Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The diagnosis of pulmonary hypertension (PH) requires a right heart catheterization (RHC) that reveals a mean pulmonary artery pressure ≥ 25 mmHg. The pulmonary artery catheter traverse the right atrium and ventricle on its way to the pulmonary artery. The presence of abnormal right heart structures, i.e. thrombus, vegetation, benign or malignant cardiac lesions, can lead to complications during this procedure. On the other hand, avoidance of RHC delays the diagnosis and treatment of PH, an approach that might be associated with worse outcomes. This paper discusses the impact of right heart lesions on the diagnosis of PH and suggests an approach on how to manage this association.

Keywords

pulmonary hypertension diagnosis right-sided heart lesions thrombus tumors

Introduction

Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is a condition characterized by an elevated pulmonary artery pressure (PAP) that could lead to right heart failure and death.¹ Echocardiography is an adequate screening test,² but given the limitations of non-invasive tests, the diagnosis of PH requires a right heart catheterization (RHC). PH is present when the mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP) is ≥ 25 mmHg.² Besides confirming the presence of PH, hemodynamic determinations obtained during RHC are essential to narrow possible etiologies. PH can be broadly divided into pre-and/post-capillary PH.^2,3 Pre-capillary PH is characterized by a pulmonary artery wedge pressure (PAWP) ≤ 15 mmHg, whereas post-capillary PH is distinguished by a PAWP of > 15 mmHg. Post-capillary PH can be further divided into the isolated or combined (pre- and post-capillary) forms.²

RHC is a relatively safe procedure⁴ with very low risk of serious complications or death. In experienced centers, the overall risk of serious adverse events in patients with PH is around 1%.⁴ Most frequent complications are related to venous access (local hematoma/pneumothorax), arrhythmias, and hypotensive episodes (vagal reactions). In a large multicenter series (n = 7,218 RHC), the RHC-related mortality was 0.055%.⁴

On certain occasions, echocardiography (transthoracic or transesophageal) or other imaging modalities such as computed tomography (CT) or cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMRI) show abnormal structures on the right side of the heart. These abnormalities may include clots, right valve vegetations, benign or malignant tumors, or more frequently normal anatomical variants that could be mistaken for abnormal lesions. The presence of abnormal right heart structures may expose patients to higher risks during RHC, such as embolic events in the pulmonary or systemic (in the presence of a patent foramen ovale) circulations, arrhythmias, cardiac perforation, etc. Little is known on how to approach the diagnosis and subsequent management of PH in patients with abnormal structures in the right side of the heart. In this review, we present two challenging cases, examine the literature, and make recommendations on how to approach the diagnosis of PH in patients with right heart lesions.

Case presentation

Case 1

A 64-year-old woman presented with dyspnea on exertion and clinical suspicion of PH. She had been anticoagulated with apixaban given her recurrent lower extremity deep vein thrombosis in the setting of factor V Leiden mutation and protein S deficiency. An echocardiogram showed elevated right ventricular systolic pressure (RVSP) and severe dysfunction of the right ventricle. Unexpectedly, a pedunculated structure was found in the right ventricle. CT angiography (CTA) showed no filling defects in the pulmonary arteries and ventilation perfusion scan revealed normal pulmonary perfusion. Given concerns for an intraventricular clot, a RHC was not done; however, since the presumption of having idiopathic PAH was high, she was treated with PAH-specific therapies (riociguat 2.5 mg thrice daily and macitentan 10 mg daily). Three months after receiving apixaban, a transthoracic echocardiogram showed no variations in the size of the right ventricular mass (Fig 1a). CMRI described an ill-defined mass of 1.6 × 0.7 cm attached to a 4.0 × 0.6 cm stalk that originated from the right ventricular free wall. The right ventricle was hypertrophic with systolic and diastolic septal flattening and presented an ejection fraction of 31% (Fig. 1b). The cardiac lesion was attributed to a papillary fibroelastoma and RHC was performed. RHC revealed a mPAP of 52 mmHg, PAWP of 20 mmHg, and pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) of 7.1 Wood units (WU). No complications occurred with anticoagulation or during RHC. Treatment with intravenous epoprostenol was subsequently initiated.

