of healthy behaviors to take regular physical activity and eat a healthy diet among NCDs patients in the PHCs in Gaza Strip, Palestine.

Methods

Study participants

This cross-sectional study was conducted from September 2019 to May 2020, among a representative sample of NCDs patients (both genders, aged ⩾18 years), selected by a convenience sampling method from patients receiving care in five PHCs in Gaza Strip, Palestine. Participants were selected from the five Gaza Strip governorates based on the population density; Gaza Strip is divided into five smaller governorates, which include North Gaza, Gaza, Deir Al Balah, Khan-Yunis, and Rafah.¹⁵ The five PHCs were selected purposively to include the centers with high utilization and attendance of NCDs services in each governorate of Gaza Strip, Palestine.

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria include patients with one of the major NCDs (CVDs, chronic respiratory disease, cancer, and diabetes), both genders, aged ⩾18 years, and registered and receiving treatment in the five selected Ministry of Health, PHCs in Gaza Strip.

Exclusion criteria include patients who did not receive treatment in the five selected PHCs, or their medical files are not available. In addition, pregnant, lactating women, and patients with other types of NCDs illness such as multiple sclerosis and osteoarthritis were also excluded from the study.

Sample size and sampling

The traditional equation (Cochran) was used to calculate the sample size,²⁰ and the estimated sample size according to the equation is 384 cases, with a margin of error of 5% and confidence level of 95%. In addition, the sample size was increased to 400 cases; chosen were distributed based on the population density in the five Gaza Strip governorates.²¹ The study sample was distributed in each governorate (North Gaza, Gaza City, Mid Zone, Khan Younis, and Rafah) as follows 78, 137, 58, 78, and 49 patients, respectively.

Data collection

A structured questionnaire was used to collect data from NCDs patients via individual interviews during clinic work hours. Data were collected by five data collectors after one full day of training about the study scope and purposes, questionnaire items, and possible areas for misunderstanding.

Study instrument

Based on the health belief model and the theory of planned behavior,^17,18 the questionnaire was developed after reviewing the previous appropriate studies questionnaires.^22–24 A preliminary questionnaire with 14-items to assess barriers of adherence to healthy behaviors (of regular physical activity and eat a healthy diet) among NCDs patients and the seven main determinants of human behaviors were surveyed. In addition, nine-items to assess the socio-demographic characteristics of the patients, and seven-items to exploring the adherence level to healthy behaviors were also included. The healthy behaviors recommendations are defined based on WHO-PEN protocol 2 for all NCDs patients.¹⁴ A 5-point Likert-type scale was used for response categories with the rating scale of “always,” “often,” “sometimes,” “rarely,” and “never.” For main perceived barriers responses categorized to yes or no. “always,” “often,” and “sometimes” consider as Yes and “rarely” and “never “consider as No.

Translation and validation of the questionnaire

The cross-cultural guideline process was employed in the translation of the questionnaire.²⁵ Face and content validity were checked for the final Arabic draft questionnaire, independently validated by seven experts (researchers, health experts, head nurse, and family doctors). Content validity index was calculated to rate the relevance of the questionnaire items.²⁶ All items were rated as relevant. Minor changes in the language and the construction were done. Then, the questionnaire was piloted among 30 of the eligible NCDs patients, and the results of the pilot study showed a good overall Cronbach’s alphas of 0.85.

Data analysis

The SPSS software version 22 was used for the statistical analysis. Characteristics of the sample were described by descriptive statistics. Frequencies and percentages were used to describe categorical variables, whereas mean values and standard deviations (SDs) were used to represent continuous variables. The Shapiro–Wilk test was used to test the normality of quantitative variables. Independent-samples t-test, one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), chi-square, and Fisher’s exact test were used for analysis. p-values of less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Results

Characteristics of the study participants

The characteristics of the study participants are summarized in Table 1. A total of 400 patients with NCDs, aged (53.06 ± 10.03) years old were included in this study. Approximately half of the respondents (56.8%) were females, 46.8% had a university degree, 45.5% jobless or retired, and only 7.8% of the participants were a smoker. Most of the study respondents (74.8%) were married, about two-third had incomes less than 2000 new Israeli shekel (NIS) per month, and 88% were above 40 years old.

Table 1.

Characteristics of the study participants.

Variables	NCDs patients (n = 400)	Percentage (%)
Gender
Male	173.0	43.3
Female	227.0	56.8
Age (mean ± SD: 53.06 ± 10.03)
⩽40 years	48.0	12.0
41–60 years	251.0	62.7
>60 years	101.0	25.3
Marital status
Single	3.0	0.8
Married	299.0	74.8
Widowed or divorced	98.0	24.5
Smoking status
Smoker	31.0	7.8
Non-smoker	369.0	82.3
Use of alcohol
Yes	00.0	00.0
Education level
Primary	53.0	13.3
Secondary	142.0	35.5
University	187.0	46.8
Postgraduate	18.0	4.5
Occupation
Have a job	222.0	55.5
Jobless	75.0	18.8
Retired	103.0	25.8
Monthly income
<1000 NIS	95	23.8
1000 to <2000 NIS	222	55.5
2000 to 3000 NIS	63	15.8
More than 3000 NIS	20	5.0
NCDs types
Diabetes mellitus	112.0	28.0
Hypertension	144.0	36.0
Cardiovascular diseases	9.0	2.3
Diabetes mellitus and hypertension	115.0	28.7
Other	20.0	5.0

SD: standard deviation; NIS: new Israeli shekel; NCDs: non-communicable diseases.

