The self-reinforcing effect of device and usage digital divides: A longitudinal panel study from China

Abstract

There is a growing body of literature on the demographic and socioeconomic distinctions between mobile-only and hybrid Internet users and how the two groups use the Internet differently. However, little is known about why people change their type of Internet access and the impact of this change. Relying on data from two waves of a nationally representative survey conducted in China, this study demonstrates that capital-enhancing Internet activities are positively correlated with the likelihood of switching from mobile-only access to hybrid access and negatively correlated with the likelihood of switching from hybrid access to mobile-only access. In addition, those who switch from mobile to hybrid access subsequently strengthen their capital-enhancing uses, thereby not only amplifying the divide between them and others who remain mobile-only but also creating a positive feedback loop. However, non-capital-enhancing uses, such as gaming, are irrelevant to changes in the type of access. It appears that mobile-only access has become a comparable substitute for computer-based Internet in terms of casual activities. However, for “serious” uses, a device divide still exists.

Keywords

Digital divide material access internet use positive feedback mobile-only

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Barth

A.-K.

Heimeshoff

(2014). What is the magnitude of fixed–mobile call substitution? Empirical evidence from 16 European countries. Telecommunications Policy, 38(8), 771–782. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2014.04.009

Blank

Groselj

(2014). Dimensions of internet use: Amount, variety, and types. Information, Communication & Society, 17(4), 417–435. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2014.889189

Bourdieu

Passeron

J. C.

(1977). Reproduction in education, society and culture. SAGE Publications.

Büchi

Festic

Latzer

(2018). How social well-being is affected by digital inequalities. International Journal of Communication, 12, 3686–3706.

Campbell

S. W.

(2013). Mobile media and communication: A new field, or just a new journal? Mobile Media & Communication, 1(1), 8–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050157912459495

Correa

Pavez

Contreras

(2020). Digital inclusion through mobile phones? A comparison between mobile-only and computer users in internet access, skills and use. Information, Communication & Society, 23(7), 1074–1091. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2018.1555270

Correa

Valenzuela

Pavez

. (2024). For better and for worse: A panel survey of how mobile-only and hybrid Internet use affects digital skills over time. New Media & Society, 26(2), 995–1017. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448211059114

Delaporte

Bahia

(2022). The state of mobile Internet connectivity 2022. Retrieved from https://www.gsma.com/r/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/The-State-of-Mobile-Internet-Connectivity-Report-2022.pdf?utm_source=website&utm_medium=download-button&utm_campaign=somic22

Donner

(2015). After access: Inclusion, development, and a more mobile Internet. MIT Press.

10.

Donner

Gitau

Marsden

(2011). Exploring mobile-only Internet use: Results of a training study in urban South Africa. International Journal of Communication, 5, 574–597.

11.

Ettema

J. S.

Kline

F. G.

(1977). Deficits, differences, and ceilings: Contingent conditions for understanding the knowledge gap. Communication Research, 4(2), 179–202. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365027700400204

12.

Genova

Greenberg

(1979). Interests in news and the knowledge gap. Public Opinion Quarterly, 43(1), 79–91. https://doi.org/10.1086/268493

13.

Gitau

Marsden

Donner

(2010). After access: Challenges facing mobile-only internet users in the developing world [Paper presentation]. Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 2010), New York, NY.

14.

Hargittai

(2010). Digital na(t)ives? Variation in Internet skills and uses among members of the “net generation”. Sociological Inquiry, 80(1), 92–113. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-682X.2009.00317.x

15.

Hargittai

Dobransky

(2017). Old dogs, new clicks: Digital inequality in skills and uses among older adults. Canadian Journal of Communication, 42(2), 195–212. https://doi.org/10.22230/cjc.2017v42n2a3176

16.

Hargittai

Hinnant

(2008). Digital inequality: Differences in young adults’ use of the internet. Communication Research, 35(5), 602–621. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650208321782

17.

Helsper

Van Deursen

Eynon

(2016). Measuring types of Internet use. From digital skills to tangible outcomes project report. Retrieved from http://www.lse.ac.uk/media-and-communications/assets/documents/research/projects/disto/DiSTO-MTIUF.pdf

18.