Case 2

A 48-year-old woman presented with progressive dyspnea and echocardiographic findings suggestive of PH, including an elevated RVSP at 86 mmHg with severe dysfunction of the right ventricle. As an incidental finding she had a rounded fixed mass in the dome of the right atrium (Fig. 2a). CMRI revealed right ventricular hypertrophy with an ejection fraction of 29% and a 2.4 × 2.3 × 2.5 cm mass attached to the superior aspect of the anterolateral right atrial wall (Fig. 2b–c) with features consistent with a thrombus. Since a RHC could not be done, she received anticoagulation with warfarin and was started on PAH-specific therapies, i.e. tadalafil 40 mg and ambrisentan 10 mg daily. The international normalized ratio goal was between 2 and 3. No bleeding complications were observed during treatment. At three-month a follow-up CMRI showed a complete resolution of the right atrial mass (Fig. 2d). The right ventricle remained dilated with an ejection fraction of 31%. A subsequent RHC confirmed the presence of PAH with a mPAP of 38 mmHg, PAWP of 10 mmHg, cardiac index of 2.61 L/min/m², and PVR of 7 WU. No complications occurred during or immediately after RHC. Subcutaneous treprostinil was added to her PH treatment.

Fig. 1.

Echocardiogram and CMR at 3-month. (a) A right ventricular mass (1.54 cm in length and 0.9 cm wide). (b) A pedunculated lesion in the right ventricle.

Fig. 2.

Echocardiogram and CMR at baseline and CMR at three months. (a) Echocardiogram reveals a 2 cm mass in the right atrium. (b) Axial CMR section shows a circular structure in the right atrium. (c) Sagittal CMR view depicts a circular mass in the right atrium. (d) Coronal CMR section in a three-month follow-up study shows resolution of the right atrial mass.

Abnormal right heart structures

Abnormal right cardiac lesions include benign or malignant tumors, and infectious and non-infectious structures such as vegetations or thrombi. It is important to differentiate these abnormal lesions from normal cardiac variants. Table 1 summarizes the most common cardiac lesions seen in the right heart chambers. The differential diagnosis of these cardiac structures can be narrowed by considering their location, attachment, mobility, number, and morphology (e.g. necrosis, vascularity, and calcification), as well as associated abnormalities such as stagnant flow, valvular lesions, myocardial abnormalities, and evidence of systemic infection.

Table 1.

Right cardiac lesions.

Benign lesions	Malignant lesions	Normal variants	Others
Myxomas Papillary fibroelastomas Lipomas Fibromas Hemangiomas Teratomas Purkinje cell tumors/hamartomas Rhabdomyomas	Angiosarcomas Rhabdomyosarcomas Fibrosarcomas Leiomyosarcomas Primary lymphoma	Chiari network Moderator band Eustachian valve Muscle bundles/trabeculations Crista terminalis Catheters/pacemaker leads Pectinate muscles Fatty infiltration	Thrombus/clots Vegetations
Pseudotumors
Lipomatous hypertrophy Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor Hamartoma of mature cardiac myocytes Calcified amorphous tumor Mesothelial/monocytic incidental cardiac excrescences

Right heart thrombus can be seen in the context of acute pulmonary embolism,⁵ atrial fibrillation, wall motion abnormalities, or in association with pacemaker leads or prosthetic valves. Most cases of infectious endocarditis of the tricuspid or pulmonic valve are seen in injection drug users.⁶ More than 90% of cardiac tumors are benign.⁷ Malignant lesions could originate in the heart but are more commonly metastasis of extracardiac neoplasms.⁷ It is imperative to recognize these conditions given that their treatments are markedly different.

Cardiac thrombus could appear in patients with hypercoagulable disorders, acute pulmonary embolism,⁵ blood stagnation (myocardial wall motion abnormalities and atrial fibrillation),⁸ or foreign bodies such as indwelling catheters,⁹ pacemaker leads, prosthetic valves, and atrial or ventricular septal closure devices.¹⁰ A right atrial thrombus has been observed in about 10% of patients with pulmonary thromboembolism¹¹ and in 7% of all autopsies (n = 23,796).¹¹ The right atrium is an unusual site for thrombus formation, even in patients with atrial fibrillation; nevertheless, thrombi could form in enlarged right atria with lower appendage emptying velocities.^12,13 Patients with right atrial thrombus are treated with anticoagulants, thrombolytic agents, or surgical thrombectomy.^14–16