Data are expressed as percentage for different categorical variables.

Other includes cancer or cancer + hypertension + diabetes mellitus or diabetes mellitus + cardiovascular diseases or hypertension + cardiovascular diseases or diabetes mellitus + hypertension + cardiovascular diseases.

NCDs patient’s adherence level to the key recommendations of healthy behaviors

In addition, Table 2 shows that the adherence mean scores across the key recommendations of healthy behaviors (take regular physical activity and eat a healthy diet) were reported as 50.1%, SD = 18.3 in terms of attended regular physical activity, and 44.04%, SD = 15.4 in terms of eating a heart-healthy diet. Only 16.8% of patients claimed that they always and often progressively increase physical activity to moderate levels, and only 1.8% of patients reported that they always and often eat 400–500 g of fruits and vegetables per day as recommendations.

Table 2.

NCDs patient’s adherence level to the key recommendations of healthy behaviors.

Key recommendations	NCDs patients (n = 400)
Key recommendations	Always and often N (%)	Sometimes N (%)	Rarely and never N (%)
1. Take regular physical activity
Progressively increase physical activity to moderate levels (such as brisk walking); at least 150 min per week	67.0 (16.8)	145.0 (36.3)	188.0 (47.0)
Control body weight and avoid overweight by reducing high calorie food and taking adequate physical activity	73.0 (18.3)	104.0 (26.0)	223.0 (55.8)
Mean ± SD = 50.1 ± 18.3
2. Eat healthy diet
Restrict salt to less than 5 g (one teaspoon) per day, reduce salt when cooking, limit processed and fast foods	64.0 (16.0)	195.0 (48.8)	141.0 (35.3)
Eat five servings (400–500 g) of fruits and vegetable per day	7.0 (1.8)	39.0 (9.8)	354.0 (88.5)
Limit fatty meat, dairy fat, and cooking oil (less than two tablespoons per day)	62.0 (15.5)	60.0 (15.0)	278.0 (69.5)
Replace palm and coconut oil with olive, soya, corn, rapeseed, or safflower oil	87.0 (21.8)	89.0 (22.3)	224.0 (56.0)
Replace other meat with chicken (without skin)	65.0 (16.3)	73.0 (18.3)	262.0 (65.5)
Mean ± SD = 44.04 ± 15.4

NCDs: non-communicable diseases; SD: standard deviation.

Data are expressed as percentage for different categorical variables and as means ± SD for continuous variables.

Characteristics of the study participants in relation to adherence level to the key recommendations

Furthermore, Table 3 demonstrated that in terms of taking regular physical activity, the mean scores were statistically significant differences between different age groups, education level, and occupation status. The age group less than 40 years old were more physically active compared to other age groups (55.8%, SD = 17.2), and the age group between 40 and 60 years old were more physically inactive (48.2%, SD = 18.8). The participants with postgraduate certificates were more physically active compared to other education levels (61.1%, SD = 13.7), and the participants with primary education were more physically inactive (46.2%, SD = 20.1). The jobless participants were more physically active compared to others (54.4%, SD = 17.9), and the employed participants were more physically inactive (47.6%, SD = 18.9). In terms of eating a healthy diet, all attributes mean scores (gender, age, marital status, smoking status, education level, occupation status, income, and NCDs types) were statistically significant differences, except marital status and smoking status. The adherence to eating a healthy diet was more, among females were 46.2%, SD = 16.9, compared to males, among the participants less than 40-year-old were 46.6%, SD = 18.3, compared to others age groups, among the postgraduate certificates participants were (65.1%, SD = 21.2), compared to other groups, among the jobless participants were (46.9%, SD = 16.2), compared to retired and employed, among the participants who had income more than 3000 NIS were (53.0%, SD = 17.2), compared to other groups, and among the patients with CVDs were (60.9%, SD = 12.9), compared to the patients with other types of NCDs.

Table 3.

Characteristics of the study participants in relation to adherence level to the key recommendations.