Kreutzer

(2009). Internet and online media usage on mobile phones among low-income urban youth in Cape Town. International Journal of Education and Development Using ICT, 5(5), 1–21.

19.

Lee

Kim

. (2014). Socio-demographic gaps in mobile use, causes, and consequences: A multi-group analysis of the mobile divide model. Information, Communication & Society, 17(8), 917–936. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2013.860182

20.

Levinson

(1997). The soft edge: A natural history and future of the information revolution. Routledge.

21.

Lin

W.-Y.

Zhang

Jung

J.-Y.

Kim

Y.-C.

(2013). From the wired to wireless generation? Investigating teens’ internet use through the mobile phone. Telecommunications Policy, 37(8), 651–661. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2012.09.008

22.

Liu

Zhang

Yuan

(2023). The impact of internet use on the perceptions of class boundaries and life trajectories: A report from a representative survey in China. Telecommunications Policy, 47(10), 102663. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2023.102663

23.

Lopez-Sintas

Lamberti

Sukphan

(2020). The social structuring of the digital gap in a developing country: The impact of computer and internet access opportunities on internet use in Thailand. Technology in Society, 63, 101433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101433

24.

Lythreatis

Singh

S. K.

El-Kassar

A.-N.

(2022). The digital divide: A review and future research agenda. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 175, 121359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121359

25.

Manlove

Whitacre

(2019). Understanding the trend to mobile-only internet connections: A decomposition analysis. Telecommunications Policy, 43(1), 76–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2018.03.012

26.

Marler

(2023). “You can’t talk at the library”: The leisure divide and public internet access for people experiencing homelessness. Information, Communication & Society, 26(7), 1303–1321. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2021.2006742

27.

McDonald

(2022). Almost three quarters of internet users will be mobile-only by 2025. Retrieved from https://www.warc.com/content/paywall/article/warc-datapoints/almost_three_quarters_of_internet_users_will_be_mobileonly_by_2025/124845

28.

Mossberger

Tolbert

C. J.

Hamilton

. (2012). Measuring digital citizenship: Mobile access and broadband. International Journal of Communication, 6, 2492–2528. Retrieved from http://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/1777/808

29.

Napoli

P. M.

Obar

J. A.

(2014). The emerging mobile internet underclass: A critique of mobile internet access. The Information Society, 30(5), 323–334. https://doi.org/10.1080/01972243.2014.944726

30.

Newlands

Lutz

(2020). Crowdwork and the mobile underclass: Barriers to participation in India and the United States. New Media & Society, 23(6), 1341–1361. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820901847

31.

Pavez

Correa

. (2020). “I don’t use the Internet”: Exploring perceptions and practices among mobile-only and hybrid Internet users. International Journal of Communication, 14, 2208–2226. Retrieved from https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/12275

32.

Pearce

K. E.

Rice

R. E.

(2013). Digital divides from access to activities: Comparing mobile and personal computer internet users. Journal of Communication, 63(4), 721–744. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12045

33.

Perrin

(2021). Mobile technology and home broadband 2021. Retrieved from https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2021/06/03/mobile-technology-and-home-broadband-2021/

34.

Ragnedda

Ruiu

M. L.

Addeo

(2022). The self-reinforcing effect of digital and social exclusion: The inequality loop. Telematics and Informatics, 72, 101852. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2022.101852

35.

Rangaswamy

Arora

(2015). The mobile internet in the wild and every day: Digital leisure in the slums of urban India. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 19(6), 611–626. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367877915576538

36.

Reisdorf

B. C.

Fernandez

Hampton

K. N.

Shin

Dutton

W. H

. (2022). Mobile phones will not eliminate digital and social divides: How variation in internet activities mediates the relationship between type of internet access and local social capital in Detroit. Social Science Computer Review, 40(2), 288–308. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439320909446

37.

Rice

R. E.

Pearce

K. E.

Calderwood

K. J

. (2023). W(h)ither the device divide? Changing relationships between personal computer or mobile device with online activities. Mobile Media & Communication, 11(3), 484–506. https://doi.org/10.1177/20501579221142134

38.

Richter

(2017). Mobile Devices Put The Worldwide in WWW. Retrieved from https://www.statista.com/chart/11803/internet-access-via-mobile-devices/

39.