Endocarditis of the right heart presents with vegetations in the tricuspid and/or pulmonic valves. Valvular endocarditis can have an infectious or non-infectious origin. Non-infectious endocarditis can occur in patients with an underlying malignancy or systemic inflammatory illness (e.g. systemic lupus erythematosus, rheumatoid arthritis).¹⁷ Endocarditis of the right heart valves comprise 5–10% of all cases of infectious endocarditis¹⁸ and is generally due to Staphylococcus aureus infection.¹⁹ Risk factors include intravenous drug use, presence of foreign material, underlying heart disease, invasive dental, medical, or surgical procedures, and prior episodes of endocarditis.¹⁹ Pulmonary events occur in 80% of these patients, including septic emboli and cavitation.²⁰

Cardiac myxomas are the most common benign cardiac neoplasms. The majority of cardiac myxomas (∼80%) originate in the left atrium while most of the remainder come from the right atrium.^21–24 Myxomas are the most common cardiac tumors seen in the right atrium.²⁵ Patients with myxomas tend to have constitutional symptoms²⁶ and findings suggestive of tricuspid stenosis or recurrent embolism. Papillary fibroelastomas are the second most common benign cardiac tumors in adults.²⁷ About one-third of these patients are asymptomatic, while the rest may present with pulmonary embolism, syncope, myocardial infarction, or sudden death.^27,28

Malignant cardiac tumors are significantly less common and can be either primary (originating in the heart) or secondary (originating in extracardiac structures). Primary cardiac tumors include cardiac sarcomas²⁹ and lymphomas.³⁰ Secondary tumors are significantly more common and derive from hematogenous metastases, direct invasion from nearby structures (e.g. bronchogenic carcinoma of the lung, breast cancer, lymphoma, melanoma, mesothelioma, and osteoscarcoma),³¹ or intravascular extension across the superior or inferior vena cava into the right atrium (e.g. renal cell carcinoma³¹).^32,33

Clinical presentation and impact of abnormal right heart structures

In general, patients with right-sided cardiac lesions do not have characteristic clinical symptoms. One can suspect this diagnosis in patients with recurrent acute pulmonary embolism, caused by fragments dislodging from the right heart mass.^34–37 A right atrial mass that extends to and obstructs the superior vena cava will present with superior vena cava syndrome which is characterized by edema of the face and arms, jugular vein distention, and facial cyanosis. If the atrial mass extends into the inferior vena cava it may cause Budd–Chiari syndrome, characterized by right upper quadrant pain, hepatomegaly, ascites, and acute liver failure.³⁸ If the right atrial mass causes a reduction of the right ventricular inflow area, the right atrial pressure may increase, leading to venous congestion.²² In the presence of a patent foramen ovale, a higher right atrial pressure may expose a right-to-left shunt potentially leading to hypoxemia.^39–41 Abnormal structures in the right ventricle can embolize to the pulmonary artery or interfere with the filling or outflow of the right ventricle, resulting in venous congestion or reduction in the cardiac output, respectively.²⁵ Cardiac lesions may disturb the electrical automaticity and conduction of the heart, leading to arrhythmias and/or heart block. Another potential complication of abnormal heart structures is pericardial effusion or myocardial rupture which might lead to pericardial tamponade.^42,43

Use of imaging modalities in the diagnosis of cardiac masses

There is no imaging technique that can precisely identify whether a cardiac structure is a thrombus, tumor (benign or malignant), or normal variant/artifact. Nevertheless, echocardiography or CMRI provide important clues that can help secure the correct diagnosis (Fig. 3). Abnormal right heart structures are generally noted during echocardiography.⁴⁴ The echocardiographic examination provides essential information on the anatomic location and extent of the mass, severity of valve regurgitation or stenosis, presence of chamber obliteration, pericardial effusion, or cardiac tamponade.⁴⁵ Transthoracic echocardiography may not detect all thrombi or might show normal structures that resemble thrombi.⁴⁶ For instance, small non-protruding mural thrombi may resemble normal or mildly thickened cardiac wall; on the other hand, normal structures such as papillary muscles, anomalous bands, or trabeculae may mimic thrombi. These misdiagnoses are routed on certain echocardiographic limitations such as poor image quality (e.g. patients with parenchymal lung disease), inability to adequately identify the myocardium-thrombus interface and the limited near-field resolution of the right ventricular apex.⁴⁶ Echocardiography continues to be the gold standard imaging for confirming the presence valvular vegetations. Importantly, ample expertise in echocardiographic acquisition and interpretation is essential to identify and adequately characterize abnormal right heart structures.⁴⁵

Fig. 3.

Imaging approach to cardiac masses. CMR, cardiac magnetic resonance; TEE, transesophageal echocardiography.