Key recommendations		Take regular physical activity (n = 400)		Eat healthy diet (n = 400)
Variables		Mean ± SD	p-value	Mean ± SD	p-value
Gender	Male	50.7 ± 16.3	0.578	41.1 ± 12.5	0.001
Gender	Female	49.7 ± 19.7	0.578	46.2 ± 16.9	0.001
Age	⩽40 years	55.8 ± 17.2	0.012	46.6 ± 18.3	0.005
	41–60 years	48.2 ± 18.8		45.3 ± 16.0
	>60 years	52.2 ± 16.8		39.8 ± 11.1
Marital status	Single	53.3 ± 11.5	0.391	33.3 ± 2.3	0.175
	Married	49.4 ± 17.8		43.5 ± 15.6
	Widowed or divorced	52.2 ± 19.6		46.0 ± 13.9
Smoking status	Smoker	53.2 ± 13.9	0.326	46.5 ± 15.7	0.365
Smoking status	Non-smoker	49.9 ± 18.6	0.326	43.8 ± 15.4	0.365
Education level	Primary	46.2 ± 20.1	0.017	46.5 ± 16.9	0.001
	Secondary	51.4 ± 18.0		43.7 ± 14.3
	University	49.2 ± 17.9		41.5 ± 13.5
	Postgraduate	61.1 ± 13.7		65.1 ± 21.2
Occupation	Have a job	47.6 ± 18.9	0.006	45.2 ± 15.9	0.002
	Jobless	54.4 ± 17.9		46.9 ± 16.2
	Retired	52.5 ± 16.1		39.5 ± 12.4
Monthly income	<1000 NIS	53.3 ± 19.4	0.084	47.4 ± 15.4	0.001
	1000 to <2000 NIS	48.8 ± 18.6		41.4 ± 14.5
	2000 to 3000 NIS	47.3 ± 13.5		44.5 ± 15.9
	More than 3000 NIS	54.0 ± 16.0		53.0 ± 17.2
NCDs types	Diabetes mellitus	53.3 ± 20.0	0.064	46.5 ± 17.8	0.001
	Hypertension	47.9 ± 18.3		41.6 ± 12.8
	Cardiovascular diseases	58.9 ± 16.2		60.9 ± 12.9
	Diabetes mellitus and hypertension	49.9 ± 16.4		43.1 ± 15.8
	Other	45.5 ± 16.7		45.8 ± 10.2

SD: standard deviation; NIS: new Israeli shekel; NCDs: non-communicable diseases.

Data are expressed as mean values ± SD for continuous variables. The differences between means were tested using the independent sample t-test and one-way ANOVA.

p-value less than 0.05 was considered as statistically significant.

Characteristics of the study participants in relation to barriers toward practice of physical activity

Moreover, Table 4 demonstrated that the majority (92.0%) of participants believed that by adhering to physical activity, the NCDs will be under control, and 82.0% of the participants believed that non-compliance to physical activity will lead to serious NCDs complications. The main perceived barrier to being active was lack of accessibility of materials (98.4%), which was significantly higher among widowed, divorced, primary education level, and was significantly lower among employed as well as hypertensive patients. The lack of social support ranked as a second barrier to being active (55.5%), which was significantly higher among retired and CVDs patients and was significantly lower among females, smokers, and income class between 1000 and <2000 NIS. The lack of reminder to action ranked as a third barrier to being active (54.8%), which was significantly higher among retired, CVDs patients, and the highest income group and was significantly lower among female as well as primary education level patients.

Table 4.

Characteristics of the study participants in relation to barriers toward practice of physical activity.

