Abstract
I am sympathetic with Bassens et al.’s project of rethinking in explicitly social class, people-based terms the question of socio-spatial inequalities that has occupied the minds of urban and regional scholars after the populist eruption of the mid-2010s and onward. In doing so, the article has the merit of moving beyond a merely place-based understanding of today’s regional inequality phenomenon, constructed around the undifferentiated notion of ‘left-behind places’. However, despite embracing a people-based perspective, the article offers a response to the liveability crisis centred on a conventional place-based approach to public policy. I argue that a place-based approach to public policy on liveability can have the effect of increasing the attractiveness of some places and, in doing so, of fomenting phenomena of inter-place competitiveness. Following this criticism, in conclusion, I call for a renewed role of the national state, in collaboration with local authorities and communities, in the pursuit of equity in public service delivery.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