Transesophageal echocardiography has been shown to be superior to transthoracic echocardiography for detection of intracardiac thrombi, since it allows excellent visualization of cardiac chambers.^47,48 Transesophageal echocardiography may offer clues that help narrow the differential diagnosis of cardiac lesions. For example, malignant lesions may have intra-myocardial extension and vena cava invasion.⁴⁵ Contrast echocardiography and three-dimensional echocardiography may enhance the traditional image acquisition.⁴⁹

CMRI is currently the best modality to discriminate among the different etiologies of abnormal right heart structures.⁵⁰ A good number of CMRI features help differentiate benign and malignant cardiac masses.⁵¹ Certain characteristics such as mass surface, size, location, T1-weighted and T2-weighted response, presence of hemorrhage or calcifications, valvular involvement, and pericardial effusion provide diagnostic clues.⁵² For instance, malignant cardiac tumors are usually larger,⁵³ have ill-defined and invasive borders^52,54 and broad-based myocardial insertion,⁵³ invading the myocardium, pericardium, and extracardiac structures.

In fact, the presence of pericardial effusion in the setting of a cardiac mass increases the suspicion of malignancy.⁵³ Large foci of calcification are a characteristic hallmark of cardiac osteosarcomas, whereas small areas of calcification can be seen in cardiac fibromas.⁵³ Tumors arising from the right atrial wall should be considered suspicious for malignancy since this location is uncommon for benign tumors.⁵² Lobulated masses that appear distinct from the myocardial wall, in the presence of severe wall motion abnormality, strongly suggest a thrombus rather than a tumor.⁵⁵ Thrombi are avascular and therefore show no contrast uptake; therefore the CMRI shows thrombi as a low-signal-intensity filling defect in the heart cavities.⁵⁶ Delayed enhanced sequences on CMRI are useful for detection myocardial scars, which are a risk factor for thrombosis.^46,57 Gultai et al. concluded that CMRI performed better than a combination of transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography in detecting intracardiac masses. The authors reported that CMRI is better suited for determining the cardiac mass etiology, extent, and relationship to adjacent structures, as well as the hemodynamic impact of the lesion.⁵⁸

Diagnosis of PH in patients with right heart abnormalities

The diagnosis of PH requires a RHC. Conditions in which RHC could be avoided include left heart and lung diseases (PH groups 2 and 3) without signs of severe PH or right ventricular dysfunction.⁵⁹ In the rest, RHC is essential to determine whether patients have pre- and/or post-capillary PH, assess the hemodynamic severity, and determine pulmonary vasoreactivity (e.g. vasodilatory challenge with nitric oxide). These data are essential, not only for diagnosis and hemodynamic characterization of the disease, but also for prognostication and treatment.

Unfortunately, in the presence of abnormal right cardiac structures, a RHC is largely contraindicated given potential complications. For instance, during RHC a thrombus, vegetation or piece of a tumor may dislodge and embolize to the lung or cause paradoxical embolism in the presence of patent foramen ovale with right-to-left flow. Other potential complications in this particular context include arrhythmias and cardiac perforation with or without tamponade.

The prevalence of abnormal right-sided lesions in patients suspected of having PH remains unknown. It is certainly possible that since PH patients tend to develop right ventricular hypertrophy, certain normal variants, i.e. muscle bundles or trabeculations, may appear more prominent and be wrongly characterized as a clot or other abnormal structures. In this setting, one needs to use the best clinical judgment to decide whether a particular patient is likely to have PH and employ complementary tools to determine the most likely etiology and establish disease severity and need for treatment. Helpful tools include New York Heart Association (NYHA) FC, history of syncope, clinical signs of right heart failure, rate of disease progression, 6-min walk distance, serum NT-pro brain natriuretic peptide, and certain echocardiographic determinations such as right atrial area, right ventricular function, and presence of pericardial effusion. If there is a high clinical probability of PAH, particularly when the risk of complications during RHC are moderate to high, PAH-specific treatments should be initiated as soon as possible, since delays may lead to worse outcomes.⁶⁰ The type of PAH-specific treatment is selected based on the FC and severity of disease.⁶¹

There are possible alternatives to obtain pulmonary pressures, besides the traditional RHC. For instance, one could measure the left ventricular end-diastolic pressure, to assess whether the post-capillary component could explain their suspected PH. A novel approach was proposed by Suliman et al.⁶² who measured the pulmonary pressures in a patient with a mechanical tricuspid valve by trans-septal puncture and retrograde catheterization with occlusion of a pulmonary vein, akin to a reverse wedge. This procedure allowed the measurement of the transpulmonary gradient (mPAP-left atrial pressure).