Barriers		Self-efficacy		Social acceptability		Action efficacy		Reminder		Accessibility of materials		Perceived severity		Perceived risk
Variables		No	%	No	%	No	%	No	%	No	%	No	%	No	%
Total (n = 400)		197	49.3	222	55.5	32.0	8.0	219	54.8	380	94.8	81.0	20.3	72.0	18.0
Gender	Male (n = 173)	107	61.8	108	62.4	8.0	4.6	112	64.7	164	94.8	35.0	20.2	38.0	22.0
Gender	Female (n = 227)	90.0	39.6	114	50.2	24.0	10.6	107	47.1	216	95.2	46.0	20.3	34.0	15.0
p-value		0.001		0.020		0.030		0.001		0.871		0.993		0.072
Age	⩽40 years (n = 48)	25.0	52.1	23.0	47.9	3.0	6.3	29.0	60.4	48.0	100	14.0	29.2	12.0	25.0
	41–60 years (n = 251)	115	45.8	134	53.4	16.0	6.4	127	50.6	237	94.4	45.0	17.9	41.0	16.3
	>60 years (n = 101)	57.0	56.4	65.0	64.4	13.0	12.9	63.0	62.4	95.0	94.1	22.0	21.8	19.0	18.8
p-value		0.180		0.092		0.113		0.093		0.236		0.118		0.348
Marital status	Single (n = 3.0)	2.0	66.7	2.0	66.7	3.0	100	2.0	66.7	2.0	66.7	3.0	100	3.0	100
	Married (n = 299)	147	49.2	156	52.2	21.0	7.0	168	56.2	280	93.6	55.0	18.4	42.0	14.0
	Widowed or divorced (n = 98)	48.0	49.0	64.0	65.3	11.0	11.2	49.0	50.0	98.0	100	26.0	26.5	30.0	30.6
p-value		0.930		0.050		0.378		0.515		0.002		0.192		0.001
Smoking status	Smoker (31)	12.0	38.7	7.0	22.6	0.0	0.0	16.0	51.6	31.0	100	7.0	22.6	8.0	25.8
Smoking status	Non-smoker (369)	185	50.1	215	58.3	32.0	8.7	203	55.0	349	94.6	74.0	20.1	64.0	17.3
p-value		0.263		0.034		0.157		0.851		0.386		0.816		0.328
Education level	Primary (n = 53)	28.0	52.8	31.0	58.5	8.0	15.1	17.0	32.1	53.0	100	18.0	34.0	16.0	30.2
	Secondary (n = 142)	74.0	52.1	67.0	47.2	10.0	7.0	84.0	59.2	138	97.2	29.0	20.4	26.0	18.3
	University (n = 187)	91.0	48.7	115	61.5	14.0	7.5	112	59.9	177	94.7	34.0	18.2	29.0	15.5
	Postgraduate (n = 18)	4.0	22.2	9.0	50.0	0.0	0.0	6.0	33.3	12.0	66.7	0.0	0.0	1.0	5.6
p-value		0.111		0.068		0.198		0.001		0.001		0.003		0.059
Occupation	Have a job (n = 222)	84.0	37.8	98.0	44.1	10.0	4.5	106	47.7	202	91.0	34.0	15.3	31.0	14.0
	Jobless (n = 75)	38.0	50.7	43.0	57.3	12.0	16.0	36.0	48.0	75.0	100	22.0	29.3	12.0	16.0
	Retired (n = 103)	75.0	72.8	81.0	78.6	10.0	9.7	77.0	74.8	103	100	25.0	24.3	29.0	28.2
p-value		0.001		0.001		0.006		0.001		0.001		0.016		0.008
Monthly income (NIS)	<1000 (n = 112)	52.0	46.4	75.0	67.0	8.0	7.1	46.0	41.1	110	98.2	20.0	17.9	16.0	14.3
	1000 to <2000 (n = 219)	107	48.9	109	49.8	14.0	6.4	130	59.4	202	92.2	45.0	20.5	39.0	17.8
	2000 to 3000 (n = 49)	24.0	49.0	27.0	55.1	7.0	14.3	29.0	59.2	48.0	98.0	12.0	24.5	13.0	26.5
	More than 3000 (n = 20)	14.0	70.0	11.0	55.0	3.0	15.0	14.0	70.0	20.0	0.0	4.0	20.0	4.0	20.0
p-value		0.282		0.030		0.182		0.005		0.069		0.793		0.305
NCDs types	DM (n = 112)	49.0	43.8	52.0	46.4	6.0	5.4	54.0	48.2	107	95.5	18.0	16.1	24.0	21.4
	HTN (n = 144)	56.0	38.9	60.0	41.7	12.0	8.3	73.0	50.7	129	89.6	28.0	19.4	14.0	9.7
	CVDs (n = 9.0)	9.0	100	9.0	100	1.0	11.1	9.0	100	9.0	100	1.0	11.1	3.0	33.3
	DM and HTN (n = 115)	68.0	59.1	82.0	71.3	10.0	8.7	66.0	57.4	115	100	31.0	27.0	24.0	20.9
	Other (n = 20.0)	15.0	75.0	19.0	95.0	3.0	15.0	17.0	85.0	20.0	100	3.0	15.0	7.0	35.0
p-value		0.001		0.001		0.453		0.001		0.002		0.303		0.004

NIS: new Israeli shekel; NCDs: non-communicable diseases; DM: diabetes mellitus; HTN: hypertension; CVDs: cardiovascular diseases.

Data are expressed as percentage for different categorical variables. The chi-square test and Fisher’s exact test were used to examine differences in the prevalence of different categorical variables.

p-value less than 0.05 was considered as statistically significant.

Characteristics of the study participants in relation to barriers toward practice of healthy diet

In addition, Table 5 demonstrated that the vast majority of participants (88.7%) believed that by adhering to eating a healthy diet the NCDs will be under control, and the majority (81.0%) of participants believed that the NCD a serious health condition. The main perceived barrier to adherence to the eating of a healthy diet was the lack of accessibility to materials (96.0%), which was significantly higher among primary education patients. The lack of social support ranked as a second barrier to eating a healthy diet (63%), which was significantly higher among males, smokers, retired, and the lowest income group. The lack of self-efficacy ranked as a third barrier to eating a healthy diet (61%), which was significantly lower among females, primary education level, and the highest income group.

Table 5.

Characteristics of the study participants in relation to barriers toward practice of healthy diet.

