Digital back-feeding is a bottom-up process by which younger generations teach or assist older generations in digital access, usage, and literacy. This study aims to examine how two means of digital back-feeding—proxy back-feeding and learning back-feeding—might be differently impacted by older adults’ perceptions of smartphone use, as well as their impact on older adults’ digital literacy. A cross-sectional questionnaire survey (n = 433) was conducted in mainland China. Our findings revealed that perceived usefulness and perceived risk of smartphone use were positively associated with older adults’ engagement with both proxy back-feeding and learning back-feeding. Perceived ease of use was found to be negatively associated with older adults’ engagement in proxy back-feeding. In addition, older adults’ digital literacy was found to be negatively associated with proxy back-feeding, but positively associated with learning back-feeding. Results suggest that digital back-feeding is a complicated process that may influence older adults’ digital literacy through different routes, which deserves further investigation to bridge digital divide intergenerationally.
AnrijsS.ConradieP.PonnetK. (2022, May 26–30). Explaining engagement patterns in independent, proxy, and supported internet use and problem solving drawing from digital divide theory and social-cognitive theory. 72nd Annual ICA Conference, Paris, France.
2.
AsmarA.Van AudenhoveL.MariënI. (2020). Social support for digital inclusion: Towards a typology of social support patterns. Social Inclusion, 8(2), 138–150. https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v8i2.2627
3.
ChenK.ChanA. H. S. (2014). Gerontechnology acceptance by elderly Hong Kong Chinese: A senior technology acceptance model (STAM). Ergonomics, 57(5), 635–652. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2014.895855
4.
ChengH.LyuK.LiJ.ShiuH. (2021). Bridging the digital divide for rural older adults by family intergenerational learning: A classroom case in a rural primary school in China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(1), 371. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19010371
ChoudrieJ.PheeraphuttranghkoonS.DavariS. (2020). The digital divide and older adult population adoption, use and diffusion of Mobile phones: A quantitative study. Information Systems Frontiers, 22(3), 673–695. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-018-9875-2
7.
CorreaT. (2014). Bottom-up technology transmission within families: Exploring how youths influence their parents’ digital media use with dyadic data. Journal of Communication, 64(1), 103–124. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12067
8.
CorreaT. (2016). Acquiring a new technology at home: A parent-child study about youths’ influence on digital media adoption in a family. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 60(1), 123–139. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2015.1127238
9.
CorreaT.PavezI.ContrerasJ. (2019). The complexities of the role of children in the process of technology transmission among disadvantaged families: A mixed-methods approach. International Journal of Communication, 13, 1099–1119. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/9153
10.
CorreaT.StraubhaarJ. D.ChenW.SpenceJ. (2015). Brokering new technologies: The role of children in their parents’ usage of the internet. New Media & Society, 17(4), 483–500. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444813506975
11.
CourtoisC.VerdegemP. (2016). With a little help from my friends: An analysis of the role of social support in digital inequalities. New Media & Society, 18(8), 1508–1527. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444814562162
12.
DavisF. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
DuflosM.GiraudeauC. (2021). Using the intergenerational solidarity framework to understand the grandparent–grandchild relationship: A scoping review. European Journal of Ageing, 19(2), 233–262. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10433-021-00626-6
15.
DunawayJ.SorokaS. (2021). Smartphone-size screens constrain cognitive access to video news stories. Information, Communication & Society, 24(1), 69–84. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2019.1631367
16.
DuttonW. H.RogersE. M.JunS.-H. (1987). Diffusion and social impacts of personal computers. Communication Research, 14(2), 219–250. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365087014002005
17.
EynonR.HelsperE. (2015). Family dynamics and internet use in Britain: What role do children play in adults’ engagement with the internet?Information, Communication & Society, 18(2), 156–171. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2014.942344
18.
FanJ. X.YuZ. (2022). Prevalence and risk factors of consumer financial fraud in China. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 43(2), 384–396. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10834-021-09793-1
Fernández-ArdèvolM. (2020). Older people go mobile. In The Oxford handbook of mobile communication and society (pp. 187).