The best approach for diagnosis PH in the setting of an abnormal right heart structure is unknown. We proposed the algorithm presented in Fig. 4. It is essential that experienced physicians assess the clinical, echocardiographic, and CMRI characteristics of the cardiac mass to narrow the differential diagnosis. If the probability of a cardiac thrombus is high, one could consider anticoagulation for three months and then reassess. If the mass persists, further evaluation is needed to rule out other etiologies. Treatment of infectious endocarditis include adequate antibiotic therapy based on the bacterial isolation and antimicrobial susceptibility. Management of a certain benign tumors, i.e. myxoma, and malignant tumors may require biopsy and potentially surgery; which carry increased risks in patients with underlying PH. RHC could be performed when the clot or vegetations resolve. In cases of cardiac tumors, risk/benefits of RCH and alternative approaches need to be discussed with the patient.

Fig. 4.

Algorithm on to approach the diagnosis of PH in patients with a right cardiac mass. CMR, cardiac magnetic resonance; RA, right atrium; RHC, right heart catheterization; RV, right ventricle; TEE, transesophageal echocardiography; TTE, transthoracic echocardiography.

Conclusion

The presence of abnormal right heart structures presents a diagnostic challenge in PH, since RHC, the required diagnostic procedure, is contraindicated in this context. In these cases, it is essential to carefully evaluate and closely follow the right heart mass to identify the most likely etiology and assess response to treatments. In the appropriate patients, PAH-specific treatments may need to be initiated based on clinical suspicion and results of complementary testing. When safe, a RHC needs to be performed to confirm the diagnosis and determine hemodynamic severity.

Footnotes

Conflict of interest

The author(s) declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Funding

MYD is supported by the Haslam Family Endowed Chair in Cardiovascular Medicine. ART is supported by NIH grant no. R01HL130307.

References

Tonelli

Arelli

Minai

et al.

Causes and circumstances of death in pulmonary arterial hypertension. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2013; 188: 365–369.

Galiè

Humbert

Vachiery

et al.

2015 ESC/ERS Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of pulmonary hypertension: The Joint Task Force for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Pulmonary Hypertension of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Respiratory Society (ERS): Endorsed by: Association for European Paediatric and Congenital Cardiology (AEPC), International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT). Eur Heart J 2016; 37: 67–119.

Hoeper

Bogaard

Condliffe

et al.

Definitions and diagnosis of pulmonary hypertension. J Am Coll Cardiol 2013; 62: D42–50.

Hoeper

Lee

Voswinckel

et al.

Complications of right heart catheterization procedures in patients with pulmonary hypertension in experienced centers. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006; 48: 2546–2552.

Carson

Kelley

Duff

et al.

The clinical course of pulmonary embolism. N Engl J Med 1992; 326: 1240–1245.

Dressler

Roberts

. Infective endocarditis in opiate addicts: analysis of 80 cases studied at necropsy. Am J Cardiol 1989; 63: 1240–1257.

Bussani

De-Giorgio

Abbate

et al.

Cardiac metastases. J Clin Pathol 2007; 60: 27–34.

Finlayson

. Right heart thrombi: consider the cause. Can J Cardiol 2008; 24: 888.

Burns

McLaren

. Catheter-related right atrial thrombus and pulmonary embolism: a case report and systematic review of the literature. Can Respir J 2009; 16: 163–165.

10.

Yilmaz

Gurlertop

Erdogan

. Right atrial thrombus following closure of an atrial septal defect. Heart 2003; 89: 726.

11.

Ogren

Bergqvist

Eriksson

et al.

Prevalence and risk of pulmonary embolism in patients with intracardiac thrombosis: a population-based study of 23 796 consecutive autopsies. Eur Heart J 2005; 26: 1108–1114.

12.

Bashir

Asher

Garcia

et al.

Right atrial spontaneous echo contrast and thrombi in atrial fibrillation: a transesophageal echocardiography study. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2001; 14: 122–127.

13.

de Divitiis

Omran

Rabahieh

et al.

Right atrial appendage thrombosis in atrial fibrillation: its frequency and its clinical predictors. Am J Cardiol 1999; 84: 1023–1028.