Barriers		Self-efficacy		Social acceptability		Action efficacy		Reminder		Accessibility of materials		Perceived severity		Perceived risk
Variables		No	%	No	%	No	%	No	%	No	%	No	%	No	%
Total (n = 400)		244	61.0	252	63.0	17.0	4.3	221	55.3	384	96.0	75.0	18.8	78.0	19.5
Gender	Male (n = 173)	121	69.9	127	73.4	3.0	7.4	108	62.4	165	95.4	17.0	9.8	29.0	16.8
Gender	Female (n = 227)	123	54.2	125	55.1	14	9.6	113	49.8	219	96.5	58.0	25.6	49.0	21.6
p-value		0.002		0.001		0.043		0.015		0.614		0.001		0.253
Age	⩽40 years (n = 48)	24.0	50.0	27.0	56.3	1.0	2.1	21.0	43.8	44.0	91.7	11.0	22.9	10.0	20.8
	41–60 years (n = 251)	153	61.0	155	61.8	10.0	4.0	140	55.8	241	96.0	33.0	13.1	43.0	17.1
	>60 years (n = 101)	67.0	66.3	70.0	69.3	6.0	5.9	60.0	59.4	95.0	94.1	31.0	31.7	25.0	24.8
p-value		0.163		0.248		0.573		0.194		0.333		0.001		0.262
Marital status	Single (n = 3.0)	2.0	66.7	3.0	100	3.0	100	2.0	66.7	3.0	100	0.0	0.0	2.0	66.7
	Married (n = 299)	191	63.9	183	61.2	11.0	3.7	170	65.9	281	94.0	64.0	21.4	67.0	22.4
	Widowed or divorced (n = 98)	51.0	52.0	66.0	67.3	6.0	6.1	49.0	50.0	96.0	98.0	12.0	12.2	9.0	9.2
p-value		0.097		0.257		0.461		0.473		0.298		0.103		0.001
Smoking status	Smoker (31)	27.0	87.1	31.0	100	13.0	41.9	14.0	45.2	31.0	100	6.0	19.4	8.0	25.8
Smoking status	Non-smoker (369)	217	58.8	223	60.4	32.0	8.7	207	56.1	353	95.7	70.0	19.0	70.0	19.0
p-value		0.078		0.001		0.001		0.263		0.386		0.557		0.239
Education level	Primary (n = 53)	24.0	45.3	31.0	58.5	8.0	15.1	17.0	32.1	53.0	100	4.0	7.5	0.0	0.0
	Secondary (n = 142)	83.0	58.5	88.0	62.0	26.0	18.3	76.0	53.5	136	95.8	24.0	16.9	29.0	20.4
	University (n = 187)	126	67.4	124	66.3	9.0	4.8	119	63.6	181	96.8	48.0	25.7	49.0	26.2
	Postgraduate (n = 18)	11.0	61.1	9.0	50.0	0.0	0.0	9.0	50.0	10.0	55.6	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0
p-value		0.027		0.444		0.001		0.001		0.001		0.001		0.001
Occupation	Have a job (n = 222)	127	57.2	123	55.4	23.0	10.4	113	50.9	207	93.2	52.0	23.4	58.0	26.1
	Jobless (n = 75)	45.0	60.0	49.0	65.3	10.0	13.3	32.0	42.7	72.0	96.0	11.0	14.7	10.0	13.3
	Retired (n = 103)	72.0	69.9	82.0	79.6	13.0	12.6	76.0	73.8	101	98.1	13.0	12.6	10.0	9.7
p-value		0.089		0.001		0.719		0.001		0.184		0.040		0.001
Monthly income (NIS)	<1000 (n = 112)	79.0	70.5	82.0	73.2	10.0	8.9	75.0	67.0	103	92.0	23.0	20.5	25.0	22.3
	1000 to <2000 (n = 219)	129	58.9	139	63.5	26.0	11.9	119	54.3	214	97.7	34.0	15.5	38.0	17.4
	2000 to 3000 (n = 49)	33.0	67.3	30.0	61.2	7.0	14.3	27.0	55.1	43.0	87.8	18.0	36.7	15.0	30.6
	More than 3000 (n = 20)	3.0	15.0	3.0	15.0	3.0	15.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	1.0	5.0	0.0	0.0
p-value		0.001		0.001		0.641		0.001		0.008		0.004		0.012
NCDs types	DM (n = 112)	71.0	63.4	76.0	67.9	13.0	11.6	63.0	56.3	103	92.0	17.0	15.2	19.0	17.0
	HTN (n = 144)	91.0	63.2	93.0	64.6	12.0	8.3	78.0	54.2	140	97.2	24.0	16.7	28.0	19.4
	CVDs (n = 9.0)	7.0	77.8	8.0	88.9	2.0	22.2	8.0	88.9	9.0	100	1.0	11.1	0.0	0.0
	DM and HTN (n = 115)	64.0	55.7	66.0	57.4	17.0	14.8	60.0	52.2	111	96.5	27.0	23.5	24.0	20.9
	Other (n = 20.0)	11.0	55.0	11.0	55.0	2.0	10.0	12.0	60.0	17.0	85.0	7.0	35.0	7.0	35.0
p-value		0.531		0.209		0.362		0.306		0.077		0.159		0.239

NIS: new Israeli shekel; NCDs: non-communicable diseases; DM: diabetes mellitus; HTN: hypertension; CVDs: cardiovascular diseases.

p-value less than 0.05 was considered as statistically significant.

