I analyze the results of a survey on the public reception of evolution and creationism in South Korea. I reconfirm findings from previous studies, which demonstrated the significance of antievolutionism in the country. The proportion of Koreans who deny or are skeptical toward evolution constitutes 31.6% of the population. They tend to be Protestants, women, seniors, political conservatives, and from rural regions. I also report several seemingly anomalous findings. Notably, many respondents who professed no religion take creationist stances. Moreover, young-earth creationism seems unpopular even among creationists, although it is the mainstream theory of the Korea Association for Creation Research, the country’s flagship creationist organization that influenced many Protestants. In contrast, the majority of the respondents, including evolutionists, endorse the creationist argument that both evolution and creationism should be taught in class. I provide my analyses and hypotheses on these results within Korea’s historical, religious, and cultural contexts.
AechtnerT (2016) Terrorism in the evolution wars: Mass media and human nature. Theology and Science14: 495–517.
2.
ArjomandK (2020) Islamic responses to Darwinism in the Persianate world. In: BrownCM (ed.) Asian Religious Responses to Darwinism: Evolutionary Theories in Middle Eastern, South Asian, and East Asian Cultural Contexts. Cham: Springer, pp. 65–98.
3.
ArmstrongCK (ed.) (2007) Korean Society: Civil Society, Democracy, and the State. London: Routledge.
4.
ArtigasMGlickTFMartínezRA (2007) Negotiating Darwin: The Vatican Confronts Evolution, 1877–1902. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
5.
BaderCDFinkeR (2014) Toward assessing and improving survey questions on religion: The ARDA’s measurement wizard. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion53: 652–661.
6.
BakerDL (1982) Jesuit science through Korean eyes. Journal of Korean Studies4: 207–239.
7.
BakerDL (2008) Korean Spirituality. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaiʻi Press.
8.
BakerDL (2010a) A slippery, changing concept: How Korean new religions define religion. Journal of Korean Religions1: 57–84.
9.
BakerS (2010) The Theos/ComRes survey into public perception of Darwinism in the UK: A recipe for confusion. Public Understanding of Science21: 286–295.
10.
BerkmanMPlutzerE (2010) Evolution, Creationism, and the Battle to Control America’s Classrooms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
11.
BlanckeSHjermitslevHHKjærgaardPC (2014) Introduction: Creationism in Europe or European creationism? In: BlanckeSHjermitslevHHKjærgaardPC (eds) Creationism in Europe. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, pp. 1–14.
BrownCM (ed.) (2020) Asian Religious Responses to Darwinism: Evolutionary Theories in Middle Eastern, South Asian, and East Asian Cultural Contexts. Cham: Springer.
14.
BuswellRELeeTS (eds) (2006) Christianity in Korea. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai’i Press.
15.
ChangPY (2015) Protest Dialectics: State Repression and South Korea’s Democratic Movement, 1970-1979. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
16.
ClémentP (2015) Muslim teachers’ conceptions of evolution in several countries. Public Understanding of Science24: 400–421.
17.
ColemanSCarlinL (2004) Introduction—The cultures of creationism: Shifting boundaries of belief, knowledge and nationhood. In: ColemanSCarlinL (eds) Cultures of Creationism: Anti-evolutionism in English-speaking Countries. Aldershot: Ashgate, pp. 1–28.
18.
De SouzaRFDe CarvalhoMMatsuoTZaiaDAM (2010) Study on the opinion of university students about the themes of the origin of universe and evolution of life. International Journal of Astrobiology9: 109–117.
19.
DeuchlerM (1995) The Confucian Transformation of Korea. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
EcklundEScheitleC (2018) Religion Vs. Science: What Religious People Really Think. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
22.
EdisT (2020) The politics of Islamic opposition to evolution in Turkey. In: BrownCM (ed.) Asian Religious Responses to Darwinism: Evolutionary Theories in Middle Eastern, South Asian, and East Asian Cultural Contexts. Cham: Springer, pp. 19–36.
23.
Elsdon-BakerF (2015) Creating creationists: The influence of “issues framing” on our understanding of public perceptions of clash narratives between evolutionary science and belief. Public Understanding of Science24: 422–439.
24.
FrancisLJGreerJE (1999) Attitudes towards creationism and evolutionary theory: The debate among secondary pupils attending Catholic and Protestant schools in Northern Ireland. Public Understanding of Science8: 93–103.
25.
Gallup Korea (1991) Kwahak Chisik—In’gan Ŭn Tongmul Ro Put’ŏ Chinhwa Haetta [Scientific knowledge: Humans evolved from animals]. Seoul, South Korea: Gallup Korea.
26.
Gallup Korea (2012) Ch’angjoron Kwa Chinhwaron E Taehan Yŏron Chosa [A survey on creationism and evolutionism]. Seoul, South Korea: Gallup Korea.
27.
Gallup Korea (2020) Han’guk Kaellŏp Teilli Op’iniŏn P’yobon Sŏlgye: Chŏnhwa Chosa [Gallup Korea’s sampling methods for surveying public opinions: telephone surveys]. Available at: https://www.gallup.co.kr/gallupdb/columnContents.asp?seqNo=123 (accessed 23 April 2022).
28.
GodartGC (2017) Darwin, Dharma, and the Divine: Evolutionary Theory and Religion in Modern Japan. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai’i Press.