14.

The European Cooperative Study on the clinical significance of right heart thrombi. European Working Group on Echocardiography. Eur Heart J 1989; 10: 1046–1059.

15.

Kinney

Wright

. Efficacy of treatment of patients with echocardiographically detected right-sided heart thrombi: a meta-analysis. Am Heart J 1989; 118: 569–573.

16.

Rose

Punjabi

Pearse

. Treatment of right heart thromboemboli. Chest 2002; 121: 806–814.

17.

Holland

Baddour

Bayer

et al.

Infective endocarditis. Nat Rev Dis Primers 2016; 2: 16059.

18.

Chan

Ogilby

Segal

. Tricuspid valve endocarditis. Am Heart J 1989; 117: 1140–1146.

19.

Yuan

. Right-sided infective endocarditis: recent epidemiologic changes. Int J Clin Exp Med 2014; 7: 199–218.

20.

Heydari

Safari

Sarvghad

. Isolated tricuspid valve endocarditis. Int J Infect Dis 2009; 13: e109–111.

21.

Vander Salm

. Unusual primary tumors of the heart. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2000; 12: 89–100.

22.

Kuon

Kreplin

Weiss

et al.

The challenge presented by right atrial myxoma. Herz 2004; 29: 702–709.

23.

Jelic

Milicić

Alfirević

et al.

Cardiac myxoma: diagnostic approach, surgical treatment and follow-up. A twenty years experience. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) 1996; 37: 113–117.

24.

Keeling

Oberwalder

Anelli-Monti

et al.

Cardiac myxomas: 24 years of experience in 49 patients. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2002; 22: 971–977.

25.

Abu Abeeleh

Saleh

Alhaddad

et al.

Cardiac myxoma: clinical characteristics, surgical intervention, intra-operative challenges and outcome. Perfusion 2017; 32(8): 686–690.

26.

Maisch

. Immunology of cardiac tumors. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1990; 38(Suppl. 2): 157–163.

27.

Gowda

Khan

Nair

et al.

Cardiac papillary fibroelastoma: a comprehensive analysis of 725 cases. Am Heart J 2003; 146: 404–410.

28.

Sun

Asher

Yang

et al.

Clinical and echocardiographic characteristics of papillary fibroelastomas: a retrospective and prospective study in 162 patients. Circulation 2001; 103: 2687–2693.

29.

Leduc

Jenkins

Sukov

et al.

Cardiac angiosarcoma: histopathologic, immunohistochemical, and cytogenetic analysis of 10 cases. Hum Pathol 2017; 60: 199–207.

30.

Ikeda

Nakamura

Nishimaki

et al.

Primary lymphoma of the heart: case report and literature review. Pathol Int 2004; 54: 187–195.

31.

Chiles

Woodard

Gutierrez

et al.

Metastatic involvement of the heart and pericardium: CT and MR imaging. Radiographics 2001; 21: 439–449.

32.

Silvestri

Bussani

Pavletic

et al.

Metastases of the heart and pericardium. G Ital Cardiol 1997; 27: 1252–1255.

33.

Longo

Mocini

Santini

et al.

Unusual sites of metastatic malignancy: case 1. Cardiac metastasis in hepatocellular carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 2004; 22: 5012–5014.

34.

Alsafwah

Lababidi

. Recurrent pulmonary embolism originating from right atrial myxoma. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2001; 14: 305–307.

35.

Oshiumi

Hashimoto

Sasaki

et al.

Right atrial myxoma complicated with pulmonary embolism. Jpn J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2001; 49: 449–452.

36.

Parsons

Detterbeck

. Multifocal right atrial myxoma and pulmonary embolism. Ann Thorac Surg 2003; 75: 1323–1324.

37.

Shimizu

Okuri

Yokoyama

et al.

A case of right atrial myxoma–effect of large myxoma in the right atrium studied by M-mode and Doppler echocardiography. Jpn Circ J 1995; 59: 579–586.

38.

Loire

Delaye

. [Myxoma of the right atrium. Apropos of 10 surgically treated cases]. Ann Cardiol Angeiol (Paris) 1992; 41: 177–183.

39.

Murayama

Tamaki

Kato

et al.

Right atrial myxoma associated with atrial septal defect: a case report and review of the literature. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2001; 7: 166–169.

40.

Saito

Tsuchiya

Osawa

et al.

