Programming learning and teaching of pre-service computer science teachers: Challenges,concerns,and solutions

Abstract

This study investigates pre-service computer science (CS) teachers’ perspectives on the factors affecting their programming abilities, concerns about their future professional lives, and pedagogical suggestions for effective programming teaching. The participants of the study were twenty-eight pre-service CS teachers studying at eighteen different universities in Türkiye. The data was gathered with a questionnaire consisting of open-ended questions. Results showed that inherent programming challenges, personal factors, and quality of undergraduate education affected pre-service CS teachers’ abilities in programming teaching. They were concerned about their professional lives relating to programming teaching, keeping up with technological innovations, pedagogical concerns, and teaching practice. They also suggested pedagogical approaches that could be used in programming teaching under two categories, namely basic programming teaching, and teaching principles and techniques. The study contributes to the development of programming teaching by shedding light on the current perspectives of pre-service CS teachers on programming education.

Keywords

Computer science education programming teacher preparation pre-service teachers programming education

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Anastasiadou

Karakos

(2011) The beliefs of electrical and computer engineering students’ regarding computer programming. The International Journal of Technology, Knowledge and Society 7(1): 37–51. DOI: 10.18848/1832-3669/CGP/v07i01/56170.

AP Central (2020, Sep 24) About AP Computer Science Principles. https://apcentral.collegeboard.org/courses/ap-computer-science-principles

Aparicio

Costa

(2018) A Virtual Robot to Support Programming Learning. Paper presented at the ISR 2018; 50th International Symposium on Robotics, Munich.

Bayman

Mayer

(1988) Using conceptual models to teach basic computer programming. Journal of Educational Psychology 80(3): 291–298. DOI: 10.1037/0022-0663.80.3.291.

Berssanette

de Francisco

(2021) Active learning in the context of the teaching/learning of computer programming: A systematic review. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research 20(1): 201–220. DOI: 10.28945/4767 .

Bocconi

Chioccariello

Dettori

, et al. (2016) Developing Computational Thinking in Compulsory Education. European Commission, JRC Science for Policy Report, 68.

Brown

Wilson

(2018) Ten quick tips for teaching programming. PLoS Computational Biolog 14(4): e1006023. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006023 .

Butler

Morgan

(2007) Learning Challenges Faced by Novice Programming Students Studying High Level and Low Feedback Concepts. Paper presented at the 24th ASCILITE Conference, Singapore.

Cheah

(2020) Factors contributing to the difficulties in teaching and learning of computer programming: A literature review. Contemporary Educational Technology 12(2): ep272. DOI: 10.30935/cedtech/8247 .

10.

Code.org (2020) About Us. Retrieved from https://www.codecademy.com/about

11.

Coderdojo.com (2020) About Us. Retrieved from: https://www.codecademy.com/about

12.

Computing at School (2020) About Us. Retrieved from: https://www.computingatschool.org.uk/about

13.

Costa

Aparicio

Cordeiro

(2012) A Solution to Support Student Learning of Programming. Paper presented at the Workshop on Open Source and Design of Communication, New York, USA. DOI: 10.1145/2316936.2316942.

14.

Council of Higher Education (2018) New Teacher Training Undergraduate Programs. Retrieved from: https://www.yok.gov.tr/kurumsal/idari-birimler/egitim-ogretim-dairesi/yeni-ogretmen-yetistirme-lisans-programlari

15.

Creswell

(2013) Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design Choosing Among Five Approaches. 3rd edition. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.

16.

CS for All (2020) About CS for All. Retrieved from: https://www.csforall.org/about/

17.

CSTA (2017) About CSTA’s K-12 Standards. Retrieved from: https://www.csteachers.org/page/about-csta-s-k-12-nbsp-standards

18.

CSTA (2020) Standards for CS Teachers. Retrieved from: https://csteachers.org/page/standards-for-cs-teachers-interactive

19.

Council of Higher Education (2020) Computer and Instructional Technologies Teaching Undergraduate Program. Retrieved from: https://www.yok.gov.tr/Documents

20.

Demilie

(2019) Causes of failure of university students in computer programming courses: The case of Wachemo University. International Journal of Scientific Research in Computer Science, Engineering and Information Technology 5(5): 123–132. DOI: 10.32628/CSEIT195516.

21.

Drini

(2018) Using New Methodologies in Teaching Computer Programming. Paper presented at the IEEE Integrated STEM Education Conference. IEEE.

22.

Ebrahimi

(1994) Novice programmer errors: Language constructs and plan composition. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 41(4): 457–480. DOI: 10.1006/ijhc.1994.1069.

23.

Esteves

Mendes

(2004) A Simulation Tool to Help Learning of Object Oriented Programming Basics. Paper presented at the 34th Annual Frontiers in Education, Savannah, GA.

24.

European Schoolnet (2014) Computing Our Future, Computer Programming and Coding Priorities, School Curricula and Initiatives across Europe. Belgium: European Schoolnet.

25.

Furber

(2012) Shut Down or Restart: The Way Forward for Computing in UK Schools. Retrieved from: https://royalsociety.org/-/media/education/computing-in-schools/2012-01-12-computing-in-schools.pdf

26.

Gal-Ezer

Stephenson

(2010) Computer science teacher preparation is critical. ACM Inroads 1(1): 61–66. DOI: 10.1145/1721933.1721953.