Discussion

This study’s findings give initial evidence of the NCDs patient’s adherence level to healthy behaviors, as well as main perceived barriers to being active and eat a healthy diet among NCDs patients in the Palestinian context. Healthy behaviors change can be reached by developed strategies; these strategies need a full understanding of perceived barriers to reach them.²⁷ The study demonstrated that the NCDs patients’ compliance mean score to take regular physical activity was 50.1%, SD = 18.3 and compliance to eat a healthy diet was 44.0%, SD = 15.4. The main barriers to being active among patients were lack of accessibility to materials, lack of social support, and lack of reminder, while in terms of eating a healthy diet were lack of accessibility to materials, lack of social support, and lack of self-efficacy.

First, the NCDs patients’ compliance mean score to take regular physical activity was 50.1%, SD = 18.3, In the United States, studies conducted demonstrated that 34%–69% of diabetes patients attended the physical activity, and 9%–31% of them attended regular physical activity as recommendations.²⁸ In Saudi Arabia, 49.5% of NCDs patients claimed that they do some type of exercise, 43.2% do walking, and only 5.9% do brisk walking,²⁹ and 43.6% of diabetes patients followed exercises.³⁰ In South Africa, 65% of NCDs patients claimed that they were moderately active.³¹ In Pakistan, a study demonstrated that 23.6% of hypertensive patients usually do physical activity.³²

Second, this study findings showed that the NCDs patients’ compliance to eat a healthy diet was 44.0%, SD = 15.4. In Saudi Arabia, more than 50% of diabetes patients did not comply with the American Diabetes Association’s recommendations in terms of diet,³³ and another study demonstrated that 56.7% of diabetes patients followed a healthy diet.³⁰ In Pakistan, 55.1% of hypertensive patients were having salt restriction.³²

It is clear that being younger, higher education, and jobless participants were more adherence to the key recommendations. The possible explanation for that the adherence to the key recommendations needs more free time (young and jobless patients) may have more leisure time or free time, which gives them more opportunity to practice physical activity or eat a healthy diet. Higher education patients may be due to their understanding of the nature of disease consequences and the associated mortality.

The main perceived barriers to being active among NCDs patients were the lack of accessibility of materials, lack of social support, and lack of reminder. The vast majority of participants (92.0%) believed that by adhering to eat a healthy diet the NCDs will be under control, the majority (82.0%) of participants believed that non-compliance to physical activity may lead to a serious NCDs complication, and approximately 80% believed that the NCDs is a serious health condition. The lack of accessibility to materials, lack of social support, and lack of self-efficacy were the main perceived barriers among NCDs patients to eat a healthy diet, the vast majority of participants (88.8%) believed that by adhering to eat a healthy diet the NCDs will be under control, 80.5% believed non-compliance to a healthy diet may lead to a serious NCDs complication, and the majority (81.0%) of participants believed that the NCD is a serious health condition. For both, take regular physical activity and eat a healthy diet, the lack of accessibility to materials and lack of social support ranked as the first and second perceived barriers for compliance, this study’s findings are consistent with previous studies that defined lack of resources or materials and lack of social support as the main barrier to attending healthy behaviors.^22–24 The possible explanation for the inaccessibility to materials may be that the Gaza Strip since 2007 has been under a siege that affects all aspects of life, with a poverty rate of 53%, and 79% of the people had received aids.³⁴ In addition, around 80% of people in the Gaza Strip are dependent on food aids,³⁵ it is difficult for people facing these challenges join a club or buy suitable equipment for attending the physical activity, and buy different foods recommended such as different types of fruits and vegetables and a special type of oil or meat. The second-ranked barrier was lack of social support; any efforts to change toward healthy behaviors from patients will take place in a social setting.³⁶ So, it is believed that social can promote adherence by providing help in activities.³⁷ Interventions include family support can have better results in compliance among patients.³⁸ A previous study conducted showed that social support can increase the duration of physical activity by about 44%.³⁹ The third main perceived barrier in terms of physical activity was lack of reminder, which was significantly higher among retired, CVDs patients, highest income group and was significantly lower among female as well as primary education level patients, 67.4% of male participants claimed that they are forgetting to attended regular physical activity, and 74.8% of retired patient, our findings consistent with previous studies which defined lack of reminder to act as main barriers adherence to healthy behaviors.^22,40 The third main perceived barrier in terms of eating a healthy diet in this study was lack of self-efficacy; the lack of self-efficacy in previous studies was defined as the most determinant of healthy behaviors.^41,42 Feeling a deficit or if an individual believes that he cannot alter the behavior, then he will not even try to change it and try to adopt healthy behaviors.^19,43 The evidence showed that the preliminary stage of change toward healthy behaviors is important to increase self-efficacy; so, success in the preliminary stage will increase self-efficacy and failure will increase the frustration through individuals.¹⁹ Therefore, the people who are educated to start with simple and reachable healthy behaviors can build-up self-confidence and be more effective to change toward healthy behaviors.⁴⁴

A possible limitation of the study is the dependence on self-reported data, which could lead to recall bias and social desirability bias. Small sample size can be also one of the limitations of this study, in spite of that, this study provides preliminary results about NCDs patients’ adherence level to healthy behaviors, as well as main perceived barriers to being active and eat a healthy diet among NCDs patients in the Palestinian context.