Scheerder

van Deursen

van Dijk

(2017). Determinants of internet skills, uses and outcomes: A systematic review of the second- and third-level digital divide. Telematics and Informatics, 34(8), 1607–1624. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2017.07.007

40.

Srinuan

., Srinuan

., & Bohlin

. (2012). Fixed and mobile broadband substitution in Sweden. Telecommunications Policy, 36(3), 237–251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2011.12.011

41.

Stoycheff

Nisbet

E. C.

Epstein

(2020). Differential effects of capital-enhancing and recreational internet use on citizens’ demand for democracy. Communication Research, 47(7), 1034–1055. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650216644645

42.

Taipale

. (2016). Do the mobile-rich get richer? Internet use, travelling and social differentiations in Finland. New Media & Society, 18(1), 44–61. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444814536574

43.

Tsetsi

Rains

S. A.

(2017). Smartphone internet access and use: Extending the digital divide and usage gap. Mobile Media & Communication, 5(3), 239–255. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050157917708329

44.

Van Deursen

Helsper

(2018). Collateral benefits of Internet use: Explaining the diverse outcomes of engaging with the Internet. New Media & Society, 20(7), 2333–2351. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444817715282

45.

van Deursen

., & van Dijk

. (2010). Internet skills and the digital divide. New Media & Society, 13(6), 893–911. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444810386774

46.

van Deursen

., & van Dijk

. (2014). The digital divide shifts to differences in usage. New Media & Society, 16(3), 507–526. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444813487959

47.

van Deursen

van Dijk

(2015). Toward a multifaceted model of internet access for understanding digital divides: An empirical investigation. The Information Society, 31(5), 379–391. https://doi.org/10.1080/01972243.2015.1069770

48.

van Deursen

van Dijk

(2019). The first-level digital divide shifts from inequalities in physical access to inequalities in material access. New Media & Society, 21(2), 354–375. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818797082

49.

van Deursen

van Dijk

ten Klooster

P. M.

(2015). Increasing inequalities in what we do online: A longitudinal cross sectional analysis of internet activities among the Dutch population (2010 to 2013) over gender, age, education, and income. Telematics and Informatics, 32(2), 259–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2014.09.003

50.

van Dijk

(2005). The deepening divide:Iinequality in the information society. SAGE Publications.

51.

van Dijk

(2006). Digital divide research, achievements and shortcomings. Poetics, 34(4–5), 221–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2006.05.004

52.

van Dijk

Hacker

(2003). The digital divide as a complex and dynamic phenomenon. The Information Society, 19(4), 315–326. https://doi.org/10.1080/01972240309487

53.

Vassilakopoulou

Hustad

(2023). Bridging digital divides: A literature review and research agenda for information systems research. Information Systems Frontiers, 25(3), 955–969. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-020-10096-3

54.

Wang

Liu

(2018). The mobile internet underclass: Reality or hyperbole? Journal of Information Science, 44(5), 569–579. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165551517690083

55.

Wang

Liu

(2022). The role of motivation in the digital divide: The moderating effect of device access. Mobile Media & Communication, 10(3), 406–420. https://doi.org/10.1177/20501579211060621

56.

Ward

M. R.

Zheng

(2012). Mobile and fixed substitution for telephone service in China. Telecommunications Policy, 36(4), 301–310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2011.12.002

57.

Whitacre

(2017). Fixed broadband or mobile: What makes us more civically engaged? Telematics and Informatics, 34(5), 755–766. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2017.02.006

58.

Witte

J. C.

Mannon

S. E.

(2010). The Internet and social inequalities. Routledge.

59.

Xie

(2014). An Introduction to the China Family Panel Studies (CFPS). Chinese Sociological Review, 47(1), 3–29. https://doi.org/10.2753/CSA2162-0555470101.2014.11082908

60.

Zhang

Wang

Liu

(2021). The empowerment of singleton daughters: Exploring the gender digital divide among Chinese college students. Information Technology & People, 34(5), 1401–1418. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITP-07-2019-0350

61.

Zillien

Hargittai

(2009). Digital distinction: Status-specific type of internet usage. Social Science Quarterly, 90(2), 274–291. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6237.2009.00617.x