21.
FrancisJ.KadylakT.MakkiT. W.RikardR. V.CottenS. R. (2018). Catalyst to connection: When technical difficulties lead to social support for older adults. American Behavioral Scientist, 62(9), 1167–1185. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764218773829
22.
FriemelT. N. (2016). The digital divide has grown old: Determinants of a digital divide among seniors. New Media & Society, 18(2), 313–331. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444814538648
23.
GalperinH.ArcidiaconoM. (2018). Learning from or leaning on? The impact of children on internet use by adults. New Media & Society, 21(2), 483–506. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818799996
24.
GeertsN.SchirmerW.VercruyssenA.GlorieuxI. (2023a). Bridging the ‘instruction gap’: How ICT instructors help older adults with the acquisition of digital skills. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 42(2), 195–207. https://doi.org/10.1080/02601370.2023.2174197
25.
GeertsN.SchirmerW.VercruyssenA.GlorieuxI. (2023b). Exploring older adults’ ICT support: A mismatch between needs and provision. New Media & Society, 26(12), 146144482311663. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448231166356
26.
GilsterP. (1997). Digital literacy. Wiley Computer Pub.
27.
GrošeljD.ReisdorfB. C.DolničarV.PetrovčičA. (2022). A decade of proxy internet use: The changing role of socio-demographics and family support in nonusers’ indirect internet access to online services. The Information Society, 38(4), 240–256. https://doi.org/10.1080/01972243.2022.2080782
28.
HaghzareS.CamposJ. L.BakK.MihailidisA. (2021). Older adults’ acceptance of fully automated vehicles: Effects of exposure, driving style, age, and driving conditions. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 150, 105919. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2020.105919
29.
HänninenR.TaipaleS.LuostariR. (2021). Exploring heterogeneous ICT use among older adults: The warm experts’ perspective. New Media & Society, 23(6), 1584–1601. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820917353
HeJ.HuangX. (2020). The smartphone use and eudaimonic well-being of urban elderly: Based on intergenerational support and TAM. Chinese Journal of Journalism & Communication, 42(3), 49–73. https://doi.org/10.13495/j.cnki.cjjc.20200409.003
32.
HongJ.LiX. (2019). The “cultural feedback” of WeChat in rural families: A case study of ChenQu village. Chinese Journal of Journalism & Communication, 41(10), 50–74. https://doi.org/10.13495/j.cnki.cjjc.2019.10.003
33.
HuangZ.LiC.PanP. (2016). Investigation on digital culture feedback in intergenerational family from view of senior. JingYi Journal of Humanities and Sociology, 10(2), 141–190. http://ir.meiho.edu.tw/handle/987654321/3198
34.
HunsakerA.NguyenM. H.FuchsJ.KaraogluG.DjukaricT.HargittaiE. (2020). Unsung helpers: Older adults as a source of digital media support for their peers. The Communication Review, 23(4), 309–330. https://doi.org/10.1080/10714421.2020.1829307
35.
JingY.SunJ. (2020). Digitization, aging and intergenerational interactive communication—An analysis of digital back-feeding in the audiovisual new media environment. Contemporary Communications, (4), 98–101, 105.
36.
KatzV. S. (2010). How children of immigrants use media to connect their families to the community. Journal of Children and Media, 4(3), 298–315. https://doi.org/10.1080/17482798.2010.486136
37.
KorpelaV.PajulaL.HänninenR. (2023). Older adults learning digital skills together: Peer tutors’ perspectives on non-formal digital support. Media and Communication, 11(3), 53–62. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v11i3.6742
38.
LeiX.ShenY.YangL. (2022). A study on fraud victimization among the Chinese elderly in the digital age: The role of internet usage and digital financial inclusion. Journal of Financial Research, (8), 113–131.
39.