Conclusion

The NCDs patients’ adherence to healthy behaviors is suboptimal. Varied implementation strategies targeting the main barriers are extremely required to enhance the access to physical activity infrastructure, affordable healthy diet options, and to reinforce the change toward healthy behaviors at all levels.

Supplemental Material

sj-pdf-1-smo-10.1177_20503121211029179 – Supplemental material for Barriers toward the practice of healthy behaviors among patients with non-communicable diseases in Gaza Strip, Palestine

Supplemental material, sj-pdf-1-smo-10.1177_20503121211029179 for Barriers toward the practice of healthy behaviors among patients with non-communicable diseases in Gaza Strip, Palestine by Ahmed Hassan Albelbeisi, Ali Albelbeisi, Abdel Hamid El Bilbeisi, Mahmoud Taleb, Amirhossein Takian and Ali Akbari-Sari in SAGE Open Medicine

Footnotes

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the staff and participants in the Palestinian Ministry of Health, PHCs for their important contributions to the study.

Declaration of conflicting interests

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Funding

The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Ethical approval

The study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of Tehran University of Medical Sciences (Code: IR.TUMS.REC.1398.349) and by the Palestinian Health Research Council (Helsinki Ethical Committee of Research PHRC/HC/599/19). In addition, written informed consent was also obtained from each participant.

Informed consent

Written informed consent was also obtained from each participant.

ORCID iDs

Ahmed Hassan Albelbeisi

Abdel Hamid El Bilbeisi

Supplemental material

Supplemental material for this article is available online.

References

World Health Organization. Global action plan for the prevention and control of noncommunicable diseases 2013–2020. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2013.

Puoane

Tsolekile

Sanders

, et al. Chronic non-communicable diseases: primary health care: programme areas. South African Health Review 2008; 1: 73–87.

World Health Organization. Assessing national capacity for the prevention and control of noncommunicable diseases: report of the 2017 global survey. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2018.

World Health Organization. Global status report on noncommunicable diseases 2014. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2014.

Abdeen

Chronic diseases in Palestine: the rising tide. Bridges 2006; 2: 4–7.

Ghosh

Shaar

Mashal

, et al. Diabetes control in 3 villages in Palestine: a community-based quality improvement intervention. J Ambul Care Manage 2007; 30(1): 74–78.

WEST Lebanon Jordan Syria. Palestinian Central Bureau of Statistics (PCBS), 2018, http://www.pcbs.gov.ps/portals/_pcbs/PressRelease/Press_En_Preliminary_Results_Report-en.pdf (accessed on 20 April 2021).

Abdeen

Jildeh

Dkeideek

, et al. Overweight and obesity among Palestinian adults: analyses of the anthropometric data from the first national health and nutrition survey (1999–2000). J Obes 2012; 2012: 213547.

World Bank. Economic monitoring report to the ad hoc liaison committee. Washington, DC: World Bank, 2016, https://www.worldbank.org/en/country/westbankandgaza/publication/economic-monitoring-report-ahlc (accessed on 20 April 2021).

10.

Palestinian Health Information Center. Health Annual Report Palestine 2016. Ministry of Health, Palestine, 2017, http://ghdx.healthdata.org/record/palestine-health-status-annual-report-2016

11.

Fine

Philogene

Gramling

, et al. Prevalence of multiple chronic disease risk factors: 2001 National Health Interview Survey. Am J Prev Med 2004; 27(2 Suppl.): 18–24.

12.

World Health Organization. Package of essential noncommunicable (PEN) disease interventions for primary health care in low-resource settings. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2010.

13.

World Health Organization. Palestine health profile 2015 (Regional Office for the Eastern Mediterranean). Geneva: World Health Organization, 2016.

14.

World Health Organization. Implementation tools: package of essential noncommunicable (PEN)disease interventions for primary health care in low-resource settings. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2013.

15.

Albelbeisi

El Bilbeisi

, et al. Capacity of Palestinian primary health care system to prevent and control of non-communicable diseases in Gaza Strip, Palestine: a capacity assessment analysis based on adapted WHO-PEN tool. Int J Health Plann Manage 2020; 35(6): 1412–1425.

16.

Albelbeisi

El Bilbeisi

, et al. Barriers of adherence among Palestinian healthcare professionals towards the protocol of health education and counselling on healthy behaviours for non-communicable diseases. Ethiopian Journal of Health Sciences 2021; 311: 73–84.

17.

Ajzen

Driver

BL.

Prediction of leisure participation from behavioral, normative, and control beliefs: an application of the theory of planned behavior. Leisure Sciences 1991; 13(3): 185–204.

18.

Rosenstock

IM.

The health belief model and preventive health behavior. Health Education Monographs 1974; 2(4): 354–386.

19.

Bandura

Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychol Rev 1977; 84(2): 191–215.

20.

Snedecor

Cochran

WG.

Statistical Methods. 8th ed. Ames, IA: Iowa State University Press, 1989.

21.

