In this commentary, I use the notion of carceral feminism and the false dichotomy of the public and private sphere to reimagine how geographers interrogate the spatiality, legality, and embodiment of violence against women. By rethinking the role of the state as doling out punishment, the social work approach as service providers, along with moving beyond the bifurcation of public and private, activist scholars have the opportunity to change power relations in cities and communities. While a somewhat radical idea, it is already happening in cities like Chicago.
BondiL (1998) Gender, class, and urban space: public and private space in contemporary urban landscapes. Urban Geography19(2): 160–185.
2.
CollinsPH (2002) Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness, and the Politics of Empowerment. London: Routledge.
3.
CrenshawK (1991) Mapping the margins: intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review43: 1241–1299.
4.
DuncanN (1996) Renegotiating gender and sexuality in public and private spaces. In: DuncanN (ed.) BodySpace. Destabilizing Geographies of Gender and Sexuality. London: Routledge, pp. 127–145.
5.
FainsteinSS (2005) Feminism and planning. Theoretical issues. In: FainsteinSSServonLJ (eds) Gender and Planning: A Reader. New Jersey: Rutgers University Press, pp. 120–138.
6.
HaydenD (1980) What would a non-sexist city be like? Speculations on housing, urban design, and human work. Signs5(3): S170–S187.
KempAA (1994) Women’s Work: Degraded and Devalued. Englewood Cliffs, N.J: Pearson College Division.
9.
MiranneKBYoungAH (eds) (2000) Gendering the City: Women, Boundaries, and Visions of Urban Life. Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield.
10.
Muxí MartínezZCasanovasRCiocolettoA. (2011) ¿Qué aporta la perspectiva de género al urbanismo?Feminismos17: 105–129.
11.
RichieBE (2012) Arrested Justice: Black Women, Violence, and America’s Prison Nation. New York: New York University Press.
12.
SandercockLForsythA. (1992) A gender agenda: new directions for planning theory. Journal of the American Planning Association, 58(1), 49–59.
13.
SweetELOrtiz EscalanteS (2010) Planning responds to gender violence: Evidence from Spain, Mexico and the United States. Urban Studies47(10): 2129–2147.
14.
SweetELEscalanteSO. (2015) Bringing bodies into planning: Visceral methods, fear and gender violence. Urban Studies, 52(10), 1826–1845.