LiS.LeiS.SheC.WeiR. (2022, November). A study of social support for bridging the digital divide among the elderly: A case study of smartphone use among the elderly in mainland China. 2022 Annual Conference of Health Communication Committee of Chinese Journalism History Society and the First Symposium on Future Media and Health Communication Research [Online], China.
40.
LiQ.YanL. (2020). Older adults’ use of mobile device: Usability challenges while navigating various interfaces. Behaviour & Information Technology, 39(8), 837–861. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2019.1622786
41.
LivingstoneS. (2007). Youthful experts? A critical appraisal of children’s emerging internet literacy. In C. Avgerou, R. Mansell, D. Quah, & R. Silverstone (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of information and communication technologies (p. 13). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199548798.003.0021
42.
LoosE.IvanL. (2024). Not only people are getting old, the new media are too: Technology generations and the changes in new media use. New Media & Society, 26(6), 3588–3613. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448221101783
43.
MeadM. (1973). Culture and commitment: A study of the generation gap. Leonardo, 6(2), 174–175. https://doi.org/10.2307/1572701
44.
MendelT.GaoD.LoD.TochE. (2021). An exploratory study of social support systems to help older adults in managing Mobile safety. Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Mobile Human-Computer Interaction (pp. 1–13). https://doi.org/10.1145/3447526.3472047
45.
MohlmanJ.BaschC. H. (2021). Health-related correlates of demonstrated smartphone expertise in community-dwelling older adults. Journal of Applied Gerontology, 40(5), 510–518. https://doi.org/10.1177/0733464820902304
46.
NelissenS.Van den BulckJ. (2018). When digital natives instruct digital immigrants: Active guidance of parental media use by children and conflict in the family. Information, Communication & Society, 21(3), 375–387. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2017.1281993
47.
NevesB. B.AmaroF.FonsecaJ. R. S. (2013). Coming of (old) age in the digital age: ICT usage and non-usage among older adults. Sociological Research Online, 18(2), 22–35. https://doi.org/10.5153/sro.2998
48.
NgiamN. H. W.YeeW. Q.TeoN.YowK. S.SoundararajanA.LimJ. X.LimH. A.TeyA.TangK. W. A.ThamC. Y. X.TanJ. P. Y.LuS. Y.YoonS.NgK. Y. Y.LowL. L. (2022). Building digital literacy in older adults of low socioeconomic status in Singapore (project wire up): Nonrandomized controlled trial. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 24(12), e40341. https://doi.org/10.2196/40341
PeekS. T. M.WoutersE. J. M.van HoofJ.LuijkxK. G.BoeijeH. R.VrijhoefH. J. M. (2014). Factors influencing acceptance of technology for aging in place: A systematic review. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 83(4), 235–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2014.01.004
51.
PeterJ. P.TarpeyL. X. (1975). A comparative analysis of three consumer decision strategies. Journal of Consumer Research, 2(1), 29–37. https://doi.org/10.1086/208613
52.
PetrovčičA.TaipaleS.RogeljA.DolničarV. (2018). Design of mobile phones for older adults: An empirical analysis of design guidelines and checklists for feature phones and smartphones. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 34(3), 251–264. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2017.1345142
53.
QiuJ. (2021). Digital back-feeding in rural families in the new media era—An empirical study based on juntun township, wenshang county, shandong province. News World, (6), 44–48. https://doi.org/10.19497/j.cnki.1005-5932.2021.06.015
54.
ReisdorfB. C.PetrovčičA.GrošeljD. (2021). Going online on behalf of someone else: Characteristics of internet users who act as proxy users. New Media & Society, 23(8), 2409–2429. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820928051
55.
RosalesA.Fernandez-ArdevolM. (2016). Beyond WhatsApp: Older people and smartphones. Romian Journal of Communication and Public Relations, 18(1), 27–47. https://doi.org/10.21018/rjcpr.2016.1.200
SelwynN.JohnsonN.NemorinS.KnightE. (2016). Going online on behalf of others. Australian Communications Consumer Action Network.
58.