PCBS. Preliminary results of the population, housing and establishments census, 2017, https://www.sesric.org/imgs/news/1945-Preliminary-Results-Report-EN.pdf

22.

Ghimire

Shrestha

Callahan

Barriers to dietary salt reduction among hypertensive patients. J Nepal Health Res Council 2018; 16(2): 124–130.

23.

Ghimire

Barriers to diet and exercise among Nepalese type 2 diabetic patients. Int Sch Res Notices 2017; 2017: 1273084.

24.

AlQuaiz

Tayel

SA.

Barriers to a healthy lifestyle among patients attending primary care clinics at a university hospital in Riyadh. Ann Saudi Med 2009; 29(1): 30–35.

25.

Beaton

Bombardier

Guillemin

, et al. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine 2000; 25(24): 3186–3191.

26.

Lynn

MR.

Determination and quantification of content validity. Nurs Res 1986; 35: 382–385.

27.

Webb

Sheeran

Does changing behavioral intentions engender behavior change? A meta-analysis of the experimental evidence. Psychol Bull 2006; 132(2): 249–268.

28.

Zhao

Ford

, et al. Compliance with physical activity recommendations in US adults with diabetes. Diabet Med 2008; 25(2): 221–227.

29.

Sharaf

Impact of health education on compliance among patients of chronic diseases in Al Qassim, Saudi Arabia. Int J Health Sci 2010; 4(2): 139–148.

30.

Salam

Siddiqui

AF.

Role of health education and barriers to compliance among diabetic patients. Rawal Medical Journal 2014; 39(2): 212–215.

31.

Parker

W-a

Steyn

Levitt

, et al. Health promotion services for patients having non-communicable diseases: Feedback from patients and health care providers in Cape Town, South Africa. BMC Public Health 2012; 12(1): 503.

32.

Ahmed

Abdul Khaliq

Shah

, et al. Compliance to antihypertensive drugs, salt restriction, exercise and control of systemic hypertension in hypertensive patients at Abbottabad. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad 2008; 20(2): 66–69.

33.

Mohamed

Almajwal

Saeed

, et al. Dietary practices among patients with type 2 diabetes in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. J Food Agric Environ 2013; 11(2): 110–114.

34.

World Bank. Economic monitoring report to the ad hoc liaison committee. Washington, DC: World Bank, 2017.

35.

Belov

Running for human rights in Palestine. Green Left Weekly 2018; 1202: 15.

36.

Rosland

A-M

Kieffer

Israel

, et al. When is social support important? The association of family support and professional support with specific diabetes self-management behaviors. J Gen Intern Med 2008; 23(12): 1992–1999.

37.

DiMatteo

MR.

Social support and patient adherence to medical treatment: a meta-analysis. Health Psychol 2004; 23(2): 207–218.

38.

Mayberry

Osborn

CY.

Family support, medication adherence, and glycemic control among adults with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care 2012; 35(6): 1239–1245.

39.

Heath

Howze

Kahn

, et al. Increasing physical activity; a report on recommendations of the task force on community preventive services. MMWR Recomm Rep 2001; 50: 1–14.

40.

Foster

Usherwood

Smith

, et al. Inhaler reminders improve adherence with controller treatment in primary care patients with asthma. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2014; 134(6): 1260–1268.

41.

Desharnais

Bouillon

Godin

Self-efficacy and outcome expectations as determinants of exercise adherence. Psychol Report 1986; 59(3): 1155–1159.

42.

Brady

Tucker

Alfino

, et al. An investigation of factors associated with fluid adherence among hemodialysis patients: a self-efficacy theory based approach. Ann Behav Med 1997; 19(4): 339–343.

43.

Gee

Bienek

Campbell

, et al. Prevalence of, and barriers to, preventive lifestyle behaviors in hypertension (from a national survey of Canadians with hypertension). Am J Cardiol 2012; 109(4): 570–575.

44.

Van Der Bij

Laurant

Wensing

Effectiveness of physical activity interventions for older adults: a review. Am J Prevent Med 2002; 22(2): 120–133.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.14 MB

Barriers toward the practice of healthy behaviors among patients with non-communicable diseases in Gaza Strip,Palestine

Abstract

Objectives:

Method:

Results:

Conclusion:

Keywords

Introduction

Methods

Study participants

Eligibility criteria

Sample size and sampling

Data collection

Study instrument

Translation and validation of the questionnaire

Data analysis

Results

Characteristics of the study participants

NCDs patient’s adherence level to the key recommendations of healthy behaviors

Characteristics of the study participants in relation to adherence level to the key recommendations

Characteristics of the study participants in relation to barriers toward practice of physical activity

Characteristics of the study participants in relation to barriers toward practice of healthy diet

Discussion

Conclusion

Supplemental Material

sj-pdf-1-smo-10.1177_20503121211029179 – Supplemental material for Barriers toward the practice of healthy behaviors among patients with non-communicable diseases in Gaza Strip, Palestine

Footnotes

Acknowledgements

Declaration of conflicting interests

Funding

Ethical approval

Informed consent

ORCID iDs

Supplemental material

References

Supplementary Material