27.

Gomes

Mendes

(2007) Learning to Program Difficulties and Solutions. Paper presented at the International Conference on Engineering Education, Coimbra, Portugal.

28.

Hawi

(2010) Causal attributions of success and failure made by undergraduate students in an introductory-level computer programming course. Computers and Education 54(4): 1127–1136. DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2009.10.020 .

, et al. (2008) Unpacking pedagogical content knowledge: conceptualizing and measuring teachers’ topic-specific knowledge of students. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 39(4): 372–400.

30.

Hongwarittorrn

Krairit

(2010) Effects of Program Visualization (Jeliot3) on Students’ Performance and Attitudes towards Java Programming. Paper presented at the 8th International Conference on Computing, Communication and Control Technologies, Orlando, Florida.

31.

Chen

, et al. (2021) Exploring the effectiveness and moderators of block-based visual programming on student learning: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Computing Research 58(8): 1467–1493. DOI: 10.1177/0735633120945935 .

, et al. (2012) Supporting and retaining novice teachers. Kappa Delta Pi Record 48(3): 140–143. DOI: 10.1080/00228958.2012.707532 .

33.

İmal

Eser

(2009) Challenges and Solution Approaches in Learning Programming Language. Paper presented Electrical Electronics Computer Biomedical Engineering Education IV. National Symposium, Eskişehir. https://www.emo.org.tr/ekler/8bd988bd20804a2_ek.pdf.

34.

Ismail

Ngah

Umar

(2010) Instructional strategy in the teaching of computer programming: a need assessment analyses. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology 9(2): 125–131.

35.

Kelleher

Pausch

(2005) Lowering the barriers to programming: a taxonomy of programming environments and languages for novice programmers. ACM Computing Surveys 37(2): 83–137. DOI: 10.1145/1089733.1089734.

, et al. (2020) Teacher development in computational thinking: design and learning outcomes of programming concepts, practices and pedagogy. Computers and Education 151: 103872. DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103872 .

, et al. (2005) A study of the difficulties of novice programmers. Acm Sigcse Bulletin 37(3): 14–18. DOI: 10.1145/1151954.1067453 .

38.

Lamagna

EA.

(2015) Algorithmic thinking unplugged. Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges 30(6): 45–52.

39.

Martin

(2008) Novice teachers: meeting the challenge. Principal 88(2): 42–44.

, et al. (2018) A systematic literature review on teaching and learning introductory programming in higher education. IEEE Transactions on Education 62(2): 77–90. DOI: 10.1109/TE.2018.2864133 .

41.

Mohorovicic

Strcic

(2011) An Overview of Computer Programming Teaching Methods. Paper presented at the Central European Conference on Information and Intelligent Systems, Croatia.

42.

Ministry of National Education (2018) Secondary School Computer Science Course (Level 1, Level 2) Curriculum. Retrieved from: http://mufredat.meb.gov.tr/ProgramDetay.aspx?PID = 335.

43.

Ministry of National Education (2020) Information Technology and Software. Retrieved from: http://mufredat.meb.gov.tr/ProgramDetay.aspx?PID = 374.

44.

Guzdial

(2012) Who Am I?: Understanding High School Computer Science Teachers’ Professional Identity. Paper presented at the 43rd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, Raleigh, NC.

45.

Oliver

(1993) Measuring hierarchical levels of programming knowledge. Journal of Educational Computing Research 9(3): 299–312. DOI: 10.2190/0LGX-M45X-2WBK-B7A6.

(2017) Gamification to Support Programming Learning. Paper presented at the 12th Iberian Conference on Information Systems and Technologies, Lisbon, Portugal.

, et al. (2010) Effects of an early literacy professional development intervention on head start teachers and children. Journal of Educational Psychology 102(2): 299–312. DOI: 10.1037/a0017763 .

48.

Qian

Lehman

(2017) Students’ misconceptions and other difficulties in introductory programming: a literature review. ACM Transactions on Computing Education 18(1): 1–24. DOI: 10.1145/3077618 .

49.

Robins

(2019) Novice programmers and introductory programming. In: The Cambridge Handbook of Computing Education Research, Cambridge Handbooks in Psychology. 327–376. Retrieved from: https://www.otago.ac.nz/computer-science/otago706761.pdf

50.

Savage

Piwek

(2019) Full Report on Challenges with Learning to Program and Problem Solve: An Analysis of First Year Undergraduate Open University Distance Learning Students’ Online Discussions. Retrieved from: http://oro.open.ac.uk/68073/1/IOC_TM112_Python_Help_Forum_Research.pdf

51.

Silverman

(2016) Qualitative Research. USA: Sage.

52.

Tigrek

Obadat

(2012) Teaching smartphones programming using (Android Java): Pedagogy and innovation. International Conference on Information Technology Based Higher Education and Training (ITHET). IEEE, pp. 1–7.

53.

Winslow

(1996) Programming pedagogy-a psychological overview. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin 28(3): 17–22. DOI: 10.1145/234867.234872.

, et al. (2016) Expanding computer science education in schools: understanding teacher experiences and challenges. Computer Science Education 26(4): 235–254. DOI: 10.1080/08993408.2016.1257418 .

55.

Yıldırım

Şimşek

(2011) Qualitative Research Methods in the Social Sciences. Ankara: Seçkin Publications.