[Surgical removal of right atrial myxoma with severe hypoxemia caused by right to left shunt through persistent foramen ovale]. Kyobu Geka 1998; 51: 1135–1136.

41.

Saitoh

Kubota

Takeshita

et al.

Right atrial myxoma with right to left shunt and coronary artery disease. Jpn Circ J 1994; 58: 76–79.

42.

Salazar

Wray

Denlinger

et al.

Mediastinal mass and pericardial tamponade in a renal transplant recipient: A rare case of nocardia infection. Am J Case Rep 2013; 14: 295–299.

43.

Maleszewski

Anavekar

Moynihan

et al.

Pathology, imaging, and treatment of cardiac tumours. Nat Rev Cardiol 2017; 14(9): 536–549.

44.

Sütsch

Jenni

von Segesser

et al.

[Heart tumors: incidence, distribution, diagnosis. Exemplified by 20,305 echocardiographies]. Schweiz Med Wochenschr 1991; 121: 621–629.

45.

Braunwald

. Heart disease: A textbook of cardiovascular medicine, 6th ed. Philadelphia, PA: PWSC, 2001.

46.

Srichai

Junor

Rodriguez

et al.

Clinical, imaging, and pathological characteristics of left ventricular thrombus: a comparison of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging, transthoracic echocardiography, and transesophageal echocardiography with surgical or pathological validation. Am Heart J 2006; 152: 75–84.

47.

Chen

Koschyk

Hamm

et al.

Usefulness of transesophageal echocardiography in identifying small left ventricular apical thrombus. J Am Coll Cardiol 1993; 21: 208–215.

48.

Pearson

. Transthoracic echocardiography versus transesophageal echocardiography in detecting cardiac sources of embolism. Echocardiography 1993; 10: 397–403.

49.

Mankad

Herrmann

. Cardiac tumors: echo assessment. Echo Res Pract 2016; 3: R65–R77.

50.

Freedberg

Kronzon

Rumancik

et al.

The contribution of magnetic resonance imaging to the evaluation of intracardiac tumors diagnosed by echocardiography. Circulation 1988; 77: 96–103.

51.

O’Donnell

Abbara

Chaithiraphan

et al.

Cardiac tumors: optimal cardiac MR sequences and spectrum of imaging appearances. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2009; 193: 377–387.

52.

Araoz

Eklund

Welch

et al.

CT and MR imaging of primary cardiac malignancies. Radiographics 1999; 19: 1421–1434.

53.

Siripornpitak

Higgins

. MRI of primary malignant cardiovascular tumors. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1997; 21: 462–466.

54.

Araoz

Mulvagh

Tazelaar

et al.

CT and MR imaging of benign primary cardiac neoplasms with echocardiographic correlation. Radiographics 2000; 20: 1303–1319.

55.

Goyal P and Weinsaft JW. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging for assessment of cardiac thrombus. Methodist DeBakey Cardiovascular Journal.2013; 9: 132–136.

56.

Barkhausen

Hunold

Eggebrecht

et al.

Detection and characterization of intracardiac thrombi on MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2002; 179: 1539–1544.

57.

Weinsaft

Kim

Shah

et al.

Detection of left ventricular thrombus by delayed-enhancement cardiovascular magnetic resonance prevalence and markers in patients with systolic dysfunction. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008; 52: 148–157.

58.

Gulati

Sharma

Kothari

et al.

Comparison of echo and MRI in the imaging evaluation of intracardiac masses. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2004; 27: 459–469.

59.

Galie

Humbert

Vachiery

et al.

60.

Rubin

Badesch

Fleming

et al.

Long-term treatment with sildenafil citrate in pulmonary arterial hypertension: the SUPER-2 study. Chest 2011; 140: 1274–1283.

61.

Galie

Corris

Frost

et al.

Updated treatment algorithm of pulmonary arterial hypertension. J Am Coll Cardiol 2013; 62: D60–72.

62.

Suliman SA, Howsare MM, El-Kersh K, et al. Right heart catheterization: an alternative route in a diagnostic dilemma. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2017; 195: A4183.

Effect of abnormal right heart structures on the diagnosis of pulmonary hypertension

Abstract

Keywords

Introduction

Case presentation

Case 1

Case 2

Abnormal right heart structures

Clinical presentation and impact of abnormal right heart structures

Use of imaging modalities in the diagnosis of cardiac masses

Diagnosis of PH in patients with right heart abnormalities

Conclusion

Footnotes

Conflict of interest

Funding

References