In this inaugural issue of the timely Mobile Media & Communication journal, questions have been posed about the state of play for mobile communication now and in the future. Given the growing convergence between mobile, social and locative media, this requires a reassessment of mobile media and its relationship with place and intimacy. How are these convergent media platforms, contexts and practices shaping, and being shaped by, intimate cartographies of place? Drawing on a case study of location-based services, games and camera phone practices in South Korea, this paper explores the role of gendered visual cultures in the relationship between place and intimacy.
boydd. (2010). Social network sites as networked publics: Affordances, dynamics, and implications. In PapachararissiZ. (Ed.), A networked self (pp. 39–58). London, UK: Routledge.
2.
BurgessJ. E. (2007). Vernacular creativity and new media (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from http://eprints.qut.edu.au/16378/
3.
CheeF. (2005). Understanding Korean experiences of online game hype, identity, and the menace of the “Wang-tta”. Presented at DIGRA 2005 Conference: Changing Views-Worlds in Play, Canada.
4.
ChoiJ-H. (2009). The city, self, and connections: Transyouth and urban social networking in Seoul. In Hemelryk DonaldS.AndersonT.SpryD. (Eds.), Youth, society and mobile media in Asia (pp.88–107). London, UK & New York, NY: Routledge.
de Souza e SilvaA.FrithJ. (2012). Mobile interfaces in public spaces: Locational privacy, control and urban sociability. New York, NY: Routledge.
7.
de Souza e SilvaA.HjorthL. (2009). Playful urban spaces: A historical approach to mobile games. Simulation and Gaming40(5): 602–625.
8.
FarmanJ. (2011) Mobile interface theory. London, UK: Routledge.
9.
FortunatiL. (2009). Gender and the mobile phone. In GooginG.HjorthL. (Eds.), Mobile technologies: From telecommunications to media (pp.23–34). London, UK: Routledge.
10.
GazzardA. (2011). Location, location, location: Collecting space and place in mobile media. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, 17(4), 405–417.
11.
GordonE.de Souza e SilvaA. (2011). Net locality. West Sussex, UK: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
HjorthL. (2005). Locating mobility: Practices of co-presence and the persistence of the postal metaphor in SMS/MMS mobile phone customization in Melbourne. Fibreculture Journal, 6. Retrieved from http://journal.fibreculture.org/issue6/issue6_hjorth.html
14.
HjorthL. (2007). Snapshots of almost contact. Continuum, 21(2): 227–238.
15.
HjorthL. (2009). Mobile media in the Asia-Pacific: Gender and the art of being mobile. London, UK & New York, NY: Routledge.
16.
HjorthL. (2011). Locating the online: Creativity and user-created content in SeoulMedia International Australia141: 118–127.
17.
HjorthL. (2011a). Mobile spectres of intimacy: The gendered role of mobile technologies in love – past, present and future. In LingR.CampbellS. (Eds.), The mobile communication research series: Volume II, Mobile communication: Bringing us together or tearing us apart? (pp. 37–60). Edison, NJ: Transaction Books.
18.
HjorthL.KimH. (2005). Being there and being here: Gendered customising of mobile 3G practices through a case study in Seoul. Convergence The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, 11(2): 49–55.
19.
HjorthL.NaB.HuhhJ-S. (2009). Games of gender: A case study on females who play games in Seoul, South Korea. In HjorthL.ChanD. (Eds.), Gaming cultures and place in the Asia–Pacific region (pp. 273–288). London, UK: Routledge.
20.
IngoldT. (2008). Bindings against boundaries: Entanglements of life in an open world. Environment and Planning A40: 1796–1810.
21.
ItoM. (2005). Introduction: Personal, portable, pedestrian. In ItoM.OkabeD.MatsudaM. (Eds.), Personal, portable, pedestrian: Mobile phones in Japanese life (pp.1–16). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
22.
ItoM.OkabeD. (2006). Everyday contexts of camera phone use: Steps towards technosocial ethnographic frameworks. In HöflichJ.HartmannM. (Eds.), Mobile communication in everyday life: An ethnographic view (pp. 79–102). Berlin, Germany: Frank & Timme.
KimS.D. (2003). The shaping of new politics in the era of mobile and cyber communication. In NyiriK. (Ed.), Mobile democracy (pp. 317–326). Vienna, Austria: Passagen Verlag.
LeeK.S. (2011). Interrogating ‘digital Korea’: Mobile phone tracking and the spatial expansion of labour control. Media International Australia141: 107–117.
27.
LukeR. (2006). The phoneur: Mobile commerce and the digital pedagogies of the wireless web. In TrifonasP. (Ed.), Communities of difference: Culture, language, technology (pp. 185–204). London: Palgrave.
28.
PearceC. (2010) (with Artemesia). Communities of play: Emergent cultures in multiplayer games and virtual worlds. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
29.
PinkS. (2011). Sensory digital photography: Re-thinking “moving” and the image. Visual Studies26(1): 4–13.
30.
RichardsonI.WilkenR. (2012). Parerga of the third screen: Mobile media, place, and presence. In WilkenR.GogginG. (Eds.), Mobile technology and place (pp. 198–212). New York, NY: Routledge.
31.
VilliM. (2010). Visual mobile communication: Camera phone photo messages as ritual communication and mediated presence. Academic dissertation, Aalto University School of Art and Design, Helsinki.
32.
WallaceR. (2012). Free speech fight over arrest of Seoul satirist. The Weekend Australian, April7–8, p. 9.
33.
WajcmanJ.BittmanM.BrownJ. (2009). Intimate connections: The impact of the mobile phone on work life boundaries. In GogginG.HjorthL. (Eds.), Mobile technologies (pp. 9–22). London, UK & New York, NY: Routledge.