29.
HameedS (2015) Making sense of Islamic creationism in Europe. Public Understanding of Science24: 388–399.
30.
JacksonRR (2020) Indo-Tibetan Buddhist responses to Darwinism. In: BrownCM (ed.) Asian Religious Responses to Darwinism: Evolutionary Theories in Middle Eastern, South Asian, and East Asian Cultural Contexts. Cham: Springer, pp. 209–239.
31.
JangJ (2018) Looking for the evidence of “self-evident truth”: Creation scientists’ research and identity examined through the Methuselah Project. International Journal of Korean History23: 39–90.
32.
JeohnG-HKimY (2001) Indonesia chibu [The Indonesian branch]. In: KACR (ed.) Han’guk Ch’angjo Kwahakhoe Isip Nyŏn Sa [Twenty-year history of the KACR]. Seoul: KACR, pp. 168–187.
33.
JeongY (2018) A study of news frames on the controversy over evolutionary theories in South Korean textbooks. International Journal of Korean History23: 93–119.
34.
KimC (1991) Kwahak ŭl maengsinhan kyoman [Arrogance and blind faith in science]. In: KACR (ed.) Yŏllinŭn Yŏng Ŭi Segye [Opening the spiritual world]. Seoul, South Korea: Kukmin ilbo, pp. 73–80.
35.
KimSCKimK (2015) A History of Korean Christianity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
36.
KoJH (2002) Poepko sip’ŭn tongyŏkchanimdŭl kke [I miss you, my co-ministers]. Ch’angjo132: 62–63.
LarsonEJ (2003) Trial and Error: The American Controversy Over Creation and Evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
39.
LarsonEJ (2006) Summer for the Gods: The Scopes Trial and America’s Continuing Debate Over Science and Religion. New York, NY: Basic Books.
40.
LeeN (2007) The Making of Minjung: Democracy and the Politics of Representation in South Korea. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
41.
LeeTS (2010) Born Again: Evangelicalism in Korea. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai’i Press.
42.
LivingstoneD (2003) Re-placing Darwinism and Christianity. In: LindbergDNumbersRL (eds) When Science & Christianity Meet. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, pp. 183–202.
43.
MoranJP (2012) American Genesis: The Evolution Controversies from Scopes to Creation Science. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
44.
NelkinD (1977) Science Textbook Controversies and the Politics of Equal Time. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
45.
New Scientist (2000) Burning Darwin from Kansas to Korea: Creationism is Flooding the Earth. London: New Scientist.
46.
NumbersRL (2006) The Creationists: From Scientific Creationism to Intelligent Design. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
47.
ParkC-S (2003) Protestantism and Politics in Korea. Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press.
48.
ParkH-J (2001) The creation–evolution debate: Carving creationism in the public mind. Public Understanding of Science10: 173–186.
49.
ParkHW (2021) Practicing creationism: Science and the new religious practices in South Korea. Almagest12: 12–39.
50.
ParkHWChoK (2018) Science, state, and spirituality: Stories of four creationists in South Korea. History of Science56: 35–71.
ParkSB (2012b) South Korea surrenders to creationist demands. Nature486: 14.
54.
RainieLFunkCKennedyBAndersonMDugganMOlmsteadK, et al. (2015) Americans, Politics and Science Issues. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center.
55.
RitzingerJR (2020) Dependent co-evolution: Kropotkin’s theory of mutual aid and its appropriation by Chinese Buddhists. In: BrownCM (ed.) Asian Religious Responses to Darwinism: Evolutionary Theories in Middle Eastern, South Asian, and East Asian Cultural Contexts. Cham: Springer, pp. 319–336.
56.
SchmidA (2002) Korea between Empires, 1895-1919. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
57.
ShapiroAR (2013) Trying Biology: The Scopes Trial, Textbooks, and the Antievolution Movement in American Schools. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
58.
StenhouseJ (2021) Creationists and evolutionists in New Zealand, 1800-2010. Almagest12: 93–122.
59.
StoutDA (2012) Media and Religion: Foundation of an Emerging Field. New York, NY: Routledge.
60.
TikhonovV (2010) Social Darwinism and Nationalism in Korea: The Beginnings (1880S-1910s). Leiden: Brill.
61.
UnsworthAVoasD (2018) Attitudes to evolution among Christians, Muslims and the non-religious in Britain: Differential effects of religious and educational factors. Public Understanding of Science27: 76–93.
62.
WooJ-T (2001) Ilbon chibu [Japanese branch]. In: KACR (ed.) Han’guk Ch’angjo Kwahakhoe Isip Nyŏn Sa [Twenty-year history of the KACR]. Seoul, South Korea: KACR, pp. 163–167.
63.
YeaS (2003) Reinventing the region: The cultural politics of place in Kwangju City and South Chŏlla Province. In: ShinG-WHwangKM (eds) Contentious Kwangju: The May 18 Uprising in Korea’s Past and Present. Lanham, MD: Rowman, pp. 109–131.
64.
YiK (2001) Kyogwasŏ rŭl t’onghan widaehan yusan [A great legacy through textbooks]. In: KACR (ed.) Han’guk Ch’angjo Kwahakhoe Isip Nyŏn Sa [Twenty-year history of the KACR]. Seoul, South Korea: KACR, pp. 293–300.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