ShangY.WuZ.DuX.JiangY.MaB.ChiM. (2022). The psychology of the internet fraud victimization of older adults: A systematic review. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.912242
59.
Tencent Social Research Center, & Chinese Academy of Social Sciences. (2018). Research report on middleaged and elderly Internet life. https://max.book118.com/html/2018/1116/8022025063001133.shtm
60.
VercruyssenA.SchirmerW.GeertsN.MortelmansD. (2023). How “basic” is basic digital literacy for older adults? Insights from digital skills instructors. Frontiers in Education, 8, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1231701
61.
WanZ.BaoL.GaoD.TochE.XiaX.MendelT.LoD. (2019). Appmod: Helping older adults manage Mobile security with online social help. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies, 3(4), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1145/3369819
62.
WangY.LiX.BaiJ.ZhuQ. (2023). Research on the privacy disclosure willingness of new elderly users of health apps under the suitable aging transformation. Information and Documentation Services, 44(2), 42–52. https://doi.org/10.12154/j.qbzlgz.2023.02.005
63.
WangY.RuanJ.DengX. (2023). Research on influencing factors of personal digital archiving behavior of urban middle-aged and old people from the perspective of digital feedback. Library And Information Service, 67(3), 85–95. https://doi.org/10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2023.03.008
64.
WeiW.GongX.LiJ.TianK.XingK. (2023). A study on community older people’s willingness to use smart home—An extended technology acceptance model with intergenerational relationships. Frontiers in Public Health, 11, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1139667
65.
WolffJ. L.DukhaninV.BurgdorfJ. G.DesRochesC. M. (2022). Shared access to patient portals for older adults: Implications for privacy and digital health equity. JMIR Aging, 5(2), e34628. https://doi.org/10.2196/34628
66.
XinL.FangZ. (2021). The identity and construction of the elderly in digital back-feeding. 2021 International Conference on Culture-Oriented Science & Technology (ICCST) (pp. 623–627). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCST53801.2021.00135
67.
XiongJ.ZuoM. (2019). How does family support work when older adults obtain information from mobile internet?Information Technology & People, 32(6), 1496–1516. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITP-02-2018-0060
68.
YuX.LiuS. (2021). The digital divide of the elderly and family support: Based on China family panel studies in 2018. Jilin University Journal Social Sciences Edition, 61(6), 67–82,231–232. https://doi.org/10.15939/j.jujsse.2021.06.sh1
69.
ZhangX.LiZ. (2018). Information privacy concerns, trust and information security behavior intention of smartphone users. Journal of Modern Information, 38(3), 45–50. https://doi.org/10.3969/ j.issn.1008-0821.2018.03.007
70.
ZhangD.XieX. (2022). The effect of guanxi on the improvement of new media literacy among middle-aged and elderly in rural areas. Journalism Research, (8), 1–16,121. https://doi.org/10.20050/j.cnki.xwdx.2022.08.005
71.
ZhangZ.YeZ. (2022). The role of social-psychological factors of victimity on victimization of online fraud in China. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1030670
72.
ZhouX. (2011). Cultural repayment of support and the intergenerational inheritance of artifact civilization. Social Sciences in China, (6), 109–120,223.
ZhouY. (2015). When aging society encounters new media challenges: Academic reflections on digital generation gap and feedback. News and Writing, (12), 53–56.
75.
ZhouY.DingH. (2020). The overview and influential factors of digital backfeeding among the three generations of Chinese families. Chinese Journal of Journalism & Communication, 42(3), 6–31. https://doi.org/10.13495/j.cnki.cjjc.2020.03.001
76.
ZhuX. (2018). The mobile phone’s technical feedback, parent–child communication and parenting style: Integrating theories of technology acceptance and use. Journalism Research, (4), 108–119,155.
77.
ZhuX.ChengX. (2024). Staying connected: Smartphone acceptance and use level differences of older adults in China. Universal Access in the Information Society, 23(1), 203–212. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-022-00933